Normalized to: Süveges, M.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1911.09114 [pdf] - 2001949
Multivariate Time-series Analysis of Variable Objects in the Gaia
Mission
Submitted: 2019-11-20
In astronomy, we are witnessing an enormous increase in the number of source
detections, precision, and diversity of measurements. Additionally, multi-epoch
data is becoming the norm, making time-series analyses an important aspect of
current astronomy. The Gaia mission is an outstanding example of a multi-epoch
survey that provides measurements in a large diversity of domains, with its
broad-band photometry; spectrophotometry in blue and red (used to derive
astrophysical parameters); spectroscopy (employed to infer radial velocities, v
sin(i), and other astrophysical parameters); and its extremely precise
astrometry. Most of all that information is provided for sources covering the
entire sky. Here, we present several properties related to the Gaia time
series, such as the time sampling; the different types of measurements; the
Gaia G, G BP and G RP-band photometry; and Gaia-inspired studies using the
CORrelation-RAdial-VELocities data to assess the potential of the information
on the radial velocity, the FWHM, and the contrast of the cross-correlation
function. We also present techniques (which are used or are under development)
that optimize the extraction of astrophysical information from the different
instruments of Gaia, such as the principal component analysis and the
multi-response regression. The detailed understanding of the behavior of the
observed phenomena in the various measurement domains can lead to richer and
more precise characterization of the Gaia data, including the definition of
more informative attributes that serve as input to (our) machine-learning
algorithms.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.09378 [pdf] - 1732652
Gaia Data Release 2: Observational Hertzsprung-Russell diagrams
Gaia Collaboration;
Babusiaux, C.;
van Leeuwen, F.;
Barstow, M. A.;
Jordi, C.;
Vallenari, A.;
Bossini, D.;
Bressan, A.;
Cantat-Gaudin, T.;
van Leeuwen, M.;
Brown, A. G. A.;
Prusti, T.;
de Bruijne, J. H. J.;
Bailer-Jones, C. A. L.;
Biermann, M.;
Evans, D. W.;
Eyer, L.;
Jansen, F.;
Klioner, S. A.;
Lammers, U.;
Lindegren, L.;
Luri, X.;
Mignard, F.;
Panem, C.;
Pourbaix, D.;
Randich, S.;
Sartoretti, P.;
Siddiqui, H. I.;
Soubiran, C.;
Walton, N. A.;
Arenou, F.;
Bastian, U.;
Cropper, M.;
Drimmel, R.;
Katz, D.;
Lattanzi, M. G.;
Bakker, J.;
Cacciari, C.;
Castañeda, J.;
Chaoul, L.;
Cheek, N.;
DeAngeli, F.;
Fabricius, C.;
Guerra, R.;
Holl, B.;
Masana, E.;
Messineo, R.;
Mowlavi, N.;
Nienartowicz, K.;
Panuzzo, P.;
Portell, J.;
Riello, M.;
Seabroke, G. M.;
Tanga, P.;
Thévenin, F.;
Gracia-Abril, G.;
Comoretto, G.;
Garcia-Reinaldos, M.;
Teyssier, D.;
Altmann, M.;
Andrae, R.;
Audard, M.;
Bellas-Velidis, I.;
Benson, K.;
Berthier, J.;
Blomme, R.;
Burgess, P.;
Busso, G.;
Carry, B.;
Cellino, A.;
Clementini, G.;
Clotet, M.;
Creevey, O.;
Davidson, M.;
DeRidder, J.;
Delchambre, L.;
Dell'Oro, A.;
Ducourant, C.;
Fernández-Hernández, J.;
Fouesneau, M.;
Frémat, Y.;
Galluccio, L.;
García-Torres, M.;
González-Núñez, J.;
González-Vidal, J. J.;
Gosset, E.;
Guy, L. P.;
Halbwachs, J. -L.;
Hambly, N. C.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Hernández, J.;
Hestroffer, D.;
Hodgkin, S. T.;
Hutton, A.;
Jasniewicz, G.;
Jean-Antoine-Piccolo, A.;
Jordan, S.;
Korn, A. J.;
Krone-Martins, A.;
Lanzafame, A. C.;
Lebzelter, T.;
Löffler, W.;
Manteiga, M.;
Marrese, P. M.;
Martín-Fleitas, J. M.;
Moitinho, A.;
Mora, A.;
Muinonen, K.;
Osinde, J.;
Pancino, E.;
Pauwels, T.;
Petit, J. -M.;
Recio-Blanco, A.;
Richards, P. J.;
Rimoldini, L.;
Robin, A. C.;
Sarro, L. M.;
Siopis, C.;
Smith, M.;
Sozzetti, A.;
Süveges, M.;
Torra, J.;
vanReeven, W.;
Abbas, U.;
Aramburu, A. Abreu;
Accart, S.;
Aerts, C.;
Altavilla, G.;
Álvarez, M. A.;
Alvarez, R.;
Alves, J.;
Anderson, R. I.;
Andrei, A. H.;
Varela, E. Anglada;
Antiche, E.;
Antoja, T.;
Arcay, B.;
Astraatmadja, T. L.;
Bach, N.;
Baker, S. G.;
Balaguer-Núñez, L.;
Balm, P.;
Barache, C.;
Barata, C.;
Barbato, D.;
Barblan, F.;
Barklem, P. S.;
Barrado, D.;
Barros, M.;
Muñoz, S. Bartholomé;
Bassilana, J. -L.;
Becciani, U.;
Bellazzini, M.;
Berihuete, A.;
Bertone, S.;
Bianchi, L.;
Bienaymé, O.;
Blanco-Cuaresma, S.;
Boch, T.;
Boeche, C.;
Bombrun, A.;
Borrachero, R.;
Bouquillon, S.;
Bourda, G.;
Bragaglia, A.;
Bramante, L.;
Breddels, M. A.;
Brouillet, N.;
Brüsemeister, T.;
Brugaletta, E.;
Bucciarelli, B.;
Burlacu, A.;
Busonero, D.;
Butkevich, A. G.;
Buzzi, R.;
Caffau, E.;
Cancelliere, R.;
Cannizzaro, G.;
Carballo, R.;
Carlucci, T.;
Carrasco, J. M.;
Casamiquela, L.;
Castellani, M.;
Castro-Ginard, A.;
Charlot, P.;
Chemin, L.;
Chiavassa, A.;
Cocozza, G.;
Costigan, G.;
Cowell, S.;
Crifo, F.;
Crosta, M.;
Crowley, C.;
Cuypers, J.;
Dafonte, C.;
Damerdji, Y.;
Dapergolas, A.;
David, P.;
David, M.;
deLaverny, P.;
DeLuise, F.;
DeMarch, R.;
deMartino, D.;
deSouza, R.;
deTorres, A.;
Debosscher, J.;
delPozo, E.;
Delbo, M.;
Delgado, A.;
Delgado, H. E.;
Diakite, S.;
Diener, C.;
Distefano, E.;
Dolding, C.;
Drazinos, P.;
Durán, J.;
Edvardsson, B.;
Enke, H.;
Eriksson, K.;
Esquej, P.;
Bontemps, G. Eynard;
Fabre, C.;
Fabrizio, M.;
Faigler, S.;
Falcão, A. J.;
Casas, M. Farràs;
Federici, L.;
Fedorets, G.;
Fernique, P.;
Figueras, F.;
Filippi, F.;
Findeisen, K.;
Fonti, A.;
Fraile, E.;
Fraser, M.;
Frézouls, B.;
Gai, M.;
Galleti, S.;
Garabato, D.;
García-Sedano, F.;
Garofalo, A.;
Garralda, N.;
Gavel, A.;
Gavras, P.;
Gerssen, J.;
Geyer, R.;
Giacobbe, P.;
Gilmore, G.;
Girona, S.;
Giuffrida, G.;
Glass, F.;
Gomes, M.;
Granvik, M.;
Gueguen, A.;
Guerrier, A.;
Guiraud, J.;
Gutiérrez-Sánchez, R.;
Haigron, R.;
Hatzidimitriou, D.;
Hauser, M.;
Haywood, M.;
Heiter, U.;
Helmi, A.;
Heu, J.;
Hilger, T.;
Hobbs, D.;
Hofmann, W.;
Holland, G.;
Huckle, H. E.;
Hypki, A.;
Icardi, V.;
Janßen, K.;
JevardatdeFombelle, G.;
Jonker, P. G.;
Juhász, Á. L.;
Julbe, F.;
Karampelas, A.;
Kewley, A.;
Klar, J.;
Kochoska, A.;
Kohley, R.;
Kolenberg, K.;
Kontizas, M.;
Kontizas, E.;
Koposov, S. E.;
Kordopatis, G.;
Kostrzewa-Rutkowska, Z.;
Koubsky, P.;
Lambert, S.;
Lanza, A. F.;
Lasne, Y.;
Lavigne, J. -B.;
LeFustec, Y.;
LePoncin-Lafitte, C.;
Lebreton, Y.;
Leccia, S.;
Leclerc, N.;
Lecoeur-Taibi, I.;
Lenhardt, H.;
Leroux, F.;
Liao, S.;
Licata, E.;
Lindstrøm, H. E. P.;
Lister, T. A.;
Livanou, E.;
Lobel, A.;
López, M.;
Managau, S.;
Mann, R. G.;
Mantelet, G.;
Marchal, O.;
Marchant, J. M.;
Marconi, M.;
Marinoni, S.;
Marschalkó, G.;
Marshall, D. J.;
Martino, M.;
Marton, G.;
Mary, N.;
Massari, D.;
Matijevič, G.;
Mazeh, T.;
McMillan, P. J.;
Messina, S.;
Michalik, D.;
Millar, N. R.;
Molina, D.;
Molinaro, R.;
Molnár, L.;
Montegriffo, P.;
Mor, R.;
Morbidelli, R.;
Morel, T.;
Morris, D.;
Mulone, A. F.;
Muraveva, T.;
Musella, I.;
Nelemans, G.;
Nicastro, L.;
Noval, L.;
O'Mullane, W.;
Ordénovic, C.;
Ordóñez-Blanco, D.;
Osborne, P.;
Pagani, C.;
Pagano, I.;
Pailler, F.;
Palacin, H.;
Palaversa, L.;
Panahi, A.;
Pawlak, M.;
Piersimoni, A. M.;
Pineau, F. -X.;
Plachy, E.;
Plum, G.;
Poggio, E.;
Poujoulet, E.;
Prša, A.;
Pulone, L.;
Racero, E.;
Ragaini, S.;
Rambaux, N.;
Ramos-Lerate, M.;
Regibo, S.;
Reylé, C.;
Riclet, F.;
Ripepi, V.;
Riva, A.;
Rivard, A.;
Rixon, G.;
Roegiers, T.;
Roelens, M.;
Romero-Gómez, M.;
Rowell, N.;
Royer, F.;
Ruiz-Dern, L.;
Sadowski, G.;
Sellés, T. Sagristà;
Sahlmann, J.;
Salgado, J.;
Salguero, E.;
Sanna, N.;
Santana-Ros, T.;
Sarasso, M.;
Savietto, H.;
Schultheis, M.;
Sciacca, E.;
Segol, M.;
Segovia, J. C.;
Ségransan, D.;
Shih, I-C.;
Siltala, L.;
Silva, A. F.;
Smart, R. L.;
Smith, K. W.;
Solano, E.;
Solitro, F.;
Sordo, R.;
SoriaNieto, S.;
Souchay, J.;
Spagna, A.;
Spoto, F.;
Stampa, U.;
Steele, I. A.;
Steidelmüller, H.;
Stephenson, C. A.;
Stoev, H.;
Suess, F. F.;
Surdej, J.;
Szabados, L.;
Szegedi-Elek, E.;
Tapiador, D.;
Taris, F.;
Tauran, G.;
Taylor, M. B.;
Teixeira, R.;
Terrett, D.;
Teyssandier, P.;
Thuillot, W.;
Titarenko, A.;
TorraClotet, F.;
Turon, C.;
Ulla, A.;
Utrilla, E.;
Uzzi, S.;
Vaillant, M.;
Valentini, G.;
Valette, V.;
vanElteren, A.;
Van Hemelryck, E.;
Vaschetto, M.;
Vecchiato, A.;
Veljanoski, J.;
Viala, Y.;
Vicente, D.;
Vogt, S.;
vonEssen, C.;
Voss, H.;
Votruba, V.;
Voutsinas, S.;
Walmsley, G.;
Weiler, M.;
Wertz, O.;
Wevers, T.;
Wyrzykowski, Ł.;
Yoldas, A.;
Žerjal, M.;
Ziaeepour, H.;
Zorec, J.;
Zschocke, S.;
Zucker, S.;
Zurbach, C.;
Zwitter, T.
