Normalized to: Sergijenko, O.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1908.06162 [pdf] - 1945050
The Cherenkov Telescope Array view of the Galactic Center region
Viana, Aion;
Ventura, Sofia;
Gaggero, Daniele;
Grasso, Dario;
Malyshev, Dmitry;
Kosack, Karl;
Funk, Stefan;
D'Ai, Antonino;
Batista, Rafael Alves;
Blackwell, Rebecca;
Burtovoi, Aleksandr;
Caraveo, Patrizia A.;
Chernyakova, Masha;
Da Vela, Paolo;
De Cesare, Giovanni;
Pino, Elisabete M. de Gouveia Dal;
Wilhelmi, Emma de Oña;
Filipovic, Miroslav;
Fiori, Michele;
Minaya, Ignacio A.;
Rodríguez-Ramírez, Juan Carlos;
Rowell, Gavin;
Rugliancich, Andrea;
Sergijenko, Olga;
Zampieri, Luca
Submitted: 2019-08-16
Among all the high-energy environments of our Galaxy, the Galactic Center
(GC) region is definitely the richest. It harbors a large amount of non-thermal
emitters, including the closest supermassive black hole, dense molecular
clouds, regions with strong star forming activity, multiple supernova remnants
and pulsar wind nebulae, arc-like radio structures, as well as the base of what
may be large-scale Galactic outflows, possibly related to the Fermi Bubbles. It
also contains a strong diffuse TeV gamma-ray emission along the Galactic ridge,
with a disputed origin, including the presence of a possible Pevatron,
unresolved sources, and an increased relevance of the diffuse sea of cosmic
rays. This very rich region will be one of the key targets for the next
generation ground-based observatory for gamma-ray astronomy, the Cherenkov
Telescope Array (CTA). Here we review the CTA science case for the study of the
GC region, and present the planned survey strategy. These observations are
simulated and we assess CTA's potential to better characterize the origin and
nature of a selection of gamma-ray sources in the region.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1811.04466 [pdf] - 1783057
Constraints on the dark energy with barotropic equation of state:
assessing the importance of different observations
Submitted: 2018-11-11
For dynamical dark energy with the barotropic equation of state we determine
the mean values of parameters and their confidence ranges together with other
cosmological parameters on the basis of different combined datasets. The used
observations include Planck data on CMB temperature anisotropy, E-mode
polarization and lensing, BICEP2/Keck Array data on B-mode polarization, BAO
from SDSS and 6dFGS, power spectrum of galaxies from WiggleZ, weak lensing from
CFHTLenS and SN Ia data from the JLA compilation. We find that all but one mean
models are phantom, mean values of the equation of state parameter at current
epoch are close to $-1$ and constraints on the adiabatic sound speed of dark
energy are weak. We investigate the effect of CMB polarization data on the dark
energy parameters estimation. We discuss also which type of data on the large
scale structure of the Universe allows to determine the dark energy parameters
most precisely.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1811.01245 [pdf] - 1778773
Dipole of the luminosity distance as a test for dark energy models
Submitted: 2018-11-03
The dependence of Hubble parameter on redshift can be determined directly
from the dipole of luminosity distance to Supernovae Ia. We investigate the
possibility of using the data on dipole of the luminosity distance obtained
from the Supernovae Ia compilations SDSS, Union2.1, JLA and Pantheon to
distinguish the dark energy models.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1709.07997 [pdf] - 1838112
Science with the Cherenkov Telescope Array
Consortium, The Cherenkov Telescope Array;
:;
Acharya, B. S.;
Agudo, I.;
Samarai, I. Al;
Alfaro, R.;
Alfaro, J.;
Alispach, C.;
Batista, R. Alves;
Amans, J. -P.;
Amato, E.;
Ambrosi, G.;
Antolini, E.;
Antonelli, L. A.;
Aramo, C.;
Araya, M.;
Armstrong, T.;
Arqueros, F.;
Arrabito, L.;
Asano, K.;
Ashley, M.;
Backes, M.;
Balazs, C.;
Balbo, M.;
Ballester, O.;
Ballet, J.;
Bamba, A.;
Barkov, M.;
de Almeida, U. Barres;
Barrio, J. A.;
Bastieri, D.;
Becherini, Y.;
Belfiore, A.;
Benbow, W.;
Berge, D.;
Bernardini, E.;
Bernardini, M. G.;
Bernardos, M.;
Bernlöhr, K.;
Bertucci, B.;
Biasuzzi, B.;
Bigongiari, C.;
Biland, A.;
Bissaldi, E.;
Biteau, J.;
Blanch, O.;
Blazek, J.;
Boisson, C.;
Bolmont, J.;
Bonanno, G.;
Bonardi, A.;
Bonavolontà, C.;
Bonnoli, G.;
Bosnjak, Z.;
Böttcher, M.;
Braiding, C.;
Bregeon, J.;
Brill, A.;
Brown, A. M.;
Brun, P.;
Brunetti, G.;
Buanes, T.;
Buckley, J.;
Bugaev, V.;
Bühler, R.;
Bulgarelli, A.;
Bulik, T.;
Burton, M.;
Burtovoi, A.;
Busetto, G.;
Canestrari, R.;
Capalbi, M.;
Capitanio, F.;
Caproni, A.;
Caraveo, P.;
Cárdenas, V.;
Carlile, C.;
Carosi, R.;
Carquín, E.;
Carr, J.;
Casanova, S.;
