Normalized to: Siltala, L.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1911.05418 [pdf] - 2030607
Asteroid mass estimation with the robust adaptive Metropolis algorithm
Submitted: 2019-11-13
The bulk density of an asteroid informs us about its interior structure and
composition. To constrain the bulk density one needs an estimate for the mass
of the asteroid. The mass is estimated by analyzing an asteroid's gravitational
interaction with another object, such as another asteroid during a close
encounter. An estimate for the mass has typically been obtained with linearized
least-squares methods despite the fact that this family of methods is not able
to properly describe non-Gaussian parameter distributions. In addition, the
uncertainties reported for asteroid masses in the literature are sometimes
inconsistent with each other and suspected to be unrealistically low. We
present a Markov-chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithm for the asteroid mass
estimation problem based on asteroid-asteroid close encounters. We verify that
our algorithm works correctly by applying it to synthetic data sets. We then
use astrometry available through the Minor Planet Center to estimate masses for
a few example cases and compare our results to results reported in the
literature.
Our mass estimates for the synthetic data sets are fully consistent with the
ground truth. The nominal masses for real example cases typically agree with
the literature but tend to have greater uncertainties than what is reported in
recent literature. Possible reasons for this include different astrometric
datasets and/or weights, different test asteroids, different force models and
different algorithms. For (16) Psyche, the target of NASA's Psyche mission, our
maximum likelihood mass is approximately 55% of what is reported in the
literature. Such a low mass would imply that the bulk density is significantly
lower than previously expected and hence disagrees with the theory of (16)
Psyche being the metallic core of a protoplanet. We however note that masses
reported in recent literature remain within our 3-sigma limits.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1812.07350 [pdf] - 1830582
Detection of a gamma-ray flare from the high-redshift blazar DA 193
Paliya, Vaidehi S.;
Ajello, M.;
Ojha, R.;
Angioni, R.;
Cheung, C. C.;
Tanada, K.;
Pursimo, T.;
Galindo, P.;
Losada, I. R.;
Siltala, L.;
Djupvik, A. A.;
Marcotulli, L.;
Hartmann, D.
Submitted: 2018-12-18
High-redshift ($z>2$) blazars are the most powerful members of the blazar
