Normalized to: Sembay, S.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1705.00688 [pdf] - 1583007
Gaia Data Release 1. Testing the parallaxes with local Cepheids and RR
Lyrae stars
Gaia Collaboration;
Clementini, G.;
Eyer, L.;
Ripepi, V.;
Marconi, M.;
Muraveva, T.;
Garofalo, A.;
Sarro, L. M.;
Palmer, M.;
Luri, X.;
Molinaro, R.;
Rimoldini, L.;
Szabados, L.;
Musella, I.;
Anderson, R. I.;
Prusti, T.;
de Bruijne, J. H. J.;
Brown, A. G. A.;
Vallenari, A.;
Babusiaux, C.;
Bailer-Jones, C. A. L.;
Bastian, U.;
Biermann, M.;
Evans, D. W.;
Jansen, F.;
Jordi, C.;
Klioner, S. A.;
Lammers, U.;
Lindegren, L.;
Mignard, F.;
Panem, C.;
Pourbaix, D.;
Randich, S.;
Sartoretti, P.;
Siddiqui, H. I.;
Soubiran, C.;
Valette, V.;
van Leeuwen, F.;
Walton, N. A.;
Aerts, C.;
Arenou, F.;
Cropper, M.;
Drimmel, R.;
Høg, E.;
Katz, D.;
Lattanzi, M. G.;
O'Mullane, W.;
Grebel, E. K.;
Holland, A. D.;
Huc, C.;
Passot, X.;
Perryman, M.;
Bramante, L.;
Cacciari, C.;
Castañeda, J.;
Chaoul, L.;
Cheek, N.;
De Angeli, F.;
Fabricius, C.;
Guerra, R.;
Hernández, J.;
Jean-Azntoine-Piccolo, A.;
Masana, E.;
Messineo, R.;
Mowlavi, N.;
Nienartowicz, K.;
Ordóñez-Blanco, D.;
Panuzzo, P.;
Portell, J.;
Richards, P. J.;
Riello, M.;
Seabroke, G. M.;
Tanga, P.;
Thévenin, F.;
Torra, J.;
Els, S. G.;
Gracia-Abril, G.;
Comoretto, G.;
Garcia-Reinaldos, M.;
Lock, T.;
Mercier, E.;
Altmann, M.;
Andrae, R.;
Astraatmadja, T. L.;
Bellas-Velidis, I.;
Benson, K.;
Berthier, J.;
Blomme, R.;
Busso, G.;
Carry, B.;
Cellino, A.;
Cowell, S.;
Creevey, O.;
Cuypers, J.;
Davidson, M.;
De Ridder, J.;
de Torres, A.;
Delchambre, L.;
Dell'Oro, A.;
Ducourant, C.;
Frémat, Y.;
García-Torres, M.;
Gosset, E.;
Halbwachs, J. -L.;
Hambly, N. C.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Hauser, M.;
Hestroffer, D.;
Hodgkin, S. T.;
Huckle, H. E.;
Hutton, A.;
Jasniewicz, G.;
Jordan, S.;
Kontizas, M.;
Korn, A. J.;
Lanzafame, A. C.;
Manteiga, M.;
Moitinho, A.;
Muinonen, K.;
Osinde, J.;
Pancino, E.;
Pauwels, T.;
Petit, J. -M.;
Recio-Blanco, A.;
Robin, A. C.;
Siopis, C.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, K. W.;
Sozzetti, A.;
Thuillot, W.;
van Reeven, W.;
Viala, Y.;
Abbas, U.;
Aramburu, A. Abreu;
Accart, S.;
Aguado, J. J.;
Allan, P. M.;
Allasia, W.;
Altavilla, G.;
Álvarez, M. A.;
Alves, J.;
Andrei, A. H.;
Varela, E. Anglada;
Antiche, E.;
Antoja, T.;
Antón, S.;
Arcay, B.;
Bach, N.;
Baker, S. G.;
Balaguer-Núñez, L.;
Barache, C.;
Barata, C.;
Barbier, A.;
Barblan, F.;
Navascués, D. Barrado y;
Barros, M.;
Barstow, M. A.;
Becciani, U.;
Bellazzini, M.;
García, A. Bello;
Belokurov, V.;
Bendjoya, P.;
Berihuete, A.;
Bianchi, L.;
Bienaymé, O.;
Billebaud, F.;
Blagorodnova, N.;
Blanco-Cuaresma, S.;
Boch, T.;
Bombrun, A.;
Borrachero, R.;
Bouquillon, S.;
Bourda, G.;
Bouy, H.;
Bragaglia, A.;
Breddels, M. A.;
Brouillet, N.;
Brüsemeister, T.;
Bucciarelli, B.;
Burgess, P.;
Burgon, R.;
Burlacu, A.;
Busonero, D.;
Buzzi, R.;
Caffau, E.;
Cambras, J.;
Campbell, H.;
Cancelliere, R.;
Cantat-Gaudin, T.;
Carlucci, T.;
Carrasco, J. M.;
Castellani, M.;
Charlot, P.;
Charnas, J.;
Chiavassa, A.;
Clotet, M.;
Cocozza, G.;
Collins, R. S.;
Costigan, G.;
Crifo, F.;
Cross, N. J. G.;
Crosta, M.;
Crowley, C.;
Dafonte, C.;
Damerdji, Y.;
Dapergolas, A.;
David, P.;
David, M.;
De Cat, P.;
de Felice, F.;
de Laverny, P.;
De Luise, F.;
De March, R.;
de Souza, R.;
Debosscher, J.;
del Pozo, E.;
Delbo, M.;
Delgado, A.;
Delgado, H. E.;
Di Matteo, P.;
Diakite, S.;
Distefano, E.;
Dolding, C.;
Anjos, S. Dos;
Drazinos, P.;
Durán, J.;
Dzigan, Y.;
Edvardsson, B.;
Enke, H.;
Evans, N. W.;
Bontemps, G. Eynard;
Fabre, C.;
Fabrizio, M.;
Faigler, S.;
Falcão, A. J.;
Casas, M. Farràs;
Federici, L.;
Fedorets, G.;
Fernández-Hernánde, J.;
Fernique, P.;
Fienga, A.;
Figueras, F.;
Filippi, F.;
Findeisen, K.;
Fonti, A.;
Fouesneau, M.;
Fraile, E.;
Fraser, M.;
Fuchs, J.;
Gai, M.;
Galleti, S.;
Galluccio, L.;
Garabato, D.;
García-Sedano, F.;
Garralda, N.;
Gavras, P.;
Gerssen, J.;
Geyer, R.;
Gilmore, G.;
Girona, S.;
Giuffrida, G.;
Gomes, M.;
González-Marcos, A.;
González-Núñez, J.;
González-Vidal, J. J.;
Granvik, M.;
Guerrier, A.;
Guillout, P.;
Guiraud, J.;
Gúrpide, A.;
Gutiérrez-Sánchez, R.;
Guy, L. P.;
Haigron, R.;
Hatzidimitriou, D.;
Haywood, M.;
Heiter, U.;
Helmi, A.;
Hobbs, D.;
Hofmann, W.;
Holl, B.;
Holland, G.;
Hunt, J. A. S.;