Submitted: 2018-04-25, last modified: 2018-08-13
We highlight the power of the Gaia DR2 in studying many fine structures of
the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram (HRD). Gaia allows us to present many different
HRDs, depending in particular on stellar population selections. We do not aim
here for completeness in terms of types of stars or stellar evolutionary
aspects. Instead, we have chosen several illustrative examples. We describe
some of the selections that can be made in Gaia DR2 to highlight the main
structures of the Gaia HRDs. We select both field and cluster (open and
globular) stars, compare the observations with previous classifications and
with stellar evolutionary tracks, and we present variations of the Gaia HRD
with age, metallicity, and kinematics. Late stages of stellar evolution such as
hot subdwarfs, post-AGB stars, planetary nebulae, and white dwarfs are also
analysed, as well as low-mass brown dwarf objects. The Gaia HRDs are
unprecedented in both precision and coverage of the various Milky Way stellar
populations and stellar evolutionary phases. Many fine structures of the HRDs
are presented. The clear split of the white dwarf sequence into hydrogen and
helium white dwarfs is presented for the first time in an HRD. The relation
between kinematics and the HRD is nicely illustrated. Two different populations
in a classical kinematic selection of the halo are unambiguously identified in
the HRD. Membership and mean parameters for a selected list of open clusters
are provided. They allow drawing very detailed cluster sequences, highlighting
fine structures, and providing extremely precise empirical isochrones that will
lead to more insight in stellar physics. Gaia DR2 demonstrates the potential of
combining precise astrometry and photometry for large samples for studies in
stellar evolution and stellar population and opens an entire new area for
HRD-based studies.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.09373 [pdf] - 1767409
Gaia Data Release 2: Summary of the variability processing & analysis
results
Holl, B.;
Audard, M.;
Nienartowicz, K.;
de Fombelle, G. Jevardat;
Marchal, O.;
Mowlavi, N.;
Clementini, G.;
De Ridder, J.;
Evans, D. W.;
Guy, L. P.;
Lanzafame, A. C.;
Lebzelter, T.;
Rimoldini, L.;
Roelens, M.;
Zucker, S.;
Distefano, E.;
Garofalo, A.;
Lecoeur-Taïbi, I.;
Lopez, M.;
Molinaro, R.;
Muraveva, T.;
Panahi, A.;
Regibo, S.;
Ripepi, V.;
Sarro, L. M.;
Aerts, C.;
Anderson, R. I.;
Charnas, J.;
Barblan, F.;
Blanco-Cuaresma, S.;
Busso, G.;
Cuypers, J.;
De Angeli, F.;
Glass, F.;
Grenon, M.;
Juhász, Á. L.;
Kochoska, A.;
Koubsky, P.;
Lanza, A. F.;
Leccia, S.;
Lorenz, D.;
Marconi, M.;
Marschalk, G.;
Mazeh, T.;
Messina, S.;
Mignard, F.;
Moitinho, A.;
Molnár, L.;
Morgenthaler, S.;
Musella, I.;
Ordenovic, C.;
Ordóñez, D.;
Pagano, I.;
Palaversa, L.;
Pawlak, M.;
Plachy, E.;
Prša, A.;
Riello, M.;
Süveges, M.;
Szabados, L.;
Szegedi-Elek, E.;
Votruba, V.;
Eyer, L.
Submitted: 2018-04-25, last modified: 2018-07-06
The Gaia Data Release 2 (DR2): we summarise the processing and results of the
identification of variable source candidates of RR Lyrae stars, Cepheids, long
period variables (LPVs), rotation modulation (BY Dra-type) stars, delta Scuti &
SX Phoenicis stars, and short-timescale variables. In this release we aim to
provide useful but not necessarily complete samples of candidates.
The processed Gaia data consist of the G, BP, and RP photometry during the
first 22 months of operations as well as positions and parallaxes. Various
methods from classical statistics, data mining and time series analysis were
applied and tailored to the specific properties of Gaia data, as well as
various visualisation tools.
The DR2 variability release contains: 228'904 RR Lyrae stars, 11'438
Cepheids, 151'761 LPVs, 147'535 stars with rotation modulation, 8'882 delta
Scuti & SX Phoenicis stars, and 3'018 short-timescale variables. These results
are distributed over a classification and various Specific Object Studies (SOS)
tables in the Gaia archive, along with the three-band time series and
associated statistics for the underlying 550'737 unique sources. We estimate
that about half of them are newly identified variables. The variability type
completeness varies strongly as function of sky position due to the non-uniform
sky coverage and intermediate calibration level of this data. The probabilistic
and automated nature of this work implies certain completeness and
contamination rates which are quantified so that users can anticipate their
effects. This means that even well-known variable sources can be missed or
misidentified in the published data.
