sort results by

Use logical operators AND, OR, NOT and round brackets to construct complex queries. Whitespace-separated words are treated as ANDed.

Show articles per page in mode

Runyon, K.

Normalized to: Runyon, K.

10 article(s) in total. 277 co-authors, from 1 to 10 common article(s). Median position in authors list is 44,0.

[1]  oai:arXiv.org:2006.04900  [pdf] - 2112056
Human Assisted Science at Venus: Venus Exploration in the New Human Spaceflight Age
Comments: A White Paper for the Planetary Science and Astrobiology Decadal Survey 2023-2032. 7 pages +cover page, 2 figures +cover image
Submitted: 2020-06-08
Some human mission trajectories to Mars include flybys of Venus. These flybys provide opportunities to practice deep space human operations, and offer numerous safe-return-to-Earth options, before committing to longer and lower-cadence Mars-only flights. Venus flybys, as part of dedicated missions to Mars, also enable human-in-the-loop scientific study of the second planet. The time to begin coordinating such Earth-to-Mars-via-Venus missions is now
[2]  oai:arXiv.org:2004.01017  [pdf] - 2074548
Initial results from the New Horizons exploration of 2014 MU69, a small Kuiper Belt Object
Stern, S. A.; Weaver, H. A.; Spencer, J. R.; Olkin, C. B.; Gladstone, G. R.; Grundy, W. M.; Moore, J. M.; Cruikshank, D. P.; Elliott, H. A.; McKinnon, W. B.; Parker, J. Wm.; Verbiscer, A. J.; Young, L. A.; Aguilar, D. A.; Albers, J. M.; Andert, T.; Andrews, J. P.; Bagenal, F.; Banks, M. E.; Bauer, B. A.; Bauman, J. A.; Bechtold, K. E.; Beddingfield, C. B.; Behrooz, N.; Beisser, K. B.; Benecchi, S. D.; Bernardoni, E.; Beyer, R. A.; Bhaskaran, S.; Bierson, C. J.; Binzel, R. P.; Birath, E. M.; Bird, M. K.; Boone, D. R.; Bowman, A. F.; Bray, V. J.; Britt, D. T.; Brown, L. E.; Buckley, M. R.; Buie, M. W.; Buratti, B. J.; Burke, L. M.; Bushman, S. S.; Carcich, B.; Chaikin, A. L.; Chavez, C. L.; Cheng, A. F.; Colwell, E. J.; Conard, S. J.; Conner, M. P.; Conrad, C. A.; Cook, J. C.; Cooper, S. B.; Custodio, O. S.; Ore, C. M. Dalle; Deboy, C. C.; Dharmavaram, P.; Dhingra, R. D.; Dunn, G. F.; Earle, A. M.; Egan, A. F.; Eisig, J.; El-Maarry, M. R.; Engelbrecht, C.; Enke, B. L.; Ercol, C. J.; Fattig, E. D.; Ferrell, C. L.; Finley, T. J.; Firer, J.; Fischetti, J.; Folkner, W. M.; Fosbury, M. N.; Fountain, G. H.; Freeze, J. M.; Gabasova, L.; Glaze, L. S.; Green, J. L.; Griffith, G. A.; Guo, Y.; Hahn, M.; Hals, D. W.; Hamilton, D. P.; Hamilton, S. A.; Hanley, J. J.; Harch, A.; Harmon, K. A.; Hart, H. M.; Hayes, J.; Hersman, C. B.; Hill, M. E.; Hill, T. A.; Hofgartner, J. D.; Holdridge, M. E.; Horányi, M.; Hosadurga, A.; Howard, A. D.; Howett, C. J. A.; Jaskulek, S. E.; Jennings, D. E.; Jensen, J. R.; Jones, M. R.; Kang, H. K.; Katz, D. J.; Kaufmann, D. E.; Kavelaars, J. J.; Keane, J. T.; Keleher, G. P.; Kinczyk, M.; Kochte, M. C.; Kollmann, P.; Krimigis, S. M.; Kruizinga, G. L.; Kusnierkiewicz, D. Y.; Lahr, M. S.; Lauer, T. R.; Lawrence, G. B.; Lee, J. E.; Lessac-Chenen, E. J.; Linscott, I. R.; Lisse, C. M.; Lunsford, A. W.