Normalized to: Ryczanowski, D.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:2002.01479 [pdf] - 2105615
What does strong gravitational lensing? The mass and redshift
distribution of high-magnification lenses
Submitted: 2020-02-04, last modified: 2020-06-01
Many distant objects can only be detected, or become more scientifically
valuable, if they have been highly magnified by strong gravitational lensing.
We use EAGLE and BAHAMAS, two recent cosmological hydrodynamical simulations,
to predict the probability distribution for both the lens mass and lens
redshift when point sources are highly magnified by gravitational lensing. For
sources at a redshift of two, we find the distribution of lens redshifts to be
broad, peaking at z=0.6. The contribution of different lens masses is also
fairly broad, with most high-magnification lensing due to lenses with halo
masses between 10^12 and 10^14 solar masses. Lower mass haloes are inefficient
lenses, while more massive haloes are rare. We find that a simple model in
which all haloes have singular isothermal sphere density profiles can
approximately reproduce the simulation predictions, although such a model
over-predicts the importance of haloes with mass <10^12 solar masses for
lensing. We also calculate the probability that point sources at different
redshifts are strongly lensed. At low redshift, high magnifications are
extremely unlikely. Each z=0.5 source produces, on average, 5x10^-7 images with
magnification greater than ten; for z =2 this increases to about 2x10^-5. Our
results imply that searches for strongly lensed optical transients, including
the optical counterparts to strongly lensed gravitational waves, can be
optimized by monitoring massive galaxies, groups and clusters rather than
concentrating on an individual population of lenses.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:2005.02296 [pdf] - 2097451
On building a cluster watch-list for identifying strongly lensed
supernovae, gravitational waves and kilonovae
Submitted: 2020-05-05
Motivated by discovering strongly-lensed supernovae, gravitational waves, and
kilonovae in the 2020s, we investigate whether to build a watch-list of
clusters based on observed cluster properties (i.e. lens-plane selection) or on
the detectability of strongly-lensed background galaxies (i.e. source-plane
selection). First, we estimate the fraction of high-redshift transient
progenitors that reside in galaxies that are themselves too faint to be
detected as being strongly-lensed. We find $\sim15-50$ per cent of transient
progenitors reside in $z = 1-2$ galaxies too faint to be detected in surveys
that reach ${\rm AB}\simeq23$, such as the Dark Energy Survey. This falls to
$\ls10$ per cent at depths that will be probed by early data releases of LSST
(${\rm AB}\simeq25$). Second, we estimate a conservative lower limit on the
fraction of strong lensing clusters that will be missed by magnitude limited
searches for multiply-imaged galaxies and giant arcs due to the faintness of
such images. We find that DES-like surveys will miss $\sim75$ per cent of
$10^{15}$M$_\odot$ strong lensing clusters, rising to $\sim100$ per cent of
$10^{14}$M$_\odot$ clusters. Deeper surveys, such as LSST, will miss $\sim40$
per cent at $10^{15}$M$_\odot$, and $\sim95$ per cent at $10^{14}$M$_\odot$.
Our results motivate building a cluster watch-list for strongly-lensed
transients that includes those found by lens-plane selection.