Normalized to: Sarma, J.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1610.01001 [pdf] - 1528265
The distribution and kinematics of interstellar O~{\small VI} in the
Milky Way}
Submitted: 2016-10-04
We present the results of a survey of interstellar O~{\small VI} absorption
in the Milky Way (MW) towards {69} stars in the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC)
obtained with the \textit{Far Ultraviolet Spectroscopic Explorer (FUSE)}. The
integrated MW O~{\small VI} column densities log N(O~{\small VI}) are in the
range from 13.68 to 14.73 with a mean of {14.26$_{-0.09}^{+0.07}$} atoms
cm$^{-2}$. The O~{\small VI} exponential scale height is found to be
{2.28$\pm$1.06} kpc. The O~{\small VI} column density correlates with the
Doppler parameter $\it b$. The O~{\small VI} velocity dispersion ranges from
{14.0 to 91.6 with an average value of 62.7 km s$^{-1}$}. These high values of
velocity dispersion reveal the effect of turbulence, multiple velocity
components and collision on broad O~{\small VI} profiles. There is a
significant variation of O~{\small VI} column density on all scales studied
{(0.0025$\degr$ - 6.35$\degr$)}. The smallest scale for which O~{\small VI}
column density variations has been found is {$\bigtriangleup \theta$
$\sim$~9$\arcsec$}. Comparison of the O~{\small VI} velocity profiles with
Fe~{\small II} indicates the presence of intermediate velocity cloud (IVC)
and/or high velocity cloud (HVC) components in the O~{\small VI} absorption.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1501.00908 [pdf] - 1223857
Relationship between X-ray spectral index and X-ray Eddington ratio for
Mrk 335 and Ark 564
Submitted: 2015-01-05
We present a comprehensive flux resolved spectral analysis of the bright
Narrow line Seyfert I AGNs, Mrk~335 and Ark~564 using observations by
XMM-Newton satellite. The mean and the flux resolved spectra are fitted by an
empirical model consisting of two Comptonization components, one for the low
energy soft excess and the other for the high energy power-law. A broad Iron
line and a couple of low energies edges are required to explain the spectra.
For Mrk~335, the 0.3 - 10 keV luminosity relative to the Eddington value,
L{$_{X}$}/L$_{Edd}$, varied from 0.002 to 0.06. The index variation can be
empirically described as $\Gamma$ = 0.6 log$_{10}$ L{$_{X}$}/L$_{Edd}$ + 3.0
for $0.005 < L{_{X}}/L_{Edd} < 0.04$. At $ L_{{X}}/L_{Edd} \sim 0.04$ the
spectral index changes and then continues to follow $\Gamma$ = 0.6 log$_{10}$
L$_{{X}}$/L$_{Edd}$ + 2.7, i.e. on a parallel track. We confirm that the result
is independent of the specific spectral model used by fitting the data in the 3
- 10 keV band by only a power-law and an Iron line. For Ark~564, the index
variation can be empirically described as $\Gamma$ = 0.2 log$_{10}$
L$_{{X}}$/L$_{Edd}$ + 2.7 with a significantly large scatter as compared to
Mrk~335. Our results indicate that for Mrk~335, there may be accretion disk
geometry changes which lead to different parallel tracks. These changes could
be related to structural changes in the corona or enhanced reflection at high
flux levels. There does not seem to be any homogeneous or universal
relationship for the X-ray index and luminosity for different AGNs or even for
the same AGN.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1307.6928 [pdf] - 1172991
O~{\small VI} absorption in the Milky Way along the Large Magellanic
Cloud lines of sight
Submitted: 2013-07-26
We have used \textit{Far Ultraviolet Spectroscopic Explorer (FUSE)}
observations of the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC) to determine the O {\small VI}
column densities in the Milky Way (MW) towards 6 LMC lines of sight. The mean
column density of O {\small VI} in the MW is found to be log N(O {\small
VI})=14.257$_{-0.084}^{+0.096}$. The results confirm the patchiness of O
{\small VI} absorption in the MW and the column densities are higher or
comparable to the LMC.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:0810.0993 [pdf] - 17133
IAU Planet Definition: Some Confusions and Their Modifications
Submitted: 2008-10-06
International Astronomical Union (IAU) has passed the must needed definition
of planet in its general assembly held in Prague during August 2006. The
definition had to be passed by means of voting. A group of scientists who
raised the banner of revolt against the IAU definition has pointed out that the
IAU has failed to give an acceptable definition regarding a planet. A brief
description of the serious objections found in the definition of planet has
been discussed here. In this paper an attempt has also been made to give a new
definition of a planet by introducing some modifications to the IAU definition.