Cascone, E.;
Catalani, F.;
Catalano, O.;
Cauz, D.;
Cerruti, M.;
Chadwick, P.;
Chaty, S.;
Chaves, R. C. G.;
Chen, A.;
Chen, X.;
Chernyakova, M.;
Chikawa, M.;
Christov, A.;
Chudoba, J.;
Cieślar, M.;
Coco, V.;
Colafrancesco, S.;
Colin, P.;
Conforti, V.;
Connaughton, V.;
Conrad, J.;
Contreras, J. L.;
Cortina, J.;
Costa, A.;
Costantini, H.;
Cotter, G.;
Covino, S.;
Crocker, R.;
Cuadra, J.;
Cuevas, O.;
Cumani, P.;
D'Aì, A.;
D'Ammando, F.;
D'Avanzo, P.;
D'Urso, D.;
Daniel, M.;
Davids, I.;
Dawson, B.;
Dazzi, F.;
De Angelis, A.;
Anjos, R. de Cássia dos;
De Cesare, G.;
De Franco, A.;
Pino, E. M. de Gouveia Dal;
de la Calle, I.;
Lopez, R. de los Reyes;
De Lotto, B.;
De Luca, A.;
De Lucia, M.;
de Naurois, M.;
Wilhelmi, E. de Oña;
De Palma, F.;
De Persio, F.;
de Souza, V.;
Deil, C.;
Del Santo, M.;
Delgado, C.;
della Volpe, D.;
Di Girolamo, T.;
Di Pierro, F.;
Di Venere, L.;
Díaz, C.;
Dib, C.;
Diebold, S.;
Djannati-Ataï, A.;
Domínguez, A.;
Prester, D. Dominis;
Dorner, D.;
Doro, M.;
Drass, H.;
Dravins, D.;
Dubus, G.;
Dwarkadas, V. V.;
Ebr, J.;
Eckner, C.;
Egberts, K.;
Einecke, S.;
Ekoume, T. R. N.;
Elsässer, D.;
Ernenwein, J. -P.;
Espinoza, C.;
Evoli, C.;
Fairbairn, M.;
Falceta-Goncalves, D.;
Falcone, A.;
Farnier, C.;
Fasola, G.;
Fedorova, E.;
Fegan, S.;
Fernandez-Alonso, M.;
Fernández-Barral, A.;
Ferrand, G.;
Fesquet, M.;
Filipovic, M.;
Fioretti, V.;
Fontaine, G.;
Fornasa, M.;
Fortson, L.;
Coromina, L. Freixas;
Fruck, C.;
Fujita, Y.;
Fukazawa, Y.;
Funk, S.;
Füßling, M.;
Gabici, S.;
Gadola, A.;
Gallant, Y.;
Garcia, B.;
López, R. Garcia;
Garczarczyk, M.;
Gaskins, J.;
Gasparetto, T.;
Gaug, M.;
Gerard, L.;
Giavitto, G.;
Giglietto, N.;
Giommi, P.;
Giordano, F.;
Giro, E.;
Giroletti, M.;
Giuliani, A.;
Glicenstein, J. -F.;
Gnatyk, R.;
Godinovic, N.;
Goldoni, P.;
Gómez-Vargas, G.;
González, M. M.;
González, J. M.;
Götz, D.;
Graham, J.;
Grandi, P.;
Granot, J.;
Green, A. J.;
Greenshaw, T.;
Griffiths, S.;
Gunji, S.;
Hadasch, D.;
Hara, S.;
Hardcastle, M. J.;
Hassan, T.;
Hayashi, K.;
Hayashida, M.;
Heller, M.;
Helo, J. C.;
Hermann, G.;
Hinton, J.;
Hnatyk, B.;
Hofmann, W.;
Holder, J.;
Horan, D.;
Hörandel, J.;
Horns, D.;
Horvath, P.;
Hovatta, T.;
Hrabovsky, M.;
Hrupec, D.;
Humensky, T. B.;
Hütten, M.;
Iarlori, M.;
Inada, T.;
Inome, Y.;
Inoue, S.;
Inoue, T.;
Inoue, Y.;
Iocco, F.;
Ioka, K.;
Iori, M.;
Ishio, K.;
Iwamura, Y.;
Jamrozy, M.;
Janecek, P.;
Jankowsky, D.;
Jean, P.;
Jung-Richardt, I.;
Jurysek, J.;
Kaaret, P.;
Karkar, S.;
Katagiri, H.;
Katz, U.;
Kawanaka, N.;
Kazanas, D.;
Khélifi, B.;
Kieda, D. B.;
Kimeswenger, S.;
Kimura, S.;
Kisaka, S.;
Knapp, J.;
Knödlseder, J.;
Koch, B.;
Kohri, K.;
Komin, N.;
Kosack, K.;
Kraus, M.;
Krause, M.;
Krauß, F.;
Kubo, H.;
Mezek, G. Kukec;
Kuroda, H.;
Kushida, J.;
La Palombara, N.;
Lamanna, G.;
Lang, R. G.;
Lapington, J.;
Blanc, O. Le;
Leach, S.;
Lees, J. -P.;
Lefaucheur, J.;
de Oliveira, M. A. Leigui;
Lenain, J. -P.;
Lico, R.;
Limon, M.;
Lindfors, E.;
Lohse, T.;
Lombardi, S.;
Longo, F.;
López, M.;
López-Coto, R.;
Lu, C. -C.;
Lucarelli, F.;
Luque-Escamilla, P. L.;
Lyard, E.;
Maccarone, M. C.;
Maier, G.;
Majumdar, P.;
Malaguti, G.;
Mandat, D.;
Maneva, G.;
Manganaro, M.;
Mangano, S.;
Marcowith, A.;
Marín, J.;
Markoff, S.;
Martí, J.;
Martin, P.;
Martínez, M.;
Martínez, G.;
Masetti, N.;
Masuda, S.;
Maurin, G.;
Maxted, N.;
Mazin, D.;
Medina, C.;
Melandri, A.;
Mereghetti, S.;
Meyer, M.;
Minaya, I. A.;
Mirabal, N.;
Mirzoyan, R.;
Mitchell, A.;
Mizuno, T.;
Moderski, R.;
Mohammed, M.;
Mohrmann, L.;
Montaruli, T.;
Moralejo, A.;
Morcuende-Parrilla, D.;
Mori, K.;
Morlino, G.;
Morris, P.;
Morselli, A.;
Moulin, E.;
Mukherjee, R.;
Mundell, C.;
Murach, T.;
Muraishi, H.;
Murase, K.;
Nagai, A.;
Nagataki, S.;
Nagayoshi, T.;
Naito, T.;
Nakamori, T.;
Nakamura, Y.;
Niemiec, J.;
Nieto, D.;
Nikołajuk, M.;
Nishijima, K.;
Noda, K.;
Nosek, D.;
Novosyadlyj, B.;
Nozaki, S.;
O'Brien, P.;
Oakes, L.;
Ohira, Y.;
Ohishi, M.;
Ohm, S.;
Okazaki, N.;
Okumura, A.;
Ong, R. A.;
Orienti, M.;
Orito, R.;
Osborne, J. P.;
Ostrowski, M.;
Otte, N.;
Oya, I.;
Padovani, M.;
Paizis, A.;
Palatiello, M.;
Palatka, M.;
Paoletti, R.;
Paredes, J. M.;
Pareschi, G.;
Parsons, R. D.;
Pe'er, A.;
Pech, M.;
Pedaletti, G.;
Perri, M.;
Persic, M.;
Petrashyk, A.;
Petrucci, P.;
Petruk, O.;
Peyaud, B.;
Pfeifer, M.;
Piano, G.;
Pisarski, A.;
Pita, S.;
Pohl, M.;
Polo, M.;
Pozo, D.;
Prandini, E.;
Prast, J.;
Principe, G.;
Prokhorov, D.;
Prokoph, H.;
Prouza, M.;
Pühlhofer, G.;
Punch, M.;
Pürckhauer, S.;
Queiroz, F.;
Quirrenbach, A.;
Rainò, S.;
Razzaque, S.;
Reimer, O.;
Reimer, A.;
Reisenegger, A.;
Renaud, M.;
Rezaeian, A. H.;
Rhode, W.;
Ribeiro, D.;
Ribó, M.;
Richtler, T.;
Rico, J.;
Rieger, F.;
Riquelme, M.;
Rivoire, S.;
Rizi, V.;
Rodriguez, J.;
Fernandez, G. Rodriguez;
Vázquez, J. J. Rodríguez;
Rojas, G.;
