Normalized to: Schwengner, R.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1711.10847 [pdf] - 1613148
Astrophysical S-factor of the
$^{14}\textrm{N(p,}\gamma\textrm{)}^{15}\textrm{O}$ reaction at 0.4 --
1.3\,MeV
Wagner, L.;
Akhmadaliev, S.;
Anders, M.;
Bemmerer, D.;
Caciolli, A.;
Gohl, St.;
Grieger, M.;
Junghans, A.;
Marta, M.;
Munnik, F.;
Reinhardt, T. P.;
Reinicke, S.;
Röder, M.;
Schmidt, K.;
Schwengner, R.;
Serfling, M.;
Takács, M. P.;
Szücs, T.;
Vomiero, A.;
Wagner, A.;
Zuber, K.
Submitted: 2017-11-29
The $^{14}\textrm{N(p,}\gamma\textrm{)}^{15}\textrm{O}$ reaction is the
slowest reaction of the carbon-nitrogen cycle of hydrogen burning and thus
determines its rate. The precise knowledge of its rate is required to correctly
model hydrogen burning in asymptotic giant branch stars. In addition, it is a
necessary ingredient for a possible solution of the solar abundance problem by
using the solar $^{13}$N and $^{15}$O neutrino fluxes as probes of the carbon
and nitrogen abundances in the solar core. After the downward revision of its
cross section due to a much lower contribution by one particular transition,
capture to the ground state in $^{15}$O, the evaluated total uncertainty is
still 8\%, in part due to an unsatisfactory knowledge of the excitation
function over a wide energy range. The present work reports precise S-factor
data at twelve energies between 0.357-1.292~MeV for the strongest transition,
capture to the 6.79~MeV excited state in $^{15}$O, and at ten energies between
0.479-1.202~MeV for the second strongest transition, capture to the ground
state in $^{15}$O. An R-matrix fit is performed to estimate the impact of the
new data on astrophysical energies. The recently suggested slight enhancement
of the 6.79~MeV transition at low energy could not be confirmed. The present
extrapolated zero-energy S-factors are $S_{6.79}(0)$~=~1.24$\pm$0.11~keV~barn
and $S_{\rm GS}(0)$~=~0.19$\pm$0.05~keV~barn.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1310.1632 [pdf] - 1338874
Nuclear astrophysics with radioactive ions at FAIR
Reifarth, R.;
Altstadt, S.;
Göbel, K.;
Heftrich, T.;
Heil, M.;
Koloczek, A.;
Langer, C.;
Plag, R.;
Pohl, M.;
Sonnabend, K.;
Weigand, M.;
Adachi, T.;
Aksouh, F.;
Al-Khalili, J.;
AlGarawi, M.;
AlGhamdi, S.;
Alkhazov, G.;
Alkhomashi, N.;
Alvarez-Pol, H.;
Alvarez-Rodriguez, R.;
Andreev, V.;
Andrei, B.;
Atar, L.;
Aumann, T.;
Avdeichikov, V.;
Bacri, C.;
Bagchi, S.;
Barbieri, C.;
Beceiro, S.;
Beck, C.;
Beinrucker, C.;
Belier, G.;
Bemmerer, D.;
Bendel, M.;
Benlliure, J.;
Benzoni, G.;
Berjillos, R.;