; Mages, D. M.; Mallder, V. A.; Martin, N. P.; May, B. H.; McComas, D. J.; McNutt, R. L.; Mehoke, Jr. D. S.; Mehoke, T. S.; Nelson, D. S.; Nguyen, H. D.; Núñez, J. I.; Ocampo, A. C.; Owen, W. M.; Oxton, G. K.; Parker, A. H.; Pätzold, M.; Pelgrift, J. Y.; Pelletier, F. J.; Pineau, J. P.; Piquette, M. R.; Porter, S. B.; Protopapa, S.; Quirico, E.; Redfern, J. A.; Regiec, A. L.; Reitsema, H. J.; Reuter, D. C.; Richardson, D. C.; Riedel, J. E.; Ritterbush, M. A.; Robbins, S. J.; Rodgers, D. J.; Rogers, G. D.; Rose, D. M.; Rosendall, P. E.; Runyon, K. D.; Ryschkewitsch, M. G.; Saina, M. M.; Salinas, M. J.; Schenk, P. M.; Scherrer, J. R.; Schlei, W. R.; Schmitt, B.; Schultz, D. J.; Schurr, D. C.; Scipioni, F.; Sepan, R. L.; Shelton, R. G.; Showalter, M. R.; Simon, M.; Singer, K. N.; Stahlheber, E. W.; Stanbridge, D. R.; Stansberry, J. A.; Steffl, A. J.; Strobel, D. F.; Stothoff, M. M.; Stryk, T.; Stuart, J. R.; Summers, M. E.; Tapley, M. B.; Taylor, A.; Taylor, H. W.; Tedford, R. M.; Throop, H. B.; Turner, L. S.; Umurhan, O. M.; Van Eck, J.; Velez, D.; Versteeg, M. H.; Vincent, M. A.; Webbert, R. W.; Weidner, S. E.; Weigle, G. E.; Wendel, J. R.; White, O. L.; Whittenburg, K. E.; Williams, B. G.; Williams, K. E.; Williams, S. P.; Winters, H. L.; Zangari, A. M.; Zurbuchen, T. H.
Comments: 43 pages, 8 figure
Submitted: 2020-04-02
The Kuiper Belt is a distant region of the Solar System. On 1 January 2019, the New Horizons spacecraft flew close to (486958) 2014 MU69, a Cold Classical Kuiper Belt Object, a class of objects that have never been heated by the Sun and are therefore well preserved since their formation. Here we describe initial results from these encounter observations. MU69 is a bi-lobed contact binary with a flattened shape, discrete geological units, and noticeable albedo heterogeneity. However, there is little surface color and compositional heterogeneity. No evidence for satellites, ring or dust structures, gas coma, or solar wind interactions was detected. By origin MU69 appears consistent with pebble cloud collapse followed by a low velocity merger of its two lobes.
[3]  oai:arXiv.org:2004.00727  [pdf] - 2074526
The Geology and Geophysics of Kuiper Belt Object (486958) Arrokoth
Comments:
Submitted: 2020-04-01
The Cold Classical Kuiper Belt, a class of small bodies in undisturbed orbits beyond Neptune, are primitive objects preserving information about Solar System formation. The New Horizons spacecraft flew past one of these objects, the 36 km long contact binary (486958) Arrokoth (2014 MU69), in January 2019. Images from the flyby show that Arrokoth has no detectable rings, and no satellites (larger than 180 meters diameter) within a radius of 8000 km, and has a lightly-cratered smooth surface with complex geological features, unlike those on previously visited Solar System bodies. The density of impact craters indicates the surface dates from the formation of the Solar System. The two lobes of the contact binary have closely aligned poles and equators, constraining their accretion mechanism.
