Normalized to: Scovacricchi, D.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1710.09585 [pdf] - 1622307
Euclid: Superluminous supernovae in the Deep Survey
Inserra, C.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Scovacricchi, D.;
Amiaux, J.;
Brescia, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Cappellaro, E.;
Carvalho, C. S.;
Cavuoti, S.;
Conforti, V.;
Cuillandre, J. -C.;
da Silva, A.;
De Rosa, A.;
Della Valle, M.;
Dinis, J.;
Franceschi, E.;
Hook, I.;
Hudelot, P.;
Jahnke, K.;
Kitching, T.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lloro, I.;
Longo, G.;
Maiorano, E.;
Maris, M.;
Rhodes, J. D.;
Scaramella, R.;
Smartt, S. J.;
Sullivan, M.;
Tao, C.;
Toledo-Moreo, R.;
Tereno, I.;
Trifoglio, M.;
Valenziano, L.
Submitted: 2017-10-26
In the last decade, astronomers have found a new type of supernova called
`superluminous supernovae' (SLSNe) due to their high peak luminosity and long
light-curves. These hydrogen-free explosions (SLSNe-I) can be seen to z~4 and
therefore, offer the possibility of probing the distant Universe. We aim to
investigate the possibility of detecting SLSNe-I using ESA's Euclid satellite,
scheduled for launch in 2020. In particular, we study the Euclid Deep Survey
(EDS) which will provide a unique combination of area, depth and cadence over
the mission. We estimated the redshift distribution of Euclid SLSNe-I using the
latest information on their rates and spectral energy distribution, as well as
known Euclid instrument and survey parameters, including the cadence and depth
of the EDS. We also applied a standardization method to the peak magnitudes to
create a simulated Hubble diagram to explore possible cosmological constraints.
We show that Euclid should detect approximately 140 high-quality SLSNe-I to z ~
3.5 over the first five years of the mission (with an additional 70 if we lower
our photometric classification criteria). This sample could revolutionize the
study of SLSNe-I at z>1 and open up their use as probes of star-formation
rates, galaxy populations, the interstellar and intergalactic medium. In
addition, a sample of such SLSNe-I could improve constraints on a
time-dependent dark energy equation-of-state, namely w(a), when combined with
local SLSNe-I and the expected SN Ia sample from the Dark Energy Survey. We
show that Euclid will observe hundreds of SLSNe-I for free. These luminous
transients will be in the Euclid data-stream and we should prepare now to
identify them as they offer a new probe of the high-redshift Universe for both
astrophysics and cosmology.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1607.03966 [pdf] - 1531032
The effects of velocities and lensing on moments of the Hubble diagram
Submitted: 2016-07-13, last modified: 2017-01-16
We consider the dispersion on the supernova distance-redshift relation due to
peculiar velocities and gravitational lensing, and the sensitivity of these
effects to the amplitude of the matter power spectrum. We use the MeMo lensing
likelihood developed by Quartin, Marra & Amendola (2014), which accounts for
the characteristic non-Gaussian distribution caused by lensing magnification
with measurements of the first four central moments of the distribution of
magnitudes. We build on the MeMo likelihood by including the effects of
peculiar velocities directly into the model for the moments. In order to
measure the moments from sparse numbers of supernovae, we take a new approach
using Kernel Density Estimation to estimate the underlying probability density
function of the magnitude residuals. We also describe a bootstrap re-sampling
approach to estimate the data covariance matrix. We then apply the method to
the Joint Light-curve Analysis (JLA) supernova catalogue. When we impose only
that the intrinsic dispersion in magnitudes is independent of redshift, we find
$\sigma_8=0.44^{+0.63}_{-0.44}$ at the one standard deviation level, although
we note that in tests on simulations, this model tends to overestimate the
magnitude of the intrinsic dispersion, and underestimate $\sigma_8$. We note
that the degeneracy between intrinsic dispersion and the effects of $\sigma_8$
is more pronounced when lensing and velocity effects are considered
simultaneously, due to a cancellation of redshift dependence when both effects
are included. Keeping the model of the intrinsic dispersion fixed as a Gaussian
distribution of width 0.14 mag, we find $\sigma_8 = 1.07^{+0.50}_{-0.76}$.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1611.01315 [pdf] - 1532443
