Normalized to: Roldan, O.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1708.00441 [pdf] - 1669460
CMB in the river frame and gauge invariance at second order
Submitted: 2017-08-01, last modified: 2018-04-21
GAUGE INVARIANCE: The Sachs-Wolfe formula describing the Cosmic Microwave
Background (CMB) temperature anisotropies is one of the most important
relations in cosmology. Despite its importance, the gauge invariance of this
formula has only been discussed at first order. Here we discuss the subtle
issue of second-order gauge transformations on the CMB. By introducing two
rules (needed to handle the subtle issues), we prove the gauge invariance of
the second-order Sachs-Wolfe formula and provide several compact expressions
which can be useful for the study of gauge transformations on cosmology. Our
results go beyond a simple technicality: we discuss from a physical point of
view several aspects that improve our understanding of the CMB. We also
elucidate how crucial it is to understand gauge transformations on the CMB in
order to avoid errors and/or misconceptions as occurred in the past. THE RIVER
FRAME: we introduce a cosmological frame which we call the river frame. In this
frame, photons and any object can be thought as fishes swimming in the river
and relations are easily expressed in either the metric or the covariant
formalism then ensuring a transparent geometric meaning. Finally, our results
show that the river frame is useful to make perturbative and non-perturbative
analysis. In particular, it was already used to obtain the fully nonlinear
generalization of the Sachs-Wolfe formula and is used here to describe
second-order perturbations.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1706.08428 [pdf] - 1585144
CMB anisotropies at all orders: the non-linear Sachs-Wolfe formula
Submitted: 2017-06-26, last modified: 2017-08-14
We obtain the non-linear generalization of the Sachs-Wolfe + integrated
Sachs-Wolfe (ISW) formula describing the CMB temperature anisotropies. Our
formula is valid at all orders in perturbation theory, is also valid in all
gauges and includes scalar, vector and tensor modes. A direct consequence of
our results is that the maps of the logarithmic temperature anisotropies are
much cleaner than the usual CMB maps, because they automatically remove many
secondary anisotropies. This can for instance, facilitate the search for
primordial non-Gaussianity in future works. It also disentangles the non-linear
ISW from other effects. Finally, we provide a method which can iteratively be
used to obtain the lensing solution at the desired order.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1603.02664 [pdf] - 1421414
Interpreting the CMB aberration and Doppler measurements: boost or
intrinsic dipole?
Submitted: 2016-03-08, last modified: 2016-06-12
The aberration and Doppler coupling effects of the Cosmic Microwave
Background (CMB) were recently measured by the Planck satellite. The most
straightforward interpretation leads to a direct detection of our peculiar
velocity $\beta$, consistent with the measurement of the well-known dipole. In
this paper we discuss the assumptions behind such interpretation. We show that
Doppler-like couplings appear from two effects: our peculiar velocity and a
second order large-scale effect due to the dipolar part of the gravitational
potential. We find that the two effects are exactly degenerate but only if we
assume second-order initial conditions from single-field Inflation. Thus,
detecting a discrepancy in the value of $\beta$ from the dipole and the Doppler
couplings implies the presence of a primordial non-Gaussianity. We also show
that aberration-like signals likewise arise from two independent effects: our
peculiar velocity and lensing due to a first order large-scale dipolar
gravitational potential, independently on Gaussianity of the initial
conditions. In general such effects are not degenerate and so a discrepancy
between the measured $\beta$ from the dipole and aberration could be accounted
for by a dipolar gravitational potential. Only through a fine-tuning of the
radial profile of the potential it is possible to have a complete degeneracy
with a boost effect. Finally we discuss that we also expect other signatures
due to integrated second order terms, which may be further used to disentangle
this scenario from a simple boost.