[4]  oai:arXiv.org:1910.08833  [pdf] - 1983188
Plutos Far Side
Comments: 45 pages 12 figures
Submitted: 2019-10-19
The New Horizons spacecraft provided near global observations of Pluto that far exceed the resolution of Earth-based data sets. Most Pluto New Horizons analysis hitherto has focused on the encounter hemisphere of Pluto (i.e., the antiCharon hemisphere containing Sputnik Planitia). In this work, we summarize and interpret data on the far side (i.e., the non-encounter hemisphere), providing the first integrated New Horizons overview of the far side terrains. We find strong evidence for widespread bladed deposits, evidence for an impact crater about as large as any on the near side hemisphere, evidence for complex lineations approximately antipodal to Sputnik Planitia that may be causally related, and evidence that the far side maculae are smaller and more structured than the encounter hemisphere maculae.
[5]  oai:arXiv.org:1903.05571  [pdf] - 1848689
Convection in a volatile nitrogen-ice-rich layer drives Pluto's geological vigor
Comments:
Submitted: 2019-03-13
The vast, deep, volatile-ice-filled basin informally named Sputnik Planum is central to Pluto's geological activity[1,2]. Composed of molecular nitrogen, methane, and carbon monoxide ices[3], but dominated by N2-ice, this ice layer is organized into cells or polygons, typically ~10-40 km across, that resemble the surface manifestation of solid state convection[1,2]. Here we report, based on available rheological measurements[4], that solid layers of N2 ice approximately greater than 1 km thick should convect for estimated present-day heat flow conditions on Pluto. More importantly, we show numerically that convective overturn in a several-km-thick layer of solid nitrogen can explain the great lateral width of the cells. The temperature dependence of N2-ice viscosity implies that the SP ice layer convects in the so-called sluggish lid regime[5], a unique convective mode heretofore not definitively observed in the Solar System. Average surface horizontal velocities of a few cm/yr imply surface transport or renewal times of ~500,000 years, well under the 10 Myr upper limit crater retention age for Sputnik Planum[2]. Similar convective surface renewal may also occur on other dwarf planets in the Kuiper belt, which may help explain the high albedos of some of them.
[6]  oai:arXiv.org:1903.05574  [pdf] - 1848691
Reorientation of Sputnik Planitia implies a Subsurface Ocean on Pluto
Comments:
Submitted: 2019-03-13
The deep nitrogen-covered Sputnik Planitia (SP; informal name) basin on Pluto is located very close to the longitude of Pluto's tidal axis[1] and may be an impact feature [2], by analogy with other large basins in the solar system[3,4]. Reorientation[5-7] due to tidal and rotational torques can explain SP's location, but requires it to be a positive gravity anomaly[7], despite its negative topography. Here we argue that if SP formed via impact and if Pluto possesses a subsurface ocean, a positive gravity anomaly would naturally result because of shell thinning and ocean uplift, followed by later modest N2 deposition. Without a subsurface ocean a positive gravity anomaly requires an implausibly thick N2 layer (greater than 40 km). A rigid, conductive ice shell is required to prolong such an ocean's lifetime to the present day[8] and maintain ocean uplift. Because N2 deposition is latitude-dependent[9], nitrogen loading and reorientation may have exhibited complex feedbacks[7].