Bertini, D.;
Bertulani, C.;
Bishop, S.;
Blasi, N.;
Bloch, T.;
Blumenfeld, Y.;
Bonaccorso, A.;
Boretzky, K.;
Botvina, A.;
Boudard, A.;
Boutachkov, P.;
Boztosun, I.;
Bracco, A.;
Brambilla, S.;
Monago, J. Briz;
Caamano, M.;
Caesar, C.;
Camera, F.;
Casarejos, E.;
Catford, W.;
Cederkall, J.;
Cederwall, B.;
Chartier, M.;
Chatillon, A.;
Cherciu, M.;
Chulkov, L.;
Coleman-Smith, P.;
Cortina-Gil, D.;
Crespi, F.;
Crespo, R.;
Cresswell, J.;
Csatlós, M.;
Déchery, F.;
Davids, B.;
Davinson, T.;
Derya, V.;
Detistov, P.;
Fernandez, P. Diaz;
DiJulio, D.;
Dmitry, S.;
Doré, D.;
Duenas, J.;
Dupont, E.;
Egelhof, P.;
Egorova, I.;
Elekes, Z.;
Enders, J.;
Endres, J.;
Ershov, S.;
Ershova, O.;
Fernandez-Dominguez, B.;
Fetisov, A.;
Fiori, E.;
Fomichev, A.;
Fonseca, M.;
Fraile, L.;
Freer, M.;
Friese, J.;
Borge, M. G.;
Redondo, D. Galaviz;
Gannon, S.;
Garg, U.;
Gasparic, I.;
Gasques, L.;
Gastineau, B.;
Geissel, H.;
Gernhäuser, R.;
Ghosh, T.;
Gilbert, M.;
Glorius, J.;
Golubev, P.;
Gorshkov, A.;
Gourishetty, A.;
Grigorenko, L.;
Gulyas, J.;
Haiduc, M.;
Hammache, F.;
Harakeh, M.;
Hass, M.;
Heine, M.;
Hennig, A.;
Henriques, A.;
Herzberg, R.;
Holl, M.;
Ignatov, A.;
Ignatyuk, A.;
Ilieva, S.;
Ivanov, M.;
Iwasa, N.;
Jakobsson, B.;
Johansson, H.;
Jonson, B.;
Joshi, P.;
Junghans, A.;
Jurado, B.;
Körner, G.;
Kalantar, N.;
Kanungo, R.;
Kelic-Heil, A.;
Kezzar, K.;
Khan, E.;
Khanzadeev, A.;
Kiselev, O.;
Kogimtzis, M.;
Körper, D.;
Kräckmann, S.;
Kröll, T.;
Krücken, R.;
Krasznahorkay, A.;
Kratz, J.;
Kresan, D.;
Krings, T.;
Krumbholz, A.;
Krupko, S.;
Kulessa, R.;
Kumar, S.;
Kurz, N.;
Kuzmin, E.;
Labiche, M.;
Langanke, K.;
Lazarus, I.;
Bleis, T. Le;
Lederer, C.;
Lemasson, A.;
Lemmon, R.;
Liberati, V.;
Litvinov, Y.;
Löher, B.;
Herraiz, J. Lopez;
Münzenberg, G.;
Machado, J.;
Maev, E.;
Mahata, K.;
Mancusi, D.;
Marganiec, J.;
Perez, M. Martinez;
Marusov, V.;
Mengoni, D.;
Million, B.;
Morcelle, V.;
Moreno, O.;
Movsesyan, A.;
Nacher, E.;
Najafi, M.;
Nakamura, T.;
Naqvi, F.;
Nikolski, E.;
Nilsson, T.;
Nociforo, C.;
Nolan, P.;
Novatsky, B.;
Nyman, G.;
Ornelas, A.;
Palit, R.;
Pandit, S.;
Panin, V.;
Paradela, C.;
Parkar, V.;
Paschalis, S.;
Pawłowski, P.;
Perea, A.;
Pereira, J.;
Petrache, C.;
Petri, M.;
Pickstone, S.;
Pietralla, N.;
Pietri, S.;
Pivovarov, Y.;
Potlog, P.;
Prokofiev, A.;
Rastrepina, G.;
Rauscher, T.;
Ribeiro, G.;
Ricciardi, M.;
Richter, A.;
Rigollet, C.;
Riisager, K.;
Rios, A.;
Ritter, C.;
Frutos, T. Rodríguez;
Vignote, J. Rodriguez;
Röder, M.;
Romig, C.;
Rossi, D.;
Roussel-Chomaz, P.;
Rout, P.;
Roy, S.;
Söderström, P.;
Sarkar, M. Saha;
Sakuta, S.;
Salsac, M.;
Sampson, J.;
