Normalized to: Salvador, A.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1708.01530 [pdf] - 1840662
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Galaxy
Clustering and Weak Lensing
DES Collaboration;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Alarcon, A.;
Aleksić, J.;
Allam, S.;
Allen, S.;
Amara, A.;
Annis, J.;
Asorey, J.;
Avila, S.;
Bacon, D.;
Balbinot, E.;
Banerji, M.;
Banik, N.;
Barkhouse, W.;
Baumer, M.;
Baxter, E.;
Bechtol, K.;
Becker, M. R.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Benson, B. A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bertin, E.;
Blazek, J.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Brooks, D.;
Brout, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Busha, M. T.;
Capozzi, D.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Chang, C.;
Chen, N.;
Childress, M.;
Choi, A.;
Conselice, C.;
Crittenden, R.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Das, R.;
Davis, T. M.;
Davis, C.;
De Vicente, J.;
DePoy, D. L.;
DeRose, J.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Dodelson, S.;
Doel, P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Elliott, A. E.;
Elsner, F.;
Elvin-Poole, J.;
Estrada, J.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Fang, Y.;
Fernandez, E.;
Ferté, A.;
Finley, D. A.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Friedrich, O.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Garcia-Fernandez, M.;
Gatti, M.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Gill, M. S. S.;
Glazebrook, K.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hamilton, S.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hinton, S. R.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoyle, B.;
Huterer, D.;
Jain, B.;
James, D. J.;
Jarvis, M.;
Jeltema, T.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Kacprzak, T.;
Kent, S.;
Kim, A. G.;
King, A.;
Kirk, D.;
Kokron, N.;
Kovacs, A.;
Krause, E.;
Krawiec, C.;
Kremin, A.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lacasa, F.;
Lahav, O.;
Li, T. S.;
Liddle, A. R.;
Lidman, C.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
MacCrann, N.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Makler, M.;
Manera, M.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
McMahon, R. G.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Miranda, V.;
Mudd, D.;
Muir, J.;
Möller, A.;
Neilsen, E.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B.;
Nugent, P.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Palmese, A.;
Peacock, J.;
Peiris, H. V.;
Peoples, J.;
Percival, W. J.;
Petravick, D.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Porredon, A.;
Prat, J.;
Pujol, A.;
Rau, M. M.;
Refregier, A.;
Ricker, P. M.;
Roe, N.;
Rollins, R. P.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Rosenfeld, R.;
Ross, A. J.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sako, M.;
Salvador, A. I.;
Samuroff, S.;
Sánchez, C.;
Sanchez, E.;
Santiago, B.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Scolnic, D.;
Secco, L. F.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sheldon, E.;
Smith, R. C.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, J.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Tucker, B. E.;
Uddin, S. A.;
Varga, T. N.;
Vielzeuf, P.;
Vikram, V.;
Vivas, A. K.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wang, M.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Weller, J.;
Wester, W.;
Wolf, R. C.;
Yanny, B.;
Yuan, F.;
Zenteno, A.;
Zhang, B.;
Zhang, Y.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2017-08-04, last modified: 2019-03-01
We present cosmological results from a combined analysis of galaxy clustering
and weak gravitational lensing, using 1321 deg$^2$ of $griz$ imaging data from
the first year of the Dark Energy Survey (DES Y1). We combine three two-point
functions: (i) the cosmic shear correlation function of 26 million source
galaxies in four redshift bins, (ii) the galaxy angular autocorrelation
function of 650,000 luminous red galaxies in five redshift bins, and (iii) the
galaxy-shear cross-correlation of luminous red galaxy positions and source
galaxy shears. To demonstrate the robustness of these results, we use
independent pairs of galaxy shape, photometric redshift estimation and
validation, and likelihood analysis pipelines. To prevent confirmation bias,
the bulk of the analysis was carried out while blind to the true results; we
describe an extensive suite of systematics checks performed and passed during
this blinded phase. The data are modeled in flat $\Lambda$CDM and $w$CDM
cosmologies, marginalizing over 20 nuisance parameters, varying 6 (for
$\Lambda$CDM) or 7 (for $w$CDM) cosmological parameters including the neutrino
mass density and including the 457 $\times$ 457 element analytic covariance
matrix. We find consistent cosmological results from these three two-point
functions, and from their combination obtain $S_8 \equiv \sigma_8
(\Omega_m/0.3)^{0.5} = 0.783^{+0.021}_{-0.025}$ and $\Omega_m =
0.264^{+0.032}_{-0.019}$ for $\Lambda$CDM for $w$CDM, we find $S_8 =
0.794^{+0.029}_{-0.027}$, $\Omega_m = 0.279^{+0.043}_{-0.022}$, and
$w=-0.80^{+0.20}_{-0.22}$ at 68% CL. The precision of these DES Y1 results
rivals that from the Planck cosmic microwave background measurements, allowing
a comparison of structure in the very early and late Universe on equal terms.
