Giant collisions can account for Uranus's and Neptune's large obliquities, yet generating two planets with widely different tilts and strikingly similar spin rates is a low-probability event. Trapping into a secular spin-orbit resonance, a coupling between spin and orbit precession frequencies, is a promising alternative, as it can tilt the planet without altering its spin period. We show with numerical integrations that if Uranus harbored a massive circumplanetary disk at least three times the mass of its satellite system while it was accreting its gaseous atmosphere, then its spin precession rate would increase enough to resonate with its own orbit, potentially driving the planet's obliquity to 70${^\circ}$. We find that the presence of a massive disk moves the Laplace radius significantly outward from its classical value, resulting in more of the disk contributing to the planet's pole precession. Although we can generate tilts greater than 70${^\circ}$ only rarely and cannot drive tilts beyond 90${^\circ}$, a subsequent collision with an object about $0.5\,M_{\oplus}$ could tilt Uranus from 70${^\circ}$ to 98${^\circ}$. Minimizing the masses and number of giant impactors from two or more to just one increases the likelihood of producing Uranus's spin states by about an order of magnitude. Neptune, by contrast, needs a less massive disk to explain its 30${^\circ}$ tilt, eliminating the need for giant collisions altogether.

A recent proposal for the detection of a hypothetical gravitating body 500 AU from the Sun (termed Planet 9) calls for a fleet of near-relativistic spacecraft, equipped with high-precision clocks, to be sent to a region where the object is suspected to be. We show that the technological constraints of such a mission can be relaxed somewhat, while improving the sensitivity: high-precision clocks can be avoided when the transverse displacement induced by Planet 9 is measurable with Earth-based, or near-Earth, telescopes. Furthermore, we note that in the absence of Planet 9, these spacecraft still yield useful data by mapping gravitational perturbations in the outer parts of the solar system.

In this paper we investigate whether Uranus's 98$^{\circ}$ obliquity was a byproduct of a secular spin-orbit resonance assuming that the planet originated closer to the Sun. In this position, Uranus's spin precession frequency is fast enough to resonate with another planet located beyond Saturn. Using numerical integration, we show that resonance capture is possible in a variety of past solar system configurations, but that the timescale required to tilt the planet to 90$^{\circ}$ is of the order $\sim 10^{8}$ years; a timespan that is uncomfortably long. A resonance kick could tilt the planet to a significant 40$^{\circ}$ in $\sim 10^{7}$ years if conditions were ideal. We also revisit the collisional hypothesis for the origin of Uranus's large obliquity. We consider multiple impacts with a new collisional code that builds up a planet by summing the angular momentum imparted from impactors. Since gas accretion imparts an unknown but likely large part of the planet's spin angular momentum, we compare different collisional models for tilted, untilted, spinning, and non-spinning planets. We find that two collisions totaling to $1\,M_{\oplus}$ is sufficient to explain the planet's current spin state. Finally, we investigate hybrid models and show that resonances must produce a tilt of $\sim$40$^{\circ}$ for any noticeable improvements to the collision model.