Hypki, A.;
Icardi, V.;
Irwin, M.;
de Fombelle, G. Jevardat;
Jofré, P.;
Jonker, P. G.;
Jorissen, A.;
Julbe, F.;
Karampelas, A.;
Kochoska, A.;
Kohley, R.;
Kolenberg, K.;
Kontizas, E.;
Koposov, S. E.;
Kordopatis, G.;
Koubsky, P.;
Krone-Martins, A.;
Kudryashova, M.;
Kull, I.;
Bachchan, R. K.;
Lacoste-Seris, F.;
Lanza, A. F.;
Lavigne, J. -B.;
Poncin-Lafitte, C. Le;
Lebreton, Y.;
Lebzelter, T.;
Leccia, S.;
Leclerc, N.;
Lecoeur-Taibi, I.;
Lemaitre, V.;
Lenhardt, H.;
Leroux, F.;
Liao, S.;
Licata, E.;
Lindstrøm, H. E. P.;
Lister, T. A.;
Livanou, E.;
Lobel, A.;
Löffler, W.;
López, M.;
Lorenz, D.;
MacDonald, I.;
Fernandes, T. Magalhães;
Managau, S.;
Mann, R. G.;
Mantelet, G.;
Marchal, O.;
Marchant, J. M.;
Marinoni, S.;
Marrese, P. M.;
Marschalkó, G.;
Marshall, D. J.;
Martín-Fleitas, J. M.;
Martino, M.;
Mary, N.;
Matijevič, G.;
Mazeh, T.;
McMillan, P. J.;
Messina, S.;
Michalik, D.;
Millar, N. R.;
Miranda, B. M. H.;
Molina, D.;
Molinaro, M.;
Molnár, L.;
Moniez, M.;
Montegriffo, P.;
Mor, R.;
Mora, A.;
Morbidelli, R.;
Morel, T.;
Morgenthaler, S.;
Morris, D.;
Mulone, A. F.;
Narbonne, J.;
Nelemans, G.;
Nicastro, L.;
Noval, L.;
Ordénovic, C.;
Ordieres-Meré, J.;
Osborne, P.;
Pagani, C.;
Pagano, I.;
Pailler, F.;
Palacin, H.;
Palaversa, L.;
Parsons, P.;
Pecoraro, M.;
Pedrosa, R.;
Pentikäinen, H.;
Pichon, B.;
Piersimoni, A. M.;
Pineau, F. -X.;
Plachy, E.;
Plum, G.;
Poujoulet, E.;
Prša, A.;
Pulone, L.;
Ragaini, S.;
Rago, S.;
Rambaux, N.;
Ramos-Lerate, M.;
Ranalli, P.;
Rauw, G.;
Read, A.;
Regibo, S.;
Reylé, C.;
Ribeiro, R. A.;
Riva, A.;
Rixon, G.;
Roelens, M.;
Romero-Gómez, M.;
Rowell, N.;
Royer, F.;
Ruiz-Dern, L.;
Sadowski, G.;
Sellés, T. Sagristà;
Sahlmann, J.;
Salgado, J.;
Salguero, E.;
Sarasso, M.;
Savietto, H.;
Schultheis, M.;
Sciacca, E.;
Segol, M.;
Segovia, J. C.;
Segransan, D.;
Shih, I-C.;
Smareglia, R.;
Smart, R. L.;
Solano, E.;
Solitro, F.;
Sordo, R.;
Nieto, S. Soria;
Souchay, J.;
Spagna, A.;
Spoto, F.;
Stampa, U.;
Steele, I. A.;
Steidelmüller, H.;
Stephenson, C. A.;
Stoev, H.;
Suess, F. F.;
Süveges, M.;
Surdej, J.;
Szegedi-Elek, E.;
Tapiador, D.;
Taris, F.;
Tauran, G.;
Taylor, M. B.;
Teixeira, R.;
Terrett, D.;
Tingley, B.;
Trager, S. C.;
Turon, C.;
Ulla, A.;
Utrilla, E.;
Valentini, G.;
van Elteren, A.;
Van Hemelryck, E.;
van Leeuwen, M.;
Varadi, M.;
Vecchiato, A.;
Veljanoski, J.;
Via, T.;
Vicente, D.;
Vogt, S.;
Voss, H.;
Votruba, V.;
Voutsinas, S.;
Walmsley, G.;
Weiler, M.;
Weingrill, K.;
Wevers, T.;
Wyrzykowski, Ł.;
Yoldas, A.;
Žerjal, M.;
Zucker, S.;
Zurbach, C.;
Zwitter, T.;
Alecu, A.;
Allen, M.;
Prieto, C. Allende;
Amorim, A.;
Anglada-Escudé, G.;
Arsenijevic, V.;
Azaz, S.;
Balm, P.;
Beck, M.;
Bernstein, H. -H.;
Bigot, L.;
Bijaoui, A.;
Blasco, C.;
Bonfigli, M.;
Bono, G.;
Boudreault, S.;
Bressan, A.;
Brown, S.;
Brunet, P. -M.;
Bunclark, P.;
Buonanno, R.;
Butkevich, A. G.;
Carret, C.;
Carrion, C.;
Chemin, L.;
Chéreau, F.;
Corcione, L.;
Darmigny, E.;
de Boer, K. S.;
de Teodoro, P.;
de Zeeuw, P. T.;
Luche, C. Delle;
Domingues, C. D.;
Dubath, P.;
Fodor, F.;
Frézouls, B.;
Fries, A.;
Fustes, D.;
Fyfe, D.;
Gallardo, E.;
Gallegos, J.;
Gardiol, D.;
Gebran, M.;
Gomboc, A.;
Gómez, A.;
Grux, E.;
Gueguen, A.;
Heyrovsky, A.;
Hoar, J.;
Iannicola, G.;
Parache, Y. Isasi;
Janotto, A. -M.;
Joliet, E.;
Jonckheere, A.;
Keil, R.;
Kim, D. -W.;
Klagyivik, P.;
Klar, J.;
Knude, J.;
Kochukhov, O.;
Kolka, I.;
Kos, J.;
Kutka, A.;
Lainey, V.;
LeBouquin, D.;
Liu, C.;
Loreggia, D.;
Makarov, V. V.;
Marseille, M. G.;
Martayan, C.;
Martinez-Rubi, O.;
Massart, B.;
Meynadier, F.;
Mignot, S.;
Munari, U.;
Nguyen, A. -T.;
Nordlander, T.;
O'Flaherty, K. S.;
Ocvirk, P.;
Sanz, A. Olias;
Ortiz, P.;
Osorio, J.;
Oszkiewicz, D.;
Ouzounis, A.;
Park, P.;
Pasquato, E.;
Peltzer, C.;
Peralta, J.;
Péturaud, F.;
Pieniluoma, T.;
Pigozzi, E.;
Poels, J.;
Prat, G.;
Prod'homme, T.;
Raison, F.;
Rebordao, J. M.;
Risquez, D.;
Rocca-Volmerange, B.;
Rosen, S.;
Ruiz-Fuertes, M. I.;
Russo, F.;
Sembay, S.;
Vizcaino, I. Serraller;
Short, A.;
Siebert, A.;
Silva, H.;
Sinachopoulos, D.;
Slezak, E.;
Soffel, M.;
Sosnowska, D.;
Straižys, V.;
ter Linden, M.;
Terrell, D.;
Theil, S.;
Tiede, C.;
Troisi, L.;
Tsalmantza, P.;
Tur, D.;
Vaccari, M.;
Vachier, F.;
Valles, P.;
Van Hamme, W.;
Veltz, L.;
Virtanen, J.;
Wallut, J. -M.;
Wichmann, R.;
Wilkinson, M. I.;
Ziaeepour, H.;
Zschocke, S.
