A spacecraft pushed by radiation has the major advantage that the power source is not included in the accelerated mass, making it the preferred technique for reaching relativistic speeds. There are two main technical challenges. First, to get significant acceleration, the sail must be both extremely light weight and capable of operating at high intensities of the incident beam and the resulting high temperatures. Second, the transmitter must emit high power beams through huge apertures, many kilometers in diameter, in order to focus radiation on the sail across the long distances needed to achieve high final speeds. Existing proposals for the sail use carbon or aluminum films, but aluminum is limited by a low melting point, and both have low mechanical strength requiring either a distributed payload or complex rigging. We propose here a graphene sail, which offers high absorption per unit weight, high temperature operation, and the mechanical strength to support simple rigging to a lumped mass payload. For the transmitter, existing proposals use a compact high power source, and focus the energy with a large (hundreds to thousands of km) space-based lens. Existing optical drive proposals also require launch from the outer solar system, have severe pointing restrictions, and require difficult maneuvering of the beam source. Instead we propose an active Fresnel lens, allowing smaller apertures of less mass, easier pointing with fewer restrictions, and probe launch from the inner solar system. The technologies for both the sail and the transmitter are already under development for other reasons. Worked examples, physically smaller and less massive than those suggested so far, range from a 1kg payload launched to 10\% of the speed of light by a transmitter only 25 times the mass of ISS, to a larger system that can launch a 1000 kg payload to 50\% of the speed of light.

Interstellar radar is a potential intermediate step between passive observation of exoplanets and interstellar exploratory missions. Compared to passive observation, it has the traditional advantages of radar astronomy. It can measure surface characteristics, determine spin rates and axes, provide extremely accurate ranges, construct maps of planets, distinguish liquid from solid surfaces, find rings and moons, and penetrate clouds. It can do this even for planets close to the parent star. Compared to interstellar travel or probes, it also offers significant advantages. The technology required to build such a radar already exists, radar can return results within a human lifetime, and a single facility can investigate thousands of planetary systems. The cost, although high, is within the reach of Earth's economy, so it is cheaper as well.

Anderson, et al. find the measured trajectories of Pioneer 10 and 11 spacecraft deviate from the trajectories computed from known forces acting on them. This unmodelled acceleration (and the less well known, but similar, unmodelled torque) can be accounted for by non-isotropic radiation of spacecraft heat. Various forms of non-isotropic radiation were proposed by Katz, Murphy, and Scheffer, but Anderson, et al. felt that none of these could explain the observed effect. This paper calculates the known effects in more detail and considers new sources of radiation, all based on spacecraft construction. These effects are then modelled over the duration of the experiment. The model reproduces the acceleration from its appearance at a heliocentric distance of 5 AU to the last measurement at 71 AU to within 10 percent. However, it predicts a larger decrease in acceleration between intervals I and III of the Pioneer 10 observations than is observed. This is a 2 sigma discrepancy from the average of the three analyses (SIGMA, CHASMP, and Markwardt). A more complex (but more speculative) model provides a somewhat better fit. Radiation forces can also plausibly explain the previously unmodelled torques, including the spindown of Pioneer 10 that is directly proportional to spacecraft bus heat, and the slow but constant spin-up of Pioneer 11. In any case, by accounting for the bulk of the acceleration, the proposed mechanism makes it much more likely that the entire effect can be explained without the need for new physics.

Anderson, et al., find the measured trajectories of Pioneer 10 and 11 spacecraft deviate from the trajectories computed from known forces acting on them. This unmodelled acceleration can be accounted for by non-isotropic radiation of spacecraft heat. Various forms of non-isotropic radiation were proposed by Katz, Murphy, and Scheffer, but Anderson, et al. felt that none of these could explain the observed effect. This paper calculates the known effects in more detail and considers new sources of radiation, all based on spacecraft construction. These effects are then modelled over the duration of the experiment. The model provides a reasonable fit to the acceleration from its appearance at a heliocentric distance of 5 AU to the last measurement at 71 AU, but overpredicts by 9% the decrease in acceleration between intervals I and III of the Pioneer 10 observations. (For comparison, the two different measurements of the effect (SIGMA and CHASMP) themselves differ by 4% in interval III.) In any case, by accounting for the bulk of the acceleration, the proposed mechanism makes it much more likely that the entire effect can be explained without the need for new physics.