Although the DES Y1 best-fit values for $S_8$ and $\Omega_m$ are lower than the
central values from Planck ...
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1712.06211 [pdf] - 1798221
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Galaxy Sample for BAO Measurement
Crocce, M.;
Ross, A. J.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Elvin-Poole, J.;
Avila, S.;
Alarcon, A.;
Chan, K. C.;
Banik, N.;
Carretero, J.;
Sanchez, E.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Sanchez, C.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Rosenfeld, R.;
Salvador, A. I.;
Garcia-Fernandez, M.;
Garcia-Bellido, J.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Bechtol, K.;
Benoit-Levy, A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bernstein, R. A.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Castander, F. J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
De Vicente, J.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
Garcia-Bellido, J.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hollowood, D.;
Honscheid, K.;
Jain, B.;
James, D. J.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Percival, W. J.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Sako, M.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Scolnic, D.;
Sheldon, E.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Yanny, B.;
Zhang, Y.
Submitted: 2017-12-17, last modified: 2018-12-14
We define and characterise a sample of 1.3 million galaxies extracted from
the first year of Dark Energy Survey data, optimised to measure Baryon Acoustic
Oscillations in the presence of significant redshift uncertainties. The sample
is dominated by luminous red galaxies located at redshifts $z \gtrsim 0.6$. We
define the exact selection using color and magnitude cuts that balance the need
of high number densities and small photometric redshift uncertainties, using
the corresponding forecasted BAO distance error as a figure-of-merit in the
process. The typical photo-$z$ uncertainty varies from $2.3\%$ to $3.6\%$ (in
units of 1+$z$) from $z=0.6$ to $1$, with number densities from $200$ to $130$
galaxies per deg$^2$ in tomographic bins of width $\Delta z = 0.1$. Next we
summarise the validation of the photometric redshift estimation. We
characterise and mitigate observational systematics including stellar
contamination, and show that the clustering on large scales is robust in front
of those contaminants. We show that the clustering signal in the
auto-correlations and cross-correlations is generally consistent with
theoretical models, which serves as an additional test of the redshift
distributions.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1807.10331 [pdf] - 1767544
Measuring Linear and Non-linear Galaxy Bias Using Counts-in-Cells in the
Dark Energy Survey Science Verification Data
Salvador, A. I.;
Sánchez, F. J.;
Pagul, A.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Sanchez, E.;
Pujol, A.;
Frieman, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Ross, A. J.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Avila, S.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cunha, C. E.;
De Vicente, J.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Fosalba, P.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
James, D. J.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lima, M.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.