Submitted: 2017-05-01
Parallaxes for 331 classical Cepheids, 31 Type II Cepheids and 364 RR Lyrae
stars in common between Gaia and the Hipparcos and Tycho-2 catalogues are
published in Gaia Data Release 1 (DR1) as part of the Tycho-Gaia Astrometric
Solution (TGAS). In order to test these first parallax measurements of the
primary standard candles of the cosmological distance ladder, that involve
astrometry collected by Gaia during the initial 14 months of science operation,
we compared them with literature estimates and derived new period-luminosity
($PL$), period-Wesenheit ($PW$) relations for classical and Type II Cepheids
and infrared $PL$, $PL$-metallicity ($PLZ$) and optical luminosity-metallicity
($M_V$-[Fe/H]) relations for the RR Lyrae stars, with zero points based on
TGAS. The new relations were computed using multi-band
($V,I,J,K_{\mathrm{s}},W_{1}$) photometry and spectroscopic metal abundances
available in the literature, and applying three alternative approaches: (i) by
linear least squares fitting the absolute magnitudes inferred from direct
transformation of the TGAS parallaxes, (ii) by adopting astrometric-based
luminosities, and (iii) using a Bayesian fitting approach. TGAS parallaxes
bring a significant added value to the previous Hipparcos estimates. The
relations presented in this paper represent first Gaia-calibrated relations and
form a "work-in-progress" milestone report in the wait for Gaia-only parallaxes
of which a first solution will become available with Gaia's Data Release 2
(DR2) in 2018.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1703.01131 [pdf] - 1567701
Gaia Data Release 1. Open cluster astrometry: performance, limitations,
and future prospects
Gaia Collaboration;
van Leeuwen, F.;
Vallenari, A.;
Jordi, C.;
Lindegren, L.;
Bastian, U.;
Prusti, T.;
de Bruijne, J. H. J.;
Brown, A. G. A.;
Babusiaux, C.;
Bailer-Jones, C. A. L.;
Biermann, M.;
Evans, D. W.;
Eyer, L.;
Jansen, F.;
Klioner, S. A.;
Lammers, U.;
Luri, X.;
Mignard, F.;
Panem, C.;
Pourbaix, D.;
Randich, S.;
Sartoretti, P.;
Siddiqui, H. I.;
Soubiran, C.;
Valette, V.;
Walton, N. A.;
Aerts, C.;
Arenou, F.;
Cropper, M.;
Drimmel, R.;
Høg, E.;
Katz, D.;
Lattanzi, M. G.;
O'Mullane, W.;
Grebel, E. K.;
Holland, A. D.;
Huc, C.;
Passot, X.;
Perryman, M.;
Bramante, L.;
Cacciari, C.;
Castañeda, J.;
Chaoul, L.;
Cheek, N.;
De Angeli, F.;
Fabricius, C.;
Guerra, R.;
Hernández, J.;
Jean-Antoine-Piccolo, A.;
Masana, E.;
Messineo, R.;
Mowlavi, N.;
Nienartowicz, K.;
Ordóñez-Blanco, D.;
Panuzzo, P.;
Portell, J.;
Richards, P. J.;
Riello, M.;
Seabroke, G. M.;
Tanga, P.;
Thévenin, F.;
Torra, J.;
Els, S. G.;
Gracia-Abril, G.;
Comoretto, G.;
Garcia-Reinaldos, M.;
Lock, T.;
Mercier, E.;
Altmann, M.;
Andrae, R.;
Astraatmadja, T. L.;
Bellas-Velidis, I.;
Benson, K.;
Berthier, J.;
Blomme, R.;
Busso, G.;
Carry, B.;
Cellino, A.;
Clementini, G.;
Cowell, S.;
Creevey, O.;
Cuypers, J.;
Davidson, M.;
De Ridder, J.;
de Torres, A.;
Delchambre, L.;
Dell'Oro, A.;
Ducourant, C.;
Frémat, Y.;
García-Torres, M.;
Gosset, E.;
Halbwachs, J. -L.;
Hambly, N. C.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Hauser, M.;
Hestroffer, D.;
Hodgkin, S. T.;
Huckle, H. E.;
Hutton, A.;
Jasniewicz, G.;
Jordan, S.;
Kontizas, M.;
Korn, A. J.;
Lanzafame, A. C.;
Manteiga, M.;
Moitinho, A.;
Muinonen, K.;
Osinde, J.;
Pancino, E.;
Pauwels, T.;
Petit, J. -M.;
Recio-Blanco, A.;
Robin, A. C.;
Sarro, L. M.;
Siopis, C.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, K. W.;
Sozzetti, A.;
Thuillot, W.;
van Reeven, W.;
Viala, Y.;
Abbas, U.;
Aramburu, A. Abreu;
Accart, S.;
Aguado, J. J.;
Allan, P. M.;
Allasia, W.;
Altavilla, G.;
Álvarez, M. A.;
Alves, J.;
Anderson, R. I.;
Andrei, A. H.;
Varela, E. Anglada;
Antiche, E.;
Antoja, T.;
Antón, S.;
Arcay, B.;
Bach, N.;
Baker, S. G.;
Balaguer-Núñez, L.;
Barache, C.;
Barata, C.;
Barbier, A.;
Barblan, F.;
Navascués, D. Barrado y;
Barros, M.;
Barstow, M. A.;
Becciani, U.;
Bellazzini, M.;
García, A. Bello;
Belokurov, V.;
Bendjoya, P.;
Berihuete, A.;
Bianchi, L.;
Bienaymé, O.;
Billebaud, F.;
Blagorodnova, N.;
Blanco-Cuaresma, S.;
Boch, T.;
Bombrun, A.;
Borrachero, R.;
Bouquillon, S.;
Bourda, G.;
Bouy, H.;
Bragaglia, A.;
Breddels, M. A.;
Brouillet, N.;
Brüsemeister, T.;
Bucciarelli, B.;
Burgess, P.;
Burgon, R.;
Burlacu, A.;
Busonero, D.;
Buzzi, R.;
Caffau, E.;
Cambras, J.;
Campbell, H.;
Cancelliere, R.;
Cantat-Gaudin, T.;
Carlucci, T.;
Carrasco, J. M.;
Castellani, M.;
Charlot, P.;
Charnas, J.;
Chiavassa, A.;
Clotet, M.;
Cocozza, G.;
Collins, R. S.;
Costigan, G.;
Crifo, F.;
Cross, N. J. G.;
Crosta, M.;
Crowley, C.;
Dafonte, C.;
Damerdji, Y.;
Dapergolas, A.;
David, P.;
David, M.;
De Cat, P.;
de Felice, F.;
de Laverny, P.;
De Luise, F.;
De March, R.;
de Martino, D.;
de Souza, R.;
Debosscher, J.;
del Pozo, E.;
Delbo, M.;
Delgado, A.;
Delgado, H. E.;
Di Matteo, P.;
Diakite, S.;
Distefano, E.;
Dolding, C.;
Anjos, S. Dos;
Drazinos, P.;
Durán, J.;
Dzigan, Y.;
Edvardsson, B.;
Enke, H.;
Evans, N. W.;
Bontemps, G. Eynard;
Fabre, C.;
Fabrizio, M.;
Faigler, S.;
Falcão, A. J.;
Casas, M. Farràs;
Federici, L.;
Fedorets, G.;
Fernández-Hernández, J.;
Fernique, P.;
Fienga, A.;
Figueras, F.;
Filippi, F.;
Findeisen, K.;
Fonti, A.;
Fouesneau, M.;
Fraile, E.;
Fraser, M.;
Fuchs, J.;
Gai, M.;
Galleti, S.;
Galluccio, L.;
Garabato, D.;
García-Sedano, F.;
Garofalo, A.;
Garralda, N.;
Gavras, P.;
Gerssen, J.;
Geyer, R.;
Gilmore, G.;
Girona, S.;
Giuffrida, G.;
Gomes, M.;
González-Marcos, A.;
González-Núñez, J.;
González-Vidal, J. J.;
Granvik, M.;
Guerrier, A.;
Guillout, P.;
Guiraud, J.;
Gúrpide, A.;
Gutiérrez-Sánchez, R.;
Guy, L. P.;
Haigron, R.;
Hatzidimitriou, D.;
Haywood, M.;
Heiter, U.;
Helmi, A.;
Hobbs, D.;
Hofmann, W.;
Holl, B.;
Holland, G.;
Hunt, J. A. S.;
Hypki, A.;
Icardi, V.;
Irwin, M.;
de Fombelle, G. Jevardat;
Jofré, P.;
Jonker, P. G.;
Jorissen, A.;
Julbe, F.;
Karampelas, A.;
Kochoska, A.;
Kohley, R.;
Kolenberg, K.;
Kontizas, E.;
Koposov, S. E.;
Kordopatis, G.;
Koubsky, P.;
Krone-Martins, A.;
Kudryashova, M.;
Kull, I.;
Bachchan, R. K.;
Lacoste-Seris, F.;
Lanza, A. F.;
Lavigne, J. -B.;
Poncin-Lafitte, C. Le;
Lebreton, Y.;
Lebzelter, T.;
Leccia, S.;
Leclerc, N.;
Lecoeur-Taibi, I.;
Lemaitre, V.;
Lenhardt, H.;
Leroux, F.;
Liao, S.;
Licata, E.;
Lindstrøm, H. E. P.;
Lister, T. A.;
Livanou, E.;
Lobel, A.;
Löffer, W.;
López, M.;
Lorenz, D.;
MacDonald, I.;
Fernandes, T. Magalhães;
Managau, S.;
Mann, R. G.;
Mantelet, G.;
Marchal, O.;
Marchant, J. M.;
Marconi, M.;
Marinoni, S.;
Marrese, P. M.;
Marschalkó, G.;
Marshall, D. J.;
Martín-Fleitas, J. M.;
Martino, M.;
Mary, N.;
Matijevič, G.;
Mazeh, T.;
McMillan, P. J.;
Messina, S.;
Michalik, D.;
