Normalized to: Salvatelli, V.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1911.04008 [pdf] - 1996219
Auto-Calibration of Remote Sensing Solar Telescopes with Deep Learning
Submitted: 2019-11-10
As a part of NASA's Heliophysics System Observatory (HSO) fleet of
satellites,the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO) has continuously monitored the
Sun since2010. Ultraviolet (UV) and Extreme UV (EUV) instruments in orbit, such
asSDO's Atmospheric Imaging Assembly (AIA) instrument, suffer time-dependent
degradation which reduces instrument sensitivity. Accurate calibration for
(E)UV instruments currently depends on periodic sounding rockets, which are
infrequent and not practical for heliophysics missions in deep space. In the
present work, we develop a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) that
auto-calibrates SDO/AIA channels and corrects sensitivity degradation by
exploiting spatial patterns in multi-wavelength observations to arrive at a
self-calibration of (E)UV imaging instruments. Our results remove a major
impediment to developing future HSOmissions of the same scientific caliber as
SDO but in deep space, able to observe the Sun from more vantage points than
just SDO's current geosynchronous orbit.This approach can be adopted to perform
autocalibration of other imaging systems exhibiting similar forms of
degradation
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1911.04006 [pdf] - 1996218
Using U-Nets to Create High-Fidelity Virtual Observations of the Solar
Corona
Submitted: 2019-11-10
Understanding and monitoring the complex and dynamic processes of the Sun is
important for a number of human activities on Earth and in space. For this
reason, NASA's Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO) has been continuously
monitoring the multi-layered Sun's atmosphere in high-resolution since its
launch in 2010, generating terabytes of observational data every day. The
synergy between machine learning and this enormous amount of data has the
potential, still largely unexploited, to advance our understanding of the Sun
and extend the capabilities of heliophysics missions. In the present work, we
show that deep learning applied to SDO data can be successfully used to create
a high-fidelity virtual telescope that generates synthetic observations of the
solar corona by image translation. Towards this end we developed a deep neural
network, structured as an encoder-decoder with skip connections (U-Net), that
reconstructs the Sun's image of one instrument channel given temporally aligned
images in three other channels. The approach we present has the potential to
reduce the telemetry needs of SDO, enhance the capabilities of missions that
have less observing channels, and transform the concept development of future
missions.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1610.03371 [pdf] - 1513748
Power law cosmology model comparison with CMB scale information
Tutusaus, Isaac;
Lamine, Brahim;
Blanchard, Alain;
Dupays, Arnaud;
Zolnierowski, Yves;
Cohen-Tanugi, Johann;
Ealet, Anne;
Escoffier, Stéphanie;
Fèvre, Olivier Le;
Ilić, Stéphane;
Pisani, Alice;
Plaszczynski, Stéphane;
Sakr, Ziad;
Salvatelli, Valentina;
Schücker, Thomas;
Tilquin, André;
Virey, Jean-Marc
Submitted: 2016-10-11, last modified: 2016-11-14
Despite the ability of the cosmological concordance model ($\Lambda$CDM) to
describe the cosmological observations exceedingly well, power law expansion of
the Universe scale radius, $R(t)\propto t^n$, has been proposed as an
alternative framework. We examine here these models, analyzing their ability to
fit cosmological data using robust model comparison criteria. Type Ia
supernovae (SNIa), baryonic acoustic oscillations (BAO) and acoustic scale
information from the cosmic microwave background (CMB) have been used. We find
that SNIa data either alone or combined with BAO can be well reproduced by both
$\Lambda$CDM and power law expansion models with $n\sim 1.5$, while the
constant expansion rate model $(n=1)$ is clearly disfavored. Allowing for some
redshift evolution in the SNIa luminosity essentially removes any clear
preference for a specific model. The CMB data are well known to provide the