family. Yet, only a handful of them have both X-ray and $\gamma$-ray detection,
thereby making it difficult to characterize the energetics of the most luminous
jets. Here, we report, for the first time, the Fermi-Large Area Telescope
detection of the significant $\gamma$-ray emission from the high-redshift
blazar DA 193 ($z=2.363$). Its time-averaged $\gamma$-ray spectrum is soft
($\gamma$-ray photon index = $2.9\pm0.1$) and together with a relatively flat
hard X-ray spectrum (14$-$195 keV photon index = $1.5\pm0.4$), DA 193 presents
a case to study a typical high-redshift blazar with inverse Compton peak being
located at MeV energies. An intense GeV flare was observed from this object in
the first week of 2018 January, a phenomenon rarely observed from high-redshift
sources. What makes this event a rare one is the observation of an extremely
hard $\gamma$-ray spectrum (photon index = $1.7\pm0.2$), which is somewhat
unexpected since high-redshift blazars typically exhibit a steep falling
spectrum at GeV energies. The results of our multi-frequency campaign,
including both space- (Fermi, NuSTAR, and Swift) and ground-based (Steward and
Nordic Optical Telescope) observatories, are presented and this peculiar
$\gamma$-ray flare is studied within the framework of a single-zone leptonic
emission scenario.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.09378 [pdf] - 1732652
Gaia Data Release 2: Observational Hertzsprung-Russell diagrams
Gaia Collaboration;
Babusiaux, C.;
van Leeuwen, F.;
Barstow, M. A.;
Jordi, C.;
Vallenari, A.;
Bossini, D.;
Bressan, A.;
Cantat-Gaudin, T.;
van Leeuwen, M.;
Brown, A. G. A.;
Prusti, T.;
de Bruijne, J. H. J.;
Bailer-Jones, C. A. L.;
Biermann, M.;
Evans, D. W.;
Eyer, L.;
Jansen, F.;
Klioner, S. A.;
Lammers, U.;
Lindegren, L.;
Luri, X.;
Mignard, F.;
Panem, C.;
Pourbaix, D.;
Randich, S.;
Sartoretti, P.;
Siddiqui, H. I.;
Soubiran, C.;
Walton, N. A.;
Arenou, F.;
Bastian, U.;
Cropper, M.;
Drimmel, R.;
Katz, D.;
Lattanzi, M. G.;
Bakker, J.;
Cacciari, C.;
Castañeda, J.;
Chaoul, L.;
Cheek, N.;
DeAngeli, F.;
Fabricius, C.;
Guerra, R.;
Holl, B.;
Masana, E.;
Messineo, R.;
Mowlavi, N.;
Nienartowicz, K.;
Panuzzo, P.;
Portell, J.;
Riello, M.;
Seabroke, G. M.;
Tanga, P.;
Thévenin, F.;
Gracia-Abril, G.;
Comoretto, G.;
Garcia-Reinaldos, M.;
Teyssier, D.;
Altmann, M.;
Andrae, R.;
Audard, M.;
Bellas-Velidis, I.;
Benson, K.;
Berthier, J.;
Blomme, R.;
Burgess, P.;
Busso, G.;
Carry, B.;
Cellino, A.;
Clementini, G.;
Clotet, M.;
Creevey, O.;
Davidson, M.;
DeRidder, J.;
Delchambre, L.;
Dell'Oro, A.;
Ducourant, C.;
Fernández-Hernández, J.;
Fouesneau, M.;
Frémat, Y.;
Galluccio, L.;
García-Torres, M.;
