sort results by

Use logical operators AND, OR, NOT and round brackets to construct complex queries. Whitespace-separated words are treated as ANDed.

Show articles per page in mode

Sánchez-Sáez, P.

Normalized to: Sánchez-Sáez, P.

2 article(s) in total. 10 co-authors, from 1 to 2 common article(s). Median position in authors list is 1,0.

[1]  oai:arXiv.org:1904.04844  [pdf] - 1890442
The QUEST-La Silla AGN Variability Survey: selection of AGN candidates through optical variability
Comments: Accepted for publication in The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series
Submitted: 2019-04-09
We used data from the QUEST-La Silla Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN) variability survey to construct light curves for 208,583 sources over $\sim 70$ deg$^2$, with a a limiting magnitude $r \sim 21$. Each light curve has at least 40 epochs and a length of $\geq 200$ days. We implemented a Random Forest algorithm to classify our objects as either AGN or non-AGN according to their variability features and optical colors, excluding morphology cuts. We tested three classifiers, one that only includes variability features (RF1), one that includes variability features and also $r-i$ and $i-z$ colors (RF2), and one that includes variability features and also $g-r$, $r-i$, and $i-z$ colors (RF3). We obtained a sample of high probability candidates (hp-AGN) for each classifier, with 5,941 candidates for RF1, 5,252 candidates for RF2, and 4,482 candidates for RF3. We divided each sample according to their $g-r$ colors, defining blue ($g-r\leq 0.6$) and red sub-samples ($g-r>0.6$). We find that most of the candidates known from the literature belong to the blue sub-samples, which is not necessarily surprising given that, unlike for many literature studies, we do not cut our sample to point-like objects. This means that we can select AGN that have a significant contribution from redshifted starlight in their host galaxies. In order to test the efficiency of our technique we performed spectroscopic follow-up, confirming the AGN nature of 44 among 54 observed sources (81.5\% of efficiency). From the campaign we concluded that RF2 provides the purest sample of AGN candidates.
[2]  oai:arXiv.org:1808.00967  [pdf] - 1751944
The QUEST-La Silla AGN variability survey: connection between AGN variability and black hole physical properties
Comments: 26 pages, 17 figures, 9 tables. Minor formatting changes. Accepted for publication in ApJ
Submitted: 2018-08-02, last modified: 2018-08-27
We present our statistical analysis of the connection between active galactic nuclei (AGN) variability and physical properties of the central supermassive black hole (SMBH). We constructed optical light curves using data from the QUEST-La Silla AGN variability survey. To model the variability, we used the structure function, among the excess variance and the amplitude from Damp Random Walk (DRW) modeling. For the measurement of SMBH physical properties, we used public spectra from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS). Our analysis is based on an original sample of 2345 sources detected in both SDSS and QUEST-La Silla. For 1473 of these sources we could perform a proper measurement of the spectral and variability properties, and 1348 of these sources were classified as variable ($91.5\%$). We found that the amplitude of the variability ($A$) depends solely on the rest frame emission wavelength and the Eddington ratio, where $A$ anti-correlates with both $\lambda_{rest}$ and $L/L_{\text{Edd}}$. This suggests that AGN variability does not evolve over cosmic time, and its amplitude is inversely related to the accretion rate. We found that the logarithmic gradient of the variability ($\gamma$) does not correlate significantly with any SMBH physical parameter, since there is no statistically significant linear regression model with an absolute value of the slope higher than 0.1. Finally, we found that the general distribution of $\gamma$ measured for our sample differs from the distribution of $\gamma$ obtained for light curves simulated from a DRW process. For 20.6\% of the variable sources in our sample, a DRW model is not appropriate to describe the variability, since $\gamma$ differs considerably from the expected value of 0.5.