Measuring weak lensing correlations of Type Ia Supernovae
Submitted: 2016-11-04
We study the feasibility of detecting weak lensing spatial correlations
between Supernova (SN) Type Ia magnitudes with present (Dark Energy Survey,
DES) and future (Large Synoptic Survey Telescope, LSST) surveys. We investigate
the angular auto-correlation function of SN magnitudes (once the background
cosmology has been subtracted) and cross-correlation with galaxy catalogues. We
examine both analytical and numerical predictions, the latter using simulated
galaxy catalogues from the MICE Grand Challenge Simulation. We predict that we
will be unable to detect the SN auto-correlation in DES, while it should be
detectable with the LSST SN deep fields (15,000 SNe on 70 deg^2) at ~6sigma
level of confidence (assuming 0.15 magnitudes of intrinsic dispersion). The
SN-galaxy cross-correlation function will deliver much higher signal-to-noise,
being detectable in both surveys with an integrated signal-to-noise of ~100 (up
to 30 arcmin separations). We predict joint constraints on the matter density
parameter (Omega_m) and the clustering amplitude (sigma_8) by fitting the
auto-correlation function of our mock LSST deep fields. When assuming a
Gaussian prior for Omega_m, we can achieve a 25% measurement of sigma_8 from
just these LSST supernovae (assuming 0.15 magnitudes of intrinsic dispersion).
These constraints will improve significantly if the intrinsic dispersion of SNe
Ia can be reduced.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1511.06670 [pdf] - 1347666
Cosmology with Superluminous Supernovae
Submitted: 2015-11-20, last modified: 2015-12-14
We predict cosmological constraints for forthcoming surveys using
Superluminous Supernovae (SLSNe) as standardisable candles. Due to their high
peak luminosity, these events can be observed to high redshift (z~3), opening
up new possibilities to probe the Universe in the deceleration epoch. We
describe our methodology for creating mock Hubble diagrams for the Dark Energy
Survey (DES), the "Search Using DECam for Superluminous Supernovae" (SUDSS) and
a sample of SLSNe possible from the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST),
exploring a range of standardisation values for SLSNe. We include uncertainties
due to gravitational lensing and marginalise over possible uncertainties in the
magnitude scale of the observations (e.g. uncertain absolute peak magnitude,
calibration errors). We find that the addition of only ~100 SLSNe from SUDSS to
3800 Type Ia Supernovae (SNe Ia) from DES can improve the constraints on w and
Omega_m by at least 20% (assuming a flat wCDM universe). Moreover, the
combination of DES SNe Ia and 10,000 LSST-like SLSNe can measure Omega_m and w
to 2% and 4% respectively. The real power of SLSNe becomes evident when we
consider possible temporal variations in w(a), giving possible uncertainties of
only 2%, 5% and 14% on Omega_m, w_0 and w_a respectively, from the combination
of DES SNe Ia, LSST-like SLSNe and Planck. These errors are competitive with
predicted Euclid constraints, indicating a future role for SLSNe for probing
the high redshift Universe.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1211.7315 [pdf] - 1158188
Constraints on Dark Energy state equation with varying pivoting redshift
Submitted: 2012-11-30, last modified: 2013-12-20
We assume the DE state equations w(a) = w_0+w_a(a_p-a), and study the
dependence of the constraints on w_0 and w_a coefficients on the pivoting
redshift 1+z_p=1/a_p. Coefficients are fitted to data including WMAP7, SNIa
(Union 2.1), BAO's (including WiggleZ and SDSS results) and H_0 constraints.
The fitting algorithm is CosmoMC. We find specific differences between the
cases when neutrino mass is allowed or disregarded. More in detail: i) The z_p
value yielding uncorrelated constraints on w_0 and w_a is different in the two
cases, holding ~0.25 and ~0.35, respectively. (ii) If we consider the intervals
allowed to w_0, we find that they shift when z_p increases, in opposite
directions for vanishing or allowed neutrino mass. This leads to no overlap
between 1sigma intervals already at z_p >~0.4. (iii) The known effect that a
more negative state parameter is required to allow for neutrino mass displays
its effects on w_a, rather than on w_0. (iv) The w_0-w_a constraints found by
using any pivot z_p can be translated into constraints holding at a specific
z_p value (0 or the z_p where errors are uncorrelated). When we do so, error
ellipses exhibit a satisfactory overlap.