We demonstrate that a joint analysis of LSST-like ground-based imaging with Euclid-like space-based imaging leads to increased precision and accuracy in galaxy shape measurements. At galaxy magnitudes of $i \sim 24.5$, a combined survey analysis increases the effective galaxy number density for cosmic shear studies by $\sim 50$ percent in comparison to an analysis of each survey alone. Using a realistic distribution of galaxy sizes, ellipticities and magnitudes down to $i = 25.2$, we simulate LSST-like and Euclid-like images of over one million isolated galaxies. We compare the precision and accuracy of the recovered galaxy ellipticities for four different analyses: LSST-only, Euclid-only, a simultaneous joint-pixel analysis of the two surveys, and a simple catalogue-level survey combination. In the faint and small-galaxy regime, where neither survey excels alone, we find a $\sim 20$ percent increase in the precision of galaxy shape measurement when we adopt a joint-pixel analysis, compared to a catalogue-level combination. As the statistical power of cosmic shear is dominated by intrinsic ellipticity noise, however, this improvement in shape measurement noise only leads to a $\sim 5$ percent improvement in the effective number density of galaxies for lensing studies. We view this as the minimum improvement that should be expected from a joint-pixel analysis over a less accurate catalogue-level combination, as the former will also improve the capability of LSST to de-blend close objects.

We apply two compression methods to the galaxy power spectrum monopole/quadrupole and bispectrum monopole measurements from the BOSS DR12 CMASS sample. Both methods reduce the dimension of the original data-vector to the number of cosmological parameters considered, using the Karhunen-Lo\`eve algorithm with an analytic covariance model. In the first case, we infer the posterior through MCMC sampling from the likelihood of the compressed data-vector (MC-KL). The second, faster option, works by first Gaussianising and then orthogonalising the parameter space before the compression; in this option (G-PCA) we only need to run a low-resolution preliminary MCMC sample for the Gaussianization to compute our posterior. Both compression methods accurately reproduce the posterior distributions obtained by standard MCMC sampling on the CMASS dataset for a $k$-space range of $0.03-0.12\,h/\mathrm{Mpc}$. The compression enables us to increase the number of bispectrum measurements by a factor of $\sim 23$ over the standard binning (from 116 to 2734 triangles used), which is otherwise limited by the number of mock catalogues available. This reduces the $68\%$ credible intervals for the parameters $\left(b_1,b_2,f,\sigma_8\right)$ by $\left(-24.8\%,-52.8\%,-26.4\%,-21\%\right)$, respectively. The best-fit values we obtain are $(b_1=2.31\pm0.17,b_2=0.77\pm0.19,$ $f(z_{\mathrm{CMASS}})=0.67\pm0.06,\sigma_8(z_{\mathrm{CMASS}})=0.51\pm0.03)$. Using these methods for future redshift surveys like DESI, Euclid and PFS will drastically reduce the number of simulations needed to compute accurate covariance matrices and will facilitate tighter constraints on cosmological parameters.

The Large Synoptic Survey Telescope is designed to provide an unprecedented optical imaging dataset that will support investigations of our Solar System, Galaxy and Universe, across half the sky and over ten years of repeated observation. However, exactly how the LSST observations will be taken (the observing strategy or "cadence") is not yet finalized. In this dynamically-evolving community white paper, we explore how the detailed performance of the anticipated science investigations is expected to depend on small changes to the LSST observing strategy. Using realistic simulations of the LSST schedule and observation properties, we design and compute diagnostic metrics and Figures of Merit that provide quantitative evaluations of different observing strategies, analyzing their impact on a wide range of proposed science projects. This is work in progress: we are using this white paper to communicate to each other the relative merits of the observing strategy choices that could be made, in an effort to maximize the scientific value of the survey. The investigation of some science cases leads to suggestions for new strategies that could be simulated and potentially adopted. Notably, we find motivation for exploring departures from a spatially uniform annual tiling of the sky: focusing instead on different parts of the survey area in different years in a "rolling cadence" is likely to have significant benefits for a number of time domain and moving object astronomy projects. The communal assembly of a suite of quantified and homogeneously coded metrics is the vital first step towards an automated, systematic, science-based assessment of any given cadence simulation, that will enable the scheduling of the LSST to be as well-informed as possible.

The Astropy Project (http://astropy.org) is, in its own words, "a community effort to develop a single core package for Astronomy in Python and foster interoperability between Python astronomy packages." For five years this project has been managed, written, and operated as a grassroots, self-organized, almost entirely volunteer effort while the software is used by the majority of the astronomical community. Despite this, the project has always been and remains to this day effectively unfunded. Further, contributors receive little or no formal recognition for creating and supporting what is now critical software. This paper explores the problem in detail, outlines possible solutions to correct this, and presents a few suggestions on how to address the sustainability of general purpose astronomical software.

We present a method to transform multivariate unimodal non-Gaussian posterior probability densities into approximately Gaussian ones via non-linear mappings, such as Box--Cox transformations and generalisations thereof. This permits an analytical reconstruction of the posterior from a point sample, like a Markov chain, and simplifies the subsequent joint analysis with other experiments. This way, a multivariate posterior density can be reported efficiently, by compressing the information contained in MCMC samples. Further, the model evidence integral (i.e. the marginal likelihood) can be computed analytically. This method is analogous to the search for normal parameters in the cosmic microwave background, but is more general. The search for the optimally Gaussianising transformation is performed computationally through a maximum-likelihood formalism; its quality can be judged by how well the credible regions of the posterior are reproduced. We demonstrate that our method outperforms kernel density estimates in this objective. Further, we select marginal posterior samples from Planck data with several distinct strongly non-Gaussian features, and verify the reproduction of the marginal contours. To demonstrate evidence computation, we Gaussianise the joint distribution of data from weak lensing and baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO), for different cosmological models, and find a preference for flat $\Lambda$CDM. Comparing to values computed with the Savage-Dickey density ratio, and Population Monte Carlo, we find good agreement of our method within the spread of the other two.