Normalized to: Roever, C.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1410.6211 [pdf] - 920419
Searching for stochastic gravitational waves using data from the two
co-located LIGO Hanford detectors
The LIGO Scientific Collaboration;
the Virgo Collaboration