Normalized to: Salafia, O.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:2002.01950 [pdf] - 2118898
Observational constraints on the optical and near-infrared emission from
the neutron star-black hole binary merger S190814bv
Ackley, K.;
Amati, L.;
Barbieri, C.;
Bauer, F. E.;
Benetti, S.;
Bernardini, M. G.;
Bhirombhakdi, K.;
Botticella, M. T.;
Branchesi, M.;
Brocato, E.;
Bruun, S. H.;
Bulla, M.;
Campana, S.;
Cappellaro, E.;
Castro-Tirado, A. J.;
Chambers, K. C.;
Chaty, S.;
Chen, T. -W.;
Ciolfi, R.;
Coleiro, A.;
Copperwheat, C. M.;
Covino, S.;
Cutter, R.;
D'Ammando, F.;
D'Avanzo, P.;
De Cesare, G.;
D'Elia, V.;
Della Valle, M.;
Denneau, L.;
De Pasquale, M.;
Dhillon, V. S.;
Dyer, M. J.;
Elias-Rosa, N.;
Evans, P. A.;
Eyles-Ferris, R. A. J.;
Fiore, A.;
Fraser, M.;
Fruchter, A. S.;
Fynbo, J. P. U.;
Galbany, L.;
Gall, C.;
Galloway, D. K.;
Getman, F. I.;
Ghirlanda, G.;
Gillanders, J. H.;
Gomboc, A.;
Gompertz, B. P.;
González-Fernández, C.;
González-Gaitán, S.;
Grado, A.;
Greco, G.;
Gromadzki, M.;
Groot, P. J.;
Gutiérrez, C. P.;
Heikkilä, T.;
Heintz, K. E.;
Hjorth, J.;
Hu, Y. -D.;
Huber, M. E.;
Inserra, C.;
Izzo, L.;
Japelj, J.;
Jerkstrand, A.;
Jin, Z. P.;
Jonker, P. G.;
Kankare, E.;
Kann, D. A.;
Kennedy, M.;
Kim, S.;
Klose, S.;
Kool, E. C.;
Kotak, R.;
Kuncarayakti, H.;
Lamb, G. P.;
Leloudas, G.;
Levan, A. J.;
Longo, F.;
Lowe, T. B.;
Lyman, J. D.;
Magnier, E.;
Maguire, K.;
Maiorano, E.;
Mandel, I.;
Mapelli, M.;
Mattila, S.;
McBrien, O. R.;
Melandri, A.;
Michałowski, M. J.;
Milvang-Jensen, B.;
Moran, S.;
Nicastro, L.;
Nicholl, M.;
Guelbenzu, A. Nicuesa;
Nuttal, L.;
Oates, S. R.;
O'Brien, P. T.;
Onori, F.;
Palazzi, E.;
Patricelli, B.;
Perego, A.;
Torres, M. A. P.;
Perley, D. A.;
Pian, E.;
Pignata, G.;
Piranomonte, S.;
Poshyachinda, S.;
Possenti, A.;
Pumo, M. L.;
Quirola-Vásquez, J.;
Ragosta, F.;
Ramsay, G.;
Rau, A.;
Rest, A.;
Reynolds, T. M.;
Rosetti, S. S.;
Rossi, A.;
Rosswog, S.;
Sabha, N. B.;
Carracedo, A. Sagués;
Salafia, O. S.;
Salmon, L.;
Salvaterra, R.;
Savaglio, S.;
Sbordone, L.;
Schady, P.;
Schipani, P.;
Schultz, A. S. B.;
Schweyer, T.;
Smartt, S. J.;
Smith, K. W.;
Smith, M.;
Sollerman, J.;
Srivastav, S.;
Stanway, E. R.;
Starling, R. L. C.;
Steeghs, D.;
Stratta, G.;
Stubbs, C. W.;
Tanvir, N. R.;
Testa, V.;
Thrane, E.;
Tonry, J. L.;
Turatto, M.;
Ulaczyk, K.;
van der Horst, A. J.;
Vergani, S. D.;
Walton, N. A.;
Watson, D.;
Wiersema, K.;
Wiik, K.;
Wyrzykowski, L.;
Yang, S.;
Yi, S. -X.;
Young, D. R.
Submitted: 2020-02-05, last modified: 2020-06-22
On 2019 August 14, the LIGO and Virgo interferometers detected a
high-significance event labelled S190814bv. Preliminary analysis of the GW data
suggests that the event was likely due to the merger of a compact binary system
formed by a BH and a NS. ElectromagNetic counterparts of GRAvitational wave
sources at the VEry Large Telescope (ENGRAVE) collaboration members carried out
an intensive multi-epoch, multi-instrument observational campaign to identify
the possible optical/near infrared counterpart of the event. In addition, the
ATLAS, GOTO, GRAWITA-VST, Pan-STARRS and VINROUGE projects also carried out a
search on this event. Our observations allow us to place limits on the presence
of any counterpart and discuss the implications for the kilonova (KN) possibly
generated by this NS-BH merger, and for the strategy of future searches.
Altogether, our observations allow us to exclude a KN with large ejecta mass
$M\gtrsim 0.1\,\mathrm{M_\odot}$ to a high ($>90\%$) confidence, and we can
exclude much smaller masses in a subsample of our observations. This disfavours
the tidal disruption of the neutron star during the merger. Despite the
sensitive instruments involved in the campaign, given the distance of S190814bv
we could not reach sufficiently deep limits to constrain a KN comparable in
luminosity to AT 2017gfo on a large fraction of the localisation probability.
This suggests that future (likely common) events at a few hundreds Mpc will be
detected only by large facilities with both high sensitivity and large field of
view. Galaxy-targeted observations can reach the needed depth over a relevant
portion of the localisation probability with a smaller investment of resources,
but the number of galaxies to be targeted in order to get a fairly complete
coverage is large, even in the case of a localisation as good as that of this
event.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:2006.07376 [pdf] - 2114300
Accretion-to-jet energy conversion efficiency in GW170817
Submitted: 2020-06-12
Based on previously published multi-wavelength modelling of the GRB 170817A
jet afterglow, that includes information from the VLBI centroid motion, we
construct the posterior probability density distribution on the total energy in
the bipolar jets launched by the GW170817 merger remnant. By applying a new
numerical-relativity-informed fitting formula for the accretion disk mass, we
construct the posterior probability density distribution of the GW170817
remnant disk mass. By combining the two, we estimate the accretion-to-jet
energy conversion efficiency in this system, carefully accounting for
uncertainties. The accretion-to-jet energy conversion efficiency in GW170817 is
$\eta\sim 10^{-3}$ with an uncertainty of slightly less than two orders of
magnitude. This low efficiency is in good agreement with expectations from the
$\nu\bar\nu$ mechanism, which therefore cannot be excluded by this measurement
alone. Such an efficiency also agrees with that anticipated for the
Blandford-Znajek mechanism, provided that the magnetic field in the disk right
after the merger is predominantly toroidal (which is expected as a result of
the merger dynamics).
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:2002.09395 [pdf] - 2104003
Distinguishing the nature of ''ambiguous'' merging systems hosting a
neutron star: GW190425 in low-latency
Submitted: 2020-02-21, last modified: 2020-05-29
GW190425 is the newly discovered gravitational wave (GW) source consistent
with a neutron star-neutron star merger with chirp mass of
$1.44\pm0.02M_\odot.$ This value falls in the $ambiguous$ interval as from the
GW signal alone we can not rule out the presence of a black hole in the binary.
In this case, the system would host a neutron star and a very light stellar
black hole, with mass close to the maximum value for neutron stars, filling the
$mass$ $gap$. No electromagnetic counterpart is firmly associated with this
event, due to the poorly informative sky localisation and larger distance,
compared to GW/GRB170817. We construct here kilonova light curve models for
GW190425, for both double neutron star and black hole-neutron star systems,
considering two equations of state consistent with current constraints from the
signals of GW170817/GW190425 and the NICER results, including black hole spin
effects and assuming a new formula for the mass of the ejecta. The putative
presence of a light black hole in GW190425 would have produced a brighter
kilonova emission compared to the double neutron star case, letting us to
distinguish the nature of the companion to the neutron star. Concerning
candidate counterparts of GW190425, classified later on as supernovae, our
models could have discarded two transients detected in their early $r$-band
evolution. Combining the chirp mass and luminosity distance information from
the GW signal with a library of kilonova light curves helps identifying the
electromagnetic counterpart early on. We remark that the release in low latency
of the chirp mass in this interval of $ambiguous$ values appears to be vital
for successful electromagnetic follow-ups.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:2004.12215 [pdf] - 2084338
High latitude emission from structured jet of Gamma-Ray Bursts observed
off-axis
Submitted: 2020-04-25
The X-ray emission of gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) is often characterized by an
initial steep decay, followed by a nearly constant emission phase (so called
"plateau") which can extend up to thousands of seconds. While the steep decay
is usually interpreted as the tail of the prompt gamma-ray flash, the
long-lasting plateau is commonly associated to the emission from the external
shock sustained by energy injection from a long lasting central engine. A
recent study proposed an alternative interpretation, ascribing both the steep
decay and the plateau to high-latitude emission (HLE) from a "structured jet"
whose energy and bulk Lorentz factor depend on the angular distance from the
jet symmetry axis. In this work we expand over this idea and explore more
realistic conditions: (a) the finite duration of the prompt emission, (b) the
angular dependence of the optical depth and (c) the lightcurve dependence on
the observer viewing angle. We find that, when viewed highly off-axis, the
structured jet HLE lightcurve is smoothly decaying with no clear distinction
between the steep and flat phase, as opposed to the on-axis case. For a
realistic choice of physical parameters, the effects of a latitude-dependent
Thomson opacity and finite duration of the emission have a marginal effect on
the overall lightcurve evolution. We discuss the possible HLE of GW170817,
showing that the emission would have faded away long before the first Swift-XRT
observations. Finally, we discuss the prospects for the detection of HLE from
off-axis GRBs by present and future wide-field X-ray telescopes and X-ray
surveys, such as eROSITA and the mission concept THESEUS.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1904.08786 [pdf] - 2084982
Structured Jets and X-ray Plateaus in Gamma-Ray Burst Phenomena
Submitted: 2019-04-18, last modified: 2020-03-20
The first multi-messenger detection of a binary neutron star merger,
GW170817, brought to the forefront the structured jet model as a way to explain
multi-wavelength observations taken more than a year after the event. Here we
show that the high-latitude emission from a structured jet can naturally
produce an X-ray plateau in gamma-ray burst (GRB) light curves, independent of
the radiation from an external shock. We calculate the radiation from a
switched-off shell featuring an angular structure in both its relativistic bulk
motion and intrinsic brightness. Our model is able to explain the shallow decay
phase (plateau) often observed in GRB X-ray light curves. We discuss the
possible contribution of the structured jet high-latitude emission to other
distinctive features of GRB X-ray light curves, and its capability to explain
the chromatic optical/X-ray light curve properties.
[11]
oai:arXiv.org:1912.02185 [pdf] - 2085080
Proton-synchrotron as the radiation mechanism of the prompt emission of
GRBs?
Submitted: 2019-12-04, last modified: 2020-02-07
We discuss the new surprising observational results that indicate quite
convincingly that the prompt emission of Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs) is due to
synchrotron radiation produced by a particle distribution that has a low energy
cut-off. The evidence of this is provided by the low energy part of the
spectrum of the prompt emission, that shows the characteristic F(nu) \propto
nu^(1/3) shape followed by F(nu) \propto nu^(-1/2) up to the peak frequency.
This implies that although the emitting particles are in fast cooling, they do
not cool completely. This poses a severe challenge to the basic ideas about how
and where the emission is produced, because the incomplete cooling requires a
small value of the magnetic field, to limit synchrotron cooling, and a large
emitting region, to limit the self-Compton cooling, even considering
Klein-Nishina scattering effects. Some new and fundamental ingredient is
required for understanding the GRBs prompt emission. We propose
proton-synchrotron as a promising mechanism to solve the incomplete cooling
puzzle.
[12]
oai:arXiv.org:1907.07599 [pdf] - 2085004
Gamma-ray burst jet propagation, development of angular structure, and
the luminosity function
Submitted: 2019-07-17, last modified: 2020-01-27
The fate and observable properties of gamma-ray burst jets depend crucially
on their interaction with the progenitor material that surrounds the central
engine. We present a semi-analytical model of such interaction, which builds
upon several previous analytical and numerical works, aimed at predicting the
angular distribution of jet and cocoon energy and Lorentz factor after
breakout, given the properties of the ambient material and of the jet at
launch. Using this model, we construct synthetic populations of structured
jets, assuming either a collapsar (for long gamma-ray bursts -- LGRBs) or a
binary neutron star merger (for short gamma-ray bursts -- SGRBs) as progenitor.
