Normalized to: Seidelmann, P.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1511.01546 [pdf] - 1306246
Historical Reflections on the Work of IAU Commission 4 (Ephemerides)
Kaplan, George H.;
Bangert, John A.;
Fienga, Agnes;
Folkner, William;
Hohenkerk, Catherine;
Lukashova, Marina;
Pitjeva, Elena V.;
Seidelmann, P. Kenneth;
Sveshnikov, Michael;
Urban, Sean;
Vondrak, Jan;
Weratschnig, Julia;
Williams, James G.
Submitted: 2015-11-04
As part of a reorganization of the International Astronomical Union (IAU),
Commission 4 (Ephemerides) went out of existence after the IAU General Assembly
in August 2015. This paper presents brief discussions of some of the
developments in fundamental astronomy that have influenced and been influenced
by the work of Commission 4 over its 96-year history. The paper also presents
notes about some of the publications of the national institutions that have
played an essential role in the commission's mission. The contents of this
paper were submitted for Commission 4's final report, to appear in IAU
Transactions Vol. XXIX-A.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1106.3141 [pdf] - 374237
The Future of Time: UTC and the Leap Second
Submitted: 2011-06-16
Before atomic timekeeping, clocks were set to the skies. But starting in
1972, radio signals began broadcasting atomic seconds and leap seconds have
occasionally been added to that stream of atomic seconds to keep the signals
synchronized with the actual rotation of Earth. Such adjustments were
considered necessary because Earth's rotation is less regular than atomic
timekeeping. In January 2012, a United Nations-affiliated organization could
permanently break this link by redefining Coordinated Universal Time. To
understand the importance of this potential change, it's important to
understand the history of human timekeeping.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:0907.5100 [pdf] - 26801
Units of relativistic time scales and associated quantities
Submitted: 2009-07-29, last modified: 2009-08-29
This note suggests nomenclature for dealing with the units of various
astronomical quantities that are used with the relativistic time scales TT,
TDB, TCB and TCG. It is suggested to avoid wordings like "TDB units" and "TT
units" and avoid contrasting them to "SI units". The quantities intended for
use with TCG, TCB, TT or TDB should be called "TCG-compatible",
"TCB-compatible", "TT-compatible" or "TDB-compatible", respectively. The names
of the units second and meter for numerical values of all these quantities
should be used with out any adjectives. This suggestion comes from a special
discussion forum created within IAU Commission 52 "Relativity in Fundamental
Astronomy".
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:0903.1650 [pdf] - 22210
A Proposal for a Renewed Research Emphasis in Astrophysical and
Celestial Dynamics
Scheeres, D. J.;
Statler, T. S.;
Alfriend, K. T.;
Armitage, P.;
Burns, J.;
Efroimsky, M.;
Harris, A. W.;
Kopeikin, S.;
Murison, M.;
Nicholson, P.;
Peale, S.;
Seidelmann, P. K.;
Yeomans, D. K.
Submitted: 2009-03-09
Given the impressive investment by the nation in observational Astronomy and
Astrophysics facilities coming on line now and in the near future, we advocate
for an increased investment in applied and fundamental research on
Astrophysical and Celestial Dynamics (ACD). Specifically we call for a)
continued and expanded support for applied research in ACD, b) creation of
support for fundamental research in ACD and its subfields, and c) the creation
of a unified program to help scientists coordinate and collaborate in their
research in these fields. The benefits of this proposal are threefold. First,
it will enable researchers to interpret and understand the implications of
newly observed phenomena that will invariably arise from new facilities and
surveys. Second, research on fundamentals will foster connections between
specialists, leveraging advances found in one sub-field and making them
available to others. Third, a coordinated approach for applied and fundamental
research in ACD will help academic institutions in the United States to produce
future researchers trained and knowledgeable in essential subfields such as
Mathematical Celestial Mechanics and able to continue its advancement in
conjunction with the increase in observations.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0303376 [pdf] - 55615
The IAU 2000 resolutions for astrometry, celestial mechanics and
metrology in the relativistic framework: explanatory supplement
Soffel, M.;
Klioner, S. A.;
Petit, G.;
Wolf, P.;
Kopeikin, S. M.;
Bretagnon, P.;
Brumberg, V. A.;
Capitaine, N.;
Damour, T.;
Fukushima, T.;
Guinot, B.;
Huang, T.;
Lindegren, L.;
Ma, C.;
Nordtvedt, K.;
Ries, J.;
Seidelmann, P. K.;
Vokrouhlicky, D.;
Will, C.;
Xu, Ch.
Submitted: 2003-03-17
This paper discusses the IAU Resolutions B1.3, B1.4, B1.5 and B1.9 (2000)
that were adopted during the 24th General Assembly in Manchester, 2000 and
provides details and explanations for these Resolutions. It is explained why
they present significant progress over the corresponding IAU 1991 Resolutions
and why they are necessary in the light of present accuracies in astrometry,
celestial mechanics and metrology. In fact most of these Resolutions are
consistent with astronomical models and software already in use.
The metric tensors and gravitational potentials of both the Barycentric
Celestial Reference System and Geocentric Celestial Reference System are
defined and discussed. The necessity and relevance of the two celestial
reference systems are explained. The transformations of coordinates and
gravitational potentials are discussed. Potential coefficients parameterizing
the post-Newtonian gravitational potentials are expounded. Simplified versions
of the time transformations suitable for modern clock accuracies are
elucidated. Various approximations used in the Resolutions are explicated and
justified. Some models (e.g. for higher spin moments) that serve the purpose
for estimating orders of magnitude have actually never been published before.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9907213 [pdf] - 107438
The Full-sky Astrometric Mapping Explorer -- Astrometry for the New
Millennium
Horner, Scott D.;
Germain, Marvin E.;
Greene, Thomas P.;
Harris, Fred H.;
Johnson, Mark S.;
Johnston, Kenneth J.;
Monet, David G.;
Murison, Marc A.;
Phillips, James D.;
Reasenberg, Robert D.;
Seidelmann, P. Kenneth;
Urban, Sean E.;
Vassar, Richard H.
Submitted: 1999-07-15
FAME is designed to perform an all-sky, astrometric survey with unprecedented
accuracy. It will create a rigid astrometric catalog of 4x10^7 stars with 5 <
m_V < 15. For bright stars, 5 < m_V < 9, FAME will determine positions and
parallaxes accurate to < 50 microarcseconds, with proper motion errors < 50
microarcseconds/year. For fainter stars, 9 < m_V < 15, FAME will determine
positions and parallaxes accurate to < 500 microarcseconds, with proper motion
errors < 500 microarcseconds/year. It will also collect photometric data on
these 4 x 10^7 stars in four Sloan DSS colors.