Normalized to: Shi, K.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1907.10190 [pdf] - 1922531
The X-ray Polarization Probe mission concept
Jahoda, Keith;
Krawczynski, Henric;
Kislat, Fabian;
Marshall, Herman;
Okajima, Takashi;
Agudo, Ivan;
Angelini, Lorella;
Bachetti, Matteo;
Baldini, Luca;
Baring, Matthew;
Baumgartner, Wayne;
Bellazzini, Ronaldo;
Bianchi, Stefano;
Bucciantini, Niccolo;
Caiazzo, Ilaria;
Capitanio, Fiamma;
Coppi, Paolo;
Costa, Enrico;
De Rosa, Alessandra;
Del Monte, Ettore;
Dexter, Jason;
Di Gesu, Laura;
Di Lalla, Niccolo;
Doroshenko, Victor;
Dovciak, Michal;
Ferrazzoli, Riccardo;
Fuerst, Felix;
Garner, Alan;
Ghosh, Pranab;
Gonzalez-Caniulef, Denis;
Grinberg, Victoria;
Gunji, Shuichi;
Hartman, Dieter;
Hayashida, Kiyoshi;
Heyl, Jeremy;
Hill, Joanne;
Ingram, Adam;
Iwakiri, Wataru Buz;
Jorstad, Svetlana;
Kaaret, Phil;
Kallman, Timothy;
Karas, Vladimir;
Khabibullin, Ildar;
Kitaguchi, Takao;
Kolodziejczak, Jeff;
Kouveliotou, Chryssa;
Liodakis, Yannis;
Maccarone, Thomas;
Manfreda, Alberto;
Marin, Frederic;
Marinucci, Andrea;
Markwardt, Craig;
Marscher, Alan;
Matt, Giorgio;
McConnell, Mark;
Miller, Jon;
Mitsubishi, Ikuyuki;
Mizuno, Tsunefumi;
Mushtukov, Alexander;
Ng, Stephen;
Nowak, Michael;
O'Dell, Steve;
Papitto, Alessandro;
Pasham, Dheeraj;
Pearce, Mark;
Peirson, Lawrence;
Perri, Matteo;
Rollins, Melissa Pesce;
Petrosian, Vahe;
Petrucci, Pierre-Olivier;
Pilia, Maura;
Possenti, Andrea;
Poutanen, Juri;
Prescod-Weinstein, Chanda;
Puccetti, Simonetta;
Salmi, Tuomo;
Shi, Kevin;
Soffita, Paolo;
Spandre, Gloria;
Steiner, Jack;
Strohmayer, Tod;
Suleimanov, Valery;
Svoboda, Jiri;
Swank, Jean;
Tamagawa, Toru;
Takahashi, Hiromitsu;
Taverna, Roberto;
Tomsick, John;
Trois, Alessio;
Tsygankov, Sergey;
Turolla, Roberto;
Vink, Jacco;
Wilms, Joern;
Wu, Kinwah;
Xie, Fei;
Younes, George;
Zaino, Alessandra;
Zajczyk, Anna;
Zane, Silvia;
Zdziarski, Andrzej;
Zhang, Haocheng;
Zhang, Wenda;
Zhou, Ping
Submitted: 2019-07-23
The X-ray Polarization Probe (XPP) is a second generation X-ray polarimeter
following up on the Imaging X-ray Polarimetry Explorer (IXPE). The XPP will
offer true broadband polarimetery over the wide 0.2-60 keV bandpass in addition
to imaging polarimetry from 2-8 keV. The extended energy bandpass and
improvements in sensitivity will enable the simultaneous measurement of the
polarization of several emission components. These measurements will give
qualitatively new information about how compact objects work, and will probe
fundamental physics, i.e. strong-field quantum electrodynamics and strong
gravity.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1905.06337 [pdf] - 1912843
How Do Galaxies trace a large scale structure?: A case study around a
massive protocluster at $z=3.13$
Shi, Ke;
Huang, Yun;
Lee, Kyoung-Soo;
Toshikawa, Jun;
Bowen, Kathryn N.;
Malavasi, Nicola;
Lemaux, B. C.;
Cucciati, Olga;
Fevre, Olivier Le;
Dey, Arjun
Submitted: 2019-05-15
In the hierarchical theory of galaxy formation, a galaxy overdensity is a
hallmark of a massive cosmic structure. However, it is less well understood how
different types of galaxies trace the underlying large-scale structure.