Saez, J. Sanchez del Rio;
Rosado, J. Sanchez;
Sanjari, S.;
Sarriguren, P.;
Sauerwein, A.;
Savran, D.;
Scheidenberger, C.;
Scheit, H.;
Schmidt, S.;
Schmitt, C.;
Schnorrenberger, L.;
Schrock, P.;
Schwengner, R.;
Seddon, D.;
Sherrill, B.;
Shrivastava, A.;
Sidorchuk, S.;
Silva, J.;
Simon, H.;
Simpson, E.;
Singh, P.;
Slobodan, D.;
Sohler, D.;
Spieker, M.;
Stach, D.;
Stan, E.;
Stanoiu, M.;
Stepantsov, S.;
Stevenson, P.;
Strieder, F.;
Stuhl, L.;
Suda, T.;
Sümmerer, K.;
Streicher, B.;
Taieb, J.;
Takechi, M.;
Tanihata, I.;
Taylor, J.;
Tengblad, O.;
Ter-Akopian, G.;
Terashima, S.;
Teubig, P.;
Thies, R.;
Thoennessen, M.;
Thomas, T.;
Thornhill, J.;
Thungstrom, G.;
Timar, J.;
Togano, Y.;
Tomohiro, U.;
Tornyi, T.;
Tostevin, J.;
Townsley, C.;
Trautmann, W.;
Trivedi, T.;
Typel, S.;
Uberseder, E.;
Udias, J.;
Uesaka, T.;
Uvarov, L.;
Vajta, Z.;
Velho, P.;
Vikhrov, V.;
Volknandt, M.;
Volkov, V.;
von Neumann-Cosel, P.;
von Schmid, M.;
Wagner, A.;
Wamers, F.;
Weick, H.;
Wells, D.;
Westerberg, L.;
Wieland, O.;
Wiescher, M.;
Wimmer, C.;
Wimmer, K.;
Winfield, J. S.;
Winkel, M.;
Woods, P.;
Wyss, R.;
Yakorev, D.;
Yavor, M.;
Cardona, J. Zamora;
Zartova, I.;
Zerguerras, T.;
Zgura, I.;
Zhdanov, A.;
Zhukov, M.;
Zieblinski, M.;
Zilges, A.;
Zuber, K.
Submitted: 2013-10-06
The nucleosynthesis of elements beyond iron is dominated by neutron captures
in the s and r processes. However, 32 stable, proton-rich isotopes cannot be
formed during those processes, because they are shielded from the s-process
flow and r-process beta-decay chains. These nuclei are attributed to the p and
rp process.
For all those processes, current research in nuclear astrophysics addresses
the need for more precise reaction data involving radioactive isotopes.
Depending on the particular reaction, direct or inverse kinematics, forward or
time-reversed direction are investigated to determine or at least to constrain
the desired reaction cross sections.
The Facility for Antiproton and Ion Research (FAIR) will offer unique,
unprecedented opportunities to investigate many of the important reactions. The
high yield of radioactive isotopes, even far away from the valley of stability,
allows the investigation of isotopes involved in processes as exotic as the r
or rp processes.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1309.4159 [pdf] - 1179269
Cross-Section Measurements of the 86Kr(g,n) Reaction to Probe the
s-Process Branching at 85Kr
Raut, R.;
Tonchev, A. P.;
Rusev, G.;
Tornow, W.;
Iliadis, C.;
Lugaro, M.;
Buntain, J.;
Goriely, S.;
Kelley, J. H.;
Schwengner, R.;
Banu, A.;
Tsoneva, N.