We assume all progenitors to be identical, and we allow little variability in
the jet properties at launch: our populations therefore feature a
quasi-universal structure. These populations are able to reproduce the main
features of the observed LGRB and SGRB luminosity functions, although several
uncertainties and caveats remain to be addressed.
[16]
oai:arXiv.org:1908.08822 [pdf] - 2038257
Electromagnetic counterparts of black hole-neutron star mergers:
dependence on the neutron star properties
Submitted: 2019-08-23, last modified: 2019-12-09
Detections of gravitational waves (GWs) may soon uncover the signal from the
coalescence of a black hole - neutron star (BHNS) binary, that is expected to
be accompanied by an electromagnetic (EM) signal. In this paper, we present a
composite semi-analytical model to predict the properties of the expected EM
counterpart from BHNS mergers, focusing on the kilonova emission and on the
gamma-ray burst afterglow. Four main parameters rule the properties of the EM
emission: the NS mass $M_\mathrm{NS}$, its tidal deformability
$\Lambda_\mathrm{NS}$, the BH mass and spin. Only for certain combinations of
these parameters an EM counterpart is produced. Here we explore the parameter
space, and construct light curves, analysing the dependence of the EM emission
on the NS mass and tidal deformability. Exploring the NS parameter space
limiting to $M_\mathrm{NS}-\Lambda_\mathrm{NS}$ pairs described by a physically
motivated equations of state (EoS), we find that the brightest EM counterparts
are produced in binaries with low mass NSs (fixing the BH properties and the
EoS). Using constraints on the NS EoS from GW170817, our modeling shows that
the emission falls in a narrow range of absolute magnitudes. Within the range
of explored parameters, light curves and peak times are not dissimilar to those
from NSNS mergers, except in the B band. The lack of an hyper/supra-massive NS
in BHNS coalescences causes a dimming of the blue kilonova emission in absence
of the neutrino interaction with the ejecta.
[17]
oai:arXiv.org:1912.03894 [pdf] - 2026518
Filling the Mass Gap: How Kilonova Observations can Unveil the Nature of
the Compact Object Merging with the Neutron Star
Submitted: 2019-12-09
In this letter we focus on the peculiar case of a coalescing compact-object
binary whose chirp mass is compatible both with a neutron star-neutron star and
black hole-neutron star system, with the black hole in the $\sim 3-5M_\odot$
range defined as the "mass gap". Some models of core-collapse supernovae
predict the formation of such low-mass black holes and a recent observation
seems to confirm their existence. Here we show that the nature of the companion
to the neutron star can be inferred from the properties of the kilonova
emission once we know the chirp mass, which is the best constrained parameter
inferred from the gravitational signal in low-latency searches. In particular,
we find that the kilonova in the black hole-neutron star case is far more
luminous than in the neutron star-neutron star case, even when the black hole
is non spinning. The difference in the kilonovae brightness arises primarily
from the mass ejected during the merger. Indeed, in the considered interval of
chirp masses, the mass ejection in double neutron star mergers is at its worst
as the system promptly forms a black hole. Instead mass ejection for black
hole-neutron star case is at its best as the neutron stars have low mass/large
deformability. The kilonovae from black hole-neutron star systems can differ by
two to three magnitudes. The outcome is only marginally dependent on the
equation of state. The difference is above the systematics in the modeling.
[19]
oai:arXiv.org:1911.03646 [pdf] - 2064382
East Asia VLBI Network observations of the TeV Gamma-Ray Burst 190114C
An, Tao;
Salafia, Om Sharan;
Zhang, Yingkang;
Ghirlanda, Giancarlo;
Giovannini, Giovannini;
Giroletti, Marcello;
Hada, Kazuhiro;
Migliori, Giulia;
Orienti, Monica;
Sohn, Bong Won
Submitted: 2019-11-09
Observations of gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) at Very High Energy (VHE) offer a
unique opportunity to investigate particle acceleration processes, magnetic
fields and radiation fields in these events. Very Long Baseline Interferometry
(VLBI) observations have been proven to be a powerful tool providing unique
information on the source size of the GRBs at mas scales, as well as their
accurate positions and possible expansion speeds. This paper reports on the
follow-up observations of GRB 190114C, the first ever GRB detected with high
significance at TeV photon energies by the MAGIC telescope, conducted with the
East Asia VLBI Network (EAVN) at 22 GHz on three epochs, corresponding to 6, 15
and 32 days after the burst. The derived maps do not show any significant
source above 5 sigma. The inferred upper limits on the GRB 190114C flux density
at 22 GHz are used here to constrain the allowable two-dimensional parameter
space for the afterglow emission. We find that our limits are consistent with
most afterglow parameter combinations proposed so far in the literature. This
is the first effort for the EAVN to search and monitor a radio transient in the
Target of Opportunity mode. In addition to the useful constraints on GRB
190114C radio emission, experience gained from these observations is very
helpful for future routine operation of EAVN transient program.
[20]
oai:arXiv.org:1811.12907 [pdf] - 1973647
GWTC-1: A Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog of Compact Binary Mergers
Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the First and Second Observing Runs
The LIGO Scientific Collaboration;
the Virgo Collaboration;
Abbott, B. P.;
Abbott, R.;
Abbott, T. D.;
Abraham, S.;
Acernese, F.;
Ackley, K.;
Adams, C.;
Adhikari, R. X.;
Adya, V. B.;
Affeldt, C.;
Agathos, M.;
Agatsuma, K.;
Aggarwal, N.;
Aguiar, O. D.;
Aiello, L.;
Ain, A.;
Ajith, P.;
Allen, G.;
Allocca, A.;
Aloy, M. A.;
Altin, P. A.;
Amato, A.;
Ananyeva, A.;
Anderson, S. B.;
Anderson, W. G.;
Angelova, S. V.;
Antier, S.;
Appert, S.;
Arai, K.;
Araya, M. C.;
Areeda, J. S.;
Arène, M.;
Arnaud, N.;
Arun, K. G.;
Ascenzi, S.;
Ashton, G.;
Aston, S. M.;
Astone, P.;
Aubin, F.;
Aufmuth, P.;
AultONeal, K.;
Austin, C.;
Avendano, V.;
Avila-Alvarez, A.;
Babak, S.;
Bacon, P.;
Badaracco, F.;
Bader, M. K. M.;
Bae, S.;
Baker, P. T.;
Baldaccini, F.;
Ballardin, G.;
Ballmer, S. W.;
Banagiri, S.;
Barayoga, J. C.;
Barclay, S. E.;
Barish, B. C.;
Barker, D.;
Barkett, K.;
Barnum, S.;
Barone, F.;
Barr, B.;
Barsotti, L.;
Barsuglia, M.;
Barta, D.;
Bartlett, J.;
Bartos, I.;
Bassiri, R.;
Basti, A.;
Bawaj, M.;
Bayley, J. C.;
Bazzan, M.;
Bécsy, B.;
Bejger, M.;
Belahcene, I.;
Bell, A. S.;
Beniwal, D.;
Berger, B. K.;
Bergmann, G.;
Bernuzzi, S.;
Bero, J. J.;
Berry, C. P. L.;
Bersanetti, D.;
Bertolini, A.;
Betzwieser, J.;
Bhandare, R.;
Bidler, J.;
Bilenko, I. A.;
Bilgili, S. A.;
Billingsley, G.;
Birch, J.;
Birney, R.;
Birnholtz, O.;
Biscans, S.;
Biscoveanu, S.;
Bisht, A.;
Bitossi, M.;
Bizouard, M. A.;
Blackburn, J. K.;
Blackman, J.;
Blair, C. D.;
Blair, D. G.;
Blair, R. M.;
Bloemen, S.;
Bode, N.;
Boer, M.;
Boetzel, Y.;
Bogaert, G.;
Bondu, F.;
Bonilla, E.;
Bonnand, R.;
Booker, P.;
Boom, B. A.;
Booth, C. D.;
Bork, R.;
Boschi, V.;
Bose, S.;
Bossie, K.;
Bossilkov, V.;
Bosveld, J.;
Bouffanais, Y.;
Bozzi, A.;
Bradaschia, C.;
Brady, P. R.;
Bramley, A.;
Branchesi, M.;
Brau, J. E.;
Briant, T.;
Briggs, J. H.;
Brighenti, F.;
Brillet, A.;
Brinkmann, M.;
Brisson, V.;
Brockill, P.;
Brooks, A. F.;
Brown, D. D.;
Brunett, S.;
Buikema, A.;
Bulik, T.;
Bulten, H. J.;
Buonanno, A.;
Buskulic, D.;
Rosell, M. J. Bustamante;
Buy, C.;
Byer, R. L.;
Cabero, M.;
Cadonati, L.;
Cagnoli, G.;
Cahillane, C.;
Bustillo, J. Calderón;
Callister, T. A.;
Calloni, E.;
Camp, J. B.;
Campbell, W. A.;
Canepa, M.;
Cannon, K. C.;
Cao, H.;
Cao, J.;
Capocasa, E.;
Carbognani, F.;
Caride, S.;
Carney, M. F.;
Carullo, G.;
Diaz, J. Casanueva;
Casentini, C.;
Caudill, S.;
Cavaglià, M.;
Cavalier, F.;
Cavalieri, R.;
Cella, G.;
Cerdá-Durán, P.;
Cerretani, G.;
Cesarini, E.;
Chaibi, O.;
Chakravarti, K.;
Chamberlin, S. J.;
Chan, M.;
Chao, S.;
Charlton, P.;
Chase, E. A.;
Chassande-Mottin, E.;
Chatterjee, D.;
Chaturvedi, M.;
Chatziioannou, K.;
Cheeseboro, B. D.;
Chen, H. Y.;
Chen, X.;
Chen, Y.;
Cheng, H. -P.;
Cheong, C. K.;
Chia, H. Y.;
Chincarini, A.;
Chiummo, A.;
Cho, G.;
Cho, H. S.;
Cho, M.;
Christensen, N.;
Chu, Q.;