most stringent constraints on standard cosmological models, in particular,
through the position of the first peak of the temperature angular power
spectrum, corresponding to the sound horizon at recombination, a scale
physically related to the BAO scale. Models with $n\geq 1$ lead to a divergence
of the sound horizon and do not naturally provide the relevant scales for the
BAO and the CMB. We retain an empirical footing to overcome this issue: we let
the data choose the preferred values for these scales, while we recompute the
ionization history in power law models, to obtain the distance to the CMB. In
doing so, we find that the scale coming from the BAO data is not consistent
with the observed position of the first peak of the CMB temperature angular
power spectrum for any power law cosmology. Therefore, we conclude that when
the three standard probes are combined, the $\Lambda$CDM model is very strongly
favored over any of these alternative models, which are then essentially ruled
out.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1602.08283 [pdf] - 1485083
Constraints on modified gravity from Planck 2015: when the health of
your theory makes the difference
Submitted: 2016-02-26, last modified: 2016-09-22
We use the effective field theory of dark energy (EFT of DE) formalism to
constrain dark energy models belonging to the Horndeski class with the recent
Planck 2015 CMB data. The space of theories is spanned by a certain number of
parameters determining the linear cosmological perturbations, while the
expansion history is set to that of a standard $\Lambda$CDM model. We always
demand that the theories be free of fatal instabilities. Additionally, we
consider two optional conditions, namely that scalar and tensor perturbations
propagate with subliminal speed. Such criteria severely restrict the allowed
parameter space and are thus very effective in shaping the posteriors. As a
result, we confirm that no theory performs better than $\Lambda$CDM when CMB
data alone are analysed. Indeed, the healthy dark energy models considered here
are not able to reproduce those phenomenological behaviours of the effective
Newton constant and gravitational slip parameters that, according to previous
studies, best fit the data.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1502.01589 [pdf] - 1483195
Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters
Planck Collaboration;
Ade, P. A. R.;
Aghanim, N.;
Arnaud, M.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartlett, J. G.;
Bartolo, N.;
Battaner, E.;
Battye, R.;
Benabed, K.;
Benoit, A.;
Benoit-Levy, A.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bock, J. J.;
Bonaldi, A.;
Bonavera, L.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Catalano, A.;
Challinor, A.;
Chamballu, A.;
Chary, R. -R.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Chluba, J.;
Christensen, P. R.;
Church, S.;
Clements, D. L.;
Colombi, S.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Coulais, A.;
Crill, B. P.;
Curto, A.;
Cuttaia, F.;
Danese, L.;
Davies, R. D.;
Davis, R. J.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Desert, F. -X.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Dolag, K.;
Dole, H.;
Donzelli, S.;
Dore, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Ducout, A.;
Dunkley, J.;
Dupac, X.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Elsner, F.;
Ensslin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Farhang, M.;
Fergusson, J.;
Finelli, F.;
Forni, O.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frejsel, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Gauthier, C.;
Gerbino, M.;
Ghosh, T.;
Giard, M.;
Giraud-Heraud, Y.;
Giusarma, E.;
Gjerlow, E.;
Gonzalez-Nuevo, J.;
Gorski, K. M.;
Gratton, S.;
Gregorio, A.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Hamann, J.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Hanson, D.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Helou, G.;
Henrot-Versille, S.;
Hernandez-Monteagudo, C.;
Herranz, D.;
Hildebrandt, S. R.;
Hivon, E.;
Hobson, M.;
Holmes, W. A.;
Hornstrup, A.;
Hovest, W.;
Huang, Z.;
Huffenberger, K. M.;
Hurier, G.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jaffe, T. R.;