The DR2 variability release only represents a small subset of the processed
data. Future releases will include more variable sources and data products;
however, DR2 shows the (already) very high quality of the data and great
promise for variability studies.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1803.03071 [pdf] - 1670645
Investigating light curve modulation via kernel smoothing. II. New
additional modes in single-mode OGLE classical Cepheids
Submitted: 2018-03-08
Detailed knowledge of the variability of classical Cepheids, in particular
their modulations and mode composition, provides crucial insight into stellar
structure and pulsation. However, tiny modulations of the dominant radial-mode
pulsation were recently found to be very frequent, possibly ubiquitous in
Cepheids, which makes secondary modes difficult to detect and analyse, since
these modulations can easily mask the potentially weak secondary modes. The aim
of this study is to re-investigate the secondary mode content in the sample of
OGLE-III and -IV single-mode classical Cepheids using kernel regression with
adaptive kernel width for pre-whitening, instead of using a constant-parameter
model. This leads to a more precise removal of the modulated dominant
pulsation, and enables a more complete survey of secondary modes with
frequencies outside a narrow range around the primary. Our analysis reveals
that significant secondary modes occur more frequently among first overtone
Cepheids than previously thought. The mode composition appears significantly
different in the Large and Small Magellanic Clouds, suggesting a possible
dependence on chemical composition. In addition to the formerly identified
non-radial mode at $P_2 \approx 0.6\ldots 0.65 P_1$ (0.62-mode), and a cluster
of modes with near-primary frequency, we find two more candidate non-radial
modes. One is a numerous group of secondary modes with $P_2 \approx 1.25 P_1$,
which may represent the fundamental of the 0.62-mode, supposed to be the first
harmonic of an $l \in \{7,8, 9\}$ non-radial mode. The other new mode is at
$P_2 \approx 1.46 P_1$, possibly analogous to a similar, rare mode recently
discovered among first overtone RR Lyrae stars.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1708.08703 [pdf] - 1587610
Short timescale variables in the Gaia era: detection and
characterization by structure function analysis
Roelens, Maroussia;
Eyer, Laurent;
Mowlavi, Nami;
Lecoeur-Taïbi, Isabelle;
Rimoldini, Lorenzo;
Blanco-Cuaresma, Sergi;
Palaversa, Lovro;
Süveges, Maria;
Charnas, Jonathan;
Wevers, Thomas
Submitted: 2017-08-29, last modified: 2017-09-08
We investigate the capabilities of the ESA Gaia mission for detecting and
character- izing short timescale variability, from tens of seconds to a dozen
hours. We assess the efficiency of the variogram analysis, for both detecting
short timescale variability and estimating the underlying characteristic
timescales from Gaia photometry, through extensive light-curve simulations for
various periodic and transient short timescale variable types. We show that,
with this approach, we can detect fast periodic variabil- ity, with amplitudes
down to a few millimagnitudes, as well as some M dwarf flares and supernovae
explosions, with limited contamination from longer timescale variables or
constant sources. Timescale estimates from the variogram give valuable informa-
tion on the rapidity of the underlying variation, which could complement
timescale estimates from other methods, like Fourier-based periodograms, and be
reinvested in preparation of ground-based photometric follow-up of short
timescale candidates evi- denced by Gaia. The next step will be to find new
short timescale variable candidates from real Gaia data, and to further
characterize them using all the Gaia information, including color and spectrum.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1705.00688 [pdf] - 1583007
Gaia Data Release 1. Testing the parallaxes with local Cepheids and RR
Lyrae stars
Gaia Collaboration;
Clementini, G.;
Eyer, L.;
Ripepi, V.;
Marconi, M.;
Muraveva, T.;
Garofalo, A.;
Sarro, L. M.;
Palmer, M.;
Luri, X.;
Molinaro, R.;
Rimoldini, L.;
Szabados, L.;
Musella, I.;
Anderson, R. I.;
Prusti, T.;
de Bruijne, J. H. J.;
Brown, A. G. A.;
Vallenari, A.;
Babusiaux, C.;
Bailer-Jones, C. A. L.;
Bastian, U.;
Biermann, M.;
Evans, D. W.;
Jansen, F.;
Jordi, C.;
Klioner, S. A.;
Lammers, U.;
Lindegren, L.;
Mignard, F.;
Panem, C.;
Pourbaix, D.;
Randich, S.;
Sartoretti, P.;
Siddiqui, H. I.;
Soubiran, C.;
Valette, V.;
van Leeuwen, F.;
Walton, N. A.;
Aerts, C.;
Arenou, F.;
Cropper, M.;
Drimmel, R.;
Høg, E.;
Katz, D.;
Lattanzi, M. G.;
O'Mullane, W.;
Grebel, E. K.;
Holland, A. D.;
Huc, C.;
Passot, X.;
Perryman, M.;
Bramante, L.;
Cacciari, C.;
Castañeda, J.;
Chaoul, L.;
Cheek, N.;
De Angeli, F.;
Fabricius, C.;
Guerra, R.;
Hernández, J.;
Jean-Azntoine-Piccolo, A.;
Masana, E.;
Messineo, R.;
Mowlavi, N.;
Nienartowicz, K.;
Ordóñez-Blanco, D.;
Panuzzo, P.;
Portell, J.;
Richards, P. J.;
Riello, M.;
Seabroke, G. M.;
Tanga, P.;
Thévenin, F.;
Torra, J.;
Els, S. G.;
Gracia-Abril, G.;
Comoretto, G.;
Garcia-Reinaldos, M.;
Lock, T.;
Mercier, E.;
Altmann, M.;
Andrae, R.;
Astraatmadja, T. L.;
Bellas-Velidis, I.;
Benson, K.;
Berthier, J.;
Blomme, R.;
Busso, G.;
Carry, B.;
Cellino, A.;
Cowell, S.;
Creevey, O.;
Cuypers, J.;
Davidson, M.;
De Ridder, J.;
de Torres, A.;
Delchambre, L.;
Dell'Oro, A.;
Ducourant, C.;
Frémat, Y.;
García-Torres, M.;
Gosset, E.;
Halbwachs, J. -L.;
Hambly, N. C.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Hauser, M.;
Hestroffer, D.;
Hodgkin, S. T.;
Huckle, H. E.;
Hutton, A.;
Jasniewicz, G.;
Jordan, S.;
Kontizas, M.;
Korn, A. J.;
Lanzafame, A. C.;
Manteiga, M.;
Moitinho, A.;
Muinonen, K.;
Osinde, J.;
Pancino, E.;
Pauwels, T.;
Petit, J. -M.;
Recio-Blanco, A.;
Robin, A. C.;
Siopis, C.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, K. W.;
Sozzetti, A.;
Thuillot, W.;
van Reeven, W.;
Viala, Y.;
Abbas, U.;
Aramburu, A. Abreu;
Accart, S.;
Aguado, J. J.;
Allan, P. M.;
Allasia, W.;
Altavilla, G.;
Álvarez, M. A.;
Alves, J.;
Andrei, A. H.;
Varela, E. Anglada;
Antiche, E.;
Antoja, T.;
Antón, S.;
Arcay, B.;
Bach, N.;
Baker, S. G.;
Balaguer-Núñez, L.;
Barache, C.;
Barata, C.;
Barbier, A.;
Barblan, F.;
Navascués, D. Barrado y;
Barros, M.;
Barstow, M. A.;
Becciani, U.;
Bellazzini, M.;
García, A. Bello;
Belokurov, V.;
Bendjoya, P.;
Berihuete, A.;
Bianchi, L.;
Bienaymé, O.;
Billebaud, F.;
Blagorodnova, N.;
Blanco-Cuaresma, S.;
Boch, T.;
Bombrun, A.;
Borrachero, R.;
Bouquillon, S.;
Bourda, G.;
Bouy, H.;
Bragaglia, A.;
Breddels, M. A.;
Brouillet, N.;
Brüsemeister, T.;
Bucciarelli, B.;
Burgess, P.;
Burgon, R.;
Burlacu, A.;
Busonero, D.;
Buzzi, R.;
Caffau, E.;
Cambras, J.;
Campbell, H.;
Cancelliere, R.;
Cantat-Gaudin, T.;
Carlucci, T.;
Carrasco, J. M.;
Castellani, M.;
Charlot, P.;
Charnas, J.;
Chiavassa, A.;
Clotet, M.;
Cocozza, G.;
Collins, R. S.;
Costigan, G.;
Crifo, F.;
Cross, N. J. G.;
Crosta, M.;
Crowley, C.;
Dafonte, C.;
Damerdji, Y.;
Dapergolas, A.;
David, P.;
David, M.;
De Cat, P.;
de Felice, F.;
de Laverny, P.;
De Luise, F.;
De March, R.;
de Souza, R.;
Debosscher, J.;
del Pozo, E.;
Delbo, M.;
Delgado, A.;
Delgado, H. E.;
Di Matteo, P.;
Diakite, S.;
Distefano, E.;
Dolding, C.;
Anjos, S. Dos;
Drazinos, P.;
Durán, J.;
Dzigan, Y.;
Edvardsson, B.;
Enke, H.;
Evans, N. W.;
Bontemps, G. Eynard;
Fabre, C.;
Fabrizio, M.;
Faigler, S.;
Falcão, A. J.;
Casas, M. Farràs;
Federici, L.;
Fedorets, G.;
Fernández-Hernánde, J.;
Fernique, P.;
Fienga, A.;
Figueras, F.;
Filippi, F.;
Findeisen, K.;
Fonti, A.;
Fouesneau, M.;
Fraile, E.;
Fraser, M.;
Fuchs, J.;
Gai, M.;
Galleti, S.;
Galluccio, L.;
Garabato, D.;
García-Sedano, F.;
Garralda, N.;
Gavras, P.;
Gerssen, J.;
Geyer, R.;
Gilmore, G.;
Girona, S.;
Giuffrida, G.;
Gomes, M.;
González-Marcos, A.;
González-Núñez, J.;
González-Vidal, J. J.;
Granvik, M.;
Guerrier, A.;
Guillout, P.;
Guiraud, J.;
Gúrpide, A.;
Gutiérrez-Sánchez, R.;
Guy, L. P.;
Haigron, R.;
Hatzidimitriou, D.;
Haywood, M.;
Heiter, U.;
Helmi, A.;
Hobbs, D.;
Hofmann, W.;
Holl, B.;
Holland, G.;
Hunt, J. A. S.;
Hypki, A.;
Icardi, V.;
Irwin, M.;
de Fombelle, G. Jevardat;
Jofré, P.;
Jonker, P. G.;
Jorissen, A.;
Julbe, F.;
Karampelas, A.;
Kochoska, A.;
Kohley, R.;
Kolenberg, K.;
Kontizas, E.;
Koposov, S. E.;
Kordopatis, G.;
Koubsky, P.;
Krone-Martins, A.;
Kudryashova, M.;
Kull, I.;
Bachchan, R. K.;
Lacoste-Seris, F.;
Lanza, A. F.;
Lavigne, J. -B.;
Poncin-Lafitte, C. Le;
Lebreton, Y.;
Lebzelter, T.;
Leccia, S.;
Leclerc, N.;
Lecoeur-Taibi, I.;
Lemaitre, V.;
Lenhardt, H.;
Leroux, F.;
Liao, S.;
Licata, E.;
