Normalized to: Shang, X.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:2001.03859 [pdf] - 2108990
Nucleon effective mass in hot dense matter
Submitted: 2020-01-12, last modified: 2020-04-28
Nucleon effective masses are studied in the framework of the
Brueckner-Hartree-Fock many-body approach at finite temperature.
Self-consistent calculations using the Argonne $V_{18}$ interaction including
microscopic three-body forces are reported for varying temperature and proton
fraction up to several times the nuclear saturation density. Our calculations
are based on the exact treatment of the center-of-mass momentum instead of the
average-momentum approximation employed in previous works. We discuss in detail
the effects of the temperature together with those of the three-body forces,
the density, and the isospin asymmetry. We also provide an analytical fit of
the effective mass taking these dependencies into account. The temperature
effects on the cooling of neutron stars are briefly discussed based on the
results for betastable matter.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1711.07125 [pdf] - 1659596
Adaptive inversion algorithm for 1.5 um visibility lidar incorporating
in situ Angstrom wavelength exponent
Submitted: 2017-11-19
As one of the most popular applications of lidar systems, the atmospheric
visibility is defined to be inversely proportional to the atmospheric
extinction coefficient at 0.55 um. Since the laser at 1.5 um shows the highest
maximum permissible exposure in the wavelength ranging from 0.3 um to 10 um,
the eye-safe 1.5 um lidar can be deployed in urban areas. In such a case, the
measured extinction coefficient at 1.5 um should be converted to that at 0.55
um for visibility retrieval. Although several models have been established
since 1962, the accurate wavelength conversion remains a challenge. An adaptive
inversion algorithm for 1.5 um visibility lidar is proposed and demonstrated by
using the in situ Angstrom wavelength exponent, which is derived from either a
sun photometer or an aerosol spectrometer. The impact of the particle size
distribution of atmospheric aerosols and the Rayleigh backscattering of
atmospheric molecules are taken into account. In comparison, the Angstrom
wavelength exponent derived from the sun photometer is 7.7% higher than that
derived from the aerosol spectrometer. Then, using 1.5 um visibility lidar, the
visibility with a temporal resolution of 5 min is detected over 48 hours in
Hefei (31.83 N, 117.25 E). The average visibility error between the new method
and a visibility sensor (Vaisala, PWD52) is 5.2% with the R-square value of
0.96, while the relative error between another reference visibility lidar at
532 nm and the visibility sensor is 6.7% with the R-square value of 0.91. All
results agree with each other well, demonstrating the accuracy and stability of
the algorithm.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1511.07979 [pdf] - 1361920
Nonrelativistic nucleon effective masses in nuclear matter: BHF versus
RHF
Submitted: 2015-11-25, last modified: 2016-01-13
The density and isospin dependences of the nonrelativistic nucleon effective
mass ($m^*$) are studied, which is a measure of the nonlocality of the single
particle (s.p.) potential. We decouple it further into the so called k-mass
($m^*_k$, i.e., the nonlocality in space) and E-mass ($m^*_E$, i.e., the
nonlocality in time). Both masses are determined and compared from the latest
versions of the nonrelativistic Brueckner-Hartree Fock (BHF) model and the
relativistic Hartree-Fock (RHF) model. The latter are achieved based on the
corresponding Schr\"{o}dinger equivalent s.p. potential in a relativistic
framework. We demonstrate the origins of different effective masses and discuss
also their neutron-proton splitting in the asymmetric matter in different
models. We find that the neutron-proton splittings of both the k-mass and the
E-mass have the same asymmetry dependences at considered densities, namely
$m^*_{k,n} > m^*_{k,p}$ and $m^*_{E,p} > m^*_{E,n}$. However, the resulting
splittings of nucleon effective masses could have different asymmetry
dependences in the two models, because they could be dominated either by that
of the k-mass (then we have $m^*_n > m^*_p$ in the BHF model) or by that of the
E-mass (then we have $m^*_p > m^*_n$ in the RHF model).