Jones, W. C.;
Juvela, M.;
Keihanen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Kneissl, R.;
Knoche, J.;
Knox, L.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lahteenmaki, A.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Leahy, J. P.;
Leonardi, R.;
Lesgourgues, J.;
Levrier, F.;
Lewis, A.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Linden-Vornle, M.;
Lopez-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Macias-Perez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Marchini, A.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martinelli, M.;
Martinez-Gonzalez, E.;
Masi, S.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mazzotta, P.;
McGehee, P.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Melin, J. -B.;
Mendes, L.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Millea, M.;
Mitra, S.;
Miville-Deschenes, M. -A.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Mortlock, D.;
Moss, A.;
Munshi, D.;
Murphy, J. A.;
Naselsky, P.;
Nati, F.;
Natoli, P.;
Netterfield, C. B.;
Norgaard-Nielsen, H. U.;
Noviello, F.;
Novikov, D.;
Novikov, I.;
Oxborrow, C. A.;
Paci, F.;
Pagano, L.;
Pajot, F.;
Paladini, R.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Pasian, F.;
Patanchon, G.;
Pearson, T. J.;
Perdereau, O.;
Perotto, L.;
Perrotta, F.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Piat, M.;
Pierpaoli, E.;
Pietrobon, D.;
Plaszczynski, S.;
Pointecouteau, E.;
Polenta, G.;
Popa, L.;
Pratt, G. W.;
Prezeau, G.;
Prunet, S.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Reach, W. T.;
Rebolo, R.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renault, C.;
Renzi, A.;
Ristorcelli, I.;
Rocha, G.;
Rosset, C.;
Rossetti, M.;
Roudier, G.;
d'Orfeuil, B. Rouille;
Rowan-Robinson, M.;
Rubino-Martin, J. A.;
Rusholme, B.;
Said, N.;
Salvatelli, V.;
Salvati, L.;
Sandri, M.;
Santos, D.;
Savelainen, M.;
Savini, G.;
Scott, D.;
Seiffert, M. D.;
Serra, P.;
Shellard, E. P. S.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Spinelli, M.;
Stolyarov, V.;
Stompor, R.;
Sudiwala, R.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Sutton, D.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Sygnet, J. -F.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Terenzi, L.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tristram, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Tucci, M.;
Tuovinen, J.;
Turler, M.;
Umana, G.;
Valenziano, L.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Wade, L. A.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
White, M.;
White, S. D. M.;
Wilkinson, A.;
Yvon, D.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2015-02-05, last modified: 2016-06-17
We present results based on full-mission Planck observations of temperature
and polarization anisotropies of the CMB. These data are consistent with the
six-parameter inflationary LCDM cosmology. From the Planck temperature and
lensing data, for this cosmology we find a Hubble constant, H0= (67.8 +/- 0.9)
km/s/Mpc, a matter density parameter Omega_m = 0.308 +/- 0.012 and a scalar
spectral index with n_s = 0.968 +/- 0.006. (We quote 68% errors on measured
parameters and 95% limits on other parameters.) Combined with Planck
temperature and lensing data, Planck LFI polarization measurements lead to a
reionization optical depth of tau = 0.066 +/- 0.016. Combining Planck with
other astrophysical data we find N_ eff = 3.15 +/- 0.23 for the effective
number of relativistic degrees of freedom and the sum of neutrino masses is
constrained to < 0.23 eV. Spatial curvature is found to be |Omega_K| < 0.005.
For LCDM we find a limit on the tensor-to-scalar ratio of r <0.11 consistent
with the B-mode constraints from an analysis of BICEP2, Keck Array, and Planck
(BKP) data. Adding the BKP data leads to a tighter constraint of r < 0.09. We
find no evidence for isocurvature perturbations or cosmic defects. The equation
of state of dark energy is constrained to w = -1.006 +/- 0.045. Standard big
bang nucleosynthesis predictions for the Planck LCDM cosmology are in excellent
agreement with observations. We investigate annihilating dark matter and
deviations from standard recombination, finding no evidence for new physics.