Lindstrøm, H. E. P.;
Lister, T. A.;
Livanou, E.;
Lobel, A.;
Löffler, W.;
López, M.;
Lorenz, D.;
MacDonald, I.;
Fernandes, T. Magalhães;
Managau, S.;
Mann, R. G.;
Mantelet, G.;
Marchal, O.;
Marchant, J. M.;
Marinoni, S.;
Marrese, P. M.;
Marschalkó, G.;
Marshall, D. J.;
Martín-Fleitas, J. M.;
Martino, M.;
Mary, N.;
Matijevič, G.;
Mazeh, T.;
McMillan, P. J.;
Messina, S.;
Michalik, D.;
Millar, N. R.;
Miranda, B. M. H.;
Molina, D.;
Molinaro, M.;
Molnár, L.;
Moniez, M.;
Montegriffo, P.;
Mor, R.;
Mora, A.;
Morbidelli, R.;
Morel, T.;
Morgenthaler, S.;
Morris, D.;
Mulone, A. F.;
Narbonne, J.;
Nelemans, G.;
Nicastro, L.;
Noval, L.;
Ordénovic, C.;
Ordieres-Meré, J.;
Osborne, P.;
Pagani, C.;
Pagano, I.;
Pailler, F.;
Palacin, H.;
Palaversa, L.;
Parsons, P.;
Pecoraro, M.;
Pedrosa, R.;
Pentikäinen, H.;
Pichon, B.;
Piersimoni, A. M.;
Pineau, F. -X.;
Plachy, E.;
Plum, G.;
Poujoulet, E.;
Prša, A.;
Pulone, L.;
Ragaini, S.;
Rago, S.;
Rambaux, N.;
Ramos-Lerate, M.;
Ranalli, P.;
Rauw, G.;
Read, A.;
Regibo, S.;
Reylé, C.;
Ribeiro, R. A.;
Riva, A.;
Rixon, G.;
Roelens, M.;
Romero-Gómez, M.;
Rowell, N.;
Royer, F.;
Ruiz-Dern, L.;
Sadowski, G.;
Sellés, T. Sagristà;
Sahlmann, J.;
Salgado, J.;
Salguero, E.;
Sarasso, M.;
Savietto, H.;
Schultheis, M.;
Sciacca, E.;
Segol, M.;
Segovia, J. C.;
Segransan, D.;
Shih, I-C.;
Smareglia, R.;
Smart, R. L.;
Solano, E.;
Solitro, F.;
Sordo, R.;
Nieto, S. Soria;
Souchay, J.;
Spagna, A.;
Spoto, F.;
Stampa, U.;
Steele, I. A.;
Steidelmüller, H.;
Stephenson, C. A.;
Stoev, H.;
Suess, F. F.;
Süveges, M.;
Surdej, J.;
Szegedi-Elek, E.;
Tapiador, D.;
Taris, F.;
Tauran, G.;
Taylor, M. B.;
Teixeira, R.;
Terrett, D.;
Tingley, B.;
Trager, S. C.;
Turon, C.;
Ulla, A.;
Utrilla, E.;
Valentini, G.;
van Elteren, A.;
Van Hemelryck, E.;
van Leeuwen, M.;
Varadi, M.;
Vecchiato, A.;
Veljanoski, J.;
Via, T.;
Vicente, D.;
Vogt, S.;
Voss, H.;
Votruba, V.;
Voutsinas, S.;
Walmsley, G.;
Weiler, M.;
Weingrill, K.;
Wevers, T.;
Wyrzykowski, Ł.;
Yoldas, A.;
Žerjal, M.;
Zucker, S.;
Zurbach, C.;
Zwitter, T.;
Alecu, A.;
Allen, M.;
Prieto, C. Allende;
Amorim, A.;
Anglada-Escudé, G.;
Arsenijevic, V.;
Azaz, S.;
Balm, P.;
Beck, M.;
Bernstein, H. -H.;
Bigot, L.;
Bijaoui, A.;
Blasco, C.;
Bonfigli, M.;
Bono, G.;
Boudreault, S.;
Bressan, A.;
Brown, S.;
Brunet, P. -M.;
Bunclark, P.;
Buonanno, R.;
Butkevich, A. G.;
Carret, C.;
Carrion, C.;
Chemin, L.;
Chéreau, F.;
Corcione, L.;
Darmigny, E.;
de Boer, K. S.;
de Teodoro, P.;
de Zeeuw, P. T.;
Luche, C. Delle;
Domingues, C. D.;
Dubath, P.;
Fodor, F.;
Frézouls, B.;
Fries, A.;
Fustes, D.;
Fyfe, D.;
Gallardo, E.;
Gallegos, J.;
Gardiol, D.;
Gebran, M.;
Gomboc, A.;
Gómez, A.;
Grux, E.;
Gueguen, A.;
Heyrovsky, A.;
Hoar, J.;
Iannicola, G.;
Parache, Y. Isasi;
Janotto, A. -M.;
Joliet, E.;
Jonckheere, A.;
Keil, R.;
Kim, D. -W.;
Klagyivik, P.;
Klar, J.;
Knude, J.;
Kochukhov, O.;
Kolka, I.;
Kos, J.;
Kutka, A.;
Lainey, V.;
LeBouquin, D.;
Liu, C.;
Loreggia, D.;
Makarov, V. V.;
Marseille, M. G.;
Martayan, C.;
Martinez-Rubi, O.;
Massart, B.;
Meynadier, F.;
Mignot, S.;
Munari, U.;
Nguyen, A. -T.;
Nordlander, T.;
O'Flaherty, K. S.;
Ocvirk, P.;
Sanz, A. Olias;
Ortiz, P.;
Osorio, J.;
Oszkiewicz, D.;
Ouzounis, A.;
Park, P.;
Pasquato, E.;
Peltzer, C.;
Peralta, J.;
Péturaud, F.;
Pieniluoma, T.;
Pigozzi, E.;
Poels, J.;
Prat, G.;
Prod'homme, T.;
Raison, F.;
Rebordao, J. M.;
Risquez, D.;
Rocca-Volmerange, B.;
Rosen, S.;
Ruiz-Fuertes, M. I.;
Russo, F.;
Sembay, S.;
Vizcaino, I. Serraller;
Short, A.;
Siebert, A.;
Silva, H.;
Sinachopoulos, D.;
Slezak, E.;
Soffel, M.;
Sosnowska, D.;
Straižys, V.;
ter Linden, M.;
Terrell, D.;
Theil, S.;
Tiede, C.;
Troisi, L.;
Tsalmantza, P.;
Tur, D.;
Vaccari, M.;
Vachier, F.;
Valles, P.;
Van Hamme, W.;
Veltz, L.;
Virtanen, J.;
Wallut, J. -M.;
Wichmann, R.;
Wilkinson, M. I.;
Ziaeepour, H.;
Zschocke, S.
Submitted: 2017-05-01
Parallaxes for 331 classical Cepheids, 31 Type II Cepheids and 364 RR Lyrae
stars in common between Gaia and the Hipparcos and Tycho-2 catalogues are
published in Gaia Data Release 1 (DR1) as part of the Tycho-Gaia Astrometric
Solution (TGAS). In order to test these first parallax measurements of the
primary standard candles of the cosmological distance ladder, that involve
astrometry collected by Gaia during the initial 14 months of science operation,
we compared them with literature estimates and derived new period-luminosity
($PL$), period-Wesenheit ($PW$) relations for classical and Type II Cepheids
and infrared $PL$, $PL$-metallicity ($PLZ$) and optical luminosity-metallicity
($M_V$-[Fe/H]) relations for the RR Lyrae stars, with zero points based on
TGAS. The new relations were computed using multi-band
($V,I,J,K_{\mathrm{s}},W_{1}$) photometry and spectroscopic metal abundances
available in the literature, and applying three alternative approaches: (i) by
linear least squares fitting the absolute magnitudes inferred from direct
transformation of the TGAS parallaxes, (ii) by adopting astrometric-based
luminosities, and (iii) using a Bayesian fitting approach. TGAS parallaxes
bring a significant added value to the previous Hipparcos estimates. The
relations presented in this paper represent first Gaia-calibrated relations and
form a "work-in-progress" milestone report in the wait for Gaia-only parallaxes
of which a first solution will become available with Gaia's Data Release 2
(DR2) in 2018.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1704.01581 [pdf] - 1582372
Pulsating star research and the Gaia revolution
Eyer, Laurent;
Clementini, Gisella;
Guy, Leanne P.;
Rimoldini, Lorenzo;
Glass, Florian;
Audard, Marc;
Holl, Berry;
Charnas, Jonathan;
Cuypers, Jan;
De Ridder, Joris;
Evans, Dafydd W.;
de Fombelle, Gregory Jevardat;
Lanzafame, Alessandro;
Lecoeur-Taibi, Isabelle;
Mowlavi, Nami;
Nienartowicz, Krzysztof;
Riello, Marco;
Ripepi, Vincenzo;
Sarro, Luis;
Süveges, Maria
Submitted: 2017-04-05
In this article we present an overview of the ESA Gaia mission and of the
unprecedented impact that Gaia will have on the field of variable star
research. We summarise the contents and impact of the first Gaia data release
on the description of variability phenomena, with particular emphasis on
pulsating star research. The Tycho-Gaia astrometric solution, although limited
to 2.1 million stars, has been used in many studies related to pulsating stars.
Furthermore a set of 3,194 Cepheids and RR Lyrae stars with their times series
have been released. Finally we present the plans for the ongoing study of
variable phenomena with Gaia and highlight some of the possible impacts of the
second data release on variable, and specifically, pulsating stars.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1703.10334 [pdf] - 1656078
Investigating Light Curve Modulation via Kernel Smoothing. I.
Application to 53 fundamental mode and first-overtone Cepheids in the LMC
Submitted: 2017-03-30
Recent studies have revealed a hitherto unknown complexity of Cepheid
pulsation. We implement local kernel regression to search for both period and
amplitude modulations simultaneously in continuous time and to investigate
their detectability, and test this new method on 53 classical Cepheids from the
OGLE-III catalog. We determine confidence intervals using parametric and
non-parametric bootstrap sampling to estimate significance and investigate
multi-periodicity using a modified pre-whitening approach that relies on
time-dependent light curve parameters. We find a wide variety of period and
amplitude modulations and confirm that first overtone pulsators are less stable
than fundamental mode Cepheids. Significant temporal variations in period are
more frequently detected than those in amplitude. We find a range of modulation
intensities, suggesting that both amplitude and period modulations are
ubiquitous among Cepheids. Over the 12-year baseline offered by OGLE-III, we
find that period changes are often non-linear, sometimes cyclic, suggesting
physical origins beyond secular evolution. Our method more efficiently detects
modulations (period and amplitude) than conventional methods reliant on
pre-whitening with constant light curve parameters and more accurately
pre-whitens time series, removing spurious secondary peaks effectively.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:1703.10597 [pdf] - 1582256
Gaia eclipsing binary and multiple systems. Two-Gaussian models applied
to OGLE-III eclipsing binary light curves in the Large Magellanic Cloud
Mowlavi, N.;
Lecoeur-Taïbi, I.;
Holl, B.;
Rimoldini, L.;
Barblan, F.;
Prsa, A.;
Kochoska, A.;
Süveges, M.;
Eyer, L.;
Nienartowicz, K.;
Jevardat, G.;
Charnas, J.;
Guy, L.;
Audard, M.
