Scholl, Isabelle F.
Normalized to: Scholl, I.
2 article(s) in total. 4 co-authors, from 1 to 2 common article(s). Median position in authors list is 4,0.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1612.00873 [pdf] - 1532980
A Poynting-Robertson-like drag at the Sun's surface
Submitted: 2016-12-02
The Sun's internal rotation {\Omega}(r,{\Theta}) has previously been measured
using helioseismology techniques and found to be a complex function of
co-latitude, {\theta}, and radius, r. From helioseismology and observations of
apparently "rooted" solar magnetic tracers we know that the surface rotates
more slowly than much of the interior. The cause of this slow-down is not
understood but it is important for understanding stellar rotation generally and
any plausible theory of the solar interior. A new analysis using 5-min solar
p-mode limb oscillations as a rotation "tracer" finds an even larger velocity
gradient in a thin region at the top of the photosphere. This shear occurs
where the solar atmosphere radiates energy and angular momentum. We suggest
that the net effect of the photospheric angular momentum loss is similar to
Poynting-Robertson "photon braking" on, for example, Sun-orbiting dust. The
resultant photospheric torque is readily computed and, over the Sun's lifetime,
is found to be comparable to the apparent angular momentum deficit in the
near-surface shear layer.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1203.4898 [pdf] - 1117463
Measuring the Solar Radius from Space during the 2003 and 2006 Mercury
Transits
Submitted: 2012-03-22
The Michelson Doppler Imager (MDI) aboard the Solar and Heliospheric
Observatory observed the transits of Mercury on 2003 May 7 and 2006 November 8.
Contact times between Mercury and the solar limb have been used since the 17th
century to derive the Sun's size but this is the first time that high-quality
imagery from space, above the Earth's atmosphere, has been available. Unlike
other measurements this technique is largely independent of optical distortion.
The true solar radius is still a matter of debate in the literature as measured
differences of several tenths of an arcsecond (i.e., about 500 km) are
apparent. This is due mainly to systematic errors from different instruments
and observers since the claimed uncertainties for a single instrument are
typically an order of magnitude smaller. From the MDI transit data we find the
solar radius to be 960".12 +/- 0".09 (696,342 +/- 65 km). This value is
consistent between the transits and consistent between different MDI focus
settings after accounting for systematic effects.