Normalized to: Said, N.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1906.01141 [pdf] - 1901992
Spica and the annual cycle of PKS B1322-110 scintillations
Bignall, Hayley;
Reynolds, Cormac;
Stevens, Jamie;
Bannister, Keith;
Johnston, Simon;
Tuntsov, Artem V.;
Walker, Mark A.;
Gulyaev, Sergei;
Natusch, Tim;
Weston, Stuart;
Said, Noor Masdiana Md;
Kratzer, Matthew
Submitted: 2019-06-03
PKS B1322-110 is a radio quasar that is located only 8.5' in angular
separation from the bright B star Spica. It exhibits intra-day variability in
its flux density at GHz frequencies attributed to scintillations from plasma
inhomogeneities. We have tracked the rate of scintillation of this source for
over a year with the Australia Telescope Compact Array, recording a strong
annual cycle that includes a near-standstill in August and another in December.
The cycle is consistent with scattering by highly anisotropic plasma
microstructure, and we fit our data to that model in order to determine the
kinematic parameters of the plasma. Because of the low ecliptic latitude of PKS
B1322-110, the orientation of the plasma microstructure is poorly constrained.
Nonetheless at each possible orientation our data single out a narrow range of
the corresponding velocity component, leading to a one-dimensional constraint
in a two-dimensional parameter space. The constrained region is consistent with
a published model in which the scattering material is associated with Spica and
consists of filaments that are radially oriented around the star. This result
has a 1% probability of arising by chance.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1502.01589 [pdf] - 1483195
Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters
Planck Collaboration;
Ade, P. A. R.;
Aghanim, N.;
Arnaud, M.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartlett, J. G.;
Bartolo, N.;
Battaner, E.;
Battye, R.;
Benabed, K.;
Benoit, A.;
Benoit-Levy, A.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bock, J. J.;
Bonaldi, A.;
Bonavera, L.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Catalano, A.;
Challinor, A.;
Chamballu, A.;
Chary, R. -R.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Chluba, J.;
Christensen, P. R.;
Church, S.;
Clements, D. L.;
Colombi, S.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Coulais, A.;
Crill, B. P.;
Curto, A.;
Cuttaia, F.;
Danese, L.;
Davies, R. D.;
Davis, R. J.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Desert, F. -X.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Dolag, K.;
Dole, H.;
Donzelli, S.;
Dore, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Ducout, A.;
Dunkley, J.;
Dupac, X.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Elsner, F.;
Ensslin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Farhang, M.;
Fergusson, J.;
Finelli, F.;
Forni, O.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frejsel, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Gauthier, C.;
Gerbino, M.;
Ghosh, T.;
Giard, M.;
Giraud-Heraud, Y.;
Giusarma, E.;
Gjerlow, E.;
Gonzalez-Nuevo, J.;
Gorski, K. M.;
Gratton, S.;
Gregorio, A.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Hamann, J.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Hanson, D.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Helou, G.;
Henrot-Versille, S.;
Hernandez-Monteagudo, C.;
Herranz, D.;
Hildebrandt, S. R.;
Hivon, E.;
Hobson, M.;
Holmes, W. A.;
Hornstrup, A.;
Hovest, W.;
Huang, Z.;
Huffenberger, K. M.;
Hurier, G.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jaffe, T. R.;
Jones, W. C.;
Juvela, M.;
Keihanen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Kneissl, R.;
Knoche, J.;
Knox, L.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lahteenmaki, A.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Leahy, J. P.;
Leonardi, R.;
Lesgourgues, J.;
Levrier, F.;
Lewis, A.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Linden-Vornle, M.;
Lopez-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Macias-Perez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Marchini, A.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martinelli, M.;
Martinez-Gonzalez, E.;
Masi, S.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mazzotta, P.;
McGehee, P.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Melin, J. -B.;
Mendes, L.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Millea, M.;
Mitra, S.;
Miville-Deschenes, M. -A.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Mortlock, D.;
Moss, A.;
Munshi, D.;
Murphy, J. A.;
Naselsky, P.;
Nati, F.;
Natoli, P.;
Netterfield, C. B.;
Norgaard-Nielsen, H. U.;
Noviello, F.;
Novikov, D.;
Novikov, I.;
Oxborrow, C. A.;
Paci, F.;
Pagano, L.;
Pajot, F.;
Paladini, R.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Pasian, F.;
Patanchon, G.;
Pearson, T. J.;
Perdereau, O.;