Submitted: 2017-03-30
The advent of large scale multi-epoch surveys raises the need for automated
light curve (LC) processing. This is particularly true for eclipsing binaries
(EBs), which form one of the most populated types of variable objects. The Gaia
mission, launched at the end of 2013, is expected to detect of the order of few
million EBs over a 5-year mission.
We present an automated procedure to characterize EBs based on the geometric
morphology of their LCs with two aims: first to study an ensemble of EBs on a
statistical ground without the need to model the binary system, and second to
enable the automated identification of EBs that display atypical LCs. We model
the folded LC geometry of EBs using up to two Gaussian functions for the
eclipses and a cosine function for any ellipsoidal-like variability that may be
present between the eclipses. The procedure is applied to the OGLE-III data set
of EBs in the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC) as a proof of concept. The bayesian
information criterion is used to select the best model among models containing
various combinations of those components, as well as to estimate the
significance of the components.
Based on the two-Gaussian models, EBs with atypical LC geometries are
successfully identified in two diagrams, using the Abbe values of the original
and residual folded LCs, and the reduced $\chi^2$. Cleaning the data set from
the atypical cases and further filtering out LCs that contain non-significant
eclipse candidates, the ensemble of EBs can be studied on a statistical ground
using the two-Gaussian model parameters. For illustration purposes, we present
the distribution of projected eccentricities as a function of orbital period
for the OGLE-III set of EBs in the LMC, as well as the distribution of their
primary versus secondary eclipse widths.
[10]
oai:arXiv.org:1703.01131 [pdf] - 1567701
Gaia Data Release 1. Open cluster astrometry: performance, limitations,
and future prospects
Gaia Collaboration;
van Leeuwen, F.;
Vallenari, A.;
Jordi, C.;
Lindegren, L.;
Bastian, U.;
Prusti, T.;
de Bruijne, J. H. J.;
Brown, A. G. A.;
Babusiaux, C.;
Bailer-Jones, C. A. L.;
Biermann, M.;
Evans, D. W.;
Eyer, L.;
Jansen, F.;
Klioner, S. A.;
Lammers, U.;
Luri, X.;
Mignard, F.;
Panem, C.;
Pourbaix, D.;
Randich, S.;
Sartoretti, P.;
Siddiqui, H. I.;
Soubiran, C.;
Valette, V.;
Walton, N. A.;
Aerts, C.;
Arenou, F.;
Cropper, M.;
Drimmel, R.;
Høg, E.;
Katz, D.;
Lattanzi, M. G.;
O'Mullane, W.;
Grebel, E. K.;
Holland, A. D.;
Huc, C.;
Passot, X.;
Perryman, M.;
Bramante, L.;
Cacciari, C.;
Castañeda, J.;
Chaoul, L.;
Cheek, N.;
De Angeli, F.;
Fabricius, C.;
Guerra, R.;
Hernández, J.;
Jean-Antoine-Piccolo, A.;
Masana, E.;
Messineo, R.;
Mowlavi, N.;
Nienartowicz, K.;
Ordóñez-Blanco, D.;
Panuzzo, P.;
Portell, J.;
Richards, P. J.;
Riello, M.;
Seabroke, G. M.;
Tanga, P.;
Thévenin, F.;
Torra, J.;
Els, S. G.;
Gracia-Abril, G.;
Comoretto, G.;
Garcia-Reinaldos, M.;
Lock, T.;
Mercier, E.;
Altmann, M.;
Andrae, R.;
Astraatmadja, T. L.;
Bellas-Velidis, I.;
Benson, K.;
Berthier, J.;
Blomme, R.;
Busso, G.;
Carry, B.;
Cellino, A.;
Clementini, G.;
Cowell, S.;
Creevey, O.;
Cuypers, J.;
Davidson, M.;
De Ridder, J.;
de Torres, A.;
Delchambre, L.;
Dell'Oro, A.;
Ducourant, C.;
Frémat, Y.;
García-Torres, M.;
Gosset, E.;
Halbwachs, J. -L.;
Hambly, N. C.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Hauser, M.;
Hestroffer, D.;
Hodgkin, S. T.;
Huckle, H. E.;
Hutton, A.;
Jasniewicz, G.;
Jordan, S.;
Kontizas, M.;
Korn, A. J.;
Lanzafame, A. C.;
Manteiga, M.;
Moitinho, A.;
Muinonen, K.;
Osinde, J.;
Pancino, E.;
Pauwels, T.;
Petit, J. -M.;
Recio-Blanco, A.;
Robin, A. C.;
Sarro, L. M.;
Siopis, C.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, K. W.;
Sozzetti, A.;
Thuillot, W.;
van Reeven, W.;
Viala, Y.;
Abbas, U.;
Aramburu, A. Abreu;
Accart, S.;
Aguado, J. J.;
Allan, P. M.;
Allasia, W.;
Altavilla, G.;
Álvarez, M. A.;
Alves, J.;
Anderson, R. I.;
Andrei, A. H.;
Varela, E. Anglada;
Antiche, E.;
Antoja, T.;
Antón, S.;
Arcay, B.;
Bach, N.;
Baker, S. G.;
Balaguer-Núñez, L.;
Barache, C.;
Barata, C.;
Barbier, A.;
Barblan, F.;
Navascués, D. Barrado y;
Barros, M.;
Barstow, M. A.;
Becciani, U.;
Bellazzini, M.;
García, A. Bello;
Belokurov, V.;
Bendjoya, P.;
Berihuete, A.;
Bianchi, L.;
Bienaymé, O.;
Billebaud, F.;
Blagorodnova, N.;
Blanco-Cuaresma, S.;
Boch, T.;
Bombrun, A.;
Borrachero, R.;
Bouquillon, S.;
Bourda, G.;
Bouy, H.;
Bragaglia, A.;
Breddels, M. A.;
Brouillet, N.;
Brüsemeister, T.;
Bucciarelli, B.;
Burgess, P.;
Burgon, R.;
Burlacu, A.;
Busonero, D.;
Buzzi, R.;
Caffau, E.;
Cambras, J.;
Campbell, H.;
Cancelliere, R.;
Cantat-Gaudin, T.;
Carlucci, T.;
Carrasco, J. M.;
Castellani, M.;
Charlot, P.;
Charnas, J.;
Chiavassa, A.;
Clotet, M.;
Cocozza, G.;
Collins, R. S.;
Costigan, G.;
Crifo, F.;
Cross, N. J. G.;
Crosta, M.;
Crowley, C.;
Dafonte, C.;
Damerdji, Y.;
Dapergolas, A.;
David, P.;
David, M.;
De Cat, P.;
de Felice, F.;
de Laverny, P.;
De Luise, F.;
De March, R.;
de Martino, D.;
de Souza, R.;
Debosscher, J.;
del Pozo, E.;
Delbo, M.;
Delgado, A.;
Delgado, H. E.;
Di Matteo, P.;
Diakite, S.;
Distefano, E.;
Dolding, C.;
Anjos, S. Dos;
Drazinos, P.;
Durán, J.;
Dzigan, Y.;
Edvardsson, B.;
Enke, H.;
Evans, N. W.;
Bontemps, G. Eynard;
Fabre, C.;
Fabrizio, M.;
Faigler, S.;
Falcão, A. J.;
Casas, M. Farràs;
Federici, L.;
Fedorets, G.;
Fernández-Hernández, J.;
Fernique, P.;
Fienga, A.;
Figueras, F.;
Filippi, F.;
Findeisen, K.;
Fonti, A.;
Fouesneau, M.;
Fraile, E.;
Fraser, M.;
Fuchs, J.;
Gai, M.;
Galleti, S.;
Galluccio, L.;
Garabato, D.;
García-Sedano, F.;
Garofalo, A.;
Garralda, N.;
Gavras, P.;
Gerssen, J.;
Geyer, R.;
Gilmore, G.;
Girona, S.;
Giuffrida, G.;
Gomes, M.;
González-Marcos, A.;
González-Núñez, J.;
González-Vidal, J. J.;
Granvik, M.;
Guerrier, A.;
Guillout, P.;
Guiraud, J.;
Gúrpide, A.;
Gutiérrez-Sánchez, R.;
Guy, L. P.;
Haigron, R.;
Hatzidimitriou, D.;
Haywood, M.;
Heiter, U.;
Helmi, A.;
Hobbs, D.;
Hofmann, W.;
Holl, B.;
Holland, G.;
Hunt, J. A. S.;
Hypki, A.;
Icardi, V.;
Irwin, M.;
de Fombelle, G. Jevardat;
Jofré, P.;
Jonker, P. G.;
Jorissen, A.;
Julbe, F.;
Karampelas, A.;
Kochoska, A.;
Kohley, R.;
Kolenberg, K.;
Kontizas, E.;
Koposov, S. E.;
Kordopatis, G.;
Koubsky, P.;
Krone-Martins, A.;
Kudryashova, M.;
Kull, I.;
Bachchan, R. K.;
Lacoste-Seris, F.;
Lanza, A. F.;
Lavigne, J. -B.;
Poncin-Lafitte, C. Le;
Lebreton, Y.;
Lebzelter, T.;
Leccia, S.;
Leclerc, N.;
Lecoeur-Taibi, I.;
Lemaitre, V.;
Lenhardt, H.;
Leroux, F.;
Liao, S.;
Licata, E.;
Lindstrøm, H. E. P.;
Lister, T. A.;
Livanou, E.;
Lobel, A.;
Löffer, W.;
López, M.;
Lorenz, D.;
MacDonald, I.;
Fernandes, T. Magalhães;
Managau, S.;
Mann, R. G.;
Mantelet, G.;
Marchal, O.;
Marchant, J. M.;
Marconi, M.;
Marinoni, S.;
Marrese, P. M.;
Marschalkó, G.;
Marshall, D. J.;
Martín-Fleitas, J. M.;
Martino, M.;
Mary, N.;
Matijevič, G.;
Mazeh, T.;
McMillan, P. J.;
Messina, S.;
Michalik, D.;
Millar, N. R.;
Miranda, B. M. H.;
Molina, D.;
Molinaro, R.;
Molinaro, M.;
Molnár, L.;
Moniez, M.;
Montegrio, P.;
Mor, R.;
Mora, A.;
Morbidelli, R.;
Morel, T.;
Morgenthaler, S.;
Morris, D.;
Mulone, A. F.;
Muraveva, T.;
Musella, I.;
Narbonne, J.;
Nelemans, G.;
