Normalized to: Seljebotn, D.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1807.06206 [pdf] - 1747982
Planck 2018 results. II. Low Frequency Instrument data processing
Planck Collaboration;
Akrami, Y.;
Argüeso, F.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Benabed, K.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bonavera, L.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Crill, B. P.;
Cuttaia, F.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Donzelli, S.;
Ducout, A.;
Dupac, X.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Fantaye, Y.;
Finelli, F.;
Frailis, M.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Gerbino, M.;
Ghosh, T.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gratton, S.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Handley, W.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Herranz, D.;
Hivon, E.;
Huang, Z.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jones, W. C.;
Karakci, A.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kim, J.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Leahy, J. P.;
Levrier, F.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lindholm, V.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Ma, Y. -Z.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Maris, M.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mauri, N.;
McEwen, J. D.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Molinari, D.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Moss, A.;
Natoli, P.;
Pagano, L.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Patanchon, G.;
Patrizii, L.;
Peel, M.;
Perrotta, F.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Polenta, G.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Racine, B.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renzi, A.;
Rocha, G.;
Roudier, G.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Salvati, L.;
Sandri, M.;
Savelainen, M.;
Scott, D.;
Seljebotn, D. S.;
Sirignano, C.;
Sirri, G.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Tenti, M.;
Terenzi, L.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Valiviita, J.;
Vansyngel, F.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Watson, R.;
Wehus, I. K.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2018-07-17, last modified: 2018-09-11
We present a final description of the data-processing pipeline for the
Planck, Low Frequency Instrument (LFI), implemented for the 2018 data release.
Several improvements have been made with respect to the previous release,
especially in the calibration process and in the correction of instrumental
features such as the effects of nonlinearity in the response of the
analogue-to-digital converters. We provide a brief pedagogical introduction to
the complete pipeline, as well as a detailed description of the important
changes implemented. Self-consistency of the pipeline is demonstrated using
dedicated simulations and null tests. We present the final version of the LFI
full sky maps at 30, 44, and 70 GHz, both in temperature and polarization,
together with a refined estimate of the Solar dipole and a final assessment of
the main LFI instrumental parameters.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1807.06208 [pdf] - 1717311
Planck 2018 results. IV. Diffuse component separation
Planck Collaboration;
Akrami, Y.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Benabed, K.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Carron, J.;
Casaponsa, B.;
Challinor, A.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Crill, B. P.;
Cuttaia, F.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Delouis, J. -M.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Donzelli, S.;
Doré, O.;
Ducout, A.;
Dupac, X.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Falgarone, E.;
Fernandez-Cobos, R.;
Finelli, F.;
Forastieri, F.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Gerbino, M.;
Ghosh, T.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gratton, S.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Handley, W.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Helou, G.;
Herranz, D.;
Huang, Z.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Karakci, A.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kim, J.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Levrier, F.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lindholm, V.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Ma, Y. -Z.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Marcos-Caballero, A.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mauri, N.;
McEwen, J. D.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Natoli, P.;
Oppizzi, F.;
Pagano, L.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Peel, M.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Polenta, G.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renzi, A.;
Rocha, G.;
Roudier, G.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Ruiz-Granados, B.;
Salvati, L.;
Sandri, M.;
Savelainen, M.;
Scott, D.;
Seljebotn, D. S.;
Sirignano, C.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Tenti, M.;
Thommesen, H.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2018-07-17
We present full-sky maps of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) and
polarized synchrotron and thermal dust emission, derived from the third set of
Planck frequency maps. These products have significantly lower contamination
from instrumental systematic effects than previous versions. The methodologies
used to derive these maps follow closely those described in earlier papers,
adopting four methods (Commander, NILC, SEVEM, and SMICA) to extract the CMB
component, as well as three methods (Commander, GNILC, and SMICA) to extract
astrophysical components. Our revised CMB temperature maps agree with
corresponding products in the Planck 2015 delivery, whereas the polarization
maps exhibit significantly lower large-scale power, reflecting the improved
data processing described in companion papers; however, the noise properties of
the resulting data products are complicated, and the best available end-to-end
simulations exhibit relative biases with respect to the data at the few percent
level. Using these maps, we are for the first time able to fit the spectral
index of thermal dust independently over 3 degree regions. We derive a
conservative estimate of the mean spectral index of polarized thermal dust
emission of beta_d = 1.55 +/- 0.05, where the uncertainty marginalizes both
over all known systematic uncertainties and different estimation techniques.
For polarized synchrotron emission, we find a mean spectral index of beta_s =
-3.1 +/- 0.1, consistent with previously reported measurements. We note that
the current data processing does not allow for construction of unbiased
single-bolometer maps, and this limits our ability to extract CO emission and
correlated components. The foreground results for intensity derived in this
paper therefore do not supersede corresponding Planck 2015 products. For
polarization the new results supersede the corresponding 2015 products in all
respects.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1710.00621 [pdf] - 1912669
Multi-resolution Bayesian CMB component separation through
Wiener-filtering with a pseudo-inverse preconditioner
Submitted: 2017-10-02, last modified: 2017-10-03
We present a Bayesian model for multi-resolution CMB component separation
based on Wiener filtering and/or computation of constrained realizations,
extending a previously developed framework. We also develop an efficient solver
for the corresponding linear system for the associated signal amplitudes. The
core of this new solver is an efficient preconditioner based on the
pseudo-inverse of the coefficient matrix of the linear system. In the full sky
coverage case, the method gives a speed-up of 2--3x in compute time compared to
a simple diagonal preconditioner, and it is easier to implement in terms of
practical computer code. In the case where a mask is applied and prior-driven
constrained realization is sought within the mask, this is the first time full
convergence has been achieved at the full resolution of the Planck dataset.