Motivated by the discovery of a z=3.13 protocluster, we examine how the same
structure is populated by Ly$\alpha$-emitting galaxies (LAEs). To this end, we
have undertaken a deep narrow-band imaging survey sampling Ly$\alpha$ emission
at this redshift. Of the 93 LAE candidates within a 36'x36'~(70x70~Mpc^2)
field, 21 galaxies form a significant surface overdensity (delta_g=3.3+/-0.9),
which is spatially segregated from the Lyman break galaxy (LBG) overdensity.
One possible interpretation is that they trace two separate structures of
comparable masses (~ 10^{15}M_sun) where the latter is hosted by a halo
assembled at an earlier time. We speculate that the dearth of LAEs in the LBG
overdensity region may signal the role of halo assembly bias in galaxy
formation, which would suggest that different search techniques may be biased
accordingly to the formation age or dynamical state of the host halo. The
median Ly$\alpha$- and UV luminosity is 30--70\% higher for the protocluster
LAEs relative to the field. This difference cannot be explained by the galaxy
overdensity alone, and may require a top-heavy mass function, higher star
formation efficiency for protocluster halos, or suppression of galaxy formation
in low-mass halos. A luminous Ly$\alpha$ blob and an ultramassive galaxy found
in this region paint a picture consistent with the expected early growth of
galaxies in clusters.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1808.07065 [pdf] - 1822854
A census of galaxy constituents in a Coma Progenitor observed at z>3
Shi, Ke;
Lee, Kyoung-Soo;
Dey, Arjun;
Huang, Yun;
Malavasi, Nicola;
Hung, Chao-Ling;
Inami, Hanae;
Ashby, Matthew;
Duncan, Kenneth;
Xue, Rui;
Reddy, Naveen;
Hong, Sungryong;
Jannuzi, Buell T.;
Cooper, Michael C.;
Gonzalez, Anthony H.;
Röttgering, Huub J. A.;
Best, Phillip N.;
Tasse, Cyril
Submitted: 2018-08-21, last modified: 2018-12-13
We present a detailed census of galaxies in and around PC217.96+32.3, a
spectroscopically confirmed Coma analog at z=3.78. Diverse galaxy types
identified in the field include Lya emitters (LAEs), massive star-forming
galaxies, and ultra-massive galaxies (log (Mstar/Msun)>= 11) which may have
already halted their star formation. The sky distribution of the star-forming
galaxies suggests the presence of a significant overdensity (delta_g=8+/-2),
which is spatially offset from the previously confirmed members by 3-4 Mpc to
the west. Candidate quiescent and post-starburst galaxies are also found in
large excess (a factor of ~ 8-15 higher surface density than the field)
although their redshifts are less certain. We estimate that the total enclosed
mass traced by star-forming galaxy candidates is roughly comparable to that of
PC217.96+32.3 traced by the LAEs. We speculate that the true extent of
PC217.96+32.3 may be larger than previously known, a half of which is missed by
our LAE selection. Alternatively, the newly discovered overdensity may belong
to another Coma progenitor not associated with PC217.96+32.3. Expectations from
theory suggest that both scenarios are equally unlikely (<1%), particularly in
the cosmic volume probed in our survey. If confirmed as a single structure, its
total mass will be well in excess of Coma, making this a singularly large
cosmic structure rarely seen even in large cosmological simulations. Finally,
we find that the protocluster galaxies follow the same SFR-M_star scaling
relation as the field galaxies, suggesting that the environmental effect at z~4
is a subtle one at best for normal star-forming galaxies.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1803.07145 [pdf] - 1724909
Discovery of a Very Large (~20 kpc) Galaxy at z=3.72
Lee, Kyoung-Soo;
Dey, Arjun;
Matheson, Thomas;
Shi, Ke;
Hung, Chao-Ling;
Xue, Rui;
Inami, Hanae;
Huang, Yun;
Lee, Khee-Gan;