Romano, P.;
Romeo, G.;
Rosado, J.;
Rovero, A. C.;
Rowell, G.;
Rudak, B.;
Rugliancich, A.;
Rulten, C.;
Sadeh, I.;
Safi-Harb, S.;
Saito, T.;
Sakaki, N.;
Sakurai, S.;
Salina, G.;
Sánchez-Conde, M.;
Sandaker, H.;
Sandoval, A.;
Sangiorgi, P.;
Sanguillon, M.;
Sano, H.;
Santander, M.;
Sarkar, S.;
Satalecka, K.;
Saturni, F. G.;
Schioppa, E. J.;
Schlenstedt, S.;
Schneider, M.;
Schoorlemmer, H.;
Schovanek, P.;
Schulz, A.;
Schussler, F.;
Schwanke, U.;
Sciacca, E.;
Scuderi, S.;
Seitenzahl, I.;
Semikoz, D.;
Sergijenko, O.;
Servillat, M.;
Shalchi, A.;
Shellard, R. C.;
Sidoli, L.;
Siejkowski, H.;
Sillanpää, A.;
Sironi, G.;
Sitarek, J.;
Sliusar, V.;
Slowikowska, A.;
Sol, H.;
Stamerra, A.;
Stanič, S.;
Starling, R.;
Stawarz, Ł.;
Stefanik, S.;
Stephan, M.;
Stolarczyk, T.;
Stratta, G.;
Straumann, U.;
Suomijarvi, T.;
Supanitsky, A. D.;
Tagliaferri, G.;
Tajima, H.;
Tavani, M.;
Tavecchio, F.;
Tavernet, J. -P.;
Tayabaly, K.;
Tejedor, L. A.;
Temnikov, P.;
Terada, Y.;
Terrier, R.;
Terzic, T.;
Teshima, M.;
Testa, V.;
Thoudam, S.;
Tian, W.;
Tibaldo, L.;
Tluczykont, M.;
Peixoto, C. J. Todero;
Tokanai, F.;
Tomastik, J.;
Tonev, D.;
Tornikoski, M.;
Torres, D. F.;
Torresi, E.;
Tosti, G.;
Tothill, N.;
Tovmassian, G.;
Travnicek, P.;
Trichard, C.;
Trifoglio, M.;
Pujadas, I. Troyano;
Tsujimoto, S.;
Umana, G.;
Vagelli, V.;
Vagnetti, F.;
Valentino, M.;
Vallania, P.;
Valore, L.;
van Eldik, C.;
Vandenbroucke, J.;
Varner, G. S.;
Vasileiadis, G.;
Vassiliev, V.;
Acosta, M. Vázquez;
Vecchi, M.;
Vega, A.;
Vercellone, S.;
Veres, P.;
Vergani, S.;
Verzi, V.;
Vettolani, G. P.;
Viana, A.;
Vigorito, C.;
Villanueva, J.;
Voelk, H.;
Vollhardt, A.;
Vorobiov, S.;
Vrastil, M.;
Vuillaume, T.;
Wagner, S. J.;
Wagner, R.;
Walter, R.;
Ward, J. E.;
Warren, D.;
Watson, J. J.;
Werner, F.;
White, M.;
White, R.;
Wierzcholska, A.;
Wilcox, P.;
Will, M.;
Williams, D. A.;
Wischnewski, R.;
Wood, M.;
Yamamoto, T.;
Yamazaki, R.;
Yanagita, S.;
Yang, L.;
Yoshida, T.;
Yoshiike, S.;
Yoshikoshi, T.;
Zacharias, M.;
Zaharijas, G.;
Zampieri, L.;
Zandanel, F.;
Zanin, R.;
Zavrtanik, M.;
Zavrtanik, D.;
Zdziarski, A. A.;
Zech, A.;
Zechlin, H.;
Zhdanov, V. I.;
Ziegler, A.;
Zorn, J.
Submitted: 2017-09-22, last modified: 2018-01-21
The Cherenkov Telescope Array, CTA, will be the major global observatory for
very high energy gamma-ray astronomy over the next decade and beyond. The
scientific potential of CTA is extremely broad: from understanding the role of
relativistic cosmic particles to the search for dark matter. CTA is an explorer
of the extreme universe, probing environments from the immediate neighbourhood
of black holes to cosmic voids on the largest scales. Covering a huge range in
photon energy from 20 GeV to 300 TeV, CTA will improve on all aspects of
performance with respect to current instruments.
The observatory will operate arrays on sites in both hemispheres to provide
full sky coverage and will hence maximize the potential for the rarest
phenomena such as very nearby supernovae, gamma-ray bursts or gravitational
wave transients. With 99 telescopes on the southern site and 19 telescopes on
the northern site, flexible operation will be possible, with sub-arrays
available for specific tasks. CTA will have important synergies with many of
the new generation of major astronomical and astroparticle observatories.
Multi-wavelength and multi-messenger approaches combining CTA data with those
from other instruments will lead to a deeper understanding of the broad-band
non-thermal properties of target sources.
The CTA Observatory will be operated as an open, proposal-driven observatory,
with all data available on a public archive after a pre-defined proprietary
period. Scientists from institutions worldwide have combined together to form
the CTA Consortium. This Consortium has prepared a proposal for a Core
Programme of highly motivated observations. The programme, encompassing
approximately 40% of the available observing time over the first ten years of
CTA operation, is made up of individual Key Science Projects (KSPs), which are
presented in this document.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1712.04394 [pdf] - 1634241
Molecules in the early Universe
Submitted: 2017-12-12
We study the formation of first molecules, negative Hydrogen ions and
molecular ions in model of the Universe with cosmological constant and cold
dark matter. The cosmological recombination is described in the framework of
modified model of the effective 3-level atom, while the kinetics of chemical
reactions in the framework of the minimal model for Hydrogen, Deuterium and
Helium. It is found that the uncertainties of molecular abundances caused by
the inaccuracies of computation of cosmological recombination are about 2-3%.