Perotto, L.;
Perrotta, F.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Piat, M.;
Pierpaoli, E.;
Pietrobon, D.;
Plaszczynski, S.;
Pointecouteau, E.;
Polenta, G.;
Popa, L.;
Pratt, G. W.;
Prezeau, G.;
Prunet, S.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Reach, W. T.;
Rebolo, R.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renault, C.;
Renzi, A.;
Ristorcelli, I.;
Rocha, G.;
Rosset, C.;
Rossetti, M.;
Roudier, G.;
d'Orfeuil, B. Rouille;
Rowan-Robinson, M.;
Rubino-Martin, J. A.;
Rusholme, B.;
Said, N.;
Salvatelli, V.;
Salvati, L.;
Sandri, M.;
Santos, D.;
Savelainen, M.;
Savini, G.;
Scott, D.;
Seiffert, M. D.;
Serra, P.;
Shellard, E. P. S.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Spinelli, M.;
Stolyarov, V.;
Stompor, R.;
Sudiwala, R.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Sutton, D.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Sygnet, J. -F.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Terenzi, L.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tristram, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Tucci, M.;
Tuovinen, J.;
Turler, M.;
Umana, G.;
Valenziano, L.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Wade, L. A.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
White, M.;
White, S. D. M.;
Wilkinson, A.;
Yvon, D.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2015-02-05, last modified: 2016-06-17
We present results based on full-mission Planck observations of temperature
and polarization anisotropies of the CMB. These data are consistent with the
six-parameter inflationary LCDM cosmology. From the Planck temperature and
lensing data, for this cosmology we find a Hubble constant, H0= (67.8 +/- 0.9)
km/s/Mpc, a matter density parameter Omega_m = 0.308 +/- 0.012 and a scalar
spectral index with n_s = 0.968 +/- 0.006. (We quote 68% errors on measured
parameters and 95% limits on other parameters.) Combined with Planck
temperature and lensing data, Planck LFI polarization measurements lead to a
reionization optical depth of tau = 0.066 +/- 0.016. Combining Planck with
other astrophysical data we find N_ eff = 3.15 +/- 0.23 for the effective
number of relativistic degrees of freedom and the sum of neutrino masses is
constrained to < 0.23 eV. Spatial curvature is found to be |Omega_K| < 0.005.
For LCDM we find a limit on the tensor-to-scalar ratio of r <0.11 consistent
with the B-mode constraints from an analysis of BICEP2, Keck Array, and Planck
(BKP) data. Adding the BKP data leads to a tighter constraint of r < 0.09. We
find no evidence for isocurvature perturbations or cosmic defects. The equation
of state of dark energy is constrained to w = -1.006 +/- 0.045. Standard big
bang nucleosynthesis predictions for the Planck LCDM cosmology are in excellent
agreement with observations. We investigate annihilating dark matter and
deviations from standard recombination, finding no evidence for new physics.
The Planck results for base LCDM are in agreement with BAO data and with the
JLA SNe sample. However the amplitude of the fluctuations is found to be higher
than inferred from rich cluster counts and weak gravitational lensing. Apart
from these tensions, the base LCDM cosmology provides an excellent description
of the Planck CMB observations and many other astrophysical data sets.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1502.01582 [pdf] - 1486774
Planck 2015 results. I. Overview of products and scientific results
Planck Collaboration;
Adam, R.;
Ade, P. A. R.;
Aghanim, N.;
Akrami, Y.;
Alves, M. I. R.;
Arnaud, M.;
Arroja, F.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartlett, J. G.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Battaglia, P.;
Battaner, E.;
Battye, R.;
Benabed, K.;
Benoît, A.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bertincourt, B.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bonaldi, A.;
Bonavera, L.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Carvalho, P.;
Casaponsa, B.;
Castex, G.;
Catalano, A.;
Challinor, A.;
Chamballu, A.;
Chary, R. -R.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Chluba, J.;
Christensen, P. R.;
Church, S.;
Clemens, M.;
Clements, D. L.;
Colombi, S.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Comis, B.;
Contreras, D.;
Couchot, F.;
Coulais, A.;
Crill, B. P.;
Cruz, M.;
Curto, A.;
Cuttaia, F.;
Danese, L.;
Davies, R. D.;
Davis, R. J.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Delouis, J. -M.;
Désert, F. -X.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Dolag, K.;
Dole, H.;
Donzelli, S.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Ducout, A.;
Dunkley, J.;
Dupac, X.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Eisenhardt, P. R. M.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Falgarone, E.;
Fantaye, Y.;
Farhang, M.;
Feeney, S.;