Nicastro, L.;
Noval, L.;
Ordénovic, C.;
Ordieres-Meré, J.;
Osborne, P.;
Pagani, C.;
Pagano, I.;
Pailler, F.;
Palacin, H.;
Palaversa, L.;
Parsons, P.;
Pecoraro, M.;
Pedrosa, R.;
Pentikäinen, H.;
Pichon, B.;
Piersimoni, A. M.;
Pineau, F. -X.;
Plachy, E.;
Plum, G.;
Poujoulet, E.;
Prša, A.;
Pulone, L.;
Ragaini, S.;
Rago, S.;
Rambaux, N.;
Ramos-Lerate, M.;
Ranalli, P.;
Rauw, G.;
Read, A.;
Regibo, S.;
Reylé, C.;
Ribeiro, R. A.;
Rimoldini, L.;
Ripepi, V.;
Riva, A.;
Rixon, G.;
Roelens, M.;
Romero-Gómez, M.;
Rowell, N.;
Royer, F.;
Ruiz-Dern, L.;
Sadowski, G.;
Sellés, T. Sagristà;
Sahlmann, J.;
Salgado, J.;
Salguero, E.;
Sarasso, M.;
Savietto, H.;
Schultheis, M.;
Sciacca, E.;
Segol, M.;
Segovia, J. C.;
Segransan, D.;
Shih, I-C.;
Smareglia, R.;
Smart, R. L.;
Solano, E.;
Solitro, F.;
Sordo, R.;
Nieto, S. Soria;
Souchay, J.;
Spagna, A.;
Spoto, F.;
Stampa, U.;
Steele, I. A.;
Steidelmüller, H.;
Stephenson, C. A.;
Stoev, H.;
Suess, F. F.;
Süveges, M.;
Surdej, J.;
Szabados, L.;
Szegedi-Elek, E.;
Tapiador, D.;
Taris, F.;
Tauran, G.;
Taylor, M. B.;
Teixeira, R.;
Terrett, D.;
Tingley, B.;
Trager, S. C.;
Turon, C.;
Ulla, A.;
Utrilla, E.;
Valentini, G.;
van Elteren, A.;
Van Hemelryck, E.;
van Leeuwen, M.;
Varadi, M.;
Vecchiato, A.;
Veljanoski, J.;
Via, T.;
Vicente, D.;
Vogt, S.;
Voss, H.;
Votruba, V.;
Voutsinas, S.;
Walmsley, G.;
Weiler, M.;
Weingril, K.;
Wevers, T.;
Wyrzykowski, Ł.;
Yoldas, A.;
Žerjal, M.;
Zucker, S.;
Zurbach, C.;
Zwitter, T.;
Alecu, A.;
Allen, M.;
Prieto, C. Allende;
Amorim, A.;
Anglada-Escudé, G.;
Arsenijevic, V.;
Azaz, S.;
Balm, P.;
Beck, M.;
Bernsteiny, H. -H.;
Bigot, L.;
Bijaoui, A.;
Blasco, C.;
Bonfigli, M.;
Bono, G.;
Boudreault, S.;
Bressan, A.;
Brown, S.;
Brunet, P. -M.;
Bunclarky, P.;
Buonanno, R.;
Butkevich, A. G.;
Carret, C.;
Carrion, C.;
Chemin, L.;
Chéreau, F.;
Corcione, L.;
Darmigny, E.;
de Boer, K. S.;
de Teodoro, P.;
de Zeeuw, P. T.;
Luche, C. Delle;
Domingues, C. D.;
Dubath, P.;
Fodor, F.;
Frézouls, B.;
Fries, A.;
Fustes, D.;
Fyfe, D.;
Gallardo, E.;
Gallegos, J.;
Gardio, D.;
Gebran, M.;
Gomboc, A.;
Gómez, A.;
Grux, E.;
Gueguen, A.;
Heyrovsky, A.;
Hoar, J.;
Iannicola, G.;
Parache, Y. Isasi;
Janotto, A. -M.;
Joliet, E.;
Jonckheere, A.;
Keil, R.;
Kim, D. -W.;
Klagyivik, P.;
Klar, J.;
Knude, J.;
Kochukhov, O.;
Kolka, I.;
Kos, J.;
Kutka, A.;
Lainey, V.;
LeBouquin, D.;
Liu, C.;
Loreggia, D.;
Makarov, V. V.;
Marseille, M. G.;
Martayan, C.;
Martinez-Rubi, O.;
Massart, B.;
Meynadier, F.;
Mignot, S.;
Munari, U.;
Nguyen, A. -T.;
Nordlander, T.;
O'Flaherty, K. S.;
Ocvirk, P.;
Sanz, A. Olias;
Ortiz, P.;
Osorio, J.;
Oszkiewicz, D.;
Ouzounis, A.;
Palmer, M.;
Park, P.;
Pasquato, E.;
Peltzer, C.;
Peralta, J.;
Péturaud, F.;
Pieniluoma, T.;
Pigozzi, E.;
Poelsy, J.;
Prat, G.;
Prod'homme, T.;
Raison, F.;
Rebordao, J. M.;
Risquez, D.;
Rocca-Volmerange, B.;
Rosen, S.;
Ruiz-Fuertes, M. I.;
Russo, F.;
Sembay, S.;
Vizcaino, I. Serraller;
Short, A.;
Siebert, A.;
Silva, H.;
Sinachopoulos, D.;
Slezak, E.;
Soffel, M.;
Sosnowska, D.;
Straižys, V.;
ter Linden, M.;
Terrell, D.;
Theil, S.;
Tiede, C.;
Troisi, L.;
Tsalmantza, P.;
Tur, D.;
Vaccari, M.;
Vachier, F.;
Valles, P.;
Van Hamme, W.;
Veltz, L.;
Virtanen, J.;
Wallut, J. -M.;
Wichmann, R.;
Wilkinson, M. I.;
Ziaeepour, H.;
Zschocke, S.
Submitted: 2017-03-03
Context. The first Gaia Data Release contains the Tycho-Gaia Astrometric
Solution (TGAS). This is a subset of about 2 million stars for which, besides
the position and photometry, the proper motion and parallax are calculated
using Hipparcos and Tycho-2 positions in 1991.25 as prior information. Aims. We
investigate the scientific potential and limitations of the TGAS component by
means of the astrometric data for open clusters. Methods. Mean cluster parallax
and proper motion values are derived taking into account the error correlations
within the astrometric solutions for individual stars, an estimate of the
internal velocity dispersion in the cluster, and, where relevant, the effects
of the depth of the cluster along the line of sight. Internal consistency of
the TGAS data is assessed. Results. Values given for standard uncertainties are
still inaccurate and may lead to unrealistic unit-weight standard deviations of
least squares solutions for cluster parameters. Reconstructed mean cluster
parallax and proper motion values are generally in very good agreement with
earlier Hipparcos-based determination, although the Gaia mean parallax for the
Pleiades is a significant exception. We have no current explanation for that
discrepancy. Most clusters are observed to extend to nearly 15 pc from the
cluster centre, and it will be up to future Gaia releases to establish whether
those potential cluster-member stars are still dynamically bound to the
clusters. Conclusions. The Gaia DR1 provides the means to examine open clusters
far beyond their more easily visible cores, and can provide membership
assessments based on proper motions and parallaxes. A combined HR diagram shows
the same features as observed before using the Hipparcos data, with clearly
increased luminosities for older A and F dwarfs.
[11]
oai:arXiv.org:1702.06296 [pdf] - 1581568
Gaia eclipsing binary and multiple systems. Supervised classification
and self-organizing maps
Submitted: 2017-02-21
Large surveys producing tera- and petabyte-scale databases require
machine-learning and knowledge discovery methods to deal with the overwhelming
quantity of data and the difficulties of extracting concise, meaningful
information with reliable assessment of its uncertainty. This study
investigates the potential of a few machine-learning methods for the automated
analysis of eclipsing binaries in the data of such surveys. We aim to aid the
extraction of samples of eclipsing binaries from such databases and to provide
basic information about the objects. We estimate class labels according to two
classification systems, one based on the light curve morphology (EA/EB/EW
classes) and the other based on the physical characteristics of the binary
system (system morphology classes; detached through overcontact systems).
Furthermore, we explore low-dimensional surfaces along which the light curves
of eclipsing binaries are concentrated, to use in the characterization of the
binary systems and in the exploration of biases of the full unknown Gaia data
with respect to the training sets. We explore the performance of principal
component analysis (PCA), linear discriminant analysis (LDA), random forest
classification and self-organizing maps (SOM). We pre-process the photometric
time series by combining a double Gaussian profile fit and a smoothing spline,
in order to de-noise and interpolate the observed light curves. We achieve
further denoising, and selected the most important variability elements from
the light curves using PCA. We perform supervised classification using random
forest and LDA based on the PC decomposition, while SOM gives a continuous
2-dimensional manifold of the light curves arranged by a few important
features. We estimate the uncertainty of the supervised methods due to the
specific finite training set using ensembles of models constructed on
randomized training sets.