Millar, N. R.;
Miranda, B. M. H.;
Molina, D.;
Molinaro, R.;
Molinaro, M.;
Molnár, L.;
Moniez, M.;
Montegrio, P.;
Mor, R.;
Mora, A.;
Morbidelli, R.;
Morel, T.;
Morgenthaler, S.;
Morris, D.;
Mulone, A. F.;
Muraveva, T.;
Musella, I.;
Narbonne, J.;
Nelemans, G.;
Nicastro, L.;
Noval, L.;
Ordénovic, C.;
Ordieres-Meré, J.;
Osborne, P.;
Pagani, C.;
Pagano, I.;
Pailler, F.;
Palacin, H.;
Palaversa, L.;
Parsons, P.;
Pecoraro, M.;
Pedrosa, R.;
Pentikäinen, H.;
Pichon, B.;
Piersimoni, A. M.;
Pineau, F. -X.;
Plachy, E.;
Plum, G.;
Poujoulet, E.;
Prša, A.;
Pulone, L.;
Ragaini, S.;
Rago, S.;
Rambaux, N.;
Ramos-Lerate, M.;
Ranalli, P.;
Rauw, G.;
Read, A.;
Regibo, S.;
Reylé, C.;
Ribeiro, R. A.;
Rimoldini, L.;
Ripepi, V.;
Riva, A.;
Rixon, G.;
Roelens, M.;
Romero-Gómez, M.;
Rowell, N.;
Royer, F.;
Ruiz-Dern, L.;
Sadowski, G.;
Sellés, T. Sagristà;
Sahlmann, J.;
Salgado, J.;
Salguero, E.;
Sarasso, M.;
Savietto, H.;
Schultheis, M.;
Sciacca, E.;
Segol, M.;
Segovia, J. C.;
Segransan, D.;
Shih, I-C.;
Smareglia, R.;
Smart, R. L.;
Solano, E.;
Solitro, F.;
Sordo, R.;
Nieto, S. Soria;
Souchay, J.;
Spagna, A.;
Spoto, F.;
Stampa, U.;
Steele, I. A.;
Steidelmüller, H.;
Stephenson, C. A.;
Stoev, H.;
Suess, F. F.;
Süveges, M.;
Surdej, J.;
Szabados, L.;
Szegedi-Elek, E.;
Tapiador, D.;
Taris, F.;
Tauran, G.;
Taylor, M. B.;
Teixeira, R.;
Terrett, D.;
Tingley, B.;
Trager, S. C.;
Turon, C.;
Ulla, A.;
Utrilla, E.;
Valentini, G.;
van Elteren, A.;
Van Hemelryck, E.;
van Leeuwen, M.;
Varadi, M.;
Vecchiato, A.;
Veljanoski, J.;
Via, T.;
Vicente, D.;
Vogt, S.;
Voss, H.;
Votruba, V.;
Voutsinas, S.;
Walmsley, G.;
Weiler, M.;
Weingril, K.;
Wevers, T.;
Wyrzykowski, Ł.;
Yoldas, A.;
Žerjal, M.;
Zucker, S.;
Zurbach, C.;
Zwitter, T.;
Alecu, A.;
Allen, M.;
Prieto, C. Allende;
Amorim, A.;
Anglada-Escudé, G.;
Arsenijevic, V.;
Azaz, S.;
Balm, P.;
Beck, M.;
Bernsteiny, H. -H.;
Bigot, L.;
Bijaoui, A.;
Blasco, C.;
Bonfigli, M.;
Bono, G.;
Boudreault, S.;
Bressan, A.;
Brown, S.;
Brunet, P. -M.;
Bunclarky, P.;
Buonanno, R.;
Butkevich, A. G.;
Carret, C.;
Carrion, C.;
Chemin, L.;
Chéreau, F.;
Corcione, L.;
Darmigny, E.;
de Boer, K. S.;
de Teodoro, P.;
de Zeeuw, P. T.;
Luche, C. Delle;
Domingues, C. D.;
Dubath, P.;
Fodor, F.;
Frézouls, B.;
Fries, A.;
Fustes, D.;
Fyfe, D.;
Gallardo, E.;
Gallegos, J.;
Gardio, D.;
Gebran, M.;
Gomboc, A.;
Gómez, A.;
Grux, E.;
Gueguen, A.;
Heyrovsky, A.;
Hoar, J.;
Iannicola, G.;
Parache, Y. Isasi;
Janotto, A. -M.;
Joliet, E.;
Jonckheere, A.;
Keil, R.;
Kim, D. -W.;
Klagyivik, P.;
Klar, J.;
Knude, J.;
Kochukhov, O.;
Kolka, I.;
Kos, J.;
Kutka, A.;
Lainey, V.;
LeBouquin, D.;
Liu, C.;
Loreggia, D.;
Makarov, V. V.;
Marseille, M. G.;
Martayan, C.;
Martinez-Rubi, O.;
Massart, B.;
Meynadier, F.;
Mignot, S.;
Munari, U.;
Nguyen, A. -T.;
Nordlander, T.;
O'Flaherty, K. S.;
Ocvirk, P.;
Sanz, A. Olias;
Ortiz, P.;
Osorio, J.;
Oszkiewicz, D.;
Ouzounis, A.;
Palmer, M.;
Park, P.;
Pasquato, E.;
Peltzer, C.;
Peralta, J.;
Péturaud, F.;
Pieniluoma, T.;
Pigozzi, E.;
Poelsy, J.;
Prat, G.;
Prod'homme, T.;
Raison, F.;
Rebordao, J. M.;
Risquez, D.;
Rocca-Volmerange, B.;
Rosen, S.;
Ruiz-Fuertes, M. I.;
Russo, F.;
Sembay, S.;
Vizcaino, I. Serraller;
Short, A.;
Siebert, A.;
Silva, H.;
Sinachopoulos, D.;
Slezak, E.;
Soffel, M.;
Sosnowska, D.;
Straižys, V.;
ter Linden, M.;
Terrell, D.;
Theil, S.;
Tiede, C.;
Troisi, L.;
Tsalmantza, P.;
Tur, D.;
Vaccari, M.;
Vachier, F.;
Valles, P.;
Van Hamme, W.;
Veltz, L.;
Virtanen, J.;
Wallut, J. -M.;
Wichmann, R.;
Wilkinson, M. I.;
Ziaeepour, H.;
Zschocke, S.
Submitted: 2017-03-03
Context. The first Gaia Data Release contains the Tycho-Gaia Astrometric
Solution (TGAS). This is a subset of about 2 million stars for which, besides
the position and photometry, the proper motion and parallax are calculated
using Hipparcos and Tycho-2 positions in 1991.25 as prior information. Aims. We
investigate the scientific potential and limitations of the TGAS component by
means of the astrometric data for open clusters. Methods. Mean cluster parallax
and proper motion values are derived taking into account the error correlations
within the astrometric solutions for individual stars, an estimate of the
internal velocity dispersion in the cluster, and, where relevant, the effects
of the depth of the cluster along the line of sight. Internal consistency of
the TGAS data is assessed. Results. Values given for standard uncertainties are
still inaccurate and may lead to unrealistic unit-weight standard deviations of
least squares solutions for cluster parameters. Reconstructed mean cluster
parallax and proper motion values are generally in very good agreement with
earlier Hipparcos-based determination, although the Gaia mean parallax for the
Pleiades is a significant exception. We have no current explanation for that
discrepancy. Most clusters are observed to extend to nearly 15 pc from the
cluster centre, and it will be up to future Gaia releases to establish whether
those potential cluster-member stars are still dynamically bound to the
clusters. Conclusions. The Gaia DR1 provides the means to examine open clusters
far beyond their more easily visible cores, and can provide membership
assessments based on proper motions and parallaxes. A combined HR diagram shows
the same features as observed before using the Hipparcos data, with clearly
increased luminosities for older A and F dwarfs.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1607.03069 [pdf] - 1530997
SNR 1E 0102.2-7219 as an X-ray Calibration Standard in the 0.5-1.0 keV
Bandpass and Its Application to the CCD Instruments aboard Chandra, Suzaku,
Swift and XMM-Newton
Submitted: 2016-07-11
We desire a simple comparison of the absolute effective areas of the current
generation of CCD instruments onboard the following observatories: Chandra
ACIS-S3, XMM-Newton (EPIC-MOS and EPIC-pn), Suzaku XIS, and Swift XRT and a
straightforward comparison of the time-dependent response of these instruments
across their respective mission lifetimes. We have been using 1E 0102.2-7219,
the brightest supernova remnant in the Small Magellanic Cloud, to evaluate and
modify the response models of these instruments. 1E 0102.2-7219 has strong
lines of O, Ne, and Mg below 1.5 keV and little or no Fe emission to complicate
the spectrum. As part of the activities of the International Astronomical
Consortium for High Energy Calibration (IACHEC), we have developed a standard
spectral model for 1E 0102.2-7219. The model is empirical in that it includes
Gaussians for the identified lines, an absorption component in the Galaxy,
another absorption component in the SMC, and two thermal continuum components.