Fergusson, J.;
Fernandez-Cobos, R.;
Feroz, F.;
Finelli, F.;
Florido, E.;
Forni, O.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschet, C.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frejsel, A.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Gauthier, C.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Gerbino, M.;
Ghosh, T.;
Giard, M.;
Giraud-Héraud, Y.;
Giusarma, E.;
Gjerløw, E.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Grainge, K. J. B.;
Gratton, S.;
Gregorio, A.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Hamann, J.;
Handley, W.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Hanson, D.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Heavens, A.;
Helou, G.;
Henrot-Versillé, S.;
Hernández-Monteagudo, C.;
Herranz, D.;
Hildebrandt, S. R.;
Hivon, E.;
Hobson, M.;
Holmes, W. A.;
Hornstrup, A.;
Hovest, W.;
Huang, Z.;
Huffenberger, K. M.;
Hurier, G.;
Ilić, S.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jaffe, T. R.;
Jin, T.;
Jones, W. C.;
Juvela, M.;
Karakci, A.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kim, J.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Kneissl, R.;
Knoche, J.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lacasa, F.;
Lagache, G.;
Lähteenmäki, A.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Langer, M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Leahy, J. P.;
Lellouch, E.;
Leonardi, R.;
León-Tavares, J.;
Lesgourgues, J.;
Levrier, F.;
Lewis, A.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Linden-Vørnle, M.;
Lindholm, V.;
Liu, H.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Ma, Y. -Z.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Mak, D. S. Y.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Marchini, A.;
Marcos-Caballero, A.;
Marinucci, D.;
Marshall, D. J.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martinelli, M.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Masi, S.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mazzotta, P.;
McEwen, J. D.;
McGehee, P.;
Mei, S.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Melin, J. -B.;
Mendes, L.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Mikkelsen, K.;
Mitra, S.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Moreno, R.;
Morgante, G.;
Mortlock, D.;
Moss, A.;
Mottet, S.;
Müenchmeyer, M.;
Munshi, D.;
Murphy, J. A.;
Narimani, A.;
Naselsky, P.;
Nastasi, A.;
Nati, F.;
Natoli, P.;
Negrello, M.;
Netterfield, C. B.;
Nørgaard-Nielsen, H. U.;
Noviello, F.;
Novikov, D.;
Novikov, I.;
Olamaie, M.;
Oppermann, N.;
Orlando, E.;
Oxborrow, C. A.;
Paci, F.;
Pagano, L.;
Pajot, F.;
Paladini, R.;
Pandolfi, S.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Pasian, F.;
Patanchon, G.;
Pearson, T. J.;
Peel, M.;
Peiris, H. V.;
Pelkonen, V. -M.;
Perdereau, O.;
Perotto, L.;
Perrott, Y. C.;
Perrotta, F.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Piat, M.;
Pierpaoli, E.;
Pietrobon, D.;
Plaszczynski, S.;
Pogosyan, D.;
Pointecouteau, E.;
Polenta, G.;
Popa, L.;
Pratt, G. W.;
Prézeau, G.;
Prunet, S.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Racine, B.;
Reach, W. T.;
Rebolo, R.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renault, C.;
Renzi, A.;
Ristorcelli, I.;
Rocha, G.;
Roman, M.;
Romelli, E.;
Rosset, C.;
Rossetti, M.;
Rotti, A.;
Roudier, G.;
d'Orfeuil, B. Rouillé;
Rowan-Robinson, M.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Ruiz-Granados, B.;
Rumsey, C.;
Rusholme, B.;
Said, N.;
Salvatelli, V.;
Salvati, L.;
Sandri, M.;
Sanghera, H. S.;
Santos, D.;
Saunders, R. D. E.;
Sauvé, A.;
Savelainen, M.;
Savini, G.;
Schaefer, B. M.;
Schammel, M. P.;
Scott, D.;
Seiffert, M. D.;
Serra, P.;
Shellard, E. P. S.;
Shimwell, T. W.;
Shiraishi, M.;
Smith, K.;
Souradeep, T.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Spinelli, M.;
Stanford, S. A.;
Stern, D.;
Stolyarov, V.;
Stompor, R.;
Strong, A. W.;
Sudiwala, R.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Sutter, P.;
Sutton, D.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Sygnet, J. -F.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Terenzi, L.;
Texier, D.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tornikoski, M.;
Tristram, M.;
Troja, A.;
Trombetti, T.;
Tucci, M.;
Tuovinen, J.;
Türler, M.;
Umana, G.;
Valenziano, L.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vassallo, T.;
Vidal, M.;
Viel, M.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Wade, L. A.;
Walter, B.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Watson, R.;
Wehus, I. K.;
Welikala, N.;
Weller, J.;
White, M.;
White, S. D. M.;
Wilkinson, A.;
Yvon, D.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zibin, J. P.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2015-02-05, last modified: 2015-08-09
The European Space Agency's Planck satellite, dedicated to studying the early