The Planck results for base LCDM are in agreement with BAO data and with the
JLA SNe sample. However the amplitude of the fluctuations is found to be higher
than inferred from rich cluster counts and weak gravitational lensing. Apart
from these tensions, the base LCDM cosmology provides an excellent description
of the Planck CMB observations and many other astrophysical data sets.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1502.01590 [pdf] - 1486777
Planck 2015 results. XIV. Dark energy and modified gravity
Planck Collaboration;
Ade, P. A. R.;
Aghanim, N.;
Arnaud, M.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Battaner, E.;
Battye, R.;
Benabed, K.;
Benoît, A.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bonaldi, A.;
Bonavera, L.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Catalano, A.;
Challinor, A.;
Chamballu, A.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Christensen, P. R.;
Church, S.;
Clements, D. L.;
Colombi, S.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Couchot, F.;
Coulais, A.;
Crill, B. P.;
Curto, A.;
Cuttaia, F.;
Danese, L.;
Davies, R. D.;
Davis, R. J.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Désert, F. -X.;
Diego, J. M.;
Dole, H.;
Donzelli, S.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Ducout, A.;
Dupac, X.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Fergusson, J.;
Finelli, F.;
Forni, O.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frejsel, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Giard, M.;
Giraud-Héraud, Y.;
Gjerløw, E.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gratton, S.;
Gregorio, A.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Hanson, D.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Heavens, A.;
Helou, G.;
Henrot-Versillé, S.;
Hernández-Monteagudo, C.;
Herranz, D.;
Hildebrandt, S. R.;
Hivon, E.;
Hobson, M.;
Holmes, W. A.;
Hornstrup, A.;
Hovest, W.;
Huang, Z.;
Huffenberger, K. M.;
Hurier, G.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jaffe, T. R.;
Jones, W. C.;
Juvela, M.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Knoche, J.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lähteenmäki, A.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Leonardi, R.;
Lesgourgues, J.;
Levrier, F.;
Lewis, A.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Linden-Vørnle, M.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Ma, Y. -Z.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Marchini, A.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martinelli, M.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Masi, S.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mazzotta, P.;
McGehee, P.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mendes, L.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Mitra, S.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Mortlock, D.;
Moss, A.;
Munshi, D.;
Murphy, J. A.;
Narimani, A.;
Naselsky, P.;
Nati, F.;
Natoli, P.;
Netterfield, C. B.;
Nørgaard-Nielsen, H. U.;
Noviello, F.;
Novikov, D.;
Novikov, I.;
Oxborrow, C. A.;
Paci, F.;
Pagano, L.;
Pajot, F.;
Paoletti, D.;
Pasian, F.;
Patanchon, G.;
Pearson, T. J.;
Perdereau, O.;
Perotto, L.;
Perrotta, F.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Piat, M.;
Pierpaoli, E.;
Pietrobon, D.;
Plaszczynski, S.;
Pointecouteau, E.;
Polenta, G.;
Popa, L.;
Pratt, G. W.;
Prézeau, G.;
Prunet, S.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Reach, W. T.;
Rebolo, R.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renault, C.;
Renzi, A.;
Ristorcelli, I.;
Rocha, G.;
Rosset, C.;
Rossetti, M.;
Roudier, G.;
Rowan-Robinson, M.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Rusholme, B.;
Salvatelli, V.;
Sandri, M.;
Santos, D.;
Savelainen, M.;
Savini, G.;
Schaefer, B. M.;
Scott, D.;
Seiffert, M. D.;
Shellard, E. P. S.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Stolyarov, V.;
Stompor, R.;
Sudiwala, R.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Sutton, D.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Sygnet, J. -F.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Terenzi, L.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tristram, M.;