[7]  oai:arXiv.org:1805.04115  [pdf] - 1762939
The Reclassification of Asteroids from Planets to Non-Planets
Comments: 31 pages, 5 figures
Submitted: 2018-05-10, last modified: 2018-09-07
It is often claimed that asteroids' sharing of orbits is the reason they were re-classified from planets to non-planets. A critical review of the literature from the 19th Century to the present shows this is factually incorrect. The literature shows the term asteroid was broadly recognized as a subset of planet for 150 years. On-going discovery of asteroids resulted in a de facto stretching of the concept of planet to include the ever-smaller bodies. Scientists found utility in this taxonomic identification as it provided categories needed to argue for the leading hypothesis of planet formation, Laplace's nebular hypothesis. In the 1950s, developments in planet formation theory found it no longer useful to maintain taxonomic identification between asteroids and planets, Ceres being the primary exception. At approximately the same time, there was a flood of publications on the geophysical nature of asteroids showing them to be geophysically different than the large planets. This is when the terminology in asteroid publications calling them planets abruptly plunged from a high level of usage where it had hovered during the period 1801 - 1957 to a low level that held constant thereafter. This marks the point where the community effectively formed consensus that asteroids should be taxonomically distinct from planets. The evidence demonstrates this consensus formed on the basis of geophysical differences between asteroids and planets, not the sharing of orbits. We suggest attempts to build consensus around planetary taxonomy not rely on the non-scientific process of voting, but rather through precedent set in scientific literature and discourse, by which perspectives evolve with additional observations and information, just as they did in the case of asteroids.
[8]  oai:arXiv.org:1808.02118  [pdf] - 1729244
Great Expectations: Plans and Predictions for New Horizons Encounter with Kuiper Belt Object 2014 MU69 ('Ultima Thule')
Comments:
Submitted: 2018-08-06
The New Horizons encounter with the cold classical Kuiper Belt object (KBO) 2014 MU69 (informally named 'Ultima Thule,' hereafter Ultima) on 1 January 2019 will be the first time a spacecraft has ever closely observed one of the free-orbiting small denizens of the Kuiper Belt. Related to but not thought to have formed in the same region of the Solar System as the comets that been explored so far, it will also be the largest, most distant, and most primitive body yet visited by spacecraft. In this letter we begin with a brief overview of cold classical KBOs, of which Ultima is a prime example. We give a short preview of our encounter plans. We note what is currently known about Ultima from earth-based observations. We then review our expectations and capabilities to evaluate Ultima's composition, surface geology, structure, near space environment, small moons, rings, and the search for activity.
[9]  oai:arXiv.org:1604.05702  [pdf] - 1393089
The Geology of Pluto and Charon Through the Eyes of New Horizons
Comments:
Submitted: 2016-04-19
NASA's New Horizons spacecraft has revealed the complex geology of Pluto and Charon. Pluto's encounter hemisphere shows ongoing surface geological activity centered on a vast basin containing a thick layer of volatile ices that appears to be involved in convection and advection, with a crater retention age no greater than $\approx$10 Ma. Surrounding terrains show active glacial flow, apparent transport and rotation of large buoyant water-ice crustal blocks, and pitting, likely by sublimation erosion and/or collapse. More enigmatic features include tall mounds with central depressions that are conceivably cryovolcanic, and ridges with complex bladed textures. Pluto also has ancient cratered terrains up to ~4 Ga old that are extensionally fractured and extensively mantled and perhaps eroded by glacial or other processes. Charon does not appear to be currently active, but experienced major extensional tectonism and resurfacing (probably cryovolcanic) nearly 4 billion years ago. Impact crater populations on Pluto and Charon are not consistent with the steepest proposed impactor size-frequency distributions proposed for the Kuiper belt.