González-Núñez, J.;
González-Vidal, J. J.;
Gosset, E.;
Guy, L. P.;
Halbwachs, J. -L.;
Hambly, N. C.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Hernández, J.;
Hestroffer, D.;
Hodgkin, S. T.;
Hutton, A.;
Jasniewicz, G.;
Jean-Antoine-Piccolo, A.;
Jordan, S.;
Korn, A. J.;
Krone-Martins, A.;
Lanzafame, A. C.;
Lebzelter, T.;
Löffler, W.;
Manteiga, M.;
Marrese, P. M.;
Martín-Fleitas, J. M.;
Moitinho, A.;
Mora, A.;
Muinonen, K.;
Osinde, J.;
Pancino, E.;
Pauwels, T.;
Petit, J. -M.;
Recio-Blanco, A.;
Richards, P. J.;
Rimoldini, L.;
Robin, A. C.;
Sarro, L. M.;
Siopis, C.;
Smith, M.;
Sozzetti, A.;
Süveges, M.;
Torra, J.;
vanReeven, W.;
Abbas, U.;
Aramburu, A. Abreu;
Accart, S.;
Aerts, C.;
Altavilla, G.;
Álvarez, M. A.;
Alvarez, R.;
Alves, J.;
Anderson, R. I.;
Andrei, A. H.;
Varela, E. Anglada;
Antiche, E.;
Antoja, T.;
Arcay, B.;
Astraatmadja, T. L.;
Bach, N.;
Baker, S. G.;
Balaguer-Núñez, L.;
Balm, P.;
Barache, C.;
Barata, C.;
Barbato, D.;
Barblan, F.;
Barklem, P. S.;
Barrado, D.;
Barros, M.;
Muñoz, S. Bartholomé;
Bassilana, J. -L.;
Becciani, U.;
Bellazzini, M.;
Berihuete, A.;
Bertone, S.;
Bianchi, L.;
Bienaymé, O.;
Blanco-Cuaresma, S.;
Boch, T.;
Boeche, C.;
Bombrun, A.;
Borrachero, R.;
Bouquillon, S.;
Bourda, G.;
Bragaglia, A.;
Bramante, L.;
Breddels, M. A.;
Brouillet, N.;
Brüsemeister, T.;
Brugaletta, E.;
Bucciarelli, B.;
Burlacu, A.;
Busonero, D.;
Butkevich, A. G.;
Buzzi, R.;
Caffau, E.;
Cancelliere, R.;
Cannizzaro, G.;
Carballo, R.;
Carlucci, T.;
Carrasco, J. M.;
Casamiquela, L.;
Castellani, M.;
Castro-Ginard, A.;
Charlot, P.;
Chemin, L.;
Chiavassa, A.;
Cocozza, G.;
Costigan, G.;
Cowell, S.;
Crifo, F.;
Crosta, M.;
Crowley, C.;
Cuypers, J.;
Dafonte, C.;
Damerdji, Y.;
Dapergolas, A.;
David, P.;
David, M.;
deLaverny, P.;
DeLuise, F.;
DeMarch, R.;
deMartino, D.;
deSouza, R.;
deTorres, A.;
Debosscher, J.;
delPozo, E.;
Delbo, M.;
Delgado, A.;
Delgado, H. E.;
Diakite, S.;
Diener, C.;
Distefano, E.;
Dolding, C.;
Drazinos, P.;
Durán, J.;
Edvardsson, B.;
Enke, H.;
Eriksson, K.;
Esquej, P.;
Bontemps, G. Eynard;
Fabre, C.;
Fabrizio, M.;
Faigler, S.;
Falcão, A. J.;
Casas, M. Farràs;
Federici, L.;
Fedorets, G.;
Fernique, P.;
Figueras, F.;
Filippi, F.;
Findeisen, K.;
Fonti, A.;
Fraile, E.;
Fraser, M.;
Frézouls, B.;
Gai, M.;
Galleti, S.;
Garabato, D.;
García-Sedano, F.;
Garofalo, A.;
Garralda, N.;
Gavel, A.;
Gavras, P.;
Gerssen, J.;
Geyer, R.;
Giacobbe, P.;
Gilmore, G.;
Girona, S.;
Giuffrida, G.;
Glass, F.;
Gomes, M.;
Granvik, M.;
Gueguen, A.;
Guerrier, A.;
Guiraud, J.;
Gutiérrez-Sánchez, R.;
Haigron, R.;
Hatzidimitriou, D.;
Hauser, M.;
Haywood, M.;
Heiter, U.;
