sort results by

Use logical operators AND, OR, NOT and round brackets to construct complex queries. Whitespace-separated words are treated as ANDed.

Show articles per page in mode

Sandford, Nathan

Normalized to: Sandford, N.

2 article(s) in total. 9 co-authors, from 1 to 2 common article(s). Median position in authors list is 2,5.

[1]  oai:arXiv.org:2006.08640  [pdf] - 2115442
Forecasting Chemical Abundance Precision for Extragalactic Stellar Archaeology
Comments: 60 pages, 24 figures, accepted for publication in ApJS
Submitted: 2020-06-15
Increasingly powerful and multiplexed spectroscopic facilities promise detailed chemical abundance patterns for millions of resolved stars in galaxies beyond the Milky Way (MW). Here, we employ the Cram\'er-Rao Lower Bound (CRLB) to forecast the precision to which stellar abundances for metal-poor, low-mass stars outside the MW can be measured for 41 current (e.g., Keck, MMT, VLT, DESI) and planned (e.g., MSE, JWST, ELTs) spectrograph configurations. We show that moderate resolution ($R\lesssim5000$) spectroscopy at blue-optical wavelengths ($\lambda\lesssim4500$ \AA) (i) enables the recovery of 2-4 times as many elements as red-optical spectroscopy ($5000\lesssim\lambda\lesssim10000$ \AA) at similar or higher resolutions ($R\sim 10000$) and (ii) can constrain the abundances of several neutron capture elements to $\lesssim$0.3 dex. We further show that high-resolution ($R\gtrsim 20000$), low S/N ($\sim$10 pixel$^{-1}$) spectra contain rich abundance information when modeled with full spectral fitting techniques. We demonstrate that JWST/NIRSpec and ELTs can recover (i) $\sim$10 and 30 elements, respectively, for metal-poor red giants throughout the Local Group and (ii) [Fe/H] and [$\alpha$/Fe] for resolved stars in galaxies out to several Mpc with modest integration times. We show that select literature abundances are within a factor of $\sim$2 (or better) of our CRLBs. We suggest that, like ETCs, CRLBs should be used when planning stellar spectroscopic observations. We include an open source python package, \texttt{Chem-I-Calc}, that allows users to compute CRLBs for spectrographs of their choosing.
[2]  oai:arXiv.org:1908.09727  [pdf] - 2025733
Abundance Estimates for 16 Elements in 6 Million Stars from LAMOST DR5 Low-Resolution Spectra
Comments: 44 pages, 26 figures, submitted to ApJ Supplement
Submitted: 2019-08-26
We present the determination of stellar parameters and individual elemental abundances for 6 million stars from $\sim$8 million low-resolution ($R\sim1800$) spectra from LAMOST DR5. This is based on a modeling approach that we dub $The$ $Data$--$Driven$ $Payne$ ($DD$--$Payne$), which inherits essential ingredients from both {\it The Payne} \citep{Ting2019} and $The$ $Cannon$ \citep{Ness2015}. It is a data-driven model that incorporates constraints from theoretical spectral models to ensure the derived abundance estimates are physically sensible. Stars in LAMOST DR5 that are in common with either GALAH DR2 or APOGEE DR14 are used to train a model that delivers stellar parameters ($T_{\rm eff}$, $\log g$, $V_{\rm mic}$) and abundances for 16 elements (C, N, O, Na, Mg, Al, Si, Ca, Ti, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, and Ba) when applied to LAMOST spectra. Cross-validation and repeat observations suggest that, for ${\rm S/N}_{\rm pix}\ge 50$, the typical internal abundance precision is 0.03--0.1\,dex for the majority of these elements, with 0.2--0.3\,dex for Cu and Ba, and the internal precision of $T_{\rm eff}$ and $\log g$ is better than 30\,K and 0.07\,dex, respectively. Abundance systematics at the $\sim$0.1\,dex level are present in these estimates, but are inherited from the high-resolution surveys' training labels. For some elements, GALAH provides more robust training labels, for others, APOGEE. We provide flags to guide the quality of the label determination and to identify binary/multiple stars in LAMOST DR5. The abundance catalogs are publicly accessible via \href{url}{http://dr5.lamost.org/doc/vac}.