[10]  oai:arXiv.org:1510.07704  [pdf] - 1300465
The Pluto system: Initial results from its exploration by New Horizons
Stern, S. A.; Bagenal, F.; Ennico, K.; Gladstone, G. R.; Grundy, W. M.; McKinnon, W. B.; Moore, J. M.; Olkin, C. B.; Spencer, J. R.; Weaver, H. A.; Young, L. A.; Andert, T.; Andrews, J.; Banks, M.; Bauer, B.; Bauman, J.; Barnouin, O. S.; Bedini, P.; Beisser, K.; Beyer, R. A.; Bhaskaran, S.; Binzel, R. P.; Birath, E.; Bird, M.; Bogan, D. J.; Bowman, A.; Bray, V. J.; Brozovic, M.; Bryan, C.; Buckley, M. R.; Buie, M. W.; Buratti, B. J.; Bushman, S. S.; Calloway, A.; Carcich, B.; Cheng, A. F.; Conard, S.; Conrad, C. A.; Cook, J. C.; Cruikshank, D. P.; Custodio, O. S.; Ore, C. M. Dalle; Deboy, C.; Dischner, Z. J. B.; Dumont, P.; Earle, A. M.; Elliott, H. A.; Ercol, J.; Ernst, C. M.; Finley, T.; Flanigan, S. H.; Fountain, G.; Freeze, M. J.; Greathouse, T.; Green, J. L.; Guo, Y.; Hahn, M.; Hamilton, D. P.; Hamilton, S. A.; Hanley, J.; Harch, A.; Hart, H. M.; Hersman, C. B.; Hill, A.; Hill, M. E.; Hinson, D. P.; Holdridge, M. E.; Horanyi, M.; Howard, A. D.; Howett, C. J. A.; Jackman, C.; Jacobson, R. A.; Jennings, D. E.; Kammer, J. A.; Kang, H. K.; Kaufmann, D. E.; Kollmann, P.; Krimigis, S. M.; Kusnierkiewicz, D.; Lauer, T. R.; Lee, J. E.; Lindstrom, K. L.; Linscott, I. R.; Lisse, C. M.; Lunsford, A. W.; Mallder, V. A.; Martin, N.; McComas, D. J.; McNutt, R. L.; Mehoke, D.; Mehoke, T.; Melin, E. D.; Mutchler, M.; Nelson, D.; Nimmo, F.; Nunez, J. I.; Ocampo, A.; Owen, W. M.; Paetzold, M.; Page, B.; Parker, A. H.; Parker, J. W.; Pelletier, F.; Peterson, J.; Pinkine, N.; Piquette, M.; Porter, S. B.; Protopapa, S.; Redfern, J.; Reitsema, H. J.; Reuter, D. C.; Roberts, J. H.; Robbins, S. J.; Rogers, G.; Rose, D.; Runyon, K.; Retherford, K. D.; Ryschkewitsch, M. G.; Schenk, P.; Schindhelm, E.; Sepan, B.; Showalter, M. R.; Singer, K. N.; Soluri, M.; Stanbridge, D.; Steffl, A. J.; Strobel, D. F.; Stryk, T.; Summers, M. E.; Szalay, J. R.; Tapley, M.; Taylor, A.; Taylor, H.; Throop, H. B.; Tsang, C. C. C.; Tyler, G. L.; Umurhan, O. M.; Verbiscer, A. J.; Versteeg, M. H.; Vincent, M.; Webbert, R.; Weidner, S.; Weigle, G. E.; White, O. L.; Whittenburg, K.; Williams, B. G.; Williams, K.; Williams, S.; Woods, W. W.; Zangari, A. M.; Zirnstein, E.
Comments: 8 pages - Initial Science paper from NASA's New Horizons Pluto Encounter
Submitted: 2015-10-26
The Pluto system was recently explored by NASA's New Horizons spacecraft, making closest approach on 14 July 2015. Pluto's surface displays diverse landforms, terrain ages, albedos, colors, and composition gradients. Evidence is found for a water-ice crust, geologically young surface units, surface ice convection, wind streaks, volatile transport, and glacial flow. Pluto's atmosphere is highly extended, with trace hydrocarbons, a global haze layer, and a surface pressure near 10 microbars. Pluto's diverse surface geology and long-term activity raise fundamental questions about how small planets remain active many billions of years after formation. Pluto's large moon Charon displays tectonics and evidence for a heterogeneous crustal composition, its north pole displays puzzling dark terrain. Small satellites Hydra and Nix have higher albedos than expected.