[12]
oai:arXiv.org:1702.04480 [pdf] - 1581506
Learn from every mistake! Hierarchical information combination in
astronomy
Submitted: 2017-02-15
Throughout the processing and analysis of survey data, a ubiquitous issue
nowadays is that we are spoilt for choice when we need to select a methodology
for some of its steps. The alternative methods usually fail and excel in
different data regions, and have various advantages and drawbacks, so a
combination that unites the strengths of all while suppressing the weaknesses
is desirable. We propose to use a two-level hierarchy of learners. Its first
level consists of training and applying the possible base methods on the first
part of a known set. At the second level, we feed the output probability
distributions from all base methods to a second learner trained on the
remaining known objects. Using classification of variable stars and photometric
redshift estimation as examples, we show that the hierarchical combination is
capable of achieving general improvement over averaging-type combination
methods, correcting systematics present in all base methods, is easy to train
and apply, and thus, it is a promising tool in the astronomical "Big Data" era.
[13]
oai:arXiv.org:1702.04165 [pdf] - 1535795
Crossmatching variable objects with the Gaia data
Rimoldini, Lorenzo;
Nienartowicz, Krzysztof;
Süveges, Maria;
Charnas, Jonathan;
Guy, Leanne P.;
de Fombelle, Grégory Jevardat;
Holl, Berry;
Lecoeur-Taïbi, Isabelle;
Mowlavi, Nami;
Ordóñez-Blanco, Diego;
Eyer, Laurent
Submitted: 2017-02-14
Tens of millions of new variable objects are expected to be identified in
over a billion time series from the Gaia mission. Crossmatching known variable
sources with those from Gaia is crucial to incorporate current knowledge,
understand how these objects appear in the Gaia data, train supervised
classifiers to recognise known classes, and validate the results of the
Variability Processing and Analysis Coordination Unit (CU7) within the Gaia
Data Analysis and Processing Consortium (DPAC). The method employed by CU7 to
crossmatch variables for the first Gaia data release includes a binary
classifier to take into account positional uncertainties, proper motion,
targeted variability signals, and artefacts present in the early calibration of
the Gaia data. Crossmatching with a classifier makes it possible to automate
all those decisions which are typically made during visual inspection. The
classifier can be trained with objects characterized by a variety of attributes
to ensure similarity in multiple dimensions (astrometry, photometry,
time-series features), with no need for a-priori transformations to compare
different photometric bands, or of predictive models of the motion of objects
to compare positions. Other advantages as well as some disadvantages of the
method are discussed. Implementation steps from the training to the assessment
of the crossmatch classifier and selection of results are described.
[14]
oai:arXiv.org:1702.03295 [pdf] - 1535694
Gaia Data Release 1: The variability processing & analysis and its
application to the south ecliptic pole region
Eyer, L.;
Mowlavi, N.;
Evans, D. W.;
Nienartowicz, K.;
Ordonez, D.;
Holl, B.;
Lecoeur-Taibi, I.;
Riello, M.;
Clementini, G.;
Cuypers, J.;
De Ridder, J.;
Lanzafame, A. C.;
Sarro, L. M.;
Charnas, J.;
Guy, L. P.;
de Fombelle, G. Jevardat;
Rimoldini, L.;
Süveges, M.;
Mignard, F.;
Busso, G.;
De Angeli, F.;
van Leeuwen, F.;
Dubath, P.;
Beck, M.;
Aguado, J. J.;
Debosscher, J.;
Distefano, E.;
Fuchs, J.;
Koubsky, P.;
Lebzelter, T.;
Leccia, S.;
Lopez, M.;
Moitinho, A.;
Regibo, S.;
Ripepi, V.;
Roelens, M.;
Szabados, L.;
Tingley, B.;
Votruba, V.;
Zucker, S.;
Aerts, C.;
Barblan, F.;
Blanco-Cuaresma, S.;
Grenon, M.;
Jan, A.;
Lorenz, D.;
Miranda, B.;
Morgenthaler, S.;
Ordenovic, C.;
Palaversa, L.;
Prsa, A.;
Ruiz-Fuertes, M. I.;
Anderson, R. I.;
Delgado, H. E.;
Dzigan, Y.;
Hudec, R.;
Jonckheere, A.;
Klagyivik, P.;
Kutka, A.;
Moniez, M.;
Nicoletti, J. -M.;
Park, P.;
Van Hemelryck, E.;
Varadi, M.;
Kochoska, A.;
Lanza, A. F.;
Marconi, M.;
Marschalko, G.;
Messina, S.;
Musella, I.;
Pagano, I.;
Sadowski, G.;
Schultheis, M.
Submitted: 2017-02-10
The ESA Gaia mission provides a unique time-domain survey for more than one
billion sources brighter than G=20.7 mag. Gaia offers the unprecedented
opportunity to study variability phenomena in the Universe thanks to
multi-epoch G-magnitude photometry in addition to astrometry, blue and red
spectro-photometry, and spectroscopy. Within the Gaia Consortium, Coordination
Unit 7 has the responsibility to detect variable objects, classify them, derive
characteristic parameters for specific variability classes, and provide global
descriptions of variable phenomena.
We describe the variability processing and analysis that we plan to apply to
the successive data releases, and we present its application to the G-band
photometry results of the first 14 months of Gaia operations that comprises 28
days of Ecliptic Pole Scanning Law and 13 months of Nominal Scanning Law.
Out of the 694 million, all-sky, sources that have calibrated G-band
photometry in this first stage of the mission, about 2.3 million sources that
have at least 20 observations are located within 38 degrees from the South
Ecliptic Pole. We detect about 14% of them as variable candidates, among which
the automated classification identified 9347 Cepheid and RR Lyrae candidates.
Additional visual inspections and selection criteria led to the publication of
3194 Cepheid and RR Lyrae stars, described in Clementini et al. (2016). Under
the restrictive conditions for DR1, the completenesses of Cepheids and RR Lyrae
stars are estimated at 67% and 58%, respectively, numbers that will
significantly increase with subsequent Gaia data releases.
Data processing within the Gaia Consortium is iterative, the quality of the
data and the results being improved at each iteration. The results presented in
this article show a glimpse of the exceptional harvest that is to be expected
from the Gaia mission for variability phenomena. [abridged]
[15]
oai:arXiv.org:1610.04008 [pdf] - 1528303
Short timescale variables in stellar clusters: From Gaia to ground-based
telescopes
Submitted: 2016-10-13
Combined studies of variable stars and stellar clusters open great horizons,
and they allow us to improve our understanding of stellar cluster formation and
stellar evolution. In that prospect, the Gaia mission will provide astrometric,
photometric, and spectroscopic data for about one billion stars of the Milky
Way. This will represent a major census of stellar clusters, and it will
drastically increase the number of known variable stars. In particular, the
peculiar Gaia scanning law offers the opportunity to investigate the rather
unexplored domain of short timescale variability (from tens of seconds to a
dozen of hours), bringing invaluable clues to the fields of stellar physics and
stellar aggregates. We assess the Gaia capabilities in terms of short timescale
variability detection, using extensive light-curve simulations for various
variable object types. We show that Gaia can detect periodic variability
phenomena with amplitude variations larger than a few millimagnitudes.
Additionally, we plan to perform subsequent follow-up of variables stars
detected in clusters by Gaia to better characterize them. Hence, we develop a
pipeline for the analysis of high cadence photometry from ground-based
telescopes such as the 1.2m Euler telescope (La Silla, Chile) and the 1.2m
Mercator telescope (La Palma, Canary Islands).
[16]
oai:arXiv.org:1504.00782 [pdf] - 1232162
A comparative study of four significance measures for periodicity
detection in astronomical surveys
Süveges, Maria;
Guy, Leanne P.;
Eyer, Laurent;
Cuypers, Jan;
Holl, Berry;
Lecoeur-Taïbi, Isabelle;
Mowlavi, Nami;
Nienartowicz, Krzysztof;
Blanco, Diego Ordóñez;
Rimoldini, Lorenzo;
Ruiz, Idoia
Submitted: 2015-04-03
We study the problem of periodicity detection in massive data sets of
photometric or radial velocity time series, as presented by ESA's Gaia mission.
Periodicity detection hinges on the estimation of the false alarm probability
(FAP) of the extremum of the periodogram of the time series. We consider the
problem of its estimation with two main issues in mind. First, for a given
number of observations and signal-to-noise ratio, the rate of correct
periodicity detections should be constant for all realized cadences of
observations regardless of the observational time patterns, in order to avoid
sky biases that are difficult to assess. Second, the computational loads should
be kept feasible even for millions of time series. Using the Gaia case, we
compare the $F^M$ method (Paltani 2004, Schwarzenberg-Czerny 2012), the Baluev
method (Baluev 2008) and the GEV method (S\"uveges 2014), as well as a method
for the direct estimation of a threshold. Three methods involve some unknown
parameters, which are obtained by fitting a regression-type predictive model
using easily obtainable covariates derived from observational time series. We
conclude that the GEV and the Baluev methods both provide good solutions to the
issues posed by a large-scale processing. The first of these yields the best
scientific quality at the price of some moderately costly pre-processing. When
this pre-processing is impossible for some reason (e.g. the computational costs
are prohibitive or good regression models cannot be constructed), the Baluev
method provides a computationally inexpensive alternative with slight biases in
regions where time samplings exhibit strong aliases.
[17]
oai:arXiv.org:1503.04116 [pdf] - 1055849
Revealing {\delta} Cephei's Secret Companion and Intriguing Past
Submitted: 2015-03-13
Classical Cepheid variable stars are crucial calibrators of the cosmic
distance scale thanks to a relation between their pulsation periods and
luminosities. Their archetype, {\delta} Cephei, is an important calibrator for
this relation. In this paper, we show that {\delta} Cephei is a spectroscopic
binary based on newly-obtained high-precision radial velocities. We combine
these new data with literature data to determine the orbit, which has period
2201 days, semi-amplitude 1.5 km/s, and high eccentricity (e = 0.647). We
re-analyze Hipparcos intermediate astrometric data to measure {\delta} Cephei's
parallax ($\varpi = 4.09 \pm 0.16$ mas) and find tentative evidence for an
orbital signature, although we cannot claim detection. We estimate that Gaia
will fully determine the astrometric orbit. Using the available information
from spectroscopy, velocimetry, astrometry, and Geneva stellar evolution models
($M_{\delta Cep} ~ 5.0 - 5.25 M_\odot$), we constrain the companion mass to
within $0.2 < M_2 < 1.2 M_\odot$. We discuss the potential of ongoing and
previous interactions between the companion and {\delta} Cephei near pericenter
passage, informing reported observations of circumstellar material and
bow-shock. The orbit may have undergone significant changes due to a
Kozai-Lidov mechanism driven by the outer (visual and astrometric) companion HD
213307. Our discovery of {\delta} Cephei's nature as a spectroscopic binary
exposes a hidden companion and reveals a rich and dynamical history of the
archetype of classical Cepheid variables.
