Normalized to: Severson, S.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1304.7280 [pdf] - 657392
KAPAO: a MEMS-based natural guide star adaptive optics system
Severson, Scott A.;
Choi, Philip I.;
Contreras, Daniel S.;
Gilbreth, Blaine N.;
Littleton, Erik;
McGonigle, Lorcan P.;
Morrison, William A.;
Rudy, Alex R.;
Wong, Jonathan R.;
Xue, Andrew;
Spjut, Erik;
Baranec, Christoph;
Riddle, Reed
Submitted: 2013-04-26
We describe KAPAO, our project to develop and deploy a low-cost,
remote-access, natural guide star adaptive optics (AO) system for the Pomona
College Table Mountain Observatory (TMO) 1-meter telescope. We use a
commercially available 140-actuator BMC MEMS deformable mirror and a version of
the Robo-AO control software developed by Caltech and IUCAA. We have structured
our development around the rapid building and testing of a prototype system,
KAPAO-Alpha, while simultaneously designing our more capable final system,
KAPAO-Prime. The main differences between these systems are the prototype's
reliance on off-the-shelf optics and a single visible-light science camera
versus the final design's improved throughput and capabilities due to the use
of custom optics and dual-band, visible and near-infrared imaging. In this
paper, we present the instrument design and on-sky closed-loop testing of
KAPAO-Alpha as well as our plans for KAPAO-Prime. The primarily
undergraduate-education nature of our partner institutions, both public (Sonoma
State University) and private (Pomona and Harvey Mudd Colleges), has enabled us
to engage physics, astronomy, and engineering undergraduates in all phases of
this project. This material is based upon work supported by the National
Science Foundation under Grant No. 0960343.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1202.1566 [pdf] - 1116461
MEMS practice, from the lab to the telescope
Morzinski, Katie M.;
Norton, Andrew P.;
Evans, Julia Wilhelmson;
Reza, Layra;
Severson, Scott A.;
Dillon, Daren;
Reinig, Marc;
Gavel, Donald T.;
Cornelissen, Steven;
Macintosh, Bruce A.;
Max, Claire E.
Submitted: 2012-02-07
Micro-electro-mechanical systems (MEMS) technology can provide for deformable
mirrors (DMs) with excellent performance within a favorable economy of scale.
Large MEMS-based astronomical adaptive optics (AO) systems such as the Gemini
Planet Imager are coming on-line soon. As MEMS DM end-users, we discuss our
decade of practice with the micromirrors, from inspecting and characterizing
devices to evaluating their performance in the lab. We also show MEMS wavefront
correction on-sky with the "Villages" AO system on a 1-m telescope, including
open-loop control and visible-light imaging. Our work demonstrates the maturity
of MEMS technology for astronomical adaptive optics.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1011.0752 [pdf] - 253296
The CfAO's Astronomy Course in COSMOS: Curriculum Design, Rationale, and
Application
Submitted: 2010-11-02
From 2001 to 2007, COSMOS provided a teaching and outreach venue for the
Center for Adaptive Optics Professional Development Program (CfAO PDP). COSMOS
is a four-week residential mathematics and science summer program for
high-school students organized by the University of California on four of its
campuses. Two topical science courses comprised each COSMOS cluster. An
astronomy course has always formed a basis for the CfAO PDP-affiliated cluster.
The course included a variety of pedagogical techniques to address a diversity
of learners and goals. We outline the astronomy course---lectures, activities,
etc.---and provide the rationale for what was taught, how it was aught, and
when it was taught.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0207261 [pdf] - 50404
Characterizing the Adaptive Optics Off-Axis Point-Spread Function - I: A
Semi-Empirical Method for Use in Natural-Guide-Star Observations
Steinbring, E.;
Faber, S. M.;
Hinkley, S.;
Macintosh, B. A.;
Gavel, D.;
Gates, E. L.;
Christou, Julian C.;
Louarn, M. Le;
Raschke, L. M.;
Severson, Scott A.;
Rigaut, F.;
Crampton, David;
Lloyd, J. P.;
Graham, James R.
Submitted: 2002-07-12
Even though the technology of adaptive optics (AO) is rapidly maturing,
calibration of the resulting images remains a major challenge. The AO
point-spread function (PSF) changes quickly both in time and position on the
sky. In a typical observation the star used for guiding will be separated from
the scientific target by 10" to 30". This is sufficient separation to render
images of the guide star by themselves nearly useless in characterizing the PSF
at the off-axis target position. A semi-empirical technique is described that
improves the determination of the AO off-axis PSF. The method uses calibration
images of dense star fields to determine the change in PSF with field position.
It then uses this information to correct contemporaneous images of the guide
star to produce a PSF that is more accurate for both the target position and
the time of a scientific observation. We report on tests of the method using
natural-guide-star AO systems on the Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope and Lick
Observatory Shane Telescope, augmented by simple atmospheric computer
simulations. At 25" off-axis, predicting the PSF full width at half maximum
using only information about the guide star results in an error of 60%. Using
an image of a dense star field lowers this error to 33%, and our method, which
also folds in information about the on-axis PSF, further decreases the error to
19%.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9610079 [pdf] - 329118
Optical/Near-Infrared Observations of GRO J1744-28
Cole, D. M.;
Berk, D. E. Vanden;
Severson, S. A.;
Miller, M. C.;
Quashnock, J. M.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Lamb, D. Q.;
Hurley, K.;
Blanco, P.;
Lidman, C.;
Glazebrook, K.
Submitted: 1996-10-10, last modified: 1996-11-21
We present results from a series of optical (g and r-band) and near-infrared
(K'-band) observations of the region of the sky including the entire XTE and
ROSAT error circles for the ``Bursting Pulsar'' GRO J1744-28. These data were
taken with the Astrophysical Research Consortium's 3.5-m telescope at Apache
Point Observatory and with the 2.2-m telescope at the European Southern
Observatory. We see no new object, nor any significant brightening of any known
object, in these error circles, with the exception of an object detected in our
8 February 1996 image. This object has already been proposed as a near-infrared
counterpart to GRO J1744-28. While it is seen in only two of our ten 8 February
frames, there is no evidence that this is an instrumental artifact, suggesting
the possibility of near-infrared flares from GRO J1744-28, similar to those
that have been reported from the Rapid Burster. The distance to the ``Bursting
Pulsar'' must be more than 2 kpc, and we suggest that it is more than 7 kpc.