Chua, S.;
Chung, K. W.;
Chung, S.;
Ciani, G.;
Ciobanu, A. A.;
Ciolfi, R.;
Cipriano, F.;
Cirone, A.;
Clara, F.;
Clark, J. A.;
Clearwater, P.;
Cleva, F.;
Cocchieri, C.;
Coccia, E.;
Cohadon, P. -F.;
Cohen, D.;
Colgan, R.;
Colleoni, M.;
Collette, C. G.;
Collins, C.;
Cominsky, L. R.;
Constancio, M.;
Conti, L.;
Cooper, S. J.;
Corban, P.;
Corbitt, T. R.;
Cordero-Carrión, I.;
Corley, K. R.;
Cornish, N.;
Corsi, A.;
Cortese, S.;
Costa, C. A.;
Cotesta, R.;
Coughlin, M. W.;
Coughlin, S. B.;
Coulon, J. -P.;
Countryman, S. T.;
Couvares, P.;
Covas, P. B.;
Cowan, E. E.;
Coward, D. M.;
Cowart, M. J.;
Coyne, D. C.;
Coyne, R.;
Creighton, J. D. E.;
Creighton, T. D.;
Cripe, J.;
Croquette, M.;
Crowder, S. G.;
Cullen, T. J.;
Cumming, A.;
Cunningham, L.;
Cuoco, E.;
Canton, T. Dal;
Dálya, G.;
Danilishin, S. L.;
D'Antonio, S.;
Danzmann, K.;
Dasgupta, A.;
Costa, C. F. Da Silva;
Datrier, L. E. H.;
Dattilo, V.;
Dave, I.;
Davier, M.;
Davis, D.;
Daw, E. J.;
DeBra, D.;
Deenadayalan, M.;
Degallaix, J.;
De Laurentis, M.;
Deléglise, S.;
Del Pozzo, W.;
DeMarchi, L. M.;
Demos, N.;
Dent, T.;
De Pietri, R.;
Derby, J.;
De Rosa, R.;
De Rossi, C.;
DeSalvo, R.;
de Varona, O.;
Dhurandhar, S.;
Díaz, M. C.;
Dietrich, T.;
Di Fiore, L.;
Di Giovanni, M.;
Di Girolamo, T.;
Di Lieto, A.;
Ding, B.;
Di Pace, S.;
Di Palma, I.;
Di Renzo, F.;
Dmitriev, A.;
Doctor, Z.;
Donovan, F.;
Dooley, K. L.;
Doravari, S.;
Dorrington, I.;
Downes, T. P.;
Drago, M.;
Driggers, J. C.;
Du, Z.;
Ducoin, J. -G.;
Dupej, P.;
Dwyer, S. E.;
Easter, P. J.;
Edo, T. B.;
Edwards, M. C.;
Effler, A.;
Ehrens, P.;
Eichholz, J.;
Eikenberry, S. S.;
Eisenmann, M.;
Eisenstein, R. A.;
Essick, R. C.;
Estelles, H.;
Estevez, D.;
Etienne, Z. B.;
Etzel, T.;
Evans, M.;
Evans, T. M.;
Fafone, V.;
Fair, H.;
Fairhurst, S.;
Fan, X.;
Farinon, S.;
Farr, B.;
Farr, W. M.;
Fauchon-Jones, E. J.;
Favata, M.;
Fays, M.;
Fazio, M.;
Fee, C.;
Feicht, J.;
Fejer, M. M.;
Feng, F.;
Fernandez-Galiana, A.;
Ferrante, I.;
Ferreira, E. C.;
Ferreira, T. A.;
Ferrini, F.;
Fidecaro, F.;
Fiori, I.;
Fiorucci, D.;
Fishbach, M.;
Fisher, R. P.;
Fishner, J. M.;
Fitz-Axen, M.;
Flaminio, R.;
Fletcher, M.;
Flynn, E.;
Fong, H.;
Font, J. A.;
Forsyth, P. W. F.;
Fournier, J. -D.;
Frasca, S.;
Frasconi, F.;
Frei, Z.;
Freise, A.;
Frey, R.;
Frey, V.;
Fritschel, P.;
Frolov, V. V.;
Fulda, P.;
Fyffe, M.;
Gabbard, H. A.;
Gadre, B. U.;
Gaebel, S. M.;
Gair, J. R.;
Gammaitoni, L.;
Ganija, M. R.;
Gaonkar, S. G.;
Garcia, A.;
García-Quirós, C.;
Garufi, F.;
Gateley, B.;
Gaudio, S.;
Gaur, G.;
Gayathri, V.;
Gemme, G.;
Genin, E.;
Gennai, A.;
George, D.;
George, J.;
Gergely, L.;
Germain, V.;
Ghonge, S.;
Ghosh, Abhirup;
Ghosh, Archisman;
Ghosh, S.;
Giacomazzo, B.;
Giaime, J. A.;
Giardina, K. D.;
Giazotto, A.;
Gill, K.;
Giordano, G.;
Glover, L.;
Godwin, P.;
Goetz, E.;
Goetz, R.;
Goncharov, B.;
González, G.;
Castro, J. M. Gonzalez;
Gopakumar, A.;
Gorodetsky, M. L.;
Gossan, S. E.;
Gosselin, M.;
Gouaty, R.;
Grado, A.;
Graef, C.;
Granata, M.;
Grant, A.;
Gras, S.;
Grassia, P.;
Gray, C.;
Gray, R.;
Greco, G.;
Green, A. C.;
Green, R.;
Gretarsson, E. M.;
Groot, P.;
Grote, H.;
Grunewald, S.;
Gruning, P.;
Guidi, G. M.;
Gulati, H. K.;
Guo, Y.;
Gupta, A.;
Gupta, M. K.;
Gustafson, E. K.;
Gustafson, R.;
Haegel, L.;
Halim, O.;
Hall, B. R.;
Hall, E. D.;
Hamilton, E. Z.;
Hammond, G.;
Haney, M.;
Hanke, M. M.;
Hanks, J.;
Hanna, C.;
Hannam, M. D.;
Hannuksela, O. A.;
Hanson, J.;
Hardwick, T.;
Haris, K.;
Harms, J.;
Harry, G. M.;
Harry, I. W.;
Haster, C. -J.;
Haughian, K.;
Hayes, F. J.;
Healy, J.;
Heidmann, A.;
Heintze, M. C.;
Heitmann, H.;
Hello, P.;
Hemming, G.;
Hendry, M.;
Heng, I. S.;
Hennig, J.;
Heptonstall, A. W.;
Vivanco, Francisco Hernandez;
Heurs, M.;
Hild, S.;
Hinderer, T.;
Hoak, D.;
Hochheim, S.;
Hofman, D.;
Holgado, A. M.;
Holland, N. A.;
Holt, K.;
Holz, D. E.;
Hopkins, P.;
Horst, C.;
Hough, J.;
Howell, E. J.;
Hoy, C. G.;
Hreibi, A.;
Huang, Y.;
Huerta, E. A.;
Huet, D.;
Hughey, B.;
Hulko, M.;
Husa, S.;
Huttner, S. H.;
Huynh-Dinh, T.;
Idzkowski, B.;
Iess, A.;
Ingram, C.;
Inta, R.;
Intini, G.;
Irwin, B.;
Isa, H. N.;
Isac, J. -M.;
Isi, M.;
Iyer, B. R.;
Izumi, K.;
Jacqmin, T.;
Jadhav, S. J.;
Jani, K.;
Janthalur, N. N.;
Jaranowski, P.;
Jenkins, A. C.;
Jiang, J.;
Johnson, D. S.;
Johnson-McDaniel, N. K.;
Jones, A. W.;
Jones, D. I.;
Jones, R.;
Jonker, R. J. G.;
Ju, L.;
Junker, J.;
Kalaghatgi, C. V.;
Kalogera, V.;
Kamai, B.;
Kandhasamy, S.;
Kang, G.;
Kanner, J. B.;
Kapadia, S. J.;
Karki, S.;
Karvinen, K. S.;
Kashyap, R.;
Kasprzack, M.;
Katsanevas, S.;
Katsavounidis, E.;
Katzman, W.;
Kaufer, S.;
Kawabe, K.;
Keerthana, N. V.;
Kéfélian, F.;
Keitel, D.;
Kennedy, R.;
Key, J. S.;
Khalili, F. Y.;
Khan, H.;
Khan, I.;
Khan, S.;
Khan, Z.;
Khazanov, E. A.;
Khursheed, M.;
Kijbunchoo, N.;
Kim, Chunglee;
Kim, J. C.;
Kim, K.;
Kim, W.;
Kim, W. S.;
Kim, Y. -M.;
Kimball, C.;
King, E. J.;
King, P. J.;
Kinley-Hanlon, M.;
Kirchhoff, R.;
Kissel, J. S.;
Kleybolte, L.;
Klika, J. H.;
Klimenko, S.;
Knowles, T. D.;
Koch, P.;
Koehlenbeck, S. M.;
Koekoek, G.;
Koley, S.;
Kondrashov, V.;
Kontos, A.;
Koper, N.;
Korobko, M.;
Korth, W. Z.;
Kowalska, I.;
Kozak, D. B.;
Kringel, V.;
Krishnendu, N.;
Królak, A.;
Kuehn, G.;
Kumar, A.;
Kumar, P.;
Kumar, R.;
Kumar, S.;
Kuo, L.;
Kutynia, A.;
Kwang, S.;
Lackey, B. D.;
Lai, K. H.;
Lam, T. L.;
Landry, M.;
Lane, B. B.;
Lang, R. N.;
Lange, J.;
Lantz, B.;
Lanza, R. K.;
Lartaux-Vollard, A.;
Lasky, P. D.;
Laxen, M.;
Lazzarini, A.;
Lazzaro, C.;
Leaci, P.;
Leavey, S.;
Lecoeuche, Y. K.;
Lee, C. H.;
Lee, H. K.;
Lee, H. M.;
Lee, H. W.;
Lee, J.;
Lee, K.;
Lehmann, J.;
Lenon, A.;
Leroy, N.;
Letendre, N.;
Levin, Y.;
Li, J.;
Li, K. J. L.;
Li, T. G. F.;
Li, X.;
Lin, F.;
Linde, F.;
Linker, S. D.;
Littenberg, T. B.;
Liu, J.;
Liu, X.;
Lo, R. K. L.;
Lockerbie, N. A.;
London, L. T.;
Longo, A.;
Lorenzini, M.;
Loriette, V.;
Lormand, M.;
Losurdo, G.;
Lough, J. D.;
Lousto, C. O.;
Lovelace, G.;
Lower, M. E.;
Lück, H.;
Lumaca, D.;
Lundgren, A. P.;
Lynch, R.;
Ma, Y.;
Macas, R.;
Macfoy, S.;
MacInnis, M.;
Macleod, D. M.;
Macquet, A.;
Magaña-Sandoval, F.;
Zertuche, L. Magaña;
Magee, R. M.;
Majorana, E.;
Maksimovic, I.;
Malik, A.;
Man, N.;
Mandic, V.;
Mangano, V.;
Mansell, G. L.;
Manske, M.;
Mantovani, M.;
Marchesoni, F.;
Marion, F.;
Márka, S.;
Márka, Z.;
Markakis, C.;
Markosyan, A. S.;
Markowitz, A.;
Maros, E.;
Marquina, A.;
Marsat, S.;
Martelli, F.;
Martin, I. W.;
Martin, R. M.;
Martynov, D. V.;
Mason, K.;
Massera, E.;
Masserot, A.;
Massinger, T. J.;
Masso-Reid, M.;
Mastrogiovanni, S.;
Matas, A.;
Matichard, F.;
Matone, L.;
Mavalvala, N.;
Mazumder, N.;
McCann, J. J.;
McCarthy, R.;
McClelland, D. E.;
McCormick, S.;
McCuller, L.;
McGuire, S. C.;
McIver, J.;
McManus, D. J.;
McRae, T.;
McWilliams, S. T.;
Meacher, D.;
Meadors, G. D.;
Mehmet, M.;
Mehta, A. K.;
Meidam, J.;
Melatos, A.;
Mendell, G.;
Mercer, R. A.;
Mereni, L.;
Merilh, E. L.;
Merzougui, M.;
Meshkov, S.;
Messenger, C.;
Messick, C.;
Metzdorff, R.;
Meyers, P. M.;
Miao, H.;
Michel, C.;
Middleton, H.;
Mikhailov, E. E.;
Milano, L.;
Miller, A. L.;
Miller, A.;
Millhouse, M.;
Mills, J. C.;
Milovich-Goff, M. C.;
Minazzoli, O.;
Minenkov, Y.;
Mishkin, A.;
Mishra, C.;
Mistry, T.;
Mitra, S.;
Mitrofanov, V. P.;
Mitselmakher, G.;
Mittleman, R.;
Mo, G.;
Moffa, D.;
Mogushi, K.;
Mohapatra, S. R. P.;
Montani, M.;
Moore, C. J.;
Moraru, D.;
Moreno, G.;
Morisaki, S.;
Mours, B.;
Mow-Lowry, C. M.;
Mukherjee, Arunava;
Mukherjee, D.;
Mukherjee, S.;
Mukund, N.;
Mullavey, A.;
Munch, J.;
Muñiz, E. A.;
Muratore, M.;
Murray, P. G.;
Nagar, A.;
Nardecchia, I.;
Naticchioni, L.;
Nayak, R. K.;
Neilson, J.;
Nelemans, G.;
Nelson, T. J. N.;
Nery, M.;
Neunzert, A.;
Ng, K. Y.;
Ng, S.;
Nguyen, P.;
Nichols, D.;
Nielsen, A. B.;
Nissanke, S.;
Nitz, A.;
Nocera, F.;
North, C.;
Nuttall, L. K.;
Obergaulinger, M.;
Oberling, J.;
O'Brien, B. D.;
O'Dea, G. D.;
Ogin, G. H.;
Oh, J. J.;
Oh, S. H.;
Ohme, F.;
Ohta, H.;
Okada, M. A.;
Oliver, M.;
Oppermann, P.;
Oram, Richard J.;
O'Reilly, B.;
Ormiston, R. G.;
Ortega, L. F.;
O'Shaughnessy, R.;
Ossokine, S.;
Ottaway, D. J.;
Overmier, H.;
Owen, B. J.;
Pace, A. E.;
Pagano, G.;
Page, M. A.;
Pai, A.;
Pai, S. A.;
Palamos, J. R.;
Palashov, O.;
Palomba, C.;
Pal-Singh, A.;
Pan, Huang-Wei;
Pang, B.;
Pang, P. T. H.;
Pankow, C.;
Pannarale, F.;
Pant, B. C.;
Paoletti, F.;
Paoli, A.;
Papa, M. A.;
Parida, A.;
Parker, W.;
Pascucci, D.;
Pasqualetti, A.;
Passaquieti, R.;
Passuello, D.;
Patil, M.;
Patricelli, B.;
Pearlstone, B. L.;
Pedersen, C.;
Pedraza, M.;
Pedurand, R.;
Pele, A.;
Penn, S.;
Perego, A.;
Perez, C. J.;
Perreca, A.;
Pfeiffer, H. P.;