The uncertainties of values of cosmological parameters affect the abundances of
molecules, negative Hydrogen ions and molecular ions at the level of up to 2%.
In the absence of cosmological reionization at redshift $z=10$ the ratios of
abundances to the Hydrogen one are $3.08\times10^{-13}$ for $H^-$,
$2.37\times10^{-6}$ for $H_2$, $1.26\times10^{-13}$ for $H_2^+$,
$1.12\times10^{-9}$ for $HD$ and $8.54\times10^{-14}$ for $HeH^+$.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1706.04522 [pdf] - 1584680
Observational constraints on tensor perturbations in cosmological models
with dynamical dark energy
Submitted: 2017-06-14
We constrain the contribution of tensor-mode perturbations with free $n_t$ in
the models with dynamical dark energy with the barotropic equation of state
using Planck-2015 data on CMB anisotropy, polarization and lensing, BICEP2/Keck
Array data on B-mode polarization, power spectrum of galaxies from WiggleZ and
SN Ia data from the JLA compilation. We also investigate the uncertainties of
reconstructed potential of the scalar field dark energy.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:1704.04136 [pdf] - 2039686
Prospects for CTA observations of the young SNR RX J1713.7-3946
Consortium, The CTA;
:;
Acero, F.;
Aloisio, R.;
Amans, J.;
Amato, E.;
Antonelli, L. A.;
Aramo, C.;
Armstrong, T.;
Arqueros, F.;
Asano, K.;
Ashley, M.;
Backes, M.;
Balazs, C.;
Balzer, A.;
Bamba, A.;
Barkov, M.;
Barrio, J. A.;
Benbow, W.;
Bernlöhr, K.;
Beshley, V.;
Bigongiari, C.;
Biland, A.;
Bilinsky, A.;
Bissaldi, E.;
Biteau, J.;
Blanch, O.;
Blasi, P.;
Blazek, J.;
Boisson, C.;
Bonanno, G.;
Bonardi, A.;
Bonavolontà, C.;
Bonnoli, G.;
Braiding, C.;
Brau-Nogué, S.;
Bregeon, J.;
Brown, A. M.;
Bugaev, V.;
Bulgarelli, A.;
Bulik, T.;
Burton, M.;
Burtovoi, A.;
Busetto, G.;
Böttcher, M.;
Cameron, R.;
Capalbi, M.;
Caproni, A.;
Caraveo, P.;
Carosi, R.;
Cascone, E.;
Cerruti, M.;
Chaty, S.;
Chen, A.;
Chen, X.;
Chernyakova, M.;
Chikawa, M.;
Chudoba, J.;
Cohen-Tanugi, J.;
Colafrancesco, S.;
Conforti, V.;
Contreras, J. L.;
Costa, A.;
Cotter, G.;
Covino, S.;
Covone, G.;
Cumani, P.;
Cusumano, G.;
D'Ammando, F.;
D'Urso, D.;
Daniel, M.;
Dazzi, F.;
De Angelis, A.;
De Cesare, G.;
De Franco, A.;
De Frondat, F.;
Pino, E. M. de Gouveia Dal;
De Lisio, C.;
Lopez, R. de los Reyes;
De Lotto, B.;
de Naurois, M.;
De Palma, F.;
Del Santo, M.;
Delgado, C.;
della Volpe, D.;
Di Girolamo, T.;
Di Giulio, C.;
Di Pierro, F.;
Di Venere, L.;
Doro, M.;
Dournaux, J.;
Dumas, D.;
Dwarkadas, V.;
Díaz, C.;
Ebr, J.;
Egberts, K.;
Einecke, S.;
Elsässer, D.;
Eschbach, S.;
Falceta-Goncalves, D.;
Fasola, G.;
Fedorova, E.;
Fernández-Barral, A.;
Ferrand, G.;
Fesquet, M.;
Fiandrini, E.;
Fiasson, A.;
Filipovíc, M. D.;
Fioretti, V.;
Font, L.;
Fontaine, G.;
Franco, F. J.;
Coromina, L. Freixas;
Fujita, Y.;
Fukui, Y.;
Funk, S.;
Förster, A.;
Gadola, A.;
López, R. Garcia;
Garczarczyk, M.;
Giglietto, N.;
Giordano, F.;
Giuliani, A.;
Glicenstein, J.;
Gnatyk, R.;
Goldoni, P.;
Grabarczyk, T.;
Graciani, R.;
Graham, J.;
Grandi, P.;
Granot, J.;
Green, A. J.;
Griffiths, S.;
Gunji, S.;
Hakobyan, H.;
Hara, S.;
Hassan, T.;
Hayashida, M.;
Heller, M.;
Helo, J. C.;
Hinton, J.;
Hnatyk, B.;
Huet, J.;
Huetten, M.;
Humensky, T. B.;
Hussein, M.;
Hörandel, J.;
Ikeno, Y.;
Inada, T.;
Inome, Y.;
Inoue, S.;
Inoue, T.;
Inoue, Y.;
Ioka, K.;
Iori, M.;
Jacquemier, J.;
Janecek, P.;
Jankowsky, D.;
Jung, I.;
Kaaret, P.;
Katagiri, H.;
Kimeswenger, S.;
Kimura, S.;
Knödlseder, J.;
Koch, B.;
Kocot, J.;
Kohri, K.;
Komin, N.;
Konno, Y.;
Kosack, K.;
Koyama, S.;
Kraus, M.;
Kubo, H.;
Mezek, G. Kukec;
Kushida, J.;
La Palombara, N.;
Lalik, K.;
Lamanna, G.;
Landt, H.;
Lapington, J.;
Laporte, P.;
Lee, S.;
Lees, J.;
Lefaucheur, J.;
Lenain, J. -P.;
Leto, G.;
Lindfors, E.;
Lohse, T.;
Lombardi, S.;
Longo, F.;
Lopez, M.;
Lucarelli, F.;
Luque-Escamilla, P. L.;
López-Coto, R.;
Maccarone, M. C.;
Maier, G.;
Malaguti, G.;
Mandat, D.;
Maneva, G.;
Mangano, S.;
Marcowith, A.;
Martí, J.;
Martínez, M.;
Martínez, G.;
Masuda, S.;
Maurin, G.;
Maxted, N.;
Melioli, C.;
Mineo, T.;
Mirabal, N.;
Mizuno, T.;
Moderski, R.;
Mohammed, M.;
Montaruli, T.;
Moralejo, A.;
Mori, K.;
Morlino, G.;
Morselli, A.;
Moulin, E.;
Mukherjee, R.;
Mundell, C.;
Muraishi, H.;
Murase, K.;
Nagataki, S.;
Nagayoshi, T.;
Naito, T.;
Nakajima, D.;
Nakamori, T.;
Nemmen, R.;
Niemiec, J.;
Nieto, D.;
Nievas-Rosillo, M.;
Nikołajuk, M.;
Nishijima, K.;
Noda, K.;
Nogues, L.;
