We perform an Internal Robustness analysis (iR) to a compilation of the most recent $f\sigma_8(z)$ data, using the framework of 1209.1897. The method analyzes combinations of subsets in the data set in a Bayesian model comparison way, potentially finding outliers, subsets of data affected by systematics or new physics. In order to validate our analysis and assess its sensitivity we performed several cross-checks, for example by removing some of the data or by adding artificially contaminated points, while we also generated mock data sets in order to estimate confidence regions of the iR. Applying this methodology, we found no anomalous behavior in the $f\sigma_8(z)$ data set, thus validating its internal robustness.

In this work we perform an analysis on the recently proposed conjoined cosmic growth and cosmic expansion diagram [1] to compare several dark energy models using the Figure of Merit showed in [2], which consists in the inverse of the $1\sigma$ confidence region in the $f\sigma_8(z)-H(z)$ plot. Our analysis also consists of comparing the models by performing different statistical criteria: Bayes factor [3], the Bayesian Information Criteria [4] and the Akaike Information Criterion [5]. We also developed a 3-dimensional Figure of Merit to account simultaneously for the errors on the growth rate and the Hubble parameter. The main idea is to consider several cosmological models and compare them with the different statistical criteria in order to highlight the differences and the accuracies of each single criterion.