Phelps, M.;
Phukon, K. S.;
Piccinni, O. J.;
Pichot, M.;
Piergiovanni, F.;
Pillant, G.;
Pinard, L.;
Pirello, M.;
Pitkin, M.;
Poggiani, R.;
Pong, D. Y. T.;
Ponrathnam, S.;
Popolizio, P.;
Porter, E. K.;
Powell, J.;
Prajapati, A. K.;
Prasad, J.;
Prasai, K.;
Prasanna, R.;
Pratten, G.;
Prestegard, T.;
Privitera, S.;
Prodi, G. A.;
Prokhorov, L. G.;
Puncken, O.;
Punturo, M.;
Puppo, P.;
Pürrer, M.;
Qi, H.;
Quetschke, V.;
Quinonez, P. J.;
Quintero, E. A.;
Quitzow-James, R.;
Raab, F. J.;
Radkins, H.;
Radulescu, N.;
Raffai, P.;
Raja, S.;
Rajan, C.;
Rajbhandari, B.;
Rakhmanov, M.;
Ramirez, K. E.;
Ramos-Buades, A.;
Rana, Javed;
Rao, K.;
Rapagnani, P.;
Raymond, V.;
Razzano, M.;
Read, J.;
Regimbau, T.;
Rei, L.;
Reid, S.;
Reitze, D. H.;
Ren, W.;
Ricci, F.;
Richardson, C. J.;
Richardson, J. W.;
Ricker, P. M.;
Riemenschneider, G. M.;
Riles, K.;
Rizzo, M.;
Robertson, N. A.;
Robie, R.;
Robinet, F.;
Rocchi, A.;
Rolland, L.;
Rollins, J. G.;
Roma, V. J.;
Romanelli, M.;
Romano, R.;
Romel, C. L.;
Romie, J. H.;
Rose, K.;
Rosińska, D.;
Rosofsky, S. G.;
Ross, M. P.;
Rowan, S.;
Rüdiger, A.;
Ruggi, P.;
Rutins, G.;
Ryan, K.;
Sachdev, S.;
Sadecki, T.;
Sakellariadou, M.;
Salafia, O.;
Salconi, L.;
Saleem, M.;
Salemi, F.;
Samajdar, A.;
Sammut, L.;
Sanchez, E. J.;
Sanchez, L. E.;
Sanchis-Gual, N.;
Sandberg, V.;
Sanders, J. R.;
Santiago, K. A.;
Sarin, N.;
Sassolas, B.;
Sathyaprakash, B. S.;
Saulson, P. R.;
Sauter, O.;
Savage, R. L.;
Schale, P.;
Scheel, M.;
Scheuer, J.;
Schmidt, P.;
Schnabel, R.;
Schofield, R. M. S.;
Schönbeck, A.;
Schreiber, E.;
Schulte, B. W.;
Schutz, B. F.;
Schwalbe, S. G.;
Scott, J.;
Scott, S. M.;
Seidel, E.;
Sellers, D.;
Sengupta, A. S.;
Sennett, N.;
Sentenac, D.;
Sequino, V.;
Sergeev, A.;
Setyawati, Y.;
Shaddock, D. A.;
Shaffer, T.;
Shahriar, M. S.;
Shaner, M. B.;
Shao, L.;
Sharma, P.;
Shawhan, P.;
Shen, H.;
Shink, R.;
Shoemaker, D. H.;
Shoemaker, D. M.;
ShyamSundar, S.;
Siellez, K.;
Sieniawska, M.;
Sigg, D.;
Silva, A. D.;
Singer, L. P.;
Singh, N.;
Singhal, A.;
Sintes, A. M.;
Sitmukhambetov, S.;
Skliris, V.;
Slagmolen, B. J. J.;
Slaven-Blair, T. J.;
Smith, J. R.;
Smith, R. J. E.;
Somala, S.;
Son, E. J.;
Sorazu, B.;
Sorrentino, F.;
Souradeep, T.;
Sowell, E.;
Spencer, A. P.;
Srivastava, A. K.;
Srivastava, V.;
Staats, K.;
Stachie, C.;
Standke, M.;
Steer, D. A.;
Steinke, M.;
Steinlechner, J.;
Steinlechner, S.;
Steinmeyer, D.;
Stevenson, S. P.;
Stocks, D.;
Stone, R.;
Stops, D. J.;
Strain, K. A.;
Stratta, G.;
Strigin, S. E.;
Strunk, A.;
Sturani, R.;
Stuver, A. L.;
Sudhir, V.;
Summerscales, T. Z.;
Sun, L.;
Sunil, S.;
Suresh, J.;
Sutton, P. J.;
Swinkels, B. L.;
Szczepańczyk, M. J.;
Tacca, M.;
Tait, S. C.;
Talbot, C.;
Talukder, D.;
Tanner, D. B.;
Tápai, M.;
Taracchini, A.;
Tasson, J. D.;
Taylor, R.;
Thies, F.;
Thomas, M.;
Thomas, P.;
Thondapu, S. R.;
Thorne, K. A.;
Thrane, E.;
Tiwari, Shubhanshu;
Tiwari, Srishti;
Tiwari, V.;
Toland, K.;
Tonelli, M.;
Tornasi, Z.;
Torres-Forné, A.;
Torrie, C. I.;
Töyrä, D.;
Travasso, F.;
Traylor, G.;
Tringali, M. C.;
Trovato, A.;
Trozzo, L.;
Trudeau, R.;
Tsang, K. W.;
Tse, M.;
Tso, R.;
Tsukada, L.;
Tsuna, D.;
Tuyenbayev, D.;
Ueno, K.;
Ugolini, D.;
Unnikrishnan, C. S.;
Urban, A. L.;
Usman, S. A.;
Vahlbruch, H.;
Vajente, G.;
Valdes, G.;
van Bakel, N.;
van Beuzekom, M.;
Brand, J. F. J. van den;
Broeck, C. Van Den;
Vander-Hyde, D. C.;
van Heijningen, J. V.;
van der Schaaf, L.;
van Veggel, A. A.;
Vardaro, M.;
Varma, V.;
Vass, S.;
Vasúth, M.;
Vecchio, A.;
Vedovato, G.;
Veitch, J.;
Veitch, P. J.;
Venkateswara, K.;
Venugopalan, G.;
Verkindt, D.;
Vetrano, F.;
Viceré, A.;
Viets, A. D.;
Vine, D. J.;
Vinet, J. -Y.;
Vitale, S.;
Vo, T.;
Vocca, H.;
Vorvick, C.;
Vyatchanin, S. P.;
Wade, A. R.;
Wade, L. E.;
Wade, M.;
Walet, R.;
Walker, M.;
Wallace, L.;
Walsh, S.;
Wang, G.;
Wang, H.;
Wang, J. Z.;
Wang, W. H.;
Wang, Y. F.;
Ward, R. L.;
Warden, Z. A.;
Warner, J.;
Was, M.;
Watchi, J.;
Weaver, B.;
Wei, L. -W.;
Weinert, M.;
Weinstein, A. J.;
Weiss, R.;
Wellmann, F.;
Wen, L.;
Wessel, E. K.;
Weßels, P.;
Westhouse, J. W.;
Wette, K.;
Whelan, J. T.;
White, L. V.;
Whiting, B. F.;
Whittle, C.;
Wilken, D. M.;
Williams, D.;
Williamson, A. R.;
Willis, J. L.;
Willke, B.;
Wimmer, M. H.;
Winkler, W.;
Wipf, C. C.;
Wittel, H.;
Woan, G.;
Woehler, J.;
Wofford, J. K.;
Worden, J.;
Wright, J. L.;
Wu, D. S.;
Wysocki, D. M.;
Xiao, L.;
Yamamoto, H.;
Yancey, C. C.;
Yang, L.;
Yap, M. J.;
Yazback, M.;
Yeeles, D. W.;
Yu, Hang;
Yu, Haocun;
Yuen, S. H. R.;
Yvert, M.;
Zadrożny, A. K.;
Zanolin, M.;
Zappa, F.;
Zelenova, T.;
Zendri, J. -P.;
Zevin, M.;
Zhang, J.;
Zhang, L.;
Zhang, T.;
Zhao, C.;
Zhou, M.;
Zhou, Z.;
Zhu, X. J.;
Zimmerman, A. B.;
Zlochower, Y.;
Zucker, M. E.;
Zweizig, J.
Submitted: 2018-11-30, last modified: 2019-10-04
We present the results from three gravitational-wave searches for coalescing
compact binaries with component masses above 1$\mathrm{M}_\odot$ during the
first and second observing runs of the Advanced gravitational-wave detector
network. During the first observing run (O1), from September $12^\mathrm{th}$,
2015 to January $19^\mathrm{th}$, 2016, gravitational waves from three binary
black hole mergers were detected. The second observing run (O2), which ran from
November $30^\mathrm{th}$, 2016 to August $25^\mathrm{th}$, 2017, saw the first
detection of gravitational waves from a binary neutron star inspiral, in
addition to the observation of gravitational waves from a total of seven binary
black hole mergers, four of which we report here for the first time: GW170729,
GW170809, GW170818 and GW170823. For all significant gravitational-wave events,
we provide estimates of the source properties. The detected binary black holes
have total masses between $18.6_{-0.7}^{+3.2}\mathrm{M}_\odot$, and
$84.4_{-11.1}^{+15.8} \mathrm{M}_\odot$, and range in distance between
$320_{-110}^{+120}$ Mpc and $2840_{-1360}^{+1400}$ Mpc. No neutron star - black
hole mergers were detected. In addition to highly significant
gravitational-wave events, we also provide a list of marginal event candidates
with an estimated false alarm rate less than 1 per 30 days. From these results
over the first two observing runs, which include approximately one
gravitational-wave detection per 15 days of data searched, we infer merger
rates at the 90% confidence intervals of $110\, -\, 3840$
$\mathrm{Gpc}^{-3}\,\mathrm{y}^{-1}$ for binary neutron stars and $9.7\, -\,
101$ $\mathrm{Gpc}^{-3}\,\mathrm{y}^{-1}$ for binary black holes assuming fixed
population distributions, and determine a neutron star - black hole merger rate
90% upper limit of $610$ $\mathrm{Gpc}^{-3}\,\mathrm{y}^{-1}$.
[21]
oai:arXiv.org:1909.10531 [pdf] - 2080888
The rise and fall of the high-energy afterglow emission of GRB 180720B
Ronchi, M.;
Fumagalli, F.;
Ravasio, M. E.;
Oganesyan, G.;
Toffano, M.;
Salafia, O. S.;
Nava, L.;
Ascenzi, S.;
Ghirlanda, G.;
Ghisellini, G.
Submitted: 2019-09-23
The Gamma Ray Burst (GRB) 180720B is one of the brightest events detected by
the Fermi satellite and the first GRB detected by the H.E.S.S. telescope above
100 GeV. We analyse the Fermi (GBM and LAT) and Swift (XRT and BAT) data and
describe the evolution of the burst spectral energy distribution in the 0.5 keV
- 10 GeV energy range over the first 500 seconds of emission. We reveal a
smooth transition from the prompt phase, dominated by synchrotron emission in a
moderately fast cooling regime, to the afterglow phase whose emission has been
observed from the radio to the GeV energy range. The LAT (0.1 - 100 GeV) light
curve initially rises ($F_{\rm LAT}\propto t^{2.4}$), peaks at $\sim$78 s, and
falls steeply ($F_{\rm LAT}\propto t^{-2.2}$) afterwards. The peak, which we
interpret as the onset of the fireball deceleration, allows us to estimate the
bulk Lorentz factor $\Gamma_{0}\sim 150 \ (300)$ under the assumption of a
wind-like (homogeneous) circum-burst medium density. We derive a flux upper
limit in the LAT energy range at the time of H.E.S.S. detection, but this does
not allow us to unveil the nature of the high energy component observed by
H.E.S.S. We fit the prompt spectrum with a physical model of synchrotron
emission from a non-thermal population of electrons. The 0 - 35 s spectrum
after its $E F(E)$ peak (at 1 - 2 MeV) is a steep power law extending to
hundreds of MeV. We derive a steep slope of the injected electron energy
distribution $N(\gamma)\propto \gamma^{-5}$. Our fit parameters point towards a
very low magnetic field ($B'\sim 1 $ G) in the emission region.