Nosek, D.;
Novosyadlyj, B.;
Nozaki, S.;
Ohira, Y.;
Ohishi, M.;
Ohm, S.;
Okumura, A.;
Ong, R. A.;
Orito, R.;
Orlati, A.;
Ostrowski, M.;
Oya, I.;
Padovani, M.;
Palacio, J.;
Palatka, M.;
Paredes, J. M.;
Pavy, S.;
Pe'er, A.;
Persic, M.;
Petrucci, P.;
Petruk, O.;
Pisarski, A.;
Pohl, M.;
Porcelli, A.;
Prandini, E.;
Prast, J.;
Principe, G.;
Prouza, M.;
Pueschel, E.;
Pühlhofer, G.;
Quirrenbach, A.;
Rameez, M.;
Reimer, O.;
Renaud, M.;
Ribó, M.;
Rico, J.;
Rizi, V.;
Rodriguez, J.;
Fernandez, G. Rodriguez;
Vázquez, J. J. Rodríguez;
Romano, P.;
Romeo, G.;
Rosado, J.;
Rousselle, J.;
Rowell, G.;
Rudak, B.;
Sadeh, I.;
Safi-Harb, S.;
Saito, T.;
Sakaki, N.;
Sanchez, D.;
Sangiorgi, P.;
Sano, H.;
Santander, M.;
Sarkar, S.;
Sawada, M.;
Schioppa, E. J.;
Schoorlemmer, H.;
Schovanek, P.;
Schussler, F.;
Sergijenko, O.;
Servillat, M.;
Shalchi, A.;
Shellard, R. C.;
Siejkowski, H.;
Sillanpää, A.;
Simone, D.;
Sliusar, V.;
Sol, H.;
Stanič, S.;
Starling, R.;
Stawarz, Ł.;
Stefanik, S.;
Stephan, M.;
Stolarczyk, T.;
Szanecki, M.;
Szepieniec, T.;
Tagliaferri, G.;
Tajima, H.;
Takahashi, M.;
Takeda, J.;
Tanaka, M.;
Tanaka, S.;
Tejedor, L. A.;
Telezhinsky, I.;
Temnikov, P.;
Terada, Y.;
Tescaro, D.;
Teshima, M.;
Testa, V.;
Thoudam, S.;
Tokanai, F.;
Torres, D. F.;
Torresi, E.;
Tosti, G.;
Townsley, C.;
Travnicek, P.;
Trichard, C.;
Trifoglio, M.;
Tsujimoto, S.;
Vagelli, V.;
Vallania, P.;
Valore, L.;
van Driel, W.;
van Eldik, C.;
Vandenbroucke, J.;
Vassiliev, V.;
Vecchi, M.;
Vercellone, S.;
Vergani, S.;
Vigorito, C.;
Vorobiov, S.;
Vrastil, M.;
Acosta, M. L. Vázquez;
Wagner, S. J.;
Wagner, R.;
Wakely, S. P.;
Walter, R.;
Ward, J. E.;
Watson, J. J.;
Weinstein, A.;
White, M.;
White, R.;
Wierzcholska, A.;
Wilcox, P.;
Williams, D. A.;
Wischnewski, R.;
Wojcik, P.;
Yamamoto, T.;
Yamamoto, H.;
Yamazaki, R.;
Yanagita, S.;
Yang, L.;
Yoshida, T.;
Yoshida, M.;
Yoshiike, S.;
Yoshikoshi, T.;
Zacharias, M.;
Zampieri, L.;
Zanin, R.;
Zavrtanik, M.;
Zavrtanik, D.;
Zdziarski, A.;
Zech, A.;
Zechlin, H.;
Zhdanov, V.;
Ziegler, A.;
Zorn, J.
Submitted: 2017-04-13
We perform simulations for future Cherenkov Telescope Array (CTA)
observations of RX~J1713.7$-$3946, a young supernova remnant (SNR) and one of
the brightest sources ever discovered in very-high-energy (VHE) gamma rays.
Special attention is paid to explore possible spatial (anti-)correlations of
gamma rays with emission at other wavelengths, in particular X-rays and
CO/H{\sc i} emission. We present a series of simulated images of RX
J1713.7$-$3946 for CTA based on a set of observationally motivated models for
the gamma-ray emission. In these models, VHE gamma rays produced by high-energy
electrons are assumed to trace the non-thermal X-ray emission observed by {\it
XMM-Newton}, whereas those originating from relativistic protons delineate the
local gas distributions. The local atomic and molecular gas distributions are
deduced by the NANTEN team from CO and H{\sc i} observations. Our primary goal
is to show how one can distinguish the emission mechanism(s) of the gamma rays
(i.e., hadronic vs leptonic, or a mixture of the two) through information
provided by their spatial distribution, spectra, and time variation. This work
is the first attempt to quantitatively evaluate the capabilities of CTA to
achieve various proposed scientific goals by observing this important cosmic
particle accelerator.
[11]
oai:arXiv.org:1407.2230 [pdf] - 985459
Sound speed of scalar field dark energy: weak effects and large
uncertainties
Submitted: 2014-07-08, last modified: 2015-02-06
The possibility of reconstruction of Lagrangian for the scalar field dark
energy with constant effective sound speed $c_s$ is analyzed. It is found that
such reconstruction can be made with accuracy up to an arbitrary constant. The
value of $c_s$ is estimated together with other dark energy parameters
($\Omega_{de}$, $w_0$, $c_a^2$) and main cosmological ones on the basis of data
including Planck-2013 results on CMB anisotropy, BAO distance ratios from
recent galaxy surveys, galaxy power spectrum from WiggleZ, magnitude-redshift
relations for distant SNe Ia from SNLS3 and Union2.1 compilations, the HST
determination of the Hubble constant. It is shown that no value of $c_s$ from
the range [0,1] is preferred by the used data because of very weak influence of
dark energy perturbations on the large scale structure formation and CMB
temperature fluctuations.
