sort results by

Use logical operators AND, OR, NOT and round brackets to construct complex queries. Whitespace-separated words are treated as ANDed.

Show articles per page in mode

Scuderi, Louis J.

Normalized to: Scuderi, L.

6 article(s) in total. 11 co-authors, from 1 to 4 common article(s). Median position in authors list is 3,0.

[1]  oai:arXiv.org:1308.6308  [pdf] - 1178856
Below One Earth Mass: The Detection, Formation, and Properties of Subterrestrial Worlds
Comments: 32 pages, 7 figures, accepted for publication in Space Science Reviews
Submitted: 2013-08-28
The Solar System includes two planets --- Mercury and Mars --- significantly less massive than Earth, and all evidence indicates that planets of similar size orbit many stars. In fact, one of the first exoplanets to be discovered is a lunar-mass planet around a millisecond pulsar. Novel classes of exoplanets have inspired new ideas about planet formation and evolution, and these "sub-Earths" should be no exception: they include planets with masses between Mars and Venus for which there are no Solar System analogs. Advances in astronomical instrumentation and recent space missions have opened the sub-Earth frontier for exploration: the Kepler mission has discovered dozens of confirmed or candidate sub-Earths transiting their host stars. It can detect Mars-size planets around its smallest stellar targets, as well as exomoons of comparable size. Although the application of the Doppler method is currently limited by instrument stability, future spectrographs may detect equivalent planets orbiting close to nearby bright stars. Future space-based microlensing missions should be able to probe the sub-Earth population on much wider orbits. A census of sub-Earths will complete the reconnaissance of the exoplanet mass spectrum and test predictions of planet formation models, including whether low-mass M dwarf stars preferentially host the smallest planets. The properties of sub-Earths may reflect their low gravity, diverse origins, and environment, but they will be elusive: Observations of eclipsing systems by the James Webb Space Telescope may give us our first clues to the properties of these small worlds.
[2]  oai:arXiv.org:1204.3454  [pdf] - 1118009
Infrared Variability of the Gliese 569B System
Comments: 22 pages, 7 figures, accepted for publication in the Astrophysical Journal
Submitted: 2012-04-16
Gliese 569B is a multiple brown dwarf system whose exact nature has been the subject of several investigations over the past few years. Interpretation has partially relied on infra-red photometry and spectroscopy of the resolved components of the system. We present seeing limited Ks photometry over four nights, searching for variability in this young low mass substellar system. Our photometry is consistent with other reported photometry, and we report the tentative detection of several periodic signals consistent with rotational modulation due to spots on their surfaces. The five significant periods range from 2.90 hours to 12.8 hours with peak to peak variabilities from 28 mmag to 62 mmag in the Ks band. If both components are rotating with the shortest periods, then their rotation axes are not parallel with each other, and the rotation axis of the Bb component is not perpendicular to the Ba-Bb orbital plane. If Bb has one of the longer rotational periods, then the Bb rotation axis is consistent with being parallel to the orbital axis of the Ba-Bb system.
[3]  oai:arXiv.org:1006.3580  [pdf] - 1033181
A Revised Orbital Ephemeris for HAT-P-9b
Comments: 10 pages, 3 figures
Submitted: 2010-06-17