Helmi, A.;
Heu, J.;
Hilger, T.;
Hobbs, D.;
Hofmann, W.;
Holland, G.;
Huckle, H. E.;
Hypki, A.;
Icardi, V.;
Janßen, K.;
JevardatdeFombelle, G.;
Jonker, P. G.;
Juhász, Á. L.;
Julbe, F.;
Karampelas, A.;
Kewley, A.;
Klar, J.;
Kochoska, A.;
Kohley, R.;
Kolenberg, K.;
Kontizas, M.;
Kontizas, E.;
Koposov, S. E.;
Kordopatis, G.;
Kostrzewa-Rutkowska, Z.;
Koubsky, P.;
Lambert, S.;
Lanza, A. F.;
Lasne, Y.;
Lavigne, J. -B.;
LeFustec, Y.;
LePoncin-Lafitte, C.;
Lebreton, Y.;
Leccia, S.;
Leclerc, N.;
Lecoeur-Taibi, I.;
Lenhardt, H.;
Leroux, F.;
Liao, S.;
Licata, E.;
Lindstrøm, H. E. P.;
Lister, T. A.;
Livanou, E.;
Lobel, A.;
López, M.;
Managau, S.;
Mann, R. G.;
Mantelet, G.;
Marchal, O.;
Marchant, J. M.;
Marconi, M.;
Marinoni, S.;
Marschalkó, G.;
Marshall, D. J.;
Martino, M.;
Marton, G.;
Mary, N.;
Massari, D.;
Matijevič, G.;
Mazeh, T.;
McMillan, P. J.;
Messina, S.;
Michalik, D.;
Millar, N. R.;
Molina, D.;
Molinaro, R.;
Molnár, L.;
Montegriffo, P.;
Mor, R.;
Morbidelli, R.;
Morel, T.;
Morris, D.;
Mulone, A. F.;
Muraveva, T.;
Musella, I.;
Nelemans, G.;
Nicastro, L.;
Noval, L.;
O'Mullane, W.;
Ordénovic, C.;
Ordóñez-Blanco, D.;
Osborne, P.;
Pagani, C.;
Pagano, I.;
Pailler, F.;
Palacin, H.;
Palaversa, L.;
Panahi, A.;
Pawlak, M.;
Piersimoni, A. M.;
Pineau, F. -X.;
Plachy, E.;
Plum, G.;
Poggio, E.;
Poujoulet, E.;
Prša, A.;
Pulone, L.;
Racero, E.;
Ragaini, S.;
Rambaux, N.;
Ramos-Lerate, M.;
Regibo, S.;
Reylé, C.;
Riclet, F.;
Ripepi, V.;
Riva, A.;
Rivard, A.;
Rixon, G.;
Roegiers, T.;
Roelens, M.;
Romero-Gómez, M.;
Rowell, N.;
Royer, F.;
Ruiz-Dern, L.;
Sadowski, G.;
Sellés, T. Sagristà;
Sahlmann, J.;
Salgado, J.;
Salguero, E.;
Sanna, N.;
Santana-Ros, T.;
Sarasso, M.;
Savietto, H.;
Schultheis, M.;
Sciacca, E.;
Segol, M.;
Segovia, J. C.;
Ségransan, D.;
Shih, I-C.;
Siltala, L.;
Silva, A. F.;
Smart, R. L.;
Smith, K. W.;
Solano, E.;
Solitro, F.;
Sordo, R.;
SoriaNieto, S.;
Souchay, J.;
Spagna, A.;
Spoto, F.;
Stampa, U.;
Steele, I. A.;
Steidelmüller, H.;
Stephenson, C. A.;
Stoev, H.;
Suess, F. F.;
Surdej, J.;
Szabados, L.;
Szegedi-Elek, E.;
Tapiador, D.;
Taris, F.;
Tauran, G.;
Taylor, M. B.;
Teixeira, R.;
Terrett, D.;
Teyssandier, P.;
Thuillot, W.;
Titarenko, A.;
TorraClotet, F.;
Turon, C.;
Ulla, A.;
Utrilla, E.;
Uzzi, S.;
Vaillant, M.;
Valentini, G.;
Valette, V.;
vanElteren, A.;
Van Hemelryck, E.;
Vaschetto, M.;
Vecchiato, A.;
Veljanoski, J.;
Viala, Y.;
Vicente, D.;
Vogt, S.;
vonEssen, C.;
Voss, H.;
Votruba, V.;
Voutsinas, S.;
Walmsley, G.;
Weiler, M.;
Wertz, O.;
Wevers, T.;
Wyrzykowski, Ł.;
Yoldas, A.;
Žerjal, M.;
Ziaeepour, H.;
Zorec, J.;
Zschocke, S.;
Zucker, S.;
Zurbach, C.;
Zwitter, T.