Ashby, Matthew L. N.;
Jannuzi, Buell;
Reddy, Naveen;
Hong, Sungryong;
Mo, Wenli;
Malavasi, Nicola
Submitted: 2018-03-19, last modified: 2018-07-27
We report the discovery and spectroscopic confirmation of a very large
star-forming Lyman Break galaxy, G6025, at z_spec=3.721+/-0.003. In the
rest-frame ~2100A, G6025 subtends ~24 kpc in physical extent when measured from
the 1.5-sigma isophote, in agreement with the parametric size measurements
which yield the half-light radius of 4.9+/-0.5 kpc and the semi-major axis of
12.5+/-0.1 kpc. G6025 is also very UV-luminous (~5L*(z~4}) and young (~140+/-60
Myr). Despite its unusual size and luminosity, the stellar population
parameters and dust reddening (M_star~M*(z~4)$, and E(B-V)=0.18+/-0.05)
estimated from the integrated light, are similar to those of smaller galaxies
at comparable redshifts. The ground-based morphology and spectroscopy show two
dominant components, both located off-center, embedded in more diffuse
emission. We speculate that G6025 may be a scaled-up version of chain galaxies
seen in deep HST imaging, or alternatively, a nearly equal-mass merger
involving two super-L* galaxies in its early stage. G6025 lies close to but not
within a known massive protocluster at z=3.78. We find four companions within 6
Mpc from G6025, two of which lie within 1.6 Mpc. While the limited sensitivity
of the existing spectroscopy does not allow us to robustly characterize the
local environment of G6025, it likely resides in a locally overdense
environment. The luminosity, size, and youth of G6025 make it uniquely suited
to study the early formation of massive galaxies in the universe.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1209.5580 [pdf] - 1151624
Constraining dark energy using observational growth rate data
Submitted: 2012-09-25
Observational growth rate data had been derived from observations of redshift
distortions in galaxy redshift surveys. Here we use the growth rate data to
place constraints on the dark energy model parameters. By performing a joint
analysis with the Type Ia supernova, baryon acoustic oscillation and cosmic
microwave background data, it is found that the growth rate data are useful for
improving the constraints. The joint constraints show that the $\Lambda$CDM
model is still in good agreement with current observations, although a
time-variant dark energy still cannot be ruled out. It is argued that the
growth rate data are helpful for understanding the dark energy. With more
accurate data available in the future, we will have a powerful tool for
constraining the cosmological and dark energy parameters.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1207.5875 [pdf] - 1125076
A comprehensive comparison of cosmological models from latest
observational data
Submitted: 2012-07-24
We investigate in detail some popular cosmological models in light of the
latest observational data, including the Union2.1 supernovae compilation, the
baryon acoustic oscillation measurements from the WiggleZ Dark Energy Survey,
the cosmic microwave background information from the WMAP 7-year observations
along with the observational Hubble parameter data. Based on the model
selection statistics such as the Akaike and the Bayesian information criterias,
we compare different models to assess the worth of them. We do not assume a
flat universe in the fitting. Our results show that the concordance
$\Lambda$CDM model remains the best one to explain the data, while the DGP
model is clearly disfavored by the data. Among these models, those whose
parameters can reduce themselves to the $\Lambda$CDM model provide good fits to
the data. These results indicate that for the current data, there is no obvious
evidence supporting any more complex models over the simplest $\Lambda$CDM
model.