We present here three transit observations of HAT-P-9b taken on 14 February 2010, 18 February 2010, and 05 April 2010 UT from the University of Arizona's 1.55 meter Kuiper telescope on Mt. Bigelow. Our transit light curves were obtained in the I filter for all our observations, and underwent the same reduction process. All three of our transits deviated significantly (approximately 24 minutes earlier) from the ephemeris of Shporer et al. (2008). However, due to the large time span between our observed transits and those of Shporer et al. (2008), a 6.5 second (2 sigma) shift downwards in orbital period from the value of Shporer et al. (2008) is sufficient to explain all available transit data. We find a new period of 3.922814 +/- 0.000002 days for HAT-P-9b with no evidence for significant nonlinearities in the transit period.
[4]  oai:arXiv.org:0907.1685  [pdf] - 951045
On the Apparent Orbital Inclination Change of the Extrasolar Transiting Planet TrES-2b
Comments: 19 pages, 1 table, 7 figures. Re-submitted to ApJ, January 14, 2010
Submitted: 2009-07-09, last modified: 2010-03-12
On June 15, 2009 UT the transit of TrES-2b was detected using the University of Arizona's 1.55 meter Kuiper Telescope with 2.0-2.5 millimag RMS accuracy in the I-band. We find a central transit time of $T_c = 2454997.76286 \pm0.00035$ HJD, an orbital period of $P = 2.4706127 \pm 0.0000009$ days, and an inclination angle of $i = 83^{\circ}.92 \pm 0.05$, which is consistent with our re-fit of the original I-band light curve of O'Donovan et al. (2006) where we find $i = 83^{\circ}.84 \pm0.05$. We calculate an insignificant inclination change of $\Delta i = -0^{\circ}.08 \pm 0.07$ over the last 3 years, and as such, our observations rule out, at the $\sim 11 \sigma$ level, the apparent change of orbital inclination to $i_{predicted} = 83^{\circ}.35 \pm0.1$ as predicted by Mislis and Schmitt (2009) and Mislis et al. (2010) for our epoch. Moreover, our analysis of a recently published Kepler Space Telescope light curve (Gilliland et al. 2010) for TrES-2b finds an inclination of $i = 83^{\circ}.91 \pm0.03$ for a similar epoch. These Kepler results definitively rule out change in $i$ as a function of time. Indeed, we detect no significant changes in any of the orbital parameters of TrES-2b.
[5]  oai:arXiv.org:1003.1762  [pdf] - 1025610
Transit Observations of the WASP-10 System
Comments: 11 pages, 4 figures, 1 table. Submitted to ApJ
Submitted: 2010-03-08
We present here observations of the transit of WASP-10b on 14 October 2009 UT taken from the University of Arizona's 1.55 meter Kuiper telescope on Mt. Bigelow. Conditions were photometric and accuracies of 2.0 mmag RMS were obtained throughout the transit. We have found that the ratio of the planet to host star radii is in agreement with the measurements of Christian et al. (2008) instead of the refinements of Johnson et al. (2009), suggesting that WASP-10b is indeed inflated beyond what is expected from theoretical modeling. We find no evidence for large (> 20 s) transit timing variations in WASP-10b's orbit from the ephemeris of Christian et al. (2008) and Johnson et al. (2009).
[6]  oai:arXiv.org:0905.1114  [pdf] - 315886
Follow-up Observations of the Neptune Mass Transiting Extrasolar Planet HAT-P-11b
Comments: accepted to ApJ Letters, 11 pages, 2 figures (see Dittmann et al. 2009 ApJ 699 L48-L51)
Submitted: 2009-05-07, last modified: 2009-06-18
We have confirmed the existence of the transiting super Neptune extrasolar planet HAT-P-11b. On May 1, 2009 UT the transit of HAT-P-11b was detected at the University of Arizona's 1.55m Kuiper Telescope with 1.7 millimag rms accuracy. We find a central transit time of T_c = 2454952.92534+/-0.00060 BJD; this transit occurred 80+/-73 seconds sooner than previous measurements (71 orbits in the past) would have predicted. Hence, our transit timing rules out the presence of any large (>200 s) deviations from the ephemeris of Bakos et al. (2009). We obtain a slightly more accurate period of P=4.8878045+/-0.0000043 days. We measure a slightly larger planetary radius of R_p=0.452+/-0.020 R_J (5.07+/-0.22 R_earth) compared to Bakos and co-workers' value of 0.422+/-0.014 R_J (4.73+/-0.16 R_earth). Our values confirm that HAT-P-11b is very similar to GJ 436b (the only other known transiting super Neptune) in radius and other bulk properties.