Submitted: 2018-04-25, last modified: 2018-08-13
We highlight the power of the Gaia DR2 in studying many fine structures of
the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram (HRD). Gaia allows us to present many different
HRDs, depending in particular on stellar population selections. We do not aim
here for completeness in terms of types of stars or stellar evolutionary
aspects. Instead, we have chosen several illustrative examples. We describe
some of the selections that can be made in Gaia DR2 to highlight the main
structures of the Gaia HRDs. We select both field and cluster (open and
globular) stars, compare the observations with previous classifications and
with stellar evolutionary tracks, and we present variations of the Gaia HRD
with age, metallicity, and kinematics. Late stages of stellar evolution such as
hot subdwarfs, post-AGB stars, planetary nebulae, and white dwarfs are also
analysed, as well as low-mass brown dwarf objects. The Gaia HRDs are
unprecedented in both precision and coverage of the various Milky Way stellar
populations and stellar evolutionary phases. Many fine structures of the HRDs
are presented. The clear split of the white dwarf sequence into hydrogen and
helium white dwarfs is presented for the first time in an HRD. The relation
between kinematics and the HRD is nicely illustrated. Two different populations
in a classical kinematic selection of the halo are unambiguously identified in
the HRD. Membership and mean parameters for a selected list of open clusters
are provided. They allow drawing very detailed cluster sequences, highlighting
fine structures, and providing extremely precise empirical isochrones that will
lead to more insight in stellar physics. Gaia DR2 demonstrates the potential of
combining precise astrometry and photometry for large samples for studies in
stellar evolution and stellar population and opens an entire new area for
HRD-based studies.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1706.09208 [pdf] - 1585248
Asteroid mass estimation using Markov-chain Monte Carlo
Submitted: 2017-06-28
Estimates for asteroid masses are based on their gravitational perturbations
on the orbits of other objects such as Mars, spacecraft, or other asteroids
and/or their satellites. In the case of asteroid-asteroid perturbations, this
leads to an inverse problem in at least 13 dimensions where the aim is to
derive the mass of the perturbing asteroid(s) and six orbital elements for both
the perturbing asteroid(s) and the test asteroid(s) based on astrometric
observations. We have developed and implemented three different mass estimation
algorithms utilizing asteroid-asteroid perturbations: the very rough 'marching'
approximation, in which the asteroids' orbital elements are not fitted, thereby
reducing the problem to a one-dimensional estimation of the mass, an
implementation of the Nelder-Mead simplex method, and most significantly, a
Markov-chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) approach. We describe each of these algorithms
with particular focus on the MCMC algorithm, and present example results using
both synthetic and real data. Our results agree with the published mass
estimates, but suggest that the published uncertainties may be misleading as a
consequence of using linearized mass-estimation methods. Finally, we discuss
remaining challenges with the algorithms as well as future plans.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1601.03536 [pdf] - 1579799
Time series analysis of long-term photometry of BM Canum Venaticorum
Siltala, L.;
Jetsu, L.;
Hackman, T.;
Henry, G. W.;
Immonen, L.;
Kajatkari, P.;
Lankinen, J.;
Lehtinen, J.;
Monira, S.;
Nikbakhsh, S.;
Viitanen, A.;
Viuho, J.;
Willamo, T.
Submitted: 2016-01-14, last modified: 2016-09-13
Studying RS CVn binaries is challenging, because in addition to spot
activity, other effects such as mass transfer between the components and
gravitational distortion of their spherical forms may distort their light
curves. Such effects can, however, be removed from the data by subtracting a
mean light curve phased with the orbital period. We study a quarter of a
century of standard Johnson differential V photometry of the RS CVn binary BM
CVn. Our main aims are to determine the activity cycles, the rate of surface
differential rotation and the rotation period of the active longitudes of BM
CVn. The Continuous Period Search (CPS) is applied to the photometry. The
changes of the mean and amplitude of the light curves are used to search for
activity cycles. The rotation period changes give an estimate of the rate of
surface differential rotation. The Kuiper method is applied to the epochs of
the primary and secondary minima to search for active longitudes. The
photometry reveals the presence of a stable mean light curve (MLC) connected to
the orbital period P_orb = 20d.6252 of this binary. We remove this MLC from the
original V magnitudes which gives us the corrected V' magnitudes. These two
samples of V and V' data are analysed separately with CPS. The fraction of
unreliable CPS models decreases when the MLC is removed. The same significant
activity cycle of approximately 12.5 years is detected in both V and V'
samples. The estimate for the surface differential rotation coefficient, k >=
0.10, is the same for both samples, but the number of unrealistic period
estimates decreases after removing the MLC. The same active longitude period of
P_al = 20d.511 +- 0d.005 is detected in the V and V' magnitudes. This long-term
regularity in the epochs of primary and secondary minima of the light curves is
not caused by the MLC. On the contrary, the MLC hampers the detection of active
longitudes.