Universe and its subsequent evolution, was launched 14~May 2009 and scanned the
microwave and submillimetre sky continuously between 12~August 2009 and
23~October 2013. In February~2015, ESA and the Planck Collaboration released
the second set of cosmology products based on data from the entire Planck
mission, including both temperature and polarization, along with a set of
scientific and technical papers and a web-based explanatory supplement. This
paper gives an overview of the main characteristics of the data and the data
products in the release, as well as the associated cosmological and
astrophysical science results and papers. The science products include maps of
the cosmic microwave background (CMB), the thermal Sunyaev-Zeldovich effect,
and diffuse foregrounds in temperature and polarization, catalogues of compact
Galactic and extragalactic sources (including separate catalogues of
Sunyaev-Zeldovich clusters and Galactic cold clumps), and extensive simulations
of signals and noise used in assessing the performance of the analysis methods
and assessment of uncertainties. The likelihood code used to assess
cosmological models against the Planck data are described, as well as a CMB
lensing likelihood. Scientific results include cosmological parameters deriving
from CMB power spectra, gravitational lensing, and cluster counts, as well as
constraints on inflation, non-Gaussianity, primordial magnetic fields, dark
energy, and modified gravity.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1410.6334 [pdf] - 1222756
Is PLANCK consistent with primordial deuterium measurements ?
Submitted: 2014-10-23
The recent measurements of the Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropies
provided by the Planck satellite experiment have significantly improved the
constraints on several cosmological parameters. In this brief paper we point
out a small but interesting tension present between recent values of the
primordial deuterium measured from quasar absorption line systems and the same
value inferred, albeit indirectly, from the Planck measurements assuming
{\Lambda}CDM and Big Bang Nucleosynthesis. Here we discuss this tension in
detail investigating the possible new physics that could be responsible for the
tension. We found that, among 8 extra parameters, only an anomalous lensing
component and a closed universe could change the Planck constraint towards a
better consistency with direct deuterium measurements.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1406.7297 [pdf] - 891976
Indications of a late-time interaction in the dark sector
Submitted: 2014-06-27, last modified: 2014-10-01
We show that a general late-time interaction between cold dark matter and
vacuum energy is favoured by current cosmological datasets. We characterize the
strength of the coupling by a dimensionless parameter $q_V$ that is free to
take different values in four redshift bins from the primordial epoch up to
today. This interacting scenario is in agreement with measurements of cosmic
microwave background temperature anisotropies from the Planck satellite,
supernovae Ia from Union 2.1 and redshift space distortions from a number of
surveys, as well as with combinations of these different datasets. We show that
a non-zero interaction is very likely at late times. We then focus on the case
$q_V\not=0$ in a single low-redshift bin, obtaining a nested one parameter
extension of the standard $\Lambda$CDM model. We study the Bayesian evidence,
with respect to $\Lambda$CDM, of this late-time interaction model, finding
moderate evidence for an interaction starting at $z=0.9$, dependent upon the
prior range chosen for the interaction strength parameter $q_V$. For this case
the null interaction ($q_V=0$, i.e.$\Lambda$CDM) is excluded at 99% c.l..
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1304.7400 [pdf] - 738995
Neutrino Anisotropies after Planck
Submitted: 2013-04-27, last modified: 2013-09-04
We present new constraints on the rest-frame sound speed, c_{eff}^2, and the
viscosity parameter, c_{vis}^2, of the Cosmic Neutrino Background from the
recent measurements of the Cosmic Microwave Background anisotropies provided by
the Planck satellite. While broadly consistent with the expectations of
c_{eff}^2=c_{vis}^2=1/3 in the standard scenario, the Planck dataset hints at a
higher value of the viscosity parameter, with c_{vis}^2=0.60+/-0.18 at 68%
c.l., and a lower value of the sound speed, with c_{eff}^2=0.304+/-0.013 at 68%
c.l.. We find a correlation between the neutrino parameters and the lensing
amplitude of the temperature power spectrum A_L. When the latter parameter is
allowed to vary, we find a better consistency with the standard model with
c_{vis}^2=0.51+/-0.22, c_{eff}^2=0.311+/-0.019 and A_L=1.08+/-0.18 at 68% c.l..