In our fits, the model is highly constrained in that only the normalizations of
the four brightest lines/line complexes (the O vii He$\alpha$ triplet, O viii
Ly$\alpha$ line, the Ne ix He$\alpha$ triplet, and the Ne x Ly$\alpha$ line)
and an overall normalization are allowed to vary. We have examined these
measured line fluxes as a function of time for each instrument after applying
the most recent calibrations that account for the time-dependent response of
each instrument. We perform our effective area comparison with representative,
early mission data when the radiation damage and contamination layers were at a
minimum. We find that the measured fluxes of these lines generally agree to
within +/-10% for all instruments, with 38 of our 48 fitted normalizations
within +/-10% of the IACHEC model value.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1412.6233 [pdf] - 911158
Summary of the 2014 IACHEC Meeting
Submitted: 2014-12-19
We present the main results of the 9th meeting of the International
Astronomical Consortium for High Energy Calibration (IACHEC), held in Warrenton
(Virginia) in May 2014. Over 50 scientists directly involved in the calibration
of operational and future high-energy missions gathered during 3.5 days to
discuss the status of the X-ray payloads inter-calibration, as well as possible
ways to improve it. Sect.2 of this Report summarises our current understanding
of the energy-dependent inter-calibration status.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1403.2436 [pdf] - 867066
Potential solar axion signatures in X-ray observations with the
XMM-Newton observatory
Submitted: 2014-03-10, last modified: 2014-09-13
The soft X-ray flux produced by solar axions in the Earth's magnetic field is
evaluated in the context of ESA's XMM-Newton observatory. Recent calculations
of the scattering of axion-conversion X-rays suggest that the sunward
magnetosphere could be an observable source of 0.2-10 keV photons. For
XMM-Newton, any conversion X-ray intensity will be seasonally modulated by
virtue of the changing visibility of the sunward magnetic field region. A
simple model of the geomagnetic field is combined with the ephemeris of
XMM-Newton to predict the seasonal variation of the conversion X-ray intensity.
This model is compared with stacked XMM-Newton blank sky datasets from which
point sources have been systematically removed. Remarkably, a seasonally
varying X-ray background signal is observed. The EPIC count rates are in the
ratio of their X-ray grasps, indicating a non-instrumental, external photon
origin, with significances of 11(pn), 4(MOS1) and 5(MOS2) sigma. After
examining the constituent observations spatially, temporally and in terms of
the cosmic X-ray background, we conclude that this variable signal is
consistent with the conversion of solar axions in the Earth's magnetic field.
The spectrum is consistent with a solar axion spectrum dominated by
bremsstrahlung- and Compton-like processes, i.e. axion-electron coupling
dominates over axion-photon coupling and the peak of the axion spectrum is
below 1 keV. A value of 2.2e-22 /GeV is derived for the product of the
axion-photon and axion-electron coupling constants, for an axion mass in the
micro-eV range. Comparisons with limits derived from white dwarf cooling may
not be applicable, as these refer to axions in the 0.01 eV range. Preliminary
results are given of a search for axion-conversion X-ray lines, in particular
the predicted features due to silicon, sulphur and iron in the solar core, and
the 14.4 keV transition line from 57Fe.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1403.3555 [pdf] - 820834
Cross-Calibration of the XMM-Newton EPIC pn & MOS On-Axis Effective
Areas Using 2XMM Sources
Submitted: 2014-03-14
We aim to examine the relative cross-calibration accuracy of the on-axis
effective areas of the XMM-Newton EPIC pn and MOS instruments. Spectra from a
sample of 46 bright, high-count, non-piled-up isolated on-axis point sources
are stacked together, and model residuals are examined to characterize the EPIC
MOS-to-pn inter-calibration. The MOS1-to-pn and MOS2-to-pn results are broadly
very similar. The cameras show the closest agreement below 1 keV, with MOS
excesses over pn of 0-2% (MOS1/pn) and 0-3% (MOS2/pn). Above 3 keV, the MOS/pn
ratio is consistent with energy-independent (or only mildly increasing)
excesses of 7-8% (MOS1/pn) and 5-8% (MOS2/pn). In addition, between 1-2 keV
there is a `silicon bump' - an enhancement at a level of 2-4% (MOS1/pn) and
3-5% (MOS2/pn). Tests suggest that the methods employed here are stable and
robust. The results presented here provide the most accurate cross-calibration
of the effective areas of the XMM-Newton EPIC pn and MOS instruments to date.
They suggest areas of further research where causes of the MOS-to-pn
differences might be found, and allow the potential for corrections to and
possible rectification of the EPIC cameras to be made in the future.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1305.4480 [pdf] - 665310
Summary of the 2013 IACHEC Meeting
Submitted: 2013-05-20
We present the main results of the 8th International Astronomical Consortium
for High Energy Calibration (IACHEC) meeting, held in Theddingworth,
Leicestershire, between March 25 and 28, 2013. Over 50 scientists directly
involved in the calibration of operational and future high-energy missions
gathered during 3.5 days to discuss the status of the X-ray payload
inter-calibration, as well as possible ways to improve it. Sect. 4 of this
Report summarises our current understanding of the energy-dependent
inter-calibration status.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1107.0680 [pdf] - 392451
AXIOM: Advanced X-ray Imaging Of the Magnetosphere
Branduardi-Raymont, G.;
Sembay, S. F.;
Eastwood, J. P.;
Sibeck, D. G.;
Abbey, A.;
Brown, P.;
Carter, J. A.;
Carr, C. M.;
Forsyth, C.;
Kataria, D.;
Kemble, S.;
Milan, S. E.;
Owen, C. J.;
Peacocke, L.;
Read, A. M.;
Coates, A. J.;
Collier, M. R.;
Cowley, S. W. H.;
Fazakerley, A. N.;
Fraser, G. W.;
Jones, G. H.;
Lallement, R.;
Lester, M.;
Porter, F. S.;
Yeoman, T. K.
Submitted: 2011-07-04, last modified: 2011-08-01
Planetary plasma and magnetic field environments can be studied by in situ
measurements or by remote sensing. While the former provide precise information
about plasma behaviour, instabilities and dynamics on local scales, the latter
offers the global view necessary to understand the overall interaction of the
magnetospheric plasma with the solar wind. Here we propose a novel and more
elegant approach employing remote X-ray imaging techniques, which are now
possible thanks to the relatively recent discovery of solar wind charge
exchange X-ray emissions in the vicinity of the Earth's magnetosphere. We
describe how an appropriately designed and located X-ray telescope, supported
by simultaneous in situ measurements of the solar wind, can be used to image
the dayside magnetosphere, magnetosheath and bow shock, with a temporal and
spatial resolution sufficient to address several key outstanding questions
concerning how the solar wind interacts with the Earth's magnetosphere on a
global level. Our studies have led us to propose 'AXIOM: Advanced X-ray Imaging
Of the Magnetosphere', a concept mission using a Vega launcher with a LISA
Pathfinder-type Propulsion Module to place the spacecraft in a Lissajous orbit
around the Earth - Moon L1 point. The model payload consists of an X-ray Wide
Field Imager and an in situ plasma and magnetic field measurement package. This
package comprises sensors designed to measure the bulk properties of the solar
wind and to characterise its minor ion populations which cause charge exchange
emission, and a magnetometer designed to measure the strength and direction of
the solar wind magnetic field. We show simulations that demonstrate how the
proposed X-ray telescope design is capable of imaging the predicted emission
from the dayside magnetosphere with the sensitivity and cadence required to
achieve the science goals of the mission.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:1101.1848 [pdf] - 1051286
Identifying XMM-Newton observations affected by solar wind charge
exchange - Part II
Submitted: 2011-01-10
We wished to analyse a sample of observations from the XMM-Newton Science
Archive to search for evidence of exospheric solar wind charge exchange (SWCX)
emission. We analysed 3012 observations up to and including revolution 1773.