Submitted: 2018-07-26, last modified: 2018-10-16
Non-linear bias measurements require a great level of control of potential
systematic effects in galaxy redshift surveys. Our goal is to demonstrate the
viability of using Counts-in-Cells (CiC), a statistical measure of the galaxy
distribution, as a competitive method to determine linear and higher-order
galaxy bias and assess clustering systematics. We measure the galaxy bias by
comparing the first four moments of the galaxy density distribution with those
of the dark matter distribution. We use data from the MICE simulation to
evaluate the performance of this method, and subsequently perform measurements
on the public Science Verification (SV) data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES).
We find that the linear bias obtained with CiC is consistent with measurements
of the bias performed using galaxy-galaxy clustering, galaxy-galaxy lensing,
CMB lensing, and shear+clustering measurements. Furthermore, we compute the
projected (2D) non-linear bias using the expansion $\delta_{g} = \sum_{k=0}^{3}
(b_{k}/k!) \delta^{k}$, finding a non-zero value for $b_2$ at the $3\sigma$
level. We also check a non-local bias model and show that the linear bias
measurements are robust to the addition of new parameters. We compare our 2D
results to the 3D prediction and find compatibility in the large scale regime
($>30$ Mpc $h^{-1}$)
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1712.06232 [pdf] - 1723432
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: galaxy mock catalogues for BAO
Avila, S.;
Crocce, M.;
Ross, A. J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Percival, W. J.;
Camacho, N. Banik H.;
Kokron, N.;
Chan, K. C.;
Andrade-Oliveira, F.;
Gomes, R.;
Gomes, D.;
Lima, M.;
Rosenfeld, R.;
Salvador, A. I.;
Friedrich, O.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Annis, J.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cunha, C. E.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
De Vicente, J.;
Doel, P.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hollowood, D.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Miquel, R.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyt, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Walker, A. R.
Submitted: 2017-12-17, last modified: 2018-07-27
Mock catalogues are a crucial tool in the analysis of galaxy surveys data,
both for the accurate computation of covariance matrices, and for the
optimisation of analysis methodology and validation of data sets. In this
paper, we present a set of 1800 galaxy mock catalogues designed to match the
Dark Energy Survey Year-1 BAO sample (Crocce et al. 2017) in abundance,
observational volume, redshift distribution and uncertainty, and redshift
dependent clustering. The simulated samples were built upon HALOGEN (Avila et
al. 2015) halo catalogues, based on a $2LPT$ density field with an exponential
bias. For each of them, a lightcone is constructed by the superposition of
snapshots in the redshift range $0.45<z<1.4$. Uncertainties introduced by
so-called photometric redshifts estimators were modelled with a
\textit{double-skewed-Gaussian} curve fitted to the data. We also introduce a
hybrid HOD-HAM model with two free parameters that are adjusted to achieve a
galaxy bias evolution $b(z_{\rm ph})$ that matches the data at the 1-$\sigma$
level in the range $0.6<z_{\rm ph}<1.0$. We further analyse the galaxy mock
catalogues and compare their clustering to the data using the angular
correlation function $ w(\theta)$, the comoving transverse separation
clustering $\xi_{\mu<0.8}(s_{\perp})$ and the angular power spectrum $C_\ell$.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1412.5151 [pdf] - 1223670
Homogeneity and isotropy in the 2MASS Photometric Redshift catalogue
Submitted: 2014-12-16, last modified: 2015-03-24
Using the 2MASS Photometric Redshift catalogue we perform a number of
statistical tests aimed at detecting possible departures from statistical
homogeneity and isotropy in the large-scale structure of the Universe. Making
use of the angular homogeneity index, an observable proposed in a previous
publication, as well as studying the scaling of the angular clustering and
number counts with magnitude limit, we place constraints on the fractal nature
of the galaxy distribution. We find that the statistical properties of our
sample are in excellent agreement with the standard cosmological model, and
that it reaches the homogeneous regime significantly faster than a class of
fractal models with dimensions $D<2.75$. As part of our search for systematic
effects, we also study the presence of hemispherical asymmetries in our data,
finding no significant deviation beyond those allowed by the concordance model.