[24]
oai:arXiv.org:1905.01190 [pdf] - 1925028
The on-axis view of GRB 170817A
Submitted: 2019-05-03, last modified: 2019-06-26
The peculiar short gamma-ray burst GRB 170817A has been firmly associated to
the gravitational wave event GW170817, which has been unaninmously interpreted
as due to the coalescence of a double neutron star binary. The unprecedented
behaviour of the non-thermal afterglow led to a debate about its nature, which
was eventually settled by high-resolution VLBI observations, which strongly
support the off-axis structured jet scenario. Using information on the jet
structure derived from multi-wavelength fitting of the afterglow emission and
of the apparent VLBI image centroid motion, we compute the appearance of a GRB
170817A-like jet as seen by an on-axis observer and we compare it to the
previously observed population of SGRB afterglows and prompt emission events.
We find that the intrinsic properties of the GRB 170817A jet are representative
of a typical event in the SGRB population, hinting at a quasi-universal jet
structure. The diversity in the SGRB afterglow population could therefore be
ascribed in large part to extrinsic (redshift, density of the surrounding
medium, viewing angle) rather than intrinsic properties. Although more
uncertain, the comparison can be extended to the prompt emission properties,
leading to similar conclusions.
[26]
oai:arXiv.org:1902.01861 [pdf] - 1894221
GRB 190114C: from prompt to afterglow?
Submitted: 2019-02-05, last modified: 2019-05-21
GRB 190114C is the first gamma-ray burst detected at Very High Energies (VHE,
i.e. >300 GeV) by the MAGIC Cherenkov telescope. The analysis of the emission
detected by the Fermi satellite at lower energies, in the 10 keV -- 100 GeV
energy range, up to ~ 50 seconds (i.e. before the MAGIC detection) can hold
valuable information. We analyze the spectral evolution of the emission of GRB
190114C as detected by the Fermi Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor (GBM) in the 10 keV --
40 MeV energy range up to ~60 sec. The first 4 s of the burst feature a typical
prompt emission spectrum, which can be fit by a smoothly broken power-law
function with typical parameters. Starting on ~4 s post-trigger, we find an
additional nonthermal component, which can be fit by a power law. This
component rises and decays quickly. The 10 keV -- 40 MeV flux of the power-law
component peaks at ~ 6 s; it reaches a value of 1.7e-5 erg cm-2 s-1. The time
of the peak coincides with the emission peak detected by the Large Area
Telescope (LAT) on board Fermi. The power-law spectral slope that we find in
the GBM data is remarkably similar to that of the LAT spectrum, and the GBM+LAT
spectral energy distribution seems to be consistent with a single component.
This suggests that the LAT emission and the power-law component that we find in
the GBM data belong to the same emission component, which we interpret as due
to the afterglow of the burst. The onset time allows us to estimate the initial
jet bulk Lorentz factor Gamma_0 is about 500, depending on the assumed
circum-burst density.
[28]
oai:arXiv.org:1903.04543 [pdf] - 1894252
Light-curve models of black hole - neutron star mergers: steps towards a
multi-messenger parameter estimation
Submitted: 2019-03-11, last modified: 2019-04-30
In the new era of gravitational wave (GW) and multi-messenger astrophysics,
the detection of a GW signal from the coalescence of a black hole - neutron
star (BHNS) binary remains a highly anticipated discovery. This kind of system
is expected to be within reach of the second generation of ground-based
detectors. In this context, we develop a series of versatile semi-analytical
models to predict the properties of all the electromagnetic (EM) counterparts
of BHNS mergers. We include the nuclear-decay-powered kilonova emission, its
radio remnant, the prompt emission from the jet and the related afterglow. The
properties of these counterparts depend upon those of the outflows that result
from the partial disruption of the NS during the merger and from the accretion
disc around the remnant, which are necessary ingredients for transient EM
emission to accompany the GW signal. We therefore define ways to relate the
properties of these outflows to those of the progenitor binary, establishing a
link between the binary parameters and the counterpart properties. From the
resulting model, we anticipate the variety of light curves that can emerge
after a BHNS coalescence, from the radio up to gamma-rays. These light curves
feature universal traits which are the imprint of the dynamics of the emitting
outflows, but at the same time they show a clear dependence on the BH mass and
spin, though with a high degree of degeneracy. The latter can be deduced by
joint GW - EM analysis. In this paper, we perform a proof-of-concept
multi-messenger parameter estimation of a BHNS merger with an associated
kilonova, to test how the information from the EM counterpart can complement
that from the GW signal. Our results indicate that the observation and modeling
of the kilonova can help to break the degeneracies in the GW parameter space,
leading to better constraints on, e.g., the BH spin.
[29]
oai:arXiv.org:1902.06731 [pdf] - 1882531
Resolving the decades-long transient FIRST J141918.9+394036: an orphan
long gamma-ray burst or a young magnetar nebula?
Submitted: 2019-02-18, last modified: 2019-04-18
Ofek (2017) identified FIRST J141918.9+394036 (hereafter FIRST J1419+3940) as
a radio source sharing similar properties and host galaxy type to the compact,
persistent radio source associated with the first known repeating fast radio
burst, FRB 121102. Law et al. (2018) showed that FIRST J1419+3940 is a
transient source decaying in brightness over the last few decades. One possible
interpretation is that FIRST J1419+3940 is a nearby analogue to FRB 121102 and
that the radio emission represents a young magnetar nebula (as several
scenarios assume for FRB 121102). Another interpretation is that FIRST
J1419+3940 is the afterglow of an `orphan' long gamma-ray burst (GRB). The
environment is similar to where most such events are produced. To distinguish
between these hypotheses, we conducted radio observations using the European
VLBI Network at 1.6 GHz to spatially resolve the emission and to search for
millisecond-duration radio bursts. We detect FIRST J1419+3940 as a compact
radio source with a flux density of $620 \pm 20\ \mathrm{\mu Jy}$ (on 2018
September 18) and a source size of $3.9 \pm 0.7\ \mathrm{mas}$ (i.e. $1.6 \pm
0.3\ \mathrm{pc}$ given the angular diameter distance of $83\ \mathrm{Mpc}$).
These results confirm that the radio emission is non-thermal and imply an
average expansion velocity of $(0.10 \pm 0.02)c$. Contemporaneous
high-time-resolution observations using the 100-m Effelsberg telescope detected
no millisecond-duration bursts of astrophysical origin. The source properties
and lack of short-duration bursts are consistent with a GRB jet expansion,
whereas they disfavor a magnetar birth nebula.
[30]
oai:arXiv.org:1903.09041 [pdf] - 1875415
X-ray absorbing column densities of a complete sample of short Gamma Ray
Bursts
Asquini, L.;
Campana, S.;
D'Avanzo, P.;
Bernardini, M. G.;
Covino, S.;
Ghirlanda, G.;
Ghisellini, G.;
Melandri, A.;
Nava, L.;
Salafia, O. S.;
Salvaterra, R.;
Sbarufatti, B.;
Tagliaferri, G.;
Vergani, S. D.
Submitted: 2019-03-21
We update a flux-limited complete sample of Swift-based SGRBs (SBAT4,
D'Avanzo et al. 2014), bringing it to 25 events and doubling its previous
redshift range. We then evaluate the column densities of the events in the
updated sample, in order to compare them with the NH distribution of LGRBs,
using the sample BAT6ext (Arcodia et al. 2016). We rely on Monte Carlo
simulations of the two populations and compare the computed NH distributions
with a two sample Kolmogorov Smirnov (K-S) test. We then study how the K-S
probability varies with respect to the redshift range we consider. We find that
the K-S probability keeps decreasing as redshift increases until at z$\sim$1.8
the probability that short and long GRBs come from the same parent distribution
drops below 1$\%$. This testifies for an observational difference among the two
populations. This difference may be due to the presence of highly absorbed
LGRBs above z$\sim$1.3, which have not been observed in the SGRB sample yet,
although this may be due to our inability to detect them, or to the relatively
small sample size.
[31]
oai:arXiv.org:1808.00469 [pdf] - 1837135
Compact radio emission indicates a structured jet was produced by a
binary neutron star merger
Ghirlanda, G.;
Salafia, O. S.;
Paragi, Z.;
Giroletti, M.;
Yang, J.;
Marcote, B.;
Blanchard, J.;
Agudo, I.;
An, T.;
Bernardini, M. G.;
Beswick, R.;
Branchesi, M.;
Campana, S.;
Casadio, C.;
Chassande-Mottin, E.;
Colpi, M.;
Covino, S.;
D'Avanzo, P.;
D'Elia, V.;
Frey, S.;
Gawronski, M.;
Ghisellini, G.;
Gurvits, L. I.;
Jonker, P. G.;
van Langevelde, H. J.;
Melandri, A.;
Moldon, J.;
Nava, L.;
Perego, A.;
Perez-Torres, M. A.;
Reynolds, C.;
Salvaterra, R.;
Tagliaferri, G.;
Venturi, T.;
Vergani, S. D.;
Zhang, M.
Submitted: 2018-08-01, last modified: 2019-02-25
The binary neutron star merger event GW170817 was detected through both
electromagnetic radiation and gravitational waves. Its afterglow emission may
have been produced by either a narrow relativistic jet or an isotropic outflow.
High spatial resolution measurements of the source size and displacement can
discriminate between these scenarios. We present Very Long Baseline
Interferometry observations, performed 207.4 days after the merger, using a
global network of 32 radio telescopes. The apparent source size is constrained
to be smaller than 2.5 milliarcseconds at the 90% confidence level. This
excludes the isotropic outflow scenario, which would have produced a larger
apparent size, indicating that GW170817 produced a structured relativistic jet.
Our rate calculations show that at least 10% of neutron star mergers produce
such a jet.