The method employed extends from that of the previously published paper by
these authors on this topic. We detect temporal variability in the diffuse
X-ray background within a narrow low-energy band and contrast this to a
continuum. The low-energy band was chosen to represent the key indicators of
charge exchange emission and the continuum was expected to be free of SWCX.
Approximately 3.4 % of observations studied are affected. We discuss our
results with reference to the XMM-Newton mission. We further investigate
remarkable cases by considering the state of the solar wind and the orientation
of XMM-Newton at the time of these observations. We present a method to
approximate the expected emission from observations, based on given solar wind
parameters taken from an upstream solar wind monitor. We also compare the
incidence of SWCX cases with solar activity. We present a comprehensive study
of the majority of the suitable and publically available XMM-Newton Science
Archive to date, with respect to the occurrence of SWCX enhancements. We
present our SWCX-affected subset of this dataset. The mean exospheric-SWCX flux
observed within this SWCX-affected subset was 15.4 keV cm-2 s-1 sr-1 in the
energy band 0.25 to 2.5 keV. Exospheric SWCX is preferentially detected when
XMM-Newton observes through the subsolar region of the Earth's magnetosheath.
The model developed to estimate the expected emission returns fluxes within a
factor of a few of the observed values in the majority of cases, with a mean
value at 83 %.
[10]
oai:arXiv.org:0911.0897 [pdf] - 1018229
A high charge state Coronal Mass Ejection seen through solar wind charge
exchange emission as detected by XMM-Newton
Submitted: 2009-11-04
We present the analysis of an observation by XMM-Newton that exhibits
strongly variable, low-energy diffuse X-ray line emission. We reason that this
emission is due to localised solar wind charge exchange (SWCX), originating
from a passing cloud of plasma associated with a Coronal Mass Ejection (CME)
interacting with neutrals in the Earth's exosphere. This case of SWCX exhibits
a much richer emission line spectrum in comparison with previous examples of
geocoronal SWCX or in interplanetary space. We show that emission from OVIII is
very prominent in the SWCX spectrum. The observed flux from oxygen ions of 18.9
keV cm-2 s-1 sr-1 is consistent with SWCX resulting from a passing CME. Highly
ionised silicon is also observed in the spectrum, and the presence of highly
charged iron is an additional spectral indicator that we are observing emission
from a CME. We argue that this is the same event detected by the solar wind
monitors ACE and Wind which measured an intense increase in the solar wind flux
due to a CME that had been released from the Sun two days previous to the
XMM-Newton observation.
[11]
oai:arXiv.org:0901.4026 [pdf] - 20678
Statistical evaluation of the flux cross-calibration of the XMM-Newton
EPIC cameras
Submitted: 2009-01-26
The second XMM-Newton serendipitous source catalogue, 2XMM, provides the
ideal data base for performing a statistical evaluation of the flux
cross-calibration of the XMM-Newton European Photon Imaging Cameras (EPIC). We
aim to evaluate the status of the relative flux calibration of the EPIC cameras
on board XMM-Newton (MOS1, MOS2, and pn) and investigate the dependence of the
calibration on energy, position in the field of view of the X-ray detectors,
and lifetime of the mission. We compiled the distribution of flux percentage
differences for large samples of 'good quality' objects detected with at least
two of the EPIC cameras. The mean offset of the fluxes and dispersion of the
distributions was then found by Gaussian fitting. Count rate to flux conversion
was performed with a fixed spectral model. The impact on the results of varying
this model was investigated. Excellent agreement was found between the two EPIC
MOS cameras to better than 4% from 0.2 keV to 12.0 keV. MOS cameras register
7-9% higher flux than pn below 4.5 keV and 10-13% flux excess above 4.5 keV. No
evolution of the flux ratios is seen with time, except at energies below 0.5
keV, where we found a strong decrease in the MOS to pn flux ratio with time.
This effect is known to be due to a gradually degrading MOS redistribution
function. The flux ratios show some dependence on distance from the optical
axis in the sense that the MOS to pn flux excess increases with off-axis angle.
Furthermore, in the 4.5-12.0 keV band there is a strong dependence of the MOS
to pn excess flux on the azimuthal-angle. These results strongly suggest that
the calibration of the Reflection Grating Array (RGA) blocking factors is
incorrect at high energies. Finally, we recommend ways to improve the
calculation of fluxes in future versions of XMM-Newton source catalogues.
[12]
oai:arXiv.org:0807.3624 [pdf] - 14764
Identifying XMM-Newton observations affected by solar wind charge
exchange - Part I
Submitted: 2008-07-23
We describe a method for identifying XMM-Newton observations that have been
affected by Solar Wind Charge Exchange (SWCX) emission and present preliminary
results of previously unidentified cases of such emission within the XMM-Newton
Science Archive. The method is based on detecting temporal variability in the
diffuse X-ray background. We judge the variability of a low energy band, taken
to represent the key indicators of charge exchange emission. We compare this to
the variability of a continuum band, which is expected to be non-varying, even
in the case when SWCX enhancement has occurred. We discuss previously published
results with SWCX contamination that have been tested with the above method. We
present a selection of observations that we consider to show previously
unpublished SWCX enhancements, and further investigate these observations for
correlation with data from the solar wind observatory, ACE. We also consider
the geometry and viewing angle of XMM-Newton at the time of the observation to
examine the origin of the charge exchange emission, whether it be from
interactions with geocoronal neutrals in Earth's magnetosheath or from the
heliosphere and heliopause.
[13]
oai:arXiv.org:0807.2176 [pdf] - 14491
The SMC SNR 1E0102.2-7219 as a Calibration Standard for X-ray Astronomy
in the 0.3-2.5 keV Bandpass
Plucinsky, Paul P.;
Haberl, Frank;
Dewey, Daniel;
Beardmore, Andrew P.;
DePasquale, Joseph M.;
Godet, Olivier;
Grinberg, Victoria;
Miller, Eric D.;
Pollock, A. M. T.;
Sembay, Steve;
Smith, Randall K.
Submitted: 2008-07-14
The flight calibration of the spectral response of CCD instruments below 1.5
keV is difficult in general because of the lack of strong lines in the on-board
calibration sources typically available. We have been using 1E 0102.2-7219, the
brightest supernova remnant in the Small Magellanic Cloud, to evaluate the
response models of the ACIS CCDs on the Chandra X-ray Observatory (CXO), the
EPIC CCDs on the XMM-Newton Observatory, the XIS CCDs on the Suzaku
Observatory, and the XRT CCD on the Swift Observatory. E0102 has strong lines
of O, Ne, and Mg below 1.5 keV and little or no Fe emission to complicate the
spectrum. The spectrum of E0102 has been well characterized using
high-resolution grating instruments, namely the XMM-Newton RGS and the CXO
HETG, through which a consistent spectral model has been developed that can
then be used to fit the lower-resolution CCD spectra. We have also used the
measured intensities of the lines to investigate the consistency of the
effective area models for the various instruments around the bright O (~570 eV
and 654 eV) and Ne (~910 eV and 1022 eV) lines. We find that the measured
fluxes of the O VII triplet, the O VIII Ly-alpha line, the Ne IX triplet, and
the Ne X Ly-alpha line generally agree to within +/-10 % for all instruments,
with 28 of our 32 fitted normalizations within +/-10% of the RGS-determined
value. The maximum discrepancies, computed as the percentage difference between
the lowest and highest normalization for any instrument pair, are 23% for the O
VII triplet, 24% for the O VIII Ly-alpha line, 13% for the Ne IX triplet, and
19% for the Ne X Ly-alpha line. If only the CXO and XMM are compared, the
maximum discrepancies are 22% for the O VII triplet, 16% for the O VIII
Ly-alpha line, 4% for the Ne IX triplet, and 12% for the Ne X Ly-alpha line.
[14]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0511395 [pdf] - 77753
Status of the XMM-Newton cross-calibration with SASv6.5.0
Stuhlinger, M.;
Altieri, B.;
Baskill, D.;
Dennerl, K.;
Esquej, M. P.;
Freyberg, M.;
Haberl, F.;
Herder, J. W. den;
Kaastra, J.;
Kirsch, M. G. F.;
Metcalfe, L.;
Pollock, A. M. T.;
Read, A. M.;
Saxton, R. D.;
Sembay, S.;
Smith, M. J. S.;
Talavera, A.;
Vink, J.;
de Vries, C.