[12]
oai:arXiv.org:1312.6579 [pdf] - 1202432
Constraining the dynamical dark energy parameters: Planck-2013 vs WMAP9
Submitted: 2013-12-23, last modified: 2014-04-15
We determine the best-fit values and confidence limits for dynamical dark
energy parameters together with other cosmological parameters on the basis of
different datasets which include WMAP9 or Planck-2013 results on CMB
anisotropy, BAO distance ratios from recent galaxy surveys, magnitude-redshift
relations for distant SNe Ia from SNLS3 and Union2.1 samples and the HST
determination of the Hubble constant. We use a Markov Chain Monte Carlo routine
to map out the likelihood in the multi-dimensional parameter space. We show
that the most precise determination of cosmological parameters with the
narrowest confidence limits is obtained for the Planck{+}HST{+}BAO{+}SNLS3
dataset. The best-fit values and 2$\sigma$ confidence limits for cosmological
parameters in this case are $\Omega_{de}=0.718\pm0.022$,
$w_0=-1.15^{+0.14}_{-0.16}$, $c_a^2=-1.15^{+0.02}_{-0.46}$,
$\Omega_bh^2=0.0220\pm0.0005$, $\Omega_{cdm}h^2=0.121\pm0.004$,
$h=0.713\pm0.027$, $n_s=0.958^{+0.014}_{-0.010}$,
$A_s=(2.215^{+0.093}_{-0.101})\cdot10^{-9}$,
$\tau_{rei}=0.093^{+0.022}_{-0.028}$. For this dataset, the $\Lambda$CDM model
is just outside the 2$\sigma$ confidence region, while for the dataset
WMAP9{+}HST{+}BAO{+}SNLS3 the $\Lambda$CDM model is only 1$\sigma$ away from
the best fit. The tension in the determination of some cosmological parameters
on the basis of two CMB datasets WMAP9 and Planck-2013 is highlighted.
[13]
oai:arXiv.org:1311.2455 [pdf] - 1042970
Scalar fields with barotropic equation of state: quintessence versus
phantom
Submitted: 2013-11-11
We constrain the parameters of dynamical dark energy in the form of a
classical scalar field with barotropic equation of state jointly with other
cosmological parameters using various combined datasets including the CMB power
spectra from WMAP7, the baryon acoustic oscillations in the space distribution
of galaxies from SDSS DR7 and WiggleZ, the light curves of SN Ia from 3
different compilations: SDSS (SALT2 and MLCS2k2 light curve fittings), SNLS3
and Union2.1. The considered class of models involves both quintessential and
phantom subclasses. The analysis has shown that the phantom models are
generally preferred by the observational data. We discuss the effect of
allowing for non-zero masses of active neutrinos, non-zero curvature or
non-zero contribution from the tensor mode of perturbations on the precision of
dark energy parameters estimation. We also perform a forecast for the Planck
mock data.
[14]
oai:arXiv.org:1212.5824 [pdf] - 686687
Quintessence versus phantom dark energy: the arbitrating power of
current and future observations
Submitted: 2012-12-23, last modified: 2013-05-28
We analyze the possibility to distinguish between quintessence and phantom
scalar field models of dark energy using observations of luminosity distance
moduli of SNe Ia, CMB anisotropies and polarization, matter density
perturbations and baryon acoustic oscillations. Among the present observations
only Planck data on CMB anisotropy and SDSS DR9 data on baryon acoustic
oscillations may be able to decide between quintessence or phantom scalar field
models, however for each model a set of best-fit parameters exists, which
matches all data with similar goodness of fit. We compare the relative
differences of best-fit model predictions with observational uncertainties for
each type of data and we show that the accuracy of SNe Ia luminosity distance
data is far from the one necessary to distinguish these types of dark energy
models, while the CMB data (WMAP, ACT, SPT and especially Planck) are close to
being able to reliably distinguish them. Also an improvement of the large-scale
structure data (future releses of SDSS BOSS and e.g. Euclid or BigBOSS) will
enable us to surely decide between quintessence and phantom dark energy.
[15]
oai:arXiv.org:1304.4611 [pdf] - 653466
Astrophysical and cosmological problems of invisible mass and dark
energy in the Universe
Belli, P.;
Berdina, L. A.;
Bernabei, R.;
Bogdan, A.;
Boiko, R. S.;
Burgazli, A. Yu.;
Cappella, F.;
Cerulli, R.;
Chernyak, D. M.;
Danevich, F. A.;
d'Angelo, A.;
Eingorn, M. V.;
Fakhr, S. H.;
Fedorova, E.;
Galashov, E. N.;
Giuliani, A.;
Hnatyk, B. I.;
Incicchitti, A.;
Ivashchenko, G.;
Kobychev, V. V.;
Kobzar, O. O.;
Kraus, H.;
Kropivyansky, B. N.;
Kudinova, A. V.;
Kulinich, Yu. A.;
Laubenstein, M.;
Marchenko, V. V.;
Marnieros, S.;
Mikhailik, V. B.;
Minakov, A. A.;
Mokina, V. M.;
Nagornaya, L. L.;
Nikolaiko, A. S.;
Nones, C.;
Novosyadlyj, B. S.;
Olivieri, E.;
Pelykh, V. O.;
Poda, D. V.;
Podviyanuk, R. B.;
Polischuk, O. G.;
Sergijenko, O. N.;
Shlegel, V. N.;
Shulga, V. M.;
Sliusar, V. M.;
Sushchov, O. B.;
Taistra, Y. V.;
Tenconi, M.;
Torbaniuk, O.;
Tretyak, V. I.;
Tsvetkova, V. S.;
Vakulik, V. G.;
Vasiliev, Ya. V.;
Vasylenko, A.;
Vasylenko, O.;
Zhdanov, V. I.;
Zhuk, A. I.