Prototype benchmark code is available at https://github.com/dagss/cmbcr .
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1504.04653 [pdf] - 1546189
SymPix: A spherical grid for efficient sampling of rotationally
invariant operators
Submitted: 2015-04-17
We present SymPix, a special-purpose spherical grid optimized for efficient
sampling of rotationally invariant linear operators. This grid is conceptually
similar to the Gauss-Legendre (GL) grid, aligning sample points with
iso-latitude rings located on Legendre polynomial zeros. Unlike the GL grid,
however, the number of grid points per ring varies as a function of latitude,
avoiding expensive over-sampling near the poles and ensuring nearly equal sky
area per grid point. The ratio between the number of grid points in two
neighbouring rings is required to be a low-order rational number (3, 2, 1, 4/3,
5/4 or 6/5) to maintain a high degree of symmetries. Our main motivation for
this grid is to solve linear systems using multi-grid methods, and to construct
efficient preconditioners through pixel-space sampling of the linear operator
in question. The GL grid is not suitable for these purposes due to its massive
over-sampling near the poles, leading to nearly degenerate linear systems,
while HEALPix, another commonly used spherical grid, exhibits few symmetries,
and is therefore computationally inefficient for these purposes. As a benchmark
and representative example, we compute a preconditioner for a linear system
with both HEALPix and SymPix that involves the operator $D + B^T N^{-1} B$,
where $B$ and $D$ may be described as both local and rotationally invariant
operators, and $N$ is diagonal in pixel domain. For a bandwidth limit of
$\ell_\text{max}=3000$, we find that SymPix, due to its higher number of
internal symmetries, yields average speed-ups of 360 and 23 for $B^T N^{-1} B$
and $D$, respectively, relative to HEALPix.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1308.5299 [pdf] - 788139
A multi-level solver for Gaussian constrained CMB realizations
Submitted: 2013-08-24, last modified: 2014-02-24
We present a multi-level solver for drawing constrained Gaussian realizations
or finding the maximum likelihood estimate of the CMB sky, given noisy sky maps
with partial sky coverage. The method converges substantially faster than
existing Conjugate Gradient (CG) methods for the same problem. For instance,
for the 143 GHz Planck frequency channel, only 3 multi-level W-cycles result in
an absolute error smaller than 1 microKelvin in any pixel. Using 16 CPU cores,
this translates to a computational expense of 6 minutes wall time per
realization, plus 8 minutes wall time for a power spectrum-dependent
precomputation. Each additional W-cycle reduces the error by more than an order
of magnitude, at an additional computational cost of 2 minutes. For comparison,
we have never been able to achieve similar absolute convergence with
conventional CG methods for this high signal-to-noise data set, even after
thousands of CG iterations and employing expensive preconditioners. The solver
is part of the Commander 2 code, which is available with an open source license
at http://commander.bitbucket.org/.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1304.0315 [pdf] - 1165637
CMB likelihood approximation for banded probability distributions
Gjerløw, E.;
Mikkelsen, K.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Górski, K. M.;
Huey, G.;
Jewell, J. B.;
Næss, S. K.;
Rocha, G.;
Seljebotn, D. S.;
Wehus, I. K.
Submitted: 2013-04-01
We investigate sets of random variables that can be arranged sequentially
such that a given variable only depends conditionally on its immediate
predecessor. For such sets, we show that the full joint probability
distribution may be expressed exclusively in terms of uni- and bivariate
marginals. Under the assumption that the CMB power spectrum likelihood only
exhibits correlations within a banded multipole range, \Delta l, we apply this
expression to two outstanding problems in CMB likelihood analysis. First, we
derive a statistically well-defined hybrid likelihood estimator, merging two
independent (e.g., low- and high-l) likelihoods into a single expression that
properly accounts for correlations between the two. Applying this expression to
the WMAP likelihood, we verify that the effect of correlations on cosmological
parameters in the transition region is negligible in terms of cosmological
parameters for WMAP; the largest relative shift seen for any parameter is
0.06\sigma. However, because this may not hold for other experimental setups
(e.g., for different instrumental noise properties or analysis masks), but must
rather be verified on a case-by-case basis, we recommend our new hybridization
scheme for future experiments for statistical self-consistency reasons. Second,
we use the same expression to improve the convergence rate of the Blackwell-Rao
likelihood estimator, reducing the required number of Monte Carlo samples by
several orders of magnitude, and thereby extend it to high-l applications.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1110.4874 [pdf] - 477675
Wavemoth -- Fast spherical harmonic transforms by butterfly matrix
compression
Submitted: 2011-10-21, last modified: 2012-01-12
We present Wavemoth, an experimental open source code for computing scalar
spherical harmonic transforms (SHTs). Such transforms are ubiquitous in
astronomical data analysis. Our code performs substantially better than
existing publicly available codes due to improvements on two fronts. First, the
computational core is made more efficient by using small amounts of precomputed
data, as well as paying attention to CPU instruction pipelining and cache
usage. Second, Wavemoth makes use of a fast and numerically stable algorithm
based on compressing a set of linear operators in a precomputation step. The
resulting SHT scales as O(L^2 (log L)^2) for the resolution range of practical
interest, where L denotes the spherical harmonic truncation degree. For low and
medium-range resolutions, Wavemoth tends to be twice as fast as libpsht, which
is the current state of the art implementation for the HEALPix grid. At the
resolution of the Planck experiment, L ~ 4000, Wavemoth is between three and
six times faster than libpsht, depending on the computer architecture and the
required precision. Due to the experimental nature of the project, only
spherical harmonic synthesis is currently supported, although adding support or
spherical harmonic analysis should be trivial.