Submitted: 2005-11-14
Further achievements of the XMM-Newton cross-calibration - XMM internal as
well as with other X-ray missions - are presented. We explain the major changes
in the new version SASv6.5 of the XMM-Newton science analysis system. The
current status of the cross-calibration of the three EPIC cameras is shown.
Using a large sample of blazars, the pn energy redistribution at low energy
could be further calibrated, correcting the overestimation of fluxes in the
lowest energy regime. In the central CCDs of the MOSs, patches were identified
at the bore-sight positions, leading to an underestimation of the low energy
fluxes. The further improvement in the understanding of the cameras resulted in
a good agreement of the EPIC instruments down to lowest energies. The latest
release of the SAS software package already includes corrections for both
effects as shown in several examples of different types of sources. Finally the
XMM internal cross-calibration is completed by the presentation of the current
cross-calibration status between EPIC and RGS instruments. Major efforts have
been made in cross-calibrations with other X-ray missions, most importantly
with Chandra, of course, but also with currently observing satellites like
Swift.
[15]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0407347 [pdf] - 66189
In-orbit performance of the EPIC-MOS detectors on XMM-Newton
Submitted: 2004-07-16
XMM-Newton was launched into space on a highly eccentric 48 hour orbit on
December 10th 1999. XMM-Newton is now in its fifth year of operation and has
been an outstanding success, observing the Cosmos with imaging, spectroscopy
and timing capabilities in the X-ray and optical wavebands. The EPIC-MOS CCD
X-ray detectors comprise two out of three of the focal plane instruments on
XMM-Newton. In this paper we discuss key aspects of the current status and
performance history of the charge transfer ineffiency (CTI), energy resolution
and spectral redistribution function (rmf) of EPIC-MOS in its fifth year of
operation.
[16]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0407257 [pdf] - 66099
XMM-Newton (cross)-calibration
Kirsch, M. G. F.;
Altieri, B.;
Chen, B.;
Haberl, F.;
Metcalfe, L.;
Pollock, A. M. T.;
Read, A. M.;
Saxton, R. D.;
Sembay, S.;
Smith, M. J. S.
Submitted: 2004-07-13
ESA's large X-ray space observatory XMM-Newton is in its fifth year of
operations. We give a general overview of the status of calibration of the five
X-ray instruments and the Optical Monitor. A main point of interest in the last
year became the cross-calibration between the instruments. A cross-calibration
campaign started at the XMM-Newton Science Operation Centre at the European
Space Astronomy Centre in collaboration with the Instrument Principle
Investigators provides a first systematic comparison of the X-ray instruments
EPIC and RGS for various kind of sources making also an initial assessment in
cross calibration with other X-ray observatories.
[17]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0312148 [pdf] - 61361
XMM-Newton observations of 3C 273
Submitted: 2003-12-05
A series of nine XMM-Newton observations of the radio-loud quasar 3C 273 are
presented, concentrating mainly on the soft excess. Although most of the
individual observations do not show evidence for iron emission, co-adding them
reveals a weak, broad line (EW ~ 56 eV). The soft excess component is found to
vary, confirming previous work, and can be well fitted with multiple blackbody
components, with temperatures ranging between ~40 and ~330 eV, together with a
power-law. Alternatively, a Comptonisation model also provides a good fit, with
a mean electron temperature of ~350 eV, although this value is higher when the
soft excess is more luminous over the 0.5-10 keV energy band. In the RGS
spectrum of 3C 273, a strong detection of the OVII He-alpha absorption line at
zero redshift is made; this may originate in warm gas in the local
intergalactic medium, consistent with the findings of both Fang et al. (2003)
and Rasmussen et al. (2003).
[18]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0306540 [pdf] - 57621
Iron K features in the hard X-ray XMM-Newton spectrum of NGC 4151
Submitted: 2003-06-25
Recent XMM-Newton observations have measured the hard (2.5-12 keV) X-ray
spectrum of the well-known Seyfert galaxy NGC 4151 with a signal-to-noise
unprecedented for this source. We find that a spectral model, developed to fit
previous Beppo-SAX and ASCA observations of NGC 4151, provides an excellent
description of the XMM-Newton EPIC data. The results support the view that it
is the level of the continuum that is the main driver of the complex spectral
variability exhibited by NGC 4151. We focus on the iron K features in the NGC
4151 spectrum. There is no requirement for a relativistically broadened iron Ka
line, in contrast to several earlier studies. The iron Ka line profile is well
modelled by a narrow Gaussian, the intensity of which varies by ~25% on
timescales of about a year. There is also a strong suggestion that the cold
media present in the active nucleus of NGC 4151 have an iron abundance that is
at least twice the solar value.
[19]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0210140 [pdf] - 52178
Serendipitous AGN in the XMM-Newton fields of Markarian 205 and QSO
0130-403
Submitted: 2002-10-07
The X-ray spectra of serendipitously observed AGN in the XMM-Newton fields of
Mrk 205 and QSO 0130-403 are analysed. The sample consists of 23 objects, none
of which is detected at radio frequencies, with a median X-ray luminosity of ~
4 x 10^44 erg s^-1 and redshifts ranging from ~0.1 to just over 3. The mean
photon index was found to be 1.89 +/- 0.04. In contrast to past ASCA and ROSAT
observations of high-redshift radio-loud quasars, we find little evidence for
excess intrinsic absorption in these radio-quiet objects, with only three
sources requiring a column density in excess of the Galactic value. Comparing
the measured spectral indices over the redshift range, we also find there is no
X-ray spectral evolution of QSOs with time, up to redshift 3. Within the sample
there is no evidence for evolution of the optical to X-ray spectral index,
alpha-ox, with redshift, the mean value being -1.66 +/- 0.04. However, upon
comparing the values from the Bright Quasar Survey at low redshift (z < 0.5)
and high redshift QSOs detected by Chandra (z > 4), a slight steepening of
alpha-ox is noted for the more distant objects. In most of the sources there is
no significant requirement for a soft excess, although a weak thermal component
(< 10% of Lx) cannot be excluded. There is an indication of spectral flattening
(by delta gamma=0.2) at higher energies (> 3 keV, QSO rest frame) for the
sample as a whole. This is consistent with the presence of a Compton reflection
component in these radio-quiet AGN, with the scattering medium (such as an
accretion disc or molecular torus) occupying a solid angle of 2 pi steradians
to the X-ray source.
[20]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0204179 [pdf] - 48724
Complex X-ray spectral variability in Mkn 421 observed with XMM-Newton
Submitted: 2002-04-10
The bright blazar Mkn 421 has been observed four times for uninterrupted
durations of ~ 9 - 13 hr during the performance verification and calibration
phases of the XMM-Newton mission. The source was strongly variable in all
epochs, with variability amplitudes that generally increased to higher energy
bands. Although the detailed relationship between soft (0.1 - 0.75 keV) and
hard (2 - 10 keV) band differed from one epoch to the next, in no case was
there any evidence for a measurable interband lag, with robust upper limits of
$| \tau | < 0.08 $ hr in the best-correlated light curves. This is in conflict
with previous claims of both hard and soft lags of ~1 hr in this and other
blazars. However, previous observations suffered a repeated 1.6 hr feature
induced by the low-Earth orbital period, a feature that is not present in the
uninterrupted XMM-Newton data. The new upper limit on $|\tau|$ leads to a lower
limit on the magnetic field strength and Doppler factor of $ B \delta^{1/3} \gs
4.7 $ G, mildly out of line with the predictions from a variety of homogeneous
synchrotron self-Compton emission models in the literature of $ B \delta^{1/3}
= 0.2 - 0.8 $ G. Time-dependent spectral fitting was performed on all epochs,
and no detectable spectral hysteresis was seen. We note however that the source
exhibited significantly different spectral evolutionary behavior from one epoch
to the next, with the strongest correlations in the first and last and an
actual divergance between soft and hard X-ray bands in the third. This
indicates that the range of spectral variability behavior in Mkn 421 is not
fully described in these short snippets; significantly longer uninterrupted
light curves are required, and can be obtained with XMM-Newton.
