Normalized to: Sankar, R.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:2006.12744 [pdf] - 2120132
EPIC Simulations of Neptune's Dark Spots Using an Active Cloud
Microphysical Model
Submitted: 2020-06-23
The Great Dark Spot (GDS-89) observed by Voyager 2 was the first of several
large-scale vortices observed on Neptune, the most recent of which was observed
in 2018 in the northern hemisphere (NDS-2018). Ongoing observations of these
features are constraining cloud formation, drift, shape oscillations, and other
dynamic properties. In order to effectively model these characteristics, an
explicit calculation of methane cloud microphysics is needed. Using an updated
version of the Explicit Planetary Isentropic Coordinate General Circulation
Model (EPIC GCM) and its active cloud microphysics module to account for the
condensation of methane, we investigate the evolution of large scale vortices
on Neptune. We model the effect of methane deep abundance and cloud formation
on vortex stability and dynamics. In our simulations, the vortex shows a sharp
contrast in methane vapor density inside compared to outside the vortex.
Methane vapor column density is analogous to optical depth and provides a more
consistent tracer to track the vortex, so we use that variable over potential
vorticity. We match the meridional drift rate of the GDS and gain an initial
insight into the evolution of vortices in the northern hemisphere, such as the
NDS-2018.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:2002.07894 [pdf] - 2055395
Fragmentation modelling of the August 2019 impact on Jupiter
Submitted: 2020-02-18
On 7th August 2019, an impact flash lasting $\sim1$s was observed on Jupiter.
The video of this event was analysed to obtain the lightcurve and determine the
energy release and initial mass. We find that the impactor released a total
energy of $96-151$ kilotons of TNT, corresponding to an initial mass between
$190-260$ metric tonnes with a diameter between $4-10$m. We developed a
fragmentation model to simulate the atmospheric breakup of the object and
reproduce the lightcurve. We model three different materials: cometary, stony
and metallic at speeds of $60$, $65 $ and $70$ km/s to determine the material
makeup of the impacting object. The slower cases are best fit by a strong,
metallic object while the faster cases require a weaker material.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1801.05072 [pdf] - 2028325
Analysis of June 2, 2016 bolide event
Submitted: 2018-01-15, last modified: 2019-05-21
On June 2, 2016 at 10h56m UTC, a $-20.4 \pm 0.2$ magnitude superbolide was
observed over Arizona. Fragments were located a few days later and the
meteorites were given the name Dishchii'bikoh. We present analysis of this
event based on 3 cameras and a multi-spectral sensor observations by the
SkySentinel continuous fireball-monitoring camera network, supplemented by a
dash cam footage and a fragmentation model. The bolide began its luminous
flight at an altitude of $100.2 \pm 0.4$ km at coordinates $\phi = 34.555 \pm
0.002^\circ$N planetographic latitude and $\lambda = 110.459 \pm 0.002^\circ$W
longitude, and it had a pre-atmospheric velocity of $17.4 \pm 0.3$ km/s. The
calculated orbital parameters indicate that the meteoroid did not belong to any
presently known asteroid family. From our calculations, the impacting object
had an initial mass of $14.8 \pm 1.7$ metric tonnes with an estimated initial
diameter of $2.03 \pm 0.12$ m.