Normalized to: Shaikh, R.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:2006.01646 [pdf] - 2105864
Constraining modified gravity from tidal phenomena in binary stars
Submitted: 2020-06-02
In beyond-Horndeski theories of gravity, the Vainshtein screening mechanism
might only be partially effective inside stellar objects. This results in a
modification of the pressure balance equation inside stars, often characterized
by a single parameter ($\Upsilon$) in isotropic systems. We show how to
constrain such theories of modified gravity, using tidal effects. We study such
effects in cataclysmic variable star binaries and numerically obtain limits on
the critical masses of the donor stars, below which they are tidally disrupted,
by modeling them in beyond-Horndeski theories. This is contrasted with values
of the donor masses, obtained using existing observational data, by a Monte
Carlo error progression method. A best fit scenario of the two yields a
parametric constraint in the theories that we consider, within the
approximations used. Here, we obtain the allowed range $ 0 \le \Upsilon \le
0.47 $.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1912.01184 [pdf] - 2008082
Tidal disruption near black holes and their mimickers
Submitted: 2019-12-02
Black holes and wormholes are solutions of Einstein's field equations, both
of which, from afar, look like a central mass. We show here that although at
large distances both behave like Newtonian objects, close to the event horizon
or to the throat, black holes and wormholes have different tidal effects on
stars, due to their respective geometries. We quantify this difference by a
numerical procedure in the Schwarzschild black hole and the exponential
wormhole backgrounds, and compare the peak fallback rates of tidal debris in
these geometries. The tidal disruption rates in these backgrounds are also
computed. It is shown that these quantities are a few times higher for
wormholes, compared to the black hole cases.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1909.10322 [pdf] - 1998071
Can we distinguish black holes from naked singularities by the images of
their accretion disks?
Submitted: 2019-09-23, last modified: 2019-11-13
We study here images of thin accretion disks around black holes and two
classes of naked singularity spacetimes and compare these scenarios. The naked
singularity models which have photon spheres have single accretion disk with
its inner edge lying outside the photon sphere. The images and shadows created
by these models mimic those of black holes. It follows, therefore, that further
and more detailed analysis of the images and shadows structure in such case is
needed to confirm or otherwise the existence of an event horizon for the
compact objects such as the galactic centers. However, naked singularity models
which do not have any photon spheres can have either double disks or a single
disk extending up to the singularity. The images obtained from such models
significantly differ from those of black holes. Moreover, the images of the two
classes of naked singularities in this latter case, differ also from one
another, thereby allowing them to be distinguish from one another through the
observation of the images.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1802.08060 [pdf] - 1775515
Shadows of spherically symmetric black holes and naked singularities
Submitted: 2018-02-22, last modified: 2018-10-30
We compare shadows cast by Schwarzschild black holes with those produced by
two classes of naked singularities that result from gravitational collapse of
spherically symmetric matter. The latter models consist of an interior naked
singularity spacetime restricted to radii $r\leq R_b$, matched to Schwarzschild
spacetime outside the boundary radius $R_b$. While a black hole always has a
photon sphere and always casts a shadow, we find that the naked singularity
models have photon spheres only if a certain parameter $M_0$ that characterizes
these models satisfies $M_0\geq 2/3$, or equivalently, if $R_b\leq 3M$, where
$M$ is the total mass of the object. Such models do produce shadows. However,
models with $M_0<2/3$ (or $R_b>3M$) have no photon sphere and do not produce a
shadow. Instead, they produce an interesting `full-moon' image. These results
imply that the presence of a shadow does not by itself prove that a compact
object is necessarily a black hole. The object could be a naked singularity
with $M_0\geq 2/3$, and we will need other observational clues to distinguish
the two possibilities. On the other hand, the presence of a full-moon image
would certainly rule out a black hole and might suggest a naked singularity
with $M_0<2/3$. It would be worthwhile to generalize the present study, which
is restricted to spherically symmetric models, to rotating black holes and
naked singularities.