[18]
oai:arXiv.org:1502.01165 [pdf] - 931035
Automated eclipsing binary detection: applying the Gaia CU7 pipeline to
Hipparcos
Holl, Berry;
Mowlavi, Nami;
Lecoeur-Taïbi, Isabelle;
Barblan, Fabio;
Rimoldini, Lorenzo;
Eyer, Laurent;
Süveges, Maria;
Guy, Leanne;
Ordoñez-Blanco, Diego;
Ruiz, Idoia;
Nienartowicz, Krzysztof
Submitted: 2015-02-04
We demonstrate the eclipsing binary detection performance of the Gaia
variability analysis and processing pipeline using Hipparcos data. The
automated pipeline classifies 1,067 (0.9%) of the 118,204 Hipparcos sources as
eclipsing binary candidates. The detection rate amounts to 89% (732 sources) in
a subset of 819 visually confirmed eclipsing binaries, with the period
correctly identified for 80% of them, and double or half periods obtained in 6%
of the cases.
[19]
oai:arXiv.org:1411.5943 [pdf] - 904189
Time series data mining for the Gaia variability analysis
Nienartowicz, Krzysztof;
Blanco, Diego Ordóñez;
Guy, Leanne;
Holl, Berry;
Lecoeur-Taïbi, Isabelle;
Mowlavi, Nami;
Rimoldini, Lorenzo;
Ruiz, Idoia;
Süveges, Maria;
Eyer, Laurent
Submitted: 2014-11-21
Gaia is an ESA cornerstone mission, which was successfully launched December
2013 and commenced operations in July 2014. Within the Gaia Data Processing and
Analysis consortium, Coordination Unit 7 (CU7) is responsible for the
variability analysis of over a billion celestial sources and nearly 4 billion
associated time series (photometric, spectrophotometric, and spectroscopic),
encoding information in over 800 billion observations during the 5 years of the
mission, resulting in a petabyte scale analytical problem. In this article, we
briefly describe the solutions we developed to address the challenges of time
series variability analysis: from the structure for a distributed data-oriented
scientific collaboration to architectural choices and specific components used.
Our approach is based on Open Source components with a distributed, partitioned
database as the core to handle incrementally: ingestion, distributed
processing, analysis, results and export in a constrained time window.
[20]
oai:arXiv.org:1301.1545 [pdf] - 611386
Automated classification of Hipparcos unsolved variables
Rimoldini, L.;
Dubath, P.;
Süveges, M.;
López, M.;
Sarro, L. M.;
Blomme, J.;
De Ridder, J.;
Cuypers, J.;
Guy, L.;
Mowlavi, N.;
Lecoeur-Taïbi, I.;
Beck, M.;
Jan, A.;
Nienartowicz, K.;
Ordóñez-Blanco, D.;
Lebzelter, T.;
Eyer, L.
Submitted: 2013-01-08
We present an automated classification of stars exhibiting periodic,
non-periodic and irregular light variations. The Hipparcos catalogue of
unsolved variables is employed to complement the training set of periodic
variables of Dubath et al. with irregular and non-periodic representatives,
leading to 3881 sources in total which describe 24 variability types. The
attributes employed to characterize light-curve features are selected according
to their relevance for classification. Classifier models are produced with
random forests and a multistage methodology based on Bayesian networks,
achieving overall misclassification rates under 12 per cent. Both classifiers
are applied to predict variability types for 6051 Hipparcos variables
associated with uncertain or missing types in the literature.
[21]
oai:arXiv.org:1212.0645 [pdf] - 598210
Extreme-value modelling for the significance assessment of periodogram
peaks
Submitted: 2012-12-04
I propose a new procedure to estimate the False Alarm Probability, the
measure of significance for peaks of periodograms. The key element of the new
procedure is the use of generalized extreme-value distributions, the limiting
distribution for maxima of variables from most continuous distributions. This
technique allows reliable extrapolation to the very high probability levels
required by multiple hypothesis testing, and enables the derivation of
confidence intervals of the estimated levels. The estimates are stable against
deviations from distributional assumptions, which are otherwise usually made
either about the observations themselves or about the theoretical univariate
distribution of the periodogram. The quality and the performance of the
procedure is demonstrated on simulations and on two multimode variable stars
from Sloan Digital Sky Survey Stripe 82.
[22]
oai:arXiv.org:1203.6196 [pdf] - 1117603
Search for high-amplitude Delta Scuti and RR Lyrae stars in Sloan
Digital Sky Survey Stripe 82 using principal component analysis
Süveges, M.;
Sesar, B.;
Váradi, M.;
Mowlavi, N.;
Becker, A. C.;
Ivezić, Ž.;
Beck, M.;
Nienartowicz, K.;
Rimoldini, L.;
Dubath, P.;
Bartholdi, P.;
Eyer, L.
Submitted: 2012-03-28
We propose a robust principal component analysis (PCA) framework for the
exploitation of multi-band photometric measurements in large surveys. Period
search results are improved using the time series of the first principal
component due to its optimized signal-to-noise ratio.The presence of correlated
excess variations in the multivariate time series enables the detection of
weaker variability. Furthermore, the direction of the largest variance differs
for certain types of variable stars. This can be used as an efficient attribute
for classification. The application of the method to a subsample of Sloan
Digital Sky Survey Stripe 82 data yielded 132 high-amplitude Delta Scuti
variables. We found also 129 new RR Lyrae variables, complementary to the
catalogue of Sesar et al., 2010, extending the halo area mapped by Stripe 82 RR
Lyrae stars towards the Galactic bulge. The sample comprises also 25
multiperiodic or Blazhko RR Lyrae stars.
[23]
oai:arXiv.org:1107.3638 [pdf] - 1078065
Hipparcos Variable Star Detection and Classification Efficiency
Dubath, P.;
Lecoeur-Taïbi, I.;
Rimoldini, L.;
Süveges, M.;
Blomme, J.;
López, M.;
Sarro, L. M.;
De Ridder, J.;
Cuypers, J.;
Guy, L.;
Nienartowicz, K.;
Jan, A.;
Beck, M.;
Mowlavi, N.;
De Cat, P.;
Lebzelter, T.;
Eyer, L.
Submitted: 2011-07-19, last modified: 2011-07-21
A complete periodic star extraction and classification scheme is set up and
tested with the Hipparcos catalogue. The efficiency of each step is derived by
comparing the results with prior knowledge coming from the catalogue or from
the literature. A combination of two variability criteria is applied in the
first step to select 17 006 variability candidates from a complete sample of
115 152 stars. Our candidate sample turns out to include 10 406 known variables
(i.e., 90% of the total of 11 597) and 6600 contaminating constant stars. A
random forest classification is used in the second step to extract 1881 (82%)
of the known periodic objects while removing entirely constant stars from the
sample and limiting the contamination of non-periodic variables to 152 stars
(7.5%). The confusion introduced by these 152 non-periodic variables is
evaluated in the third step using the results of the Hipparcos periodic star
classification presented in a previous study (Dubath et al. [1]).
[24]
oai:arXiv.org:1101.2406 [pdf] - 1051376
Random forest automated supervised classification of Hipparcos periodic
variable stars
Dubath, P.;
Rimoldini, L.;
Süveges, M.;
Blomme, J.;
López, M.;
Sarro, L. M.;
De Ridder, J.;
Cuypers, J.;
Guy, L.;
Lecoeur, I.;
Nienartowicz, K.;
Jan, A.;
Beck, M.;
Mowlavi, N.;
De Cat, P.;
Lebzelter, T.;
Eyer, L.
Submitted: 2011-01-12, last modified: 2011-07-19
We present an evaluation of the performance of an automated classification of
the Hipparcos periodic variable stars into 26 types. The sub-sample with the
most reliable variability types available in the literature is used to train
supervised algorithms to characterize the type dependencies on a number of
attributes. The most useful attributes evaluated with the random forest
methodology include, in decreasing order of importance, the period, the
amplitude, the V-I colour index, the absolute magnitude, the residual around
the folded light-curve model, the magnitude distribution skewness and the
amplitude of the second harmonic of the Fourier series model relative to that
of the fundamental frequency. Random forests and a multi-stage scheme involving
Bayesian network and Gaussian mixture methods lead to statistically equivalent
results. In standard 10-fold cross-validation experiments, the rate of correct
classification is between 90 and 100%, depending on the variability type. The
main mis-classification cases, up to a rate of about 10%, arise due to
confusion between SPB and ACV blue variables and between eclipsing binaries,
ellipsoidal variables and other variability types. Our training set and the
predicted types for the other Hipparcos periodic stars are available online.
[25]
oai:arXiv.org:1106.3164 [pdf] - 1077331
Efficient use of simultaneous multi-band observations for variable star
analysis
Submitted: 2011-06-16
The luminosity changes of most types of variable stars are correlated in the
different wavelengths, and these correlations may be exploited for several
purposes: for variability detection, for distinction of microvariability from
noise, for period search or for classification. Principal component analysis is
a simple and well-developed statistical tool to analyze correlated data. We
will discuss its use on variable objects of Stripe 82 of the Sloan Digital Sky
Survey, with the aim of identifying new RR Lyrae and SX Phoenicis-type
candidates. The application is not straightforward because of different noise
levels in the different bands, the presence of outliers that can be confused
with real extreme observations, under- or overestimated errors and the
dependence of errors on the magnitudes. These particularities require robust
methods to be applied together with the principal component analysis. The
results show that PCA is a valuable aid in variability analysis with multi-band
data.