This result indicates that the anomalous large value of A_L measured by Planck
could be connected to non-standard neutrino properties. Including additional
datasets from Baryon Acoustic Oscillation surveys and the Hubble Space
Telescope constraint on the Hubble constant, we obtain c_{vis}^2=0.40+/-0.19,
c_{eff}^2=0.319+/-0.019, and A_{L}=1.15+/-0.17 at 68% c.l.; including the
lensing power spectrum, we obtain c_{vis}^2=0.50+/-0.19,
c_{eff}^2=0.314+/-0.015, and A_L=1.025+/-0.076 at 68% c.l.. Finally, we
investigate further degeneracies between the clustering parameters and other
cosmological parameters.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1304.6217 [pdf] - 704688
Dark Radiation after Planck
Submitted: 2013-04-23
We present new constraints on the relativistic neutrino effective number
N_eff and on the Cosmic Microwave Background power spectrum lensing amplitude
A_L from the recent Planck 2013 data release. Including observations of the CMB
large angular scale polarization from the WMAP satellite, we obtain the bounds
N_eff = 3.71 +/- 0.40 and A_L = 1.25 +/- 0.13 at 68% c.l.. The Planck dataset
alone is therefore suggesting the presence of a dark radiation component at
91.1% c.l. and hinting for a higher power spectrum lensing amplitude at 94.3%
c.l.. We discuss the agreement of these results with the previous constraints
obtained from the Atacama Cosmology Telescope (ACT) and the South Pole
Telescope (SPT). Considering the constraints on the cosmological parameters, we
found a very good agreement with the previous WMAP+SPT analysis but a tension
with the WMAP+ACT results, with the only exception of the lensing amplitude.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1303.4353 [pdf] - 711294
New Constraints On The Dark Energy Equation of State
Submitted: 2013-03-18
We combine recent measurements of Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropies,
Supernovae luminosity distances and Baryonic Acoustic Oscillations to derive
constraints on the dark energy equation of state w in the redshift range 0<z<2,
using a principal components approach. We find no significant deviations from
the expectations of a cosmological constant. However, combining the datasets we
find slight indication for w<-1 at low redshift, thus highlighting how these
datasets prefer a non-constant w. Nevertheless the cosmological constant is
still in agreement with these observations, while we find that some classes of
alternative models may be in tension with the inferred w(z) behaviour.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:1301.7343 [pdf] - 704636
Tickling the CMB damping tail: scrutinizing the tension between the ACT
and SPT experiments
Submitted: 2013-01-30, last modified: 2013-01-31
The Atacama Cosmology Telescope (ACT) and the South Pole Telescope (SPT) have
recently provided new, very precise measurements of the cosmic microwave
background (CMB) anisotropy damping tail. The values of the cosmological
parameters inferred from these measurements, while broadly consistent with the
expectations of the standard cosmological model, are providing interesting
possible indications for new physics that are definitely worth of
investigation. The ACT results, while compatible with the standard expectation
of three neutrino families, indicate a level of CMB lensing, parametrized by
the lensing amplitude parameter A_L, that is about 70% higher than expected. If
not a systematic, this anomalous lensing amplitude could be produced by
modifications of general relativity or coupled dark energy. Vice-versa, the SPT
experiment, while compatible with a standard level of CMB lensing, prefers an
excess of dark radiation, parametrized by the effective number of relativistic
degrees of freedom N_eff. Here we perform a new analysis of these experiments
allowing simultaneous variations in both these, non-standard, parameters. We
also combine these experiments, for the first time in the literature, with the
recent WMAP9 data, one at a time. Including the Hubble Space Telescope (HST)
prior on the Hubble constant and information from baryon acoustic oscillations
(BAO) surveys provides the following constraints from ACT: N_eff=3.23\pm0.47,
A_L=1.65\pm0.33 at 68% c.l., while for SPT we have N_eff=3.76\pm0.34,
A_L=0.81\pm0.12 at 68% c.l.. In particular, the A_L estimates from the two
experiments, even when a variation in N_eff is allowed, are in tension at more
than 95% c.l..