Submitted: 2013-04-16
The Workshop on results of the Project Kosmomikrofizyka-2 (Astroparticle
Physics) of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) of Ukraine "Astrophysical
and cosmological problems of invisible mass and dark energy in the Universe"
was held on November 21-22, 2012 in the Institute for Nuclear Research, Kyiv,
Ukraine (http://lpd.kinr.kiev.ua/kmf12). This Project was carried out during
three years (2010-2012) by scientists from various universities and institutes
of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine; it was a logical continuation
of the previous scientific program of the NAS of Ukraine "Researches of
structure and composition of the Universe, hidden mass and dark energy
(Kosmomikrofizyka)" in 2007-2009. These programs were devoted to theoretical
and experimental investigations in astronomy, astrophysics, cosmology, physics
of atomic nuclei and particle physics, which are related with the problems of
dark matter and dark energy in the Universe.
[16]
oai:arXiv.org:1112.6083 [pdf] - 1092626
Composite spectra of quasars with different UV spectral index
Submitted: 2011-12-28, last modified: 2012-12-25
The composite spectra of quasars are widely used as templates for redshift
determination, as well as for measurements of the mean transmission in
Ly\alpha-forest studies, and for investigation of general spectral properties
of quasars. Possibility of composite spectra utilisation in these fields is
related to remarkable similarity of quasar spectra in UV-optical range. But
despite of general similarity in spectral shapes, they differ in several
parameters, one of which is the spectral index. In the present paper we study
the possible effects, related to neglect of this difference. We compiled 16
composite spectra from subsamples of individual SDSS DR7 quasar spectra with
different spectral indices \alpha_\lambda within the wavelength range 1270-1480
\AA, and show that (i) the redshifts measured for a test sample of high
signal-to-noise ratio quasar spectra using these composites as templates appear
to be systematically higher than those calculated with a traditional template,
compiled from spectra with different \alpha_\lambda, with 1.5 times smaller
errors in the former case; (ii) the difference in \alpha_\lambda in individual
spectra used for compilation of composites can yield the mean transmission
uncertainty up to 20%; (iii) a number of emission lines indistinguishable in
ordinary composites, but seen in individual high-resolution spectra, can be
detected in such composites. It is also shown, that there is no dependence of
\alpha_\lambda on quasar luminosity in SDSS u, g, r and i bands, and
monochromatic luminosity at 1450 \AA.
[17]
oai:arXiv.org:1211.1045 [pdf] - 586149
Some spectral properties of the quasar ultraviolet bump
Submitted: 2012-11-05
In the present work the part of the quasar UV-optical bump within the
wavelength range 1210-1450\AA\ was studied with the help of composite spectra
compiled from the samples of SDSS DR7 spectra with the similar spectral index
\alpha_{\lambda} within 1270-1480 \AA. This division allowed to see weak
emission lines, which were not detected in previous studies of the quasar
composite spectra, but were known from individual optical or composite UV
spectra from the Hubble Space Telescope. Although the physical explanation of
the difference in spectral indices between quasars and their dependence on
quasar parameters is still not clear, it is obvious that this difference has to
be taken into account when generating composite spectra, e.g. for redshift
measurements. It was also shown that the equivalent width of the emission lines
does not depend on the spectral index.
[18]
oai:arXiv.org:1206.5194 [pdf] - 673086
Do the cosmological observational data prefer phantom dark energy?
Submitted: 2012-06-22, last modified: 2012-09-26
The dynamics of expansion and large scale structure formation of the Universe
are analyzed for models with dark energy in the form of a phantom scalar field
which initially mimics a $\Lambda$-term and evolves slowly to the Big Rip
singularity. The discussed model of dark energy has three parameters -- the
density and the equation of state parameter at the current epoch, $\Omega_{de}$
and $w_0$, and the asymptotic value of the equation of state parameter at
$a\rightarrow\infty$, $c_a^2$. Their best-fit values are determined jointly
with all other cosmological parameters by the MCMC method using observational
data on CMB anisotropies and polarization, SNe Ia luminosity distances, BAO
measurements and more. Similar computations are carried out for $\Lambda$CDM
and a quintessence scalar field model of dark energy. It is shown that the
current data slightly prefer the phantom model, but the differences in the
maximum likelihoods are not statistically significant. It is also shown that
the phantom dark energy with monotonically increasing density in future will
cause the decay of large scale linear matter density perturbations due to the
gravitational domination of dark energy perturbations long before the Big Rip
singularity.
[19]
oai:arXiv.org:1102.3168 [pdf] - 1052124
Observational constraints on scalar field models of dark energy with
barotropic equation of state
Submitted: 2011-02-15, last modified: 2011-07-18
We constrain the parameters of dynamical dark energy in the form of a
classical or tachyonic scalar field with barotropic equation of state jointly
with other cosmological ones using the combined datasets which include the CMB
power spectra from WMAP7, the baryon acoustic oscillations in the space
distribution of galaxies from SDSS DR7, the power spectrum of luminous red
galaxies from SDSS DR7 and the light curves of SN Ia from 2 different
compilations: Union2 (SALT2 light curve fitting) and SDSS (SALT2 and MLCS2k2
light curve fittings). It has been found that the initial value of dark energy
equation of state parameter is constrained very weakly by most of the data
while the rest of main cosmological parameters are well constrained: their
likelihoods and posteriors are similar, have the forms close to Gaussian (or
half-Gaussian) and their confidential ranges are narrow. The most reliable
determinations of the best fitting value and $1\sigma$ confidence range for the
initial value of dark energy equation of state parameter were obtained from the
combined datasets including SN Ia data from the full SDSS compilation with
MLCS2k2 fitting of light curves. In all such cases the best fitting value of
this parameter is lower than the value of corresponding parameter for current
epoch. Such dark energy loses its repulsive properties and in future the
expansion of the Universe will change into contraction. We also perform an
error forecast for the Planck mock data and show that they narrow essentially
the confidential ranges of cosmological parameters values, moreover, their
combination with SN SDSS compilation with MLCS2k2 light curve fitting may
exclude the fields with initial equation of state parameter $>-0.1$ at
2$\sigma$ confidential level.
[20]
oai:arXiv.org:1011.3474 [pdf] - 955572
Distinguishability of scalar field models of dark energy with time
variable equation of state parameter
Submitted: 2010-11-15, last modified: 2011-04-12
The possibility of distinguishing of scalar field models of dark energy with
different Lagrangians and time variable equation of state parameter by
available observational data is analyzed. The multicomponent cosmological
models with the scalar field with either Klein-Gordon or Dirac-Born-Infeld
Lagrangians as dark energy and the monotonic decreasing and increasing equation
of state parameters are considered. It is concluded that scalar field models of
dark energy with decreasing and increasing EoS parameters should be
distinguishable at the accuracy level of forthcoming observational data. The
Lagrangians of scalar fields could be distinguished by expected observational
data (Planck, SDSS etc.) in the case of decreasing EoS parameter, but are
practically indistinguishable in the case of increasing one.