Tucci, M.;
Tuovinen, J.;
Valenziano, L.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Viel, M.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Wade, L. A.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
White, M.;
Yvon, D.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2015-02-05, last modified: 2016-05-03
We study the implications of Planck data for models of dark energy (DE) and
modified gravity (MG), beyond the cosmological constant scenario. We start with
cases where the DE only directly affects the background evolution, considering
Taylor expansions of the equation of state, principal component analysis and
parameterizations related to the potential of a minimally coupled DE scalar
field. When estimating the density of DE at early times, we significantly
improve present constraints. We then move to general parameterizations of the
DE or MG perturbations that encompass both effective field theories and the
phenomenology of gravitational potentials in MG models. Lastly, we test a range
of specific models, such as k-essence, f(R) theories and coupled DE. In
addition to the latest Planck data, for our main analyses we use baryonic
acoustic oscillations, type-Ia supernovae and local measurements of the Hubble
constant. We further show the impact of measurements of the cosmological
perturbations, such as redshift-space distortions and weak gravitational
lensing. These additional probes are important tools for testing MG models and
for breaking degeneracies that are still present in the combination of Planck
and background data sets. All results that include only background
parameterizations are in agreement with LCDM. When testing models that also
change perturbations (even when the background is fixed to LCDM), some tensions
appear in a few scenarios: the maximum one found is \sim 2 sigma for Planck
TT+lowP when parameterizing observables related to the gravitational potentials
with a chosen time dependence; the tension increases to at most 3 sigma when
external data sets are included. It however disappears when including CMB
lensing.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1502.01582 [pdf] - 1486774
Planck 2015 results. I. Overview of products and scientific results
Planck Collaboration;
Adam, R.;
Ade, P. A. R.;
Aghanim, N.;
Akrami, Y.;
Alves, M. I. R.;
Arnaud, M.;
Arroja, F.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartlett, J. G.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Battaglia, P.;
Battaner, E.;
Battye, R.;
Benabed, K.;
Benoît, A.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bertincourt, B.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bonaldi, A.;
Bonavera, L.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Carvalho, P.;
Casaponsa, B.;
Castex, G.;
Catalano, A.;
Challinor, A.;
Chamballu, A.;
Chary, R. -R.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Chluba, J.;
Christensen, P. R.;
Church, S.;
Clemens, M.;
Clements, D. L.;
Colombi, S.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Comis, B.;
Contreras, D.;
Couchot, F.;
Coulais, A.;
Crill, B. P.;
Cruz, M.;
Curto, A.;
Cuttaia, F.;
Danese, L.;
Davies, R. D.;
Davis, R. J.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Delouis, J. -M.;
Désert, F. -X.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Dolag, K.;
Dole, H.;
Donzelli, S.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Ducout, A.;
Dunkley, J.;
Dupac, X.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Eisenhardt, P. R. M.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Falgarone, E.;
Fantaye, Y.;
Farhang, M.;
Feeney, S.;
Fergusson, J.;
Fernandez-Cobos, R.;
Feroz, F.;
Finelli, F.;
Florido, E.;
Forni, O.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschet, C.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frejsel, A.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Gauthier, C.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Gerbino, M.;
Ghosh, T.;
Giard, M.;
Giraud-Héraud, Y.;
Giusarma, E.;
Gjerløw, E.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Grainge, K. J. B.;
Gratton, S.;