Submitted: 2013-09-16
We have carried out photodisintegration cross-section measurements on 86Kr
using monoenergetic photon beams ranging from the neutron separation energy,
S_n = 9.86 MeV, to 13 MeV. We combine our experimental 86Kr(g,n)85Kr cross
section with results from our recent 86Kr(g,g') measurement below the neutron
separation energy to obtain the complete nuclear dipole response of 86Kr. The
new experimental information is used to predict the neutron capture cross
section of 85Kr, an important branching point nucleus on the abundance flow
path during s-process nucleosynthesis. Our new and more precise 85Kr(n,g)86Kr
cross section allows to produce more precise predictions of the 86Kr abundance
from s-process models. In particular, we find that the models of the s-process
in asymptotic giant branch stars of mass < 1.5 Msun, where the 13C neutron
source burns convectively rather than radiatively, represent a possible
solution for the highest 86Kr/82Kr ratios observed in meteoritic stardust SiC
grains.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1307.6516 [pdf] - 705976
The resonance triplet at E_alpha = 4.5 MeV in the 40Ca(alpha,gamma)44Ti
reaction
Schmidt, Konrad;
Akhmadaliev, Shavkat;
Anders, Michael;
Bemmerer, Daniel;
Boretzky, Konstanze;
Caciolli, Antonio;
Degering, Detlev;
Dietz, Mirco;
Dressler, Rugard;
Elekes, Zoltán;
Fülöp, Zsolt;
Gyürky, György;
Hannaske, Roland;
Junghans, Arnd R.;
Marta, Michele;
Menzel, Marie-Luise;
Munnik, Frans;
Schumann, Dorothea;
Schwengner, Ronald;
Szücs, Tamás;
Wagner, Andreas;
Yakorev, Dmitry;
Zuber, Kai
Submitted: 2013-07-24
The 40Ca(alpha,gamma)44Ti reaction is believed to be the main production
channel for the radioactive nuclide 44Ti in core-collapse supernovae. Radiation
from decaying 44Ti has been observed so far for two supernova remnants, and a
precise knowledge of the 44Ti production rate may help improve supernova
models. The 40Ca(alpha,gamma)44Ti astrophysical reaction rate is determined by
a number of narrow resonances. Here, the resonance triplet at E_alpha = 4497,
4510, and 4523 keV is studied both by activation, using an underground
laboratory for the gamma counting, and by in-beam gamma spectrometry. The
target properties are determined by elastic recoil detection analysis and by
nuclear reactions. The strengths of the three resonances are determined to
omega gamma = (0.92+-0.20), (6.2+-0.5), and (1.32+-0.24) eV, respectively, a
factor of two more precise than before. The strengths of this resonance triplet
may be used in future works as a point of reference. In addition, the present
new data directly affect the astrophysical reaction rate at relatively high
temperatures, above 3.5 GK.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:0907.0111 [pdf] - 901484
Solving the stellar 62Ni problem with AMS
Dillmann, I.;
Faestermann, T.;
Korschinek, G.;
Lachner, J.;
Maiti, M.;
Poutivtsev, M.;
Rugel, G.;
Walter, S.;
Käppeler, F.;
Erhard, M.;
Junghans, A. R.;
Nair, C.;
Schwengner, R.;
Wagner, A.
Submitted: 2009-07-01
An accurate knowledge of the neutron capture cross sections of 62,63Ni is
crucial since both isotopes take key positions which affect the whole reaction
flow in the weak s process up to A=90. No experimental value for the
63Ni(n,gamma) cross section exists so far, and until recently the experimental
values for 62Ni(n,gamma) at stellar temperatures (kT=30 keV) ranged between 12
and 37 mb. This latter discrepancy could now be solved by two activations with
following AMS using the GAMS setup at the Munich tandem accelerator which are
also in perfect agreement with a recent time-of-flight measurement. The
resulting (preliminary) Maxwellian cross section at kT=30 keV was determined to
be <sigma>30keV = 23.4 +/- 4.6 mb. Additionally, we have measured the
64Ni(gamma,n)63Ni cross section close to threshold. Photoactivations at 13.5
MeV, 11.4 MeV and 10.3 MeV were carried out with the ELBE accelerator at
Forschungszentrum Dresden-Rossendorf. A first AMS measurement of the sample
activated at 13.5 MeV revealed a cross section smaller by more than a factor of
2 compared to NON-SMOKER predictions.