[32]
oai:arXiv.org:1806.05195 [pdf] - 1916735
Black holes, gravitational waves and fundamental physics: a roadmap
Barack, Leor;
Cardoso, Vitor;
Nissanke, Samaya;
Sotiriou, Thomas P.;
Askar, Abbas;
Belczynski, Krzysztof;
Bertone, Gianfranco;
Bon, Edi;
Blas, Diego;
Brito, Richard;
Bulik, Tomasz;
Burrage, Clare;
Byrnes, Christian T.;
Caprini, Chiara;
Chernyakova, Masha;
Chrusciel, Piotr;
Colpi, Monica;
Ferrari, Valeria;
Gaggero, Daniele;
Gair, Jonathan;
Garcia-Bellido, Juan;
Hassan, S. F.;
Heisenberg, Lavinia;
Hendry, Martin;
Heng, Ik Siong;
Herdeiro, Carlos;
Hinderer, Tanja;
Horesh, Assaf;
Kavanagh, Bradley J.;
Kocsis, Bence;
Kramer, Michael;
Tiec, Alexandre Le;
Mingarelli, Chiara;
Nardini, Germano;
Nelemans, Gijs;
Palenzuela, Carlos;
Pani, Paolo;
Perego, Albino;
Porter, Edward K.;
Rossi, Elena M.;
Schmidt, Patricia;
Sesana, Alberto;
Sperhake, Ulrich;
Stamerra, Antonio;
Stein, Leo C.;
Tamanini, Nicola;
Tauris, Thomas M.;
Urena-Lopez, L. Arturo;
Vincent, Frederic;
Volonteri, Marta;
Wardell, Barry;
Wex, Norbert;
Yagi, Kent;
Abdelsalhin, Tiziano;
Aloy, Miguel Angel;
Amaro-Seoane, Pau;
Annulli, Lorenzo;
Arca-Sedda, Manuel;
Bah, Ibrahima;
Barausse, Enrico;
Barakovic, Elvis;
Benkel, Robert;
Bennett, Charles L.;
Bernard, Laura;
Bernuzzi, Sebastiano;
Berry, Christopher P. L.;
Berti, Emanuele;
Bezares, Miguel;
Blanco-Pillado, Jose Juan;
Blazquez-Salcedo, Jose Luis;
Bonetti, Matteo;
Boskovic, Mateja;
Bosnjak, Zeljka;
Bricman, Katja;
Bruegmann, Bernd;
Capelo, Pedro R.;
Carloni, Sante;
Cerda-Duran, Pablo;
Charmousis, Christos;
Chaty, Sylvain;
Clerici, Aurora;
Coates, Andrew;
Colleoni, Marta;
Collodel, Lucas G.;
Compere, Geoffrey;
Cook, William;
Cordero-Carrion, Isabel;
Correia, Miguel;
de la Cruz-Dombriz, Alvaro;
Czinner, Viktor G.;
Destounis, Kyriakos;
Dialektopoulos, Kostas;
Doneva, Daniela;
Dotti, Massimo;
Drew, Amelia;
Eckner, Christopher;
Edholm, James;
Emparan, Roberto;
Erdem, Recai;
Ferreira, Miguel;
Ferreira, Pedro G.;
Finch, Andrew;
Font, Jose A.;
Franchini, Nicola;
Fransen, Kwinten;
Gal'tsov, Dmitry;
Ganguly, Apratim;
Gerosa, Davide;
Glampedakis, Kostas;
Gomboc, Andreja;
Goobar, Ariel;
Gualtieri, Leonardo;
Guendelman, Eduardo;
Haardt, Francesco;
Harmark, Troels;
Hejda, Filip;
Hertog, Thomas;
Hopper, Seth;
Husa, Sascha;
Ihanec, Nada;
Ikeda, Taishi;
Jaodand, Amruta;
Jimenez-Forteza, Philippe Jetzer Xisco;
Kamionkowski, Marc;
Kaplan, David E.;
Kazantzidis, Stelios;
Kimura, Masashi;
Kobayashi, Shiho;
Kokkotas, Kostas;
Krolik, Julian;
Kunz, Jutta;
Lammerzahl, Claus;
Lasky, Paul;
Lemos, Jose P. S.;
Said, Jackson Levi;
Liberati, Stefano;
Lopes, Jorge;
Luna, Raimon;
Ma, Yin-Zhe;
Maggio, Elisa;
Montero, Marina Martinez;
Maselli, Andrea;
Mayer, Lucio;
Mazumdar, Anupam;
Messenger, Christopher;
Menard, Brice;
Minamitsuji, Masato;
Moore, Christopher J.;
Mota, David;
Nampalliwar, Sourabh;
Nerozzi, Andrea;
Nichols, David;
Nissimov, Emil;
Obergaulinger, Martin;
Obers, Niels A.;
Oliveri, Roberto;
Pappas, George;
Pasic, Vedad;
Peiris, Hiranya;
Petrushevska, Tanja;
Pollney, Denis;
Pratten, Geraint;
Rakic, Nemanja;
Racz, Istvan;
Radia, Miren;
Ramazanouglu, Fethi M.;
Ramos-Buades, Antoni;
Raposo, Guilherme;
Rosca-Mead, Roxana;
Rogatko, Marek;
Rosinska, Dorota;
Rosswog, Stephan;
Morales, Ester Ruiz;
Sakellariadou, Mairi;
Sanchis-Gual, Nicolas;
Salafia, Om Sharan;
Samajdar, Anuradha;
Sintes, Alicia;
Smole, Majda;
Sopuerta, Carlos;
Souza-Lima, Rafael;
Stalevski, Marko;
Stergioulas, Nikolaos;
Stevens, Chris;
Tamfal, Tomas;
Torres-Forne, Alejandro;
Tsygankov, Sergey;
Unluturk, Kivanc;
Valiante, Rosa;
van de Meent, Maarten;
Velhinho, Jose;
Verbin, Yosef;
Vercnocke, Bert;
Vernieri, Daniele;
Vicente, Rodrigo;
Vitagliano, Vincenzo;
Weltman, Amanda;
Whiting, Bernard;
Williamson, Andrew;
Witek, Helvi;
Wojnar, Aneta;
Yakut, Kadri;
Yan, Haopeng;
Yazadjiev, Stoycho;
Zaharijas, Gabrijela;
Zilhao, Miguel
Submitted: 2018-06-13, last modified: 2019-02-01
The grand challenges of contemporary fundamental physics---dark matter, dark
energy, vacuum energy, inflation and early universe cosmology, singularities
and the hierarchy problem---all involve gravity as a key component. And of all
gravitational phenomena, black holes stand out in their elegant simplicity,
while harbouring some of the most remarkable predictions of General Relativity:
event horizons, singularities and ergoregions. The hitherto invisible landscape
of the gravitational Universe is being unveiled before our eyes: the historical
direct detection of gravitational waves by the LIGO-Virgo collaboration marks
the dawn of a new era of scientific exploration. Gravitational-wave astronomy
will allow us to test models of black hole formation, growth and evolution, as
well as models of gravitational-wave generation and propagation. It will
provide evidence for event horizons and ergoregions, test the theory of General
Relativity itself, and may reveal the existence of new fundamental fields. The
synthesis of these results has the potential to radically reshape our
understanding of the cosmos and of the laws of Nature. The purpose of this work
is to present a concise, yet comprehensive overview of the state of the art in
the relevant fields of research, summarize important open problems, and lay out
a roadmap for future progress.
[33]
oai:arXiv.org:1812.04051 [pdf] - 1796011
Target of Opportunity Observations of Gravitational Wave Events with
LSST
Margutti, R.;
Cowperthwaite, P.;
Doctor, Z.;
Mortensen, K.;
Pankow, C. P.;
Salafia, O.;
Villar, V. A.;
Alexander, K.;
Annis, J.;
Andreoni, I.;
Baldeschi, A.;
Balmaverde, B.;
Berger, E.;
Bernardini, M. G.;
Berry, C. P. L.;
Bianco, F.;
Blanchard, P. K.;
Brocato, E.;
Carnerero, M. I.;
Cartier, R.;
Cenko, S. B.;
Chornock, R.;
Chomiuk, L.;
Copperwheat, C. M.;
Coughlin, M. W.;
Coppejans, D. L.;
Corsi, A.;
D'Ammando, F.;
Datrier, L.;
D'Avanzo, P.;
Dimitriadis, G.;
Drout, M. R.;
Foley, R. J.;
Fong, W.;
Fox, O.;
Ghirlanda, G.;
Goldstein, D.;
Grindlay, J.;
Guidorzi, C.;
Haiman, Z.;
Hendry, M.;
Holz, D.;
Hung, T.;
Inserra, C.;
Jones, D. O.;
Kalogera, V.;
Kilpatrick, C. D.;
Lamb, G.;
Laskar, T.;
Levan, A.;
Mason, E.;
Maguire, K.;
Melandri, A.;
Milisavljevic, D.;
Miller, A.;
Narayan, G.;
Nielsen, E.;
Nicholl, M.;
Nissanke, S.;
Nugent, P.;
Pan, Y. -C.;
Pasham, D.;
Paterson, K.;
Piranomonte, S.;
Racusin, J.;
Rest, A.;
Righi, C.;
Sand, D.;
Seaman, R.;
Scolnic, D.;
Siellez, K.;
Singer, L.;
Szkody, P.;
Smith, M.;
Steeghs, D.;
Sullivan, M.;
Tanvir, N.;
Terreran, G.;
Trimble, V.;
Valenti, S.;
Transient, with the support of the LSST;
Collaboration, Variable Stars
Submitted: 2018-12-10
The discovery of the electromagnetic counterparts to the binary neutron star
merger GW170817 has opened the era of GW+EM multi-messenger astronomy.
Exploiting this breakthrough requires increasing samples to explore the
diversity of kilonova behaviour and provide more stringent constraints on the
Hubble constant, and tests of fundamental physics. LSST can play a key role in
this field in the 2020s, when the gravitational wave detector network is
expected to detect higher rates of merger events involving neutron stars
($\sim$10s per year) out to distances of several hundred Mpc. Here we propose
comprehensive target-of-opportunity (ToOs) strategies for follow-up of
gravitational-wave sources that will make LSST the premiere machine for
discovery and early characterization for neutron star mergers and other
gravitational-wave sources.
[34]
oai:arXiv.org:1711.03112 [pdf] - 1779482
Interpreting GRB170817A as a giant flare from a jet-less double
neutron-star merger
Submitted: 2017-11-08, last modified: 2018-08-27
We show that the delay between GRB170817A and GW170817 is incompatible with
de-beamed emission from an off-axis relativistic jet. The prompt emission and
the subsequent radio and X-ray observations can instead be interpreted within a
giant-flare-like scenario, being the result of a relativistic outflow driven by
the ultra-strong magnetic field produced by magnetohydrodynamic amplification
during the merger of the progenitor double neutron-star binary. Within such
picture, the data indicate that the outflow must be endowed with a steep
velocity profile, with a relatively fast tail extending to Gamma~8. Since the
conditions for the launch of such an outflow are quite general, and the
presence of a velocity profile is a natural expectation of the acceleration
process, most neutron star binary mergers should feature this quasi-isotropic,
hard X-ray emission component, that can be a powerful guide to the discovery of
additional kilonovae associated to relatively nearby gravitational wave events.
[35]
oai:arXiv.org:1801.06164 [pdf] - 1686720
The evolution of the X-ray afterglow emission of GW 170817 / GRB 170817A
in XMM-Newton observations
D'Avanzo, P.;
Campana, S.;
Salafia, O. S.;
Ghirlanda, G.;
Ghisellini, G.;
Melandri, A.;
Bernardini, M. G.;
Branchesi, M.;
Chassande-Mottin, E.;
Covino, S.;
D'Elia, V.;
Nava, L.;
Salvaterra, R.;
Tagliaferri, G.;
Vergani, S. D.
Submitted: 2018-01-18, last modified: 2018-04-24
We report our observation of the short GRB 170817A, associated to the binary
neutron star merger event GW 170817, perfomed in the X-ray band with XMM-Newton
135 d after the event (on the 29th December 2017). We find evidence for a
flattening of the X-ray light curve with respect to the previously observed
brightening. This is also supported by a nearly simultaneous optical Hubble
Space Telescope and successive X-ray Chandra and low-frequency radio
observations recently reported in the literature. Since the optical-to-X-ray
spectral slope did not change with respect to previous observations, we exclude
that the change in the temporal evolution of the light curve is due to the
passage of the cooling frequency: its origin must be geometric or dynamical. We
interpret all the existing afterglow data with two models: i) a structured jet
and ii) a jet-less isotropic fireball with some stratification in its radial
velocity structure. Both models fit the data and predict that the radio flux
must decrease simultaneously with the optical and the X-ray one, making hard to
distinguish between them at the present stage. Polarimetric measures and the
rate of short GRB-GW association in future LIGO/Virgo runs will be key to
disentangle these two geometrically different scenarios.
[36]
oai:arXiv.org:1803.02255 [pdf] - 1674915
Optimizing searches for electromagnetic counterparts of gravitational
wave triggers
Coughlin, Michael W.;
Tao, Duo;
Chan, Man Leong;
Chatterjee, Deep;
Christensen, Nelson;
Ghosh, Shaon;
Greco, Giuseppe;
Hu, Yiming;
Kapadia, Shasvath;
Rana, Javed;
Salafia, Om Sharan;
Stubbs, Christopher
Submitted: 2018-03-06, last modified: 2018-03-08
With the detection of a binary neutron star system and its corresponding
electromagnetic counterparts, a new window of transient astronomy has opened.
Due to the size of the error regions, which can span hundreds to thousands of
square degrees, there are significant benefits to optimizing tilings for these
large sky areas. The rich science promised by gravitational-wave astronomy has
led to the proposal for a variety of tiling and time allocation schemes, and
for the first time, we make a systematic comparison of some of these methods.
We find that differences of a factor of 2 or more in efficiency are possible,
depending on the algorithm employed. For this reason, for future surveys
searching for electromagnetic counterparts, care should be taken when selecting
tiling, time allocation, and scheduling algorithms to maximize the probability
of counterpart detection.
[37]
oai:arXiv.org:1711.06257 [pdf] - 1626389
Bulk Lorentz factors of Gamma-Ray Bursts
Submitted: 2017-11-16
Knowledge of the bulk Lorentz factor $\Gamma_{0}$ of GRBs allows us to
compute their comoving frame properties shedding light on their physics. Upon
collisions with the circumburst matter, the fireball of a GRB starts to
decelerate, producing a peak or a break (depending on the circumburst density
profile) in the light curve of the afterglow. Considering all bursts with known
redshift and with an early coverage of their emission, we find 67 GRBs with a
peak in their optical or GeV light curves at a time $t_{\rm p}$. For another
106 GRBs we set an upper limit $t_{\rm p}^{\rm UL}$. We show that $t_{\rm p}$
is due to the dynamics of the fireball deceleration and not to the passage of a
characteristic frequency of the synchrotron spectrum across the optical band.
Considering the $t_{\rm p}$ of 66 long GRBs and the 85 most constraining upper
limits, using censored data analysis methods, we reconstruct the most likely
distribution of $t_{\rm p}$. All $t_{\rm p}$ are larger than the time $t_{\rm
p,g}$ when the prompt emission peaks, and are much larger than the time $t_{\rm
ph}$ when the fireball becomes transparent. The reconstructed distribution of
$\Gamma_0$ has median value $\sim$300 (150) for a uniform (wind) circumburst
density profile. In the comoving frame, long GRBs have typical isotropic
energy, luminosity, and peak energy $\langle E_{\rm iso}\rangle=3(8)\times
10^{50}$ erg, $\langle L_{\rm iso}\rangle=3(15) \times 10^{47}$ erg s$^{-1}$ ,
and $\langle E_{\rm peak}\rangle =1(2)$ keV in the homogeneous (wind) case. We
confirm that the significant correlations between $\Gamma$ and the rest frame
isotropic energy ($E_{\rm iso}$), luminosity ($L_{\rm iso}$) and peak energy
($E_{\rm peak}$) are not due to selection effects. Assuming a typical opening
angle of 5 degrees, we derive the distribution of the jet baryon loading which
is centered around a few $10^{-6} {\rm M_{\odot}}$.