Gregorio, A.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Hamann, J.;
Handley, W.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Hanson, D.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Heavens, A.;
Helou, G.;
Henrot-Versillé, S.;
Hernández-Monteagudo, C.;
Herranz, D.;
Hildebrandt, S. R.;
Hivon, E.;
Hobson, M.;
Holmes, W. A.;
Hornstrup, A.;
Hovest, W.;
Huang, Z.;
Huffenberger, K. M.;
Hurier, G.;
Ilić, S.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jaffe, T. R.;
Jin, T.;
Jones, W. C.;
Juvela, M.;
Karakci, A.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kim, J.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Kneissl, R.;
Knoche, J.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lacasa, F.;
Lagache, G.;
Lähteenmäki, A.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Langer, M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Leahy, J. P.;
Lellouch, E.;
Leonardi, R.;
León-Tavares, J.;
Lesgourgues, J.;
Levrier, F.;
Lewis, A.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Linden-Vørnle, M.;
Lindholm, V.;
Liu, H.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Ma, Y. -Z.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Mak, D. S. Y.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Marchini, A.;
Marcos-Caballero, A.;
Marinucci, D.;
Marshall, D. J.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martinelli, M.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Masi, S.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mazzotta, P.;
McEwen, J. D.;
McGehee, P.;
Mei, S.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Melin, J. -B.;
Mendes, L.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Mikkelsen, K.;
Mitra, S.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Moreno, R.;
Morgante, G.;
Mortlock, D.;
Moss, A.;
Mottet, S.;
Müenchmeyer, M.;
Munshi, D.;
Murphy, J. A.;
Narimani, A.;
Naselsky, P.;
Nastasi, A.;
Nati, F.;
Natoli, P.;
Negrello, M.;
Netterfield, C. B.;
Nørgaard-Nielsen, H. U.;
Noviello, F.;
Novikov, D.;
Novikov, I.;
Olamaie, M.;
Oppermann, N.;
Orlando, E.;
Oxborrow, C. A.;
Paci, F.;
Pagano, L.;
Pajot, F.;
Paladini, R.;
Pandolfi, S.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Pasian, F.;
Patanchon, G.;
Pearson, T. J.;
Peel, M.;
Peiris, H. V.;
Pelkonen, V. -M.;
Perdereau, O.;
Perotto, L.;
Perrott, Y. C.;
Perrotta, F.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Piat, M.;
Pierpaoli, E.;
Pietrobon, D.;
Plaszczynski, S.;
Pogosyan, D.;
Pointecouteau, E.;
Polenta, G.;
Popa, L.;
Pratt, G. W.;
Prézeau, G.;
Prunet, S.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Racine, B.;
Reach, W. T.;
Rebolo, R.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renault, C.;
Renzi, A.;
Ristorcelli, I.;
Rocha, G.;
Roman, M.;
Romelli, E.;
Rosset, C.;
Rossetti, M.;
Rotti, A.;
Roudier, G.;
d'Orfeuil, B. Rouillé;
Rowan-Robinson, M.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Ruiz-Granados, B.;
Rumsey, C.;
Rusholme, B.;
Said, N.;
Salvatelli, V.;
Salvati, L.;
Sandri, M.;
Sanghera, H. S.;
Santos, D.;
Saunders, R. D. E.;
Sauvé, A.;
Savelainen, M.;
Savini, G.;
Schaefer, B. M.;
Schammel, M. P.;
Scott, D.;
Seiffert, M. D.;
Serra, P.;
Shellard, E. P. S.;
Shimwell, T. W.;
Shiraishi, M.;
Smith, K.;
Souradeep, T.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Spinelli, M.;
Stanford, S. A.;
Stern, D.;
Stolyarov, V.;
Stompor, R.;
Strong, A. W.;
Sudiwala, R.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Sutter, P.;
Sutton, D.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Sygnet, J. -F.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Terenzi, L.;
Texier, D.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tornikoski, M.;
Tristram, M.;
Troja, A.;
Trombetti, T.;
Tucci, M.;
Tuovinen, J.;
Türler, M.;
Umana, G.;
Valenziano, L.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vassallo, T.;
Vidal, M.;
Viel, M.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Wade, L. A.;
Walter, B.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Watson, R.;
Wehus, I. K.;
Welikala, N.;
Weller, J.;
White, M.;
White, S. D. M.;
Wilkinson, A.;
