The brightness of Neptune is often found to be in accordance with an adiabatic interior, while the low luminosity of Uranus challenges this assumption. Here we apply revised equation of state data of hydrogen, helium, and water and compute the thermal evolution of Uranus and Neptune assuming an adiabatic interior. For this purpose, we have developed a new planetary model and evolution code. We investigate the influence of albedo, solar energy influx, and equations of state of H and He, and water on the cooling time. Our cooling times of about $\tau_\text{U}=5.1\times 10^9\text{ years}$ for Uranus and $\tau_\text{N}=3.7\times 10^9\text{ years}$ for Neptune bracket the known age of the planets of $4.56\times 10^9\text{ years}$ implying that neither planet's present-day luminosity can be explained by adiabatic cooling. We also find that uncertainties on input parameters such as the level of irradiation matter generally more for Uranus than for Neptune. Our results suggest that in contrast to common assumptions, neither planet is fully adiabatic in the deeper interior.

The validity of the widely used linear mixing approximation for the equations of state (EOS) of planetary ices is investigated at pressure-temperature conditions typical for the interior of Uranus and Neptune. The basis of this study are ab initio data ranging up to 1000 GPa and 20 000 K calculated via density functional theory molecular dynamics simulations. In particular, we calculate a new EOS for methane and EOS data for the 1:1 binary mixtures of methane, ammonia, and water, as well as their 2:1:4 ternary mixture. Additionally, the self-diffusion coefficients in the ternary mixture are calculated along three different Uranus interior profiles and compared to the values of the pure compounds. We find that deviations of the linear mixing approximation from the results of the real mixture are generally small; for the thermal EOS they amount to 4% or less. The diffusion coefficients in the mixture agree with those of the pure compounds within 20% or better. Finally, a new adiabatic model of Uranus with an inner layer of almost pure ices is developed. The model is consistent with the gravity field data and results in a rather cold interior ($\mathrm{T_{core}} \mathtt{\sim}$ 4000 K).