[21]
oai:arXiv.org:1012.1278 [pdf] - 273331
Scalar field models of dark energy with barotropic equation of state:
properties and observational constraints from different datasets
Submitted: 2010-12-06
The possibility of constraining the parameters of scalar field dark energy
with barotropic equation of state using different available datasets is
discussed. It has been found that the initial value of dark energy equation of
state parameter is constrained very weakly by most of the data. We have
determined the constraints on this parameter, which come from the combined
dataset including supernovae from the full SDSS compilation with the MLCS2k2
fitting of light curves. We discuss also the possibility of distinguishing
between different dark energy models with barotropic equation of state using
the future data on CMB anisotropies.
[22]
oai:arXiv.org:1008.1943 [pdf] - 275588
Properties and uncertainties of scalar field models of dark energy with
barotropic equation of state
Submitted: 2010-08-11, last modified: 2010-10-05
The dynamics of expansion and large scale structure formation in the
multicomponent Universe with dark energy modeled by the minimally coupled
scalar field with generalized linear barotropic equation of state (EoS) are
analyzed. It is shown that the past dynamics of expansion and future of the
Universe -- eternal accelerated expansion or turnaround and collapse -- are
completely defined by the current energy density of a scalar field and relation
between its current and early EoS parameters. The clustering properties of such
models of dark energy and their imprints in the power spectrum of matter
density perturbations depend on the same relation and, additionally, on the
"effective sound speed" of a scalar field, defined by its Lagrangian. It is
concluded that such scalar fields with different values of these parameters are
distinguishable in principle. This gives the possibility to constrain them by
confronting the theoretical predictions with the corresponding observational
data. For that we have used the 7-year WMAP data on CMB anisotropies, the
Union2 dataset on Supernovae Ia and SDSS DR7 data on luminous red galaxies
(LRG) space distribution. Using the Markov Chain Monte Carlo technique the
marginalized posterior and mean likelihood distributions are computed for the
scalar fields with two different Lagrangians: Klein-Gordon and
Dirac-Born-Infeld ones. The properties of such scalar field models of dark
energy with best fitting parameters and uncertainties of their determination
are also analyzed in the paper.
[23]
oai:arXiv.org:0904.1583 [pdf] - 23234
Perturbed dark energy: classical scalar field versus tachyon
Submitted: 2009-04-09, last modified: 2009-09-17
The evolution of scalar linear perturbations is studied in gauge-invariant
approach for 2-component models with nonrelativistic matter and minimally
coupled scalar fields, the potentials of which were constructed for either
constant dark energy equation of state (EoS) parameter $w$ or its adiabatic
sound speed $c_a^2$ equal to zero. The numerical solutions show that such
fields are almost smoothed out on subhorizon scales. However they cause the
scale dependent suppression of the nonrelativistic mater density perturbations
and the decay of gravitational potential, which can be used for choice of the
dark energy model. We discuss 2 types of the Lagrangian: classical and
tachyonic ones. As our results show, the fields with $w=const$ are almost
indistinguishable, while for fields with $c_a^2=0$ the difference of dark
energy effective sound speeds $c_s^2$, which is caused by the shape of
Lagrangian, affects the evolution of perturbations significantly. We present
also the transfer functions for both components.
[24]
oai:arXiv.org:0808.2098 [pdf] - 15414
Evolution of scalar perturbations in cosmology with quintessential dark
energy
Submitted: 2008-08-15, last modified: 2009-08-10
The dynamics of expansion of the Universe and evolution of scalar
perturbations are studied for the quintessential scalar fields $Q$ with the
classical Lagrangian satisfying the additional condition $w=const$ or
$c^2_a=0$. Both quintessential fields are studied for the same cosmological
model. The systems of evolutionary equations for gauge-invariant perturbations
of metrics, matter and quintessence have been analysed analyticaly for the
early stage of the Universe life and numerically up to the present epoch. It is
shown that amplitudes of the adiabatic matter density perturbations grow like
in $\Lambda$CDM-model but time dependences of amplitudes of the quintessence
perturbations are more varied: gauge-invariant variables $D_g^{(Q)}$ and
$D_s^{(Q)}$ decay from initial constant value after entering the particle
horizon while $D^{(Q)}$ and $V^{(Q)}$ grow at the early stage before entering
the horizon and decay after that -- in the quintessence-dominated epoch, when
gravitational potential starts to decay -- so, that at the current epoch they
are approximately two orders lower than matter ones at the supercluster scale.
Therefore, at the subhorizon scales the quintessential scalar fields are
smoothed out while the matter clusters. It is also shown that both
quintessential scalar fields suppress the growth of matter density
perturbations and the amplitude of gravitational potential. In these
QCDM-models -- unlike $\Lambda$CDM ones -- such suppression is scale dependent
and more visible for the quintessence with $c^2_a=0$.
[25]
oai:arXiv.org:0809.3349 [pdf] - 1000938
Large-scale structure formation in cosmology with classical and
tachyonic scalar fields
Submitted: 2008-09-19, last modified: 2008-10-20
The evolution of scalar perturbations is studied for 2-component
(non-relativistic matter and dark energy) cosmological models at the linear and
non-linear stages. The dark energy is assumed to be the scalar field with
either classical or tachyonic Lagrangian and constant equation-of-state
parameter w. The fields and potentials were reconstructed for the set of
cosmological parameters derived from observations. The comparison of the
calculated within these models and experimental large-scale structure
characteristics is made. It is shown that for w=const such analysis can't
remove the existing degeneracy of the dark energy models.
[26]
oai:arXiv.org:0805.3782 [pdf] - 12923
Scalar Field as Dark Energy Accelerating Expansion of the Universe
Submitted: 2008-05-24, last modified: 2008-05-27
The features of a homogeneous scalar field $\phi$ with classical Lagrangian
$L=\phi_{;i}\phi^{;i}/2-V(\phi)$ and tachyon field Lagrangian
$L=-V(\phi)\sqrt{1-\phi_{;i}\phi^{;i}}$ causing the observable accelerated
expansion of the Universe are analyzed. The models with constant
equation-of-state parameter $w_{de}=p_{de}/\rho_{de}<-1/3$ are studied. For
both cases the fields $\phi(a)$ and potentials $V(a)$ are reconstucted for the
parameters of cosmological model of the Universe derived from the observations.
The effect of rolling down of the potential $V(\phi)$ to minimum is shown.