[38]
oai:arXiv.org:1710.05859 [pdf] - 1608508
Jet-driven and jet-less fireballs from compact binary mergers
Submitted: 2017-10-16, last modified: 2017-11-08
During a compact binary merger involving at least one neutron star, a small
fraction of the gravitational energy could be liberated in such a way to
accelerate a small fraction (~ 10^-6) of the neutron star mass in an isotropic
or quasi-isotropic way. In presence of certain conditions, a pair-loaded
fireball can form, which undergoes accelerated expansion reaching relativistic
velocities. As in the standard fireball scenario, internal energy is partly
transformed into kinetic energy. At the photospheric radius, the internal
radiation can escape, giving rise to a pulse that lasts for a time equal to the
delay time since the merger. The subsequent interaction with the interstellar
medium can then convert part of the remaining kinetic energy back into
radiation in a weak isotropic afterglow at all wavelengths. This scenario does
not require the presence of a jet: the associated isotropic prompt and
afterglow emission should be visible for all NS-NS and BH-NS mergers within 90
Mpc, independent of their inclination. The prompt emission is similar to that
expected from an off-axis jet, either structured or much slower than usually
assumed (Gamma ~ 10), or from the jet cocoon. The predicted afterglow emission
properties can discriminate among these scenarios.
[39]
oai:arXiv.org:1710.05858 [pdf] - 1589846
Spectroscopic identification of r-process nucleosynthesis in a double
neutron star merger
Pian, E.;
D'Avanzo, P.;
Benetti, S.;
Branchesi, M.;
Brocato, E.;
Campana, S.;
Cappellaro, E.;
Covino, S.;
D'Elia, V.;
Fynbo, J. P. U.;
Getman, F.;
Ghirlanda, G.;
Ghisellini, G.;
Grado, A.;
Greco, G.;
Hjorth, J.;
Kouveliotou, C.;
Levan, A.;
Limatola, L.;
Malesani, D.;
Mazzali, P. A.;
Melandri, A.;
Moller, P.;
Nicastro, L.;
Palazzi, E.;
Piranomonte, S.;
Rossi, A.;
Salafia, O. S.;
Selsing, J.;
Stratta, G.;
Tanaka, M.;
Tanvir, N. R.;
Tomasella, L.;
Watson, D.;
Yang, S.;
Amati, L.;
Antonelli, L. A.;
Ascenzi, S.;
Bernardini, M. G.;
Boer, M.;
Bufano, F.;
Bulgarelli, A.;
Capaccioli, M.;
Casella, P. G.;
Castro-Tirado, A. J.;
Chassande-Mottin, E.;
Ciolfi, R.;
Copperwheat, C. M.;
Dadina, M.;
De Cesare, G.;
Di Paola, A.;
Fan, Y. Z.;
Gendre, B.;
Giuffrida, G.;
Giunta, A.;
Hunt, L. K.;
Israel, G.;
Jin, Z. -P.;
Kasliwal, M.;
Klose, S.;
Lisi, M.;
Longo, F.;
Maiorano, E.;
Mapelli, M.;
Masetti, .;
Nava, L.;
Patricelli, B.;
Perley, D.;
Pescalli, A.;
Piran, T.;
Possenti, A.;
Pulone, L.;
Razzano, M.;
Salvaterra, R.;
Schipani, P.;
Spera, M.;
Stamerra, A.;
Stella, L.;
Tagliaferri, G.;
Testa, V.;
Troja, E.;
Turatto, M.;
Vergani, S. D.;
Vergani, D.
Submitted: 2017-10-16
The merger of two neutron stars is predicted to give rise to three major
detectable phenomena: a short burst of gamma-rays, a gravitational wave signal,
and a transient optical/near-infrared source powered by the synthesis of large
amounts of very heavy elements via rapid neutron capture (the r-process). Such
transients, named "macronovae" or "kilonovae", are believed to be centres of
production of rare elements such as gold and platinum. The most compelling
evidence so far for a kilonova was a very faint near-infrared rebrightening in
the afterglow of a short gamma-ray burst at z = 0.356, although findings
indicating bluer events have been reported. Here we report the spectral
identification and describe the physical properties of a bright kilonova
associated with the gravitational wave source GW 170817 and gamma-ray burst GRB
170817A associated with a galaxy at a distance of 40 Mpc from Earth. Using a
series of spectra from ground-based observatories covering the wavelength range
from the ultraviolet to the near-infrared, we find that the kilonova is
characterized by rapidly expanding ejecta with spectral features similar to
those predicted by current models. The ejecta is optically thick early on, with
a velocity of about 0.2 times light speed, and reaches a radius of about 50
astronomical units in only 1.5 days. As the ejecta expands, broad
absorption-like lines appear on the spectral continuum indicating atomic
species produced by nucleosynthesis that occurs in the post-merger fast-moving
dynamical ejecta and in two slower (0.05 times light speed) wind regions.
Comparison with spectral models suggests that the merger ejected 0.03-0.05
solar masses of material, including high-opacity lanthanides.
[40]
oai:arXiv.org:1709.08865 [pdf] - 1588880
Colour variations in the GRB 120327A afterglow
Melandri, A.;
Covino, S.;
Zaninoni, E.;
Campana, S.;
Bolmer, J.;
Cobb, B. E.;
Gorosabel, J.;
Kim, J. -W.;
Kuin, P.;
Kuroda, D.;
Malesani, D.;
Mundell, C. G.;
Nappo, F.;
Sbarufatti, B.;
Smith, R. J.;
Steele, I. A.;
Topinka, M.;
Trotter, A. S.;
Virgili, F. J.;
Bernardini, M. G.;
D'Avanzo, P.;
D'Elia, V.;
Fugazza, D.;
Ghirlanda, G.;
Gomboc, A.;
Greiner, J.;
Guidorzi, C.;
Haislip, J. B.;
Hanayama, H.;
Hanlon, L.;
Im, M.;
Ivarsen, K. M.;
Japelj, J.;
Jelinek, M.;
Kawai, N.;
Kobayashi, S.;
Kopac, D.;
LaCluyze, A. P.;
Martin-Carrillo, A.;
Murphy, D.;
Reichart, D. E.;
Salvaterra, R.;
Salafia, O. S.;
Tagliaferri, G.;
Vergani, S. D.
Submitted: 2017-09-26
We present a comprehensive temporal and spectral analysis of the long Swift
GRB 120327A afterglow data to investigate the possible causes of the observed
early time colour variations. We collected data from various
instruments/telescopes in different bands (X-rays, ultra- violet, optical and
near-infrared) and determined the shapes of the afterglow early-time light
curves. We studied the overall temporal behaviour and the spectral energy
distributions from early to late times. The ultra-violet, optical, and
near-infrared light curves can be modelled with a single power-law component
between 200 and 2e4 s after the burst event. The X-ray light curve shows a
canonical steep-shallow-steep behaviour, typical of long gamma-ray bursts. At
early times a colour variation is observed in the ultra-violet/optical bands,
while at very late times a hint of a re-brightening is visible. The observed
early time colour change can be explained as a variation in the intrinsic
optical spectral index, rather than an evolution of the optical extinction.
[41]
oai:arXiv.org:1704.05851 [pdf] - 1582676
Where and when: optimal scheduling of the electromagnetic follow-up of
gravitational-wave events based on counterpart lightcurve models
Submitted: 2017-04-19, last modified: 2017-08-01
The electromagnetic (EM) follow-up of a gravitational wave (GW) event
requires to scan a wide sky region, defined by the so called "skymap", for the
detection and identification of a transient counterpart. We propose a novel
method that exploits information encoded in the GW signal to construct a
"detectability map", which represents the time-dependent ("when") probability
to detect the transient at each position of the skymap ("where"). Focusing on
the case of a neutron star binary inspiral, we model the associated short
gamma-ray burst afterglow and macronova emission, using the probability
distributions of binary parameters (sky position, distance, orbit inclination,
mass ratio) extracted from the GW signal as inputs. The resulting family of
possible lightcurves is the basis to construct the detectability map. As a
practical example, we apply the method to a simulated GW signal produced by a
neutron star merger at 75 Mpc whose localization uncertainty is very large
(about 1500 square degrees). We construct observing strategies based on the
detectability maps for optical, infrared and radio facilities, taking VST,
VISTA and MeerKAT as prototypes. Assuming limiting fluxes of r ~ 24.5, J ~ 22.4
(AB magnitudes) and 500 uJy @ 1.4 GHz for ~ 1000 s of exposure each, the
afterglow and macronova emissions are successfully detected with a minimum
observing time of 7, 15 and 5 hours respectively.
[42]
oai:arXiv.org:1604.08204 [pdf] - 1530644
The 999th Swift gamma-ray burst: Some like it thermal
Nappo, F.;
Pescalli, A.;
Oganesyan, G.;
Ghirlanda, G.;
Giroletti, M.;
Melandri, A.;
Campana, S.;
Ghisellini, G.;
Salafia, O. S.;
D'Avanzo, P.;
Bernardini, M. G.;
Covino, S.;
Carretti, E.;
Celotti, A.;
D'Elia, V.;
Nava, L.;
Palazzi, E.;
Poppi, S.;
Prandoni, I.;
Righini, S.;
Rossi, A.;
Salvaterra, R.;
Tagliaferri, G.;
Testa, V.;
Venturi, T.;
Vergani, S. D.
Submitted: 2016-04-27, last modified: 2016-11-14
We present a multiwavelength study of GRB 151027A. This is the 999th GRB
detected by the Swift satellite and it has a densely sampled emission in the
X-ray and optical band and has been observed and detected in the radio up to
140 days after the prompt. The multiwavelength light curve from 500 s to 140
days can be modelled through a standard forward shock afterglow but requires an
additional component to reproduce the early X-ray and optical emission. We
present TNG and LBT optical observations performed 19.6, 33.9 and 92.3 days
after the trigger which show a bump with respect to a standard afterglow flux
decay and are possibly interpreted as due to the underlying SN and host galaxy
(of 0.4 uJy in the R band). Radio observations, performed with SRT, Medicina,
EVN and VLBA between day 4 and 140, suggest that the burst exploded in an
environment characterised by a density profile scaling with the distance from
the source (wind profile). A remarkable feature of the prompt emission is the
presence of a bright flare 100 s after the trigger, lasting 70 seconds in the
soft X-ray band, which was simultaneously detected from the optical band up to
the MeV energy range. By combining Swift-BAT/XRT and Fermi-GBM data, the
broadband (0.3-1000 keV) time resolved spectral analysis of the flare reveals
the coexistence of a non-thermal (power law) and thermal blackbody components.
The BB component contributes up to 35% of the luminosity in the 0.3-1000 keV
band. The gamma-ray emission observed in Swift-BAT and Fermi-GBM anticipates
and lasts less than the soft X-ray emission as observed by Swift-XRT, arguing
against a Comptonization origin. The BB component could either be produced by
an outflow becoming transparent or by the collision of a fast shell with a
slow, heavy and optically thick fireball ejected during the quiescent time
interval between the initial and later flares of the burst.
[43]
oai:arXiv.org:1610.00717 [pdf] - 1523864
On radiative acceleration in spine-sheath structured blazar jets
Submitted: 2016-10-03
It has been proposed that blazar jets are structured, with a fast spine
surrounded by a slower sheath or layer. This structured jet model explains some
properties of their emission and morphology. Because of their relative motion,
the radiation produced by one component is seen amplified by the other, thus
enhancing the inverse Compton emission of both. Radiation is emitted
anisotropically in the comoving frames, and causes the emitting plasma to
recoil. As seen in the observer frame, this corresponds to a deceleration of
the fastest component (the spine) and an acceleration of the slower one (the
layer). While the deceleration of the spine has already been investigated, here
we study for the first time the acceleration of the sheath and find
self-consistent velocity profile solutions for both the spine and the sheath
while accounting for radiative cooling. We find that the sheath can be
accelerated to the velocities required by the observations if its leptons
remain energetic in the acceleration region, assumed to be of the order of 100
Schwarzschild radii, demanding continuous injection of energetic particles in
that region.
