sort results by

Use logical operators AND, OR, NOT and round brackets to construct complex queries. Whitespace-separated words are treated as ANDed.

Show articles per page in mode

Rosario-Franco, Marialis

Normalized to: Rosario-Franco, M.

1 article(s) in total. 3 co-authors. Median position in authors list is 1,0.

[1]  oai:arXiv.org:2005.06521  [pdf] - 2095132
Orbital Stability of Exomoons and Submoons with Applications to Kepler 1625b-I
Comments: Accepted to AJ. 15 pages, 5 figures, 2 tables
Submitted: 2020-05-13
An intriguing question in the context of dynamics arises: Could a moon possess a moon itself? Such a configuration does not exist in the Solar System, although this may be possible in theory. Kollmeier et al. (2019) determined the critical size of a satellite necessary to host a long-lived sub-satellite, or submoon. However, the orbital constraints for these submoons to exist are still undetermined. Domingos et al. (2006) indicated that moons are stable out to a fraction of the host planet Hill radius $R_{H,p}$, which in turn depends on the eccentricity of its host's orbit. Motivated by this, we simulate a system of exomoons and submoons for $10^5$ planetary orbits, while considering many initial orbital phases to obtain the critical semimajor axis in terms of $R_{H,p}$ or the hosts satellite's Hill radius $R_{H,sat}$, respectively. We find that, assuming circular coplanar orbits, the stability limit for exomoons is 0.40 $R_{H,p}$ and for a submoon is 0.33 $R_{H,sat}$. Additionally, we discuss the observational feasibility of detecting these sub-satellites through photometric, radial velocity, or direct imaging observations using the Neptunes-sized exomoon candidates Kepler 1625b-I (Teachey et al. 2018) and identify how stability can shape the identification of future candidates.