Yvon, D.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zibin, J. P.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2015-02-05, last modified: 2015-08-09
The European Space Agency's Planck satellite, dedicated to studying the early
Universe and its subsequent evolution, was launched 14~May 2009 and scanned the
microwave and submillimetre sky continuously between 12~August 2009 and
23~October 2013. In February~2015, ESA and the Planck Collaboration released
the second set of cosmology products based on data from the entire Planck
mission, including both temperature and polarization, along with a set of
scientific and technical papers and a web-based explanatory supplement. This
paper gives an overview of the main characteristics of the data and the data
products in the release, as well as the associated cosmological and
astrophysical science results and papers. The science products include maps of
the cosmic microwave background (CMB), the thermal Sunyaev-Zeldovich effect,
and diffuse foregrounds in temperature and polarization, catalogues of compact
Galactic and extragalactic sources (including separate catalogues of
Sunyaev-Zeldovich clusters and Galactic cold clumps), and extensive simulations
of signals and noise used in assessing the performance of the analysis methods
and assessment of uncertainties. The likelihood code used to assess
cosmological models against the Planck data are described, as well as a CMB
lensing likelihood. Scientific results include cosmological parameters deriving
from CMB power spectra, gravitational lensing, and cluster counts, as well as
constraints on inflation, non-Gaussianity, primordial magnetic fields, dark
energy, and modified gravity.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1406.7297 [pdf] - 891976
Indications of a late-time interaction in the dark sector
Submitted: 2014-06-27, last modified: 2014-10-01
We show that a general late-time interaction between cold dark matter and
vacuum energy is favoured by current cosmological datasets. We characterize the
strength of the coupling by a dimensionless parameter $q_V$ that is free to
take different values in four redshift bins from the primordial epoch up to
today. This interacting scenario is in agreement with measurements of cosmic
microwave background temperature anisotropies from the Planck satellite,
supernovae Ia from Union 2.1 and redshift space distortions from a number of
surveys, as well as with combinations of these different datasets. We show that
a non-zero interaction is very likely at late times. We then focus on the case
$q_V\not=0$ in a single low-redshift bin, obtaining a nested one parameter
extension of the standard $\Lambda$CDM model. We study the Bayesian evidence,
with respect to $\Lambda$CDM, of this late-time interaction model, finding
moderate evidence for an interaction starting at $z=0.9$, dependent upon the
prior range chosen for the interaction strength parameter $q_V$. For this case
the null interaction ($q_V=0$, i.e.$\Lambda$CDM) is excluded at 99% c.l..
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:1304.7119 [pdf] - 713283
New constraints on Coupled Dark Energy from Planck
Submitted: 2013-04-26, last modified: 2013-08-30
We present new constraints on coupled dark energy from the recent
measurements of the Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropies from the Planck
satellite mission. We found that a coupled dark energy model is fully
compatible with the Planck measurements, deriving a weak bound on the dark
matter-dark energy coupling parameter \xi=-0.49^{+0.19}_{-0.31} at 68% c.l..
Moreover if Planck data are fitted to a coupled dark energy scenario, the
constraint on the Hubble constant is relaxed to H_0=72.1^{+3.2}_{-2.3}
km/s/Mpc, solving the tension with the Hubble Space Telescope value. We show
that a combined Planck+HST analysis provides significant evidence for coupled
dark energy finding a non-zero value for the coupling parameter \xi, with
-0.90< \xi <-0.22 at 95% c.l.. We also consider the combined constraints from
the Planck data plus the BAO measurements of the 6dF Galaxy Survey, the Sloan
Digital Sky Survey and the Baron Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey.