[44]
oai:arXiv.org:1607.07875 [pdf] - 1498370
Short GRBs at the dawn of the gravitational wave era
Ghirlanda, G.;
Salafia, O. S.;
Pescalli, A.;
Ghisellini, G.;
Salvaterra, R.;
Chassande-Mottin, E.;
Colpi, M.;
Nappo, F.;
D'Avanzo, P.;
Melandri, A.;
Bernardini, M. G.;
Branchesi, M.;
Campana, S.;
Ciolfi, R.;
Covino, S.;
Gotz, D.;
Vergani, S. D.;
Zennaro, M.;
Tagliaferri, G.
Submitted: 2016-07-26, last modified: 2016-09-06
We derive the luminosity function and redshift distribution of short Gamma
Ray Bursts (SGRBs) using (i) all the available observer-frame constraints (i.e.
peak flux, fluence, peak energy and duration distributions) of the large
population of Fermi SGRBs and (ii) the rest-frame properties of a complete
sample of Swift SGRBs. We show that a steep $\phi(L)\propto L^{-a}$ with a>2.0
is excluded if the full set of constraints is considered. We implement a Monte
Carlo Markov Chain method to derive the $\phi(L)$ and $\psi(z)$ functions
assuming intrinsic Ep-Liso and Ep-Eiso correlations or independent
distributions of intrinsic peak energy, luminosity and duration. To make our
results independent from assumptions on the progenitor (NS-NS binary mergers or
other channels) and from uncertainties on the star formation history, we assume
a parametric form for the redshift distribution of SGRBs. We find that a
relatively flat luminosity function with slope ~0.5 below a characteristic
break luminosity ~3$\times10^{52}$ erg/s and a redshift distribution of SGRBs
peaking at z~1.5-2 satisfy all our constraints. These results hold also if no
Ep-Liso and Ep-Eiso correlations are assumed. We estimate that, within ~200 Mpc
(i.e. the design aLIGO range for the detection of GW produced by NS-NS merger
events), 0.007-0.03 SGRBs yr$^{-1}$ should be detectable as gamma-ray events.
Assuming current estimates of NS-NS merger rates and that all NS-NS mergers
lead to a SGRB event, we derive a conservative estimate of the average opening
angle of SGRBs: $\theta_{jet}$~3-6 deg. Our luminosity function implies an
average luminosity L~1.5$\times 10^{52}$ erg/s, nearly two orders of magnitude
higher than previous findings, which greatly enhances the chance of observing
SGRB "orphan" afterglows. Efforts should go in the direction of finding and
identifying such orphan afterglows as counterparts of GW events.
[45]
oai:arXiv.org:1601.03735 [pdf] - 1428702
Light curves and spectra from off-axis gamma-ray bursts
Submitted: 2016-01-14, last modified: 2016-06-23
If gamma-ray burst prompt emission originates at a typical radius, and if
material producing the emission moves at relativistic speed, then the
variability of the resulting light curve depends on the viewing angle. This is
due to the fact that the pulse evolution time scale is Doppler contracted,
while the pulse separation is not. For off-axis viewing angles $\theta_{\rm
view} \gtrsim \theta_{\rm jet} + \Gamma^{-1}$, the pulse broadening
significantly smears out the light curve variability. This is largely
independent of geometry and emission processes. To explore a specific case, we
set up a simple model of a single pulse under the assumption that the pulse
rise and decay are dominated by the shell curvature effect. We show that such a
pulse observed off-axis is (i) broader, (ii) softer and (iii) displays a
different hardness-intensity correlation with respect to the same pulse seen
on-axis. For each of these effects, we provide an intuitive physical
explanation. We then show how a synthetic light curve made by a superposition
of pulses changes with increasing viewing angle. We find that a highly variable
light curve, (as seen on-axis) becomes smooth and apparently single-pulsed
(when seen off-axis) because of pulse overlap. To test the relevance of this
fact, we estimate the fraction of off-axis gamma-ray bursts detectable by
\textit{Swift} as a function of redshift, finding that a sizable fraction
(between 10\% and 80\%) of nearby ($z<0.1$) bursts are observed with
$\theta_{\rm view} \gtrsim \theta_{\rm jet} + \Gamma^{-1}$. Based on these
results, we argue that low luminosity gamma-ray bursts are consistent with
being ordinary bursts seen off-axis.
[46]
oai:arXiv.org:1606.03876 [pdf] - 1447799
Searching for narrow absorption and emission lines in XMM-Newton spectra
of gamma-ray bursts
Campana, S.;
Braito, V.;
D'Avanzo, P.;
Ghirlanda, G.;
Melandri, A.;
Pescalli, A.;
Salafia, O. S.;
Salvaterra, R.;
Tagliaferri, G.;
Vergani, S. D.
Submitted: 2016-06-13
We present the results of a spectroscopic search for narrow emission and
absorption features in the X-ray spectra of long gamma-ray burst (GRB)
afterglows. Using XMM-Newton data, both EPIC and RGS spectra, of six bright
(fluence >10^{-7} erg cm^{-2}) and relatively nearby (z=0.54-1.41) GRBs, we
performed a blind search for emission or absorption lines that could be related
to a high cloud density or metal-rich gas in the environ close to the GRBs. We
detected five emission features in four of the six GRBs with an overall
statistical significance, assessed through Monte Carlo simulations, of <3.0
sigma. Most of the lines are detected around the observed energy of the oxygen
edge at ~0.5 keV, suggesting that they are not related to the GRB environment
but are most likely of Galactic origin. No significant absorption features were
detected. A spectral fitting with a free Galactic column density (N_H) testing
different models for the Galactic absorption confirms this origin because we
found an indication of an excess of Galactic N_H in these four GRBs with
respect to the tabulated values.
[47]
oai:arXiv.org:1506.05463 [pdf] - 1358792
The rate and luminosity function of long Gamma Ray Bursts
Pescalli, A.;
Ghirlanda, G.;
Salvaterra, R.;
Ghisellini, G.;
Vergani, S. D.;
Nappo, F.;
Salafia, O. S.;
Melandri, A.;
Covino, S.;
Götz, D.
Submitted: 2015-06-17
We derive, adopting a direct method, the luminosity function and the
formation rate of long Gamma Ray Bursts through a complete, flux-limited,
sample of Swift bursts which has a high level of completeness in redshift z
(~82%). We parametrise the redshift evolution of the GRB luminosity as L =
L_0(1+ z)^k and we derive k = 2.5, consistently with recent estimates. The
de-evolved luminosity function of GRBs can be represented by a broken power law
with slopes a = -1.32 +- 0.21 and b = -1.84 +- 0.24 below and above,
respectively, a characteristic break luminosity L_0,b = 10^51.45+-0.15 erg/s.
Under the hypothesis of luminosity evolution we find that the GRB formation
rate increases with redshift up to z~2, where it peaks, and then decreases in
agreement with the shape of the cosmic star formation rate. We test the direct
method through numerical simulations and we show that if it is applied to
incomplete (both in redshift and/or flux) GRB samples it can misleadingly
result in an excess of the GRB formation rate at low redshifts.
[48]
oai:arXiv.org:1502.06608 [pdf] - 979076
Structure of Gamma-Ray Burst jets: intrinsic versus apparent properties
Submitted: 2015-02-23, last modified: 2015-04-14
With this paper we introduce the concept of apparent structure of a GRB jet,
as opposed to its intrinsic structure. The latter is customarily defined
specifying the functions epsilon(theta) (the energy emitted per jet unit solid
angle) and Gamma(theta) (the Lorentz factor of the emitting material); the
apparent structure is instead defined by us as the isotropic equivalent energy
E_iso(theta_v) as a function of the viewing angle theta_v. We show how to
predict the apparent structure of a jet given its intrinsic structure. We find
that a Gaussian intrinsic structure yields a power law apparent structure: this
opens a new viewpoint on the Gaussian (which can be understood as a proxy for a
realistic narrow, well collimated jet structure) as a possible candidate for a
quasi-universal GRB jet structure. We show that such a model (a) is consistent
with recent constraints on the observed luminosity function of GRBs; (b)
implies fewer orphan afterglows with respect to the standard uniform model; (c)
can break out the progenitor star (in the collapsar scenario) without wasting
an unreasonable amount of energy; (d) is compatible with the explanation of the
Amati correlation as a viewing angle effect; (e) can be very standard in energy
content, and still yield a very wide range of observed isotropic equivalent
energies.
[49]
oai:arXiv.org:1504.02096 [pdf] - 1129080
Unveiling the population of orphan Gamma Ray Bursts
Ghirlanda, G.;
Salvaterra, R.;
Campana, S.;
Vergani, S. D.;
Japelj, J.;
Bernardini, M. G.;
Burlon, D.;
D'Avanzo, P.;
Melandri, A.;
Gomboc, A.;
Nappo, F.;
Paladini, R.;
Pescalli, A.;
Salafia, O. S.;
Tagliaferri, G.
Submitted: 2015-04-08
Gamma Ray Bursts are detectable in the gamma-ray band if their jets are
oriented towards the observer. However, for each GRB with a typical theta_jet,
there should be ~2/theta_jet^2 bursts whose emission cone is oriented elsewhere
in space. These off-axis bursts can be eventually detected when, due to the
deceleration of their relativistic jets, the beaming angle becomes comparable
to the viewing angle. Orphan Afterglows (OA) should outnumber the current
population of bursts detected in the gamma-ray band even if they have not been
conclusively observed so far at any frequency. We compute the expected flux of
the population of orphan afterglows in the mm, optical and X-ray bands through
a population synthesis code of GRBs and the standard afterglow emission model.
We estimate the detection rate of OA by on-going and forthcoming surveys. The
average duration of OA as transients above a given limiting flux is derived and
described with analytical expressions: in general OA should appear as daily
transients in optical surveys and as monthly/yearly transients in the mm/radio
band. We find that ~ 2 OA yr^-1 could already be detected by Gaia and up to 20
OA yr^-1 could be observed by the ZTF survey. A larger number of 50 OA yr^-1
should be detected by LSST in the optical band. For the X-ray band, ~ 26 OA
yr^-1 could be detected by the eROSITA. For the large population of OA
detectable by LSST, the X-ray and optical follow up of the light curve (for the
brightest cases) and/or the extensive follow up of their emission in the mm and
radio band could be the key to disentangle their GRB nature from other
extragalactic transients of comparable flux density.
[50]
oai:arXiv.org:1503.01131 [pdf] - 943877
Gamma-ray burst jets: uniform or structured?
Submitted: 2015-03-03
The structure of Gamma-Ray Burst (GRB) jets impacts on their prompt and
afterglow emission properties. Insights into the still unknown structure of
GRBs can be achieved by studying how different structures impact on the
luminosity function (LF): i) we show that low ($10^{46} < L_{\rm iso} <
10^{48}$ erg/s) and high (i.e. with $L_{\rm iso} > 10^{50}$ erg/s) luminosity
GRBs can be described by a unique LF; ii) we find that a uniform jet (seen on-
and off-axis) as well as a very steep structured jet (i.e. $\epsilon(\theta)
\propto \theta^{-s}$ with $s > 4$) can reproduce the current LF data; iii)
taking into account the emission from the whole jet (i.e. including
contributions from mildly relativistic, off-axis jet elements) we find that
$E_{\rm iso}(\theta_{\rm v})$ (we dub this quantity "apparent structure") can
be very different from the intrinsic structure $\epsilon(\theta)$: in
particular, a jet with a Gaussian intrinsic structure has an apparent structure
which is more similar to a power law. This opens a new viewpoint on the
quasi-universal structured jet hypothesis.
[51]
oai:arXiv.org:1409.1213 [pdf] - 1216674
Luminosity function and jet structure of Gamma Ray Bursts
Submitted: 2014-09-03
The structure of Gamma Ray Burst (GRB) jets impacts on their prompt and
afterglow emission properties. The jet of GRBs could be uniform, with constant
energy per unit solid angle within the jet aperture, or it could instead be
structured, namely with energy and velocity that depend on the angular distance
from the axis of the jet. We try to get some insight about the still unknown
structure of GRBs by studying their luminosity function. We show that low
(1e46-1e48 erg/s) and high (i.e. with L > 1e50 erg/s) luminosity GRBs can be
described by a unique luminosity function, which is also consistent with
current lower limits in the intermediate luminosity range (1e48-1e50} erg/s).
We derive analytical expressions for the luminosity function of GRBs in uniform
and structured jet models and compare them with the data. Uniform jets can
reproduce the entire luminosity function with reasonable values of the free
parameters. A structured jet can also fit adequately the current data, provided
that the energy within the jet is relatively strongly structured, i.e. E propto
theta^{-k} with k > 4. The classical E propto theta^{-2} structured jet model
is excluded by the current data.