[21]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0203111 [pdf] - 48132
Timing study of the isolated neutron star RX J0720.4-3125
Submitted: 2002-03-07
We present a combined analysis of XMM-Newton, Chandra and Rosat observations
of the isolated neutron star RX J0720.4-3125, spanning a total period of \sim 7
years. We develop a maximum likelihood periodogramme based on \Delta C
statistic and maximum likelihood method, which are appropriate for sparse event
lists. As an "a posteriori" check, we have folded a further BeppoSAX dataset
with the period predicted at the time of that observation, finding that the
phase is consistent. The value of the spin down rate, here measured for the
first time, is \approx 10^{-14} s/s and can not be explained in terms of
propeller or torque from a fossil disk. When interpreted in terms of dipolar
losses, it gives a magnetic field of B \approx 10^{13} G, making also
implausible that the source is accreting from the underdense surroundings. We
discuss the implications of this measure for the different mechanisms that have
been suggested to explain the X-ray emission. We conclude that the observed
properties are more compatible with a scenario in which the source is \approx
10^6 yrs old, and its magnetic field has not changed substantially over the
lifetime.
[22]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0203105 [pdf] - 48126
Timing analysis of the isolated neutron star RX J0720.4-3125
Submitted: 2002-03-07
We present a combined analysis of XMM-Newton, Chandra and Rosat observations
of the isolated neutron star RXJ0720.4-3125, spanning a total period of \sim 7
years. We develop a maximum likelihood periodogramme for our analysis based on
the \Delta C-statistic and the maximum likelihood method, which are appropriate
for the treatment of sparse event lists. Our results have been checked "a
posteriori" by folding a further BeppoSAX dataset with the period predicted at
the time of that observation: the phase is found to be consistent. The study of
the spin history and the measure of the spin-down rate is of extreme importance
in discriminating between the possible mechanisms suggested for the nature of
the X-ray emission. The value of \dot P, here measured for the first time, is
\approx 10^{-14} s/s. This value can not be explained in terms of torque from a
fossil disk. When interpreted in terms of dipolar losses, it gives a magnetic
field of B \approx 10^{13} G, making also implausible that the source is
accreting from the underdense surroundings. On the other hand, we also find
unlikely that the field decayed from a much larger value (B\approx 10^{15} G,
as expected for a magnetar powered by dissipation of a superstrong field) since
this scenario predicts a source age of \approx 10^4 yrs, too young to match the
observed X-ray luminosity. The observed properties are more compatible with a
scenario in which the source is \approx 10^6 yrs old, and its magnetic field
has not changed substantially over the lifetime.
[23]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0202418 [pdf] - 47912
A full orbit XMM-Newton observation of PKS 2155-304
Maraschi, L.;
Tavecchio, F.;
Cagnoni, I.;
Zhang, Y-H.;
Chiappetti, L.;
Treves, A.;
Celotti, A.;
Costamante, L.;
Edelson, R.;
Fossati, G.;
Ghisellini, G.;
Pian, E.;
Sembay, S.;
Tagliaferri, G.;
Urry, C. M.
Submitted: 2002-02-22
XMM observed the BL Lac PKS 2155-304 for a full orbit (about 150 ksec) on
2000 November 19-21. Preliminary results on the temporal and spectral analysis
of data from the EPIC PN camera and Optical Monitor are presented. The
variability amplitude depends systematically on energy, however the slopes of
the structure functions of the light-curves in different bands do not appear to
be significantly different. No evidence of time lags is found by cross
correlating the light-curves in different bands.
[24]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0202372 [pdf] - 47866
Status of the EPIC/MOS calibration
Ferrando, P.;
Abbey, A. F.;
Altieri, B.;
Arnaud, M.;
Bennie, P.;
Dadina, M.;
Denby, M.;
Ghizzardi, S.;
Griffiths, R. G.;
La Palombara, N.;
de Luca, A.;
Lumb, D.;
Molendi, S.;
Neumann, D.;
Sauvageot, J. L.;
Saxton, R. D.;
Sembay, S.;
Tiengo, A.;
Turner, M. J. L.
Submitted: 2002-02-20
The XMM-Newton observatory has the largest collecting area flown so far for
an X-ray imaging system, resulting in a very high sensitivity over a broad
spectral range. In order to exploit fully these performances, a very accurate
calibration of the XMM-Newton instruments is required, and has led to an
extensive ground and flight calibration program. We report here on the current
status of the EPIC/MOS cameras calibrations, highlighting areas for which a
reasonably good accuracy has been achieved, and noting points where further
work is needed.
[25]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0102458 [pdf] - 41169
High Temporal Resolution XMM Monitoring of PKS 2155-304
Submitted: 2001-02-26
The bright, strongly variable BL Lac object PKS 2155-304 was observed by XMM
for two essentially uninterrupted periods of ~11 and 16 hr on 30-31 May 2000.
The strongest variations occurred in the highest energy bands. After scaling
for this effect, the three softest bands (0.1-1.7 keV) showed strong
correlation with no measurable lag to reliable limits of $\tau \ls 0.3$ hr.
However, the hardest band (~3 keV) was less well-correlated with the other
three, especially on short time scales, showing deviations of ~10-20% in ~1 hr
although, again, no significant interband lag was detected. This result and
examination of previous ASCA and BeppoSAX cross-correlation functions suggest
that previous claims of soft lags on time scales of 0.3-4 hr could well be an
artifact of periodic interruptions due to Earth-occultation every 1.6 hr.
Previous determinations of the magnetic field/bulk Lorentz factor were
therefore premature, as these data provide only a lower limit of $B
\gamma^{1/3} \gs 2.5$ G. The hardest band encompasses the spectral region above
the high-energy break; its enhanced variability could be indicating that the
break energy of the synchrotron spectrum, and therefore of the underlying
electron energy distribution, changes independently of the lower energies.
[26]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0012288 [pdf] - 39877
XMM-Newton observation of the Tycho Supernova Remnant
Submitted: 2000-12-13
We present the observation of the Tycho supernova remnant obtained with the
EPIC and RGS instruments onboard the XMM-Newton satellite. We compare images
and azimuthally averaged radial profiles in emission lines from different
elements (silicon and iron) and different transition lines of iron (Fe L and Fe
K). While the Fe XVII L line and Si XIII K line images are globally spatially
coincident, the Fe K emission clearly peaks at a smaller radius, indicating a
higher temperature toward the reverse shock. This is qualitatively the profile
expected when the reverse shock, after travelling through the outer power-law
density profile, has entered the central plateau of the ejecta. The high energy
continuum map has an overall smooth distribution, with a similar extent to the
radio emission. Its radial profile peaks further out than the lines emission.
Brighter and harder continuum regions are observed with a rough bipolar
symmetry in the eastern and western edges. The spectral analysis of the
southeastern knots supports spatial variations of the relative abundance of
silicon and iron, which implies an incomplete mixing of the silicon and iron
layers.
[27]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0011193 [pdf] - 39200
XMM - Newton observations of Markarian 421
Submitted: 2000-11-09
The BL Lac object Mrk 421 was observed on May 25, 2000 during the XMM -
Newton CAL/PV phase. The high throughput of the X-ray telescopes and the
spectral capabilities of the instruments allow an uninterrupted temporal and
spectral study of the source with unprecedented time resolution. Mrk 421 was
found at a relatively high state with a 2-6 keV flux of (1.3 - 1.9)E-10 erg
cm**-2 s **-1. The observed intensity variations by more than a factor of three
at highest X-ray energies are accompanied by complex spectral variations with
only a small time lag (tau = 265 {+116} {-102} seconds) between the hard and
soft photons. The (0.2-10) keV spectrum can be well fitted by a broken power
law and no absorption structures are found in the source spectrum at the high
spectral resolution of the transmission gratings.
[28]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0010649 [pdf] - 38996
XMM-Newton observations of the BL Lac MS 0737+7441
Submitted: 2000-10-31
We report on the XMM-Newton observations of the BL Lac object MS 0737.9+7441
during the performance verification phase. A simple power-law fit provides an
adequate description of the integrated spectrum in the 0.2-10 keV energy band.
The photon index is slightly steeper in the EPIC pn data with 2.38+-0.01
compared to the EPIC MOS data (2.28+-0.01). The difference is most probably due
to the present uncertainties in the calibration of the EPIC MOS and EPIC pn
data sets. We report evidence for intrinsic absorption in the distant BL Lac
above the Galactic column N_H,Gal=3.2*10^20 cm^-2 which is N_H,fit(z=0.315)=
(2.70+-0.20)*10^20cm^-2 in the EPIC pn data and N_H,fit(z=0.315)=
(3.25+-0.25)*10^20cm^-2 in the EPIC MOS data assuming neutral gas and solar
abundances. The flux variations are found to be of the order of 10 %.