[10]
oai:arXiv.org:1308.4165 [pdf] - 1173493
Far-infrared Fine-Structure Line Diagnostics of Ultraluminous Infrared
Galaxies
Farrah, Duncan;
Lebouteiller, Vianney;
Spoon, Henrik;
Bernard-Salas, Jeronimo;
Pearson, Chris;
Rigopoulou, Dimitra;
Smith, Howard;
Gonzalez-Alfonso, Eduardo;
Clements, David;
Efstathiou, Andreas;
Cormier, Diane;
Afonso, Jose;
Petty, Sara;
Harris, Kathryn;
Hurley, Peter;
Borys, Colin;
Verma, Aprajita;
Cooray, Asantha;
Salvatelli, Valentina
Submitted: 2013-08-19
We present Herschel observations of six fine-structure lines in 25
Ultraluminous Infrared Galaxies at z<0.27. The lines, [O III]52, [N III]57, [O
I]63, [N II]122, [O I]145, and [C II]158, are mostly single gaussians with
widths <600 km s-1 and luminosities of 10^7 - 10^9 Solar. There are deficits in
the [O I]63/L_IR, [N II]/L_IR, [O I]145/L_IR, and [C II]/L_IR ratios compared
to lower luminosity systems. The majority of the line deficits are consistent
with dustier H II regions, but part of the [C II] deficit may arise from an
additional mechanism, plausibly charged dust grains. This is consistent with
some of the [C II] originating from PDRs or the ISM. We derive relations
between far-IR line luminosities and both IR luminosity and star formation
rate. We find that [N II] and both [O I] lines are good tracers of IR
luminosity and star formation rate. In contrast, [C II] is a poor tracer of IR
luminosity and star formation rate, and does not improve as a tracer of either
quantity if the [C II] deficit is accounted for. The continuum luminosity
densities also correlate with IR luminosity and star formation rate. We derive
ranges for the gas density and ultraviolet radiation intensity of 10^1 < n <
10^2.5 and 10^2.2 < G_0 < 10^3.6, respectively. These ranges depend on optical
type, the importance of star formation, and merger stage. We do not find
relationships between far-IR line properties and several other parameters; AGN
activity, merger stage, mid-IR excitation, and SMBH mass. We conclude that
these far-IR lines arise from gas heated by starlight, and that they are not
strongly influenced by AGN activity.
[11]
oai:arXiv.org:1307.2002 [pdf] - 725673
Updated constraints from the PLANCK experiment on modified gravity
Submitted: 2013-07-08
A modification of the action of the general relativity produces a different
pattern for the growth of the cosmic structures below a certain length-scale
leaving an imprint on the cosmic microwave background (CMB) anisotropies. We
re-examine the upper limits on the length-scale parameter B0 of f (R) models
using the recent data from the Planck satellite experiment. We also investigate
the combined constraints obtained when including the Hubble Space Telescope H0
measurement and the baryon acoustic oscillations measurements from the SDSS,
WiggleZ and BOSS surveys.
[12]
oai:arXiv.org:1302.2593 [pdf] - 660306
Constraints on Modified Gravity from ACT and SPT
Submitted: 2013-02-11, last modified: 2013-02-14
The Atacama Cosmology Telescope (ACT) and the South Pole Telescope (SPT) have
recently provided new and precise measurements of the Cosmic Microwave
Background anisotropy damping tail. This region of the CMB angular spectra,
thanks to the angular distortions produced by gravitational lensing, can probe
the growth of matter perturbations and provide a test for general relativity.
Here we make use of the ACT and SPT power spectrum measurements (combined with
the recent WMAP9 data) to constrain f(R) gravity theories. Adopting a
parametrized approach, we obtain an upper limit on the lengthscale of the
theory of B_0 < 0.86 at 95% c.l. from ACT, while we get a significantly
stronger bound from SPT with B_0 < 0.14 at 95% c.l..
[13]
oai:arXiv.org:1204.5352 [pdf] - 625177
Parametrised modified gravity and the CMB Bispectrum
Submitted: 2012-04-24
We forecast the constraints on modified theories of gravity from the cosmic
microwave background (CMB) anisotropies bispectrum that arises from
correlations between lensing and the Integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect. In models
of modified gravity the evolution of the metric potentials is generally altered
and the contribution to the CMB bispectrum signal can differ significantly from
the one expected in the standard cosmological model.We adopt a parametrised
approach and focus on three different classes of models: Linder's growth index,
Chameleon-type models and f(R) theories. We show that the constraints on the
parameters of the models will significantly improve with future CMB bispectrum
measurements.
[14]
oai:arXiv.org:1109.4736 [pdf] - 672876
Future constraints on the Hu-Sawicki modified gravity scenario
Submitted: 2011-09-22
We present current and future constraints on the Hu and Sawicki modified
gravity scenario. This model can reproduce a late time accelerated universe and
evade solar system constraints. While current cosmological data still allows
for distinctive deviations from the cosmological constant picture, future
measurements of the growth of structure combined with Supernova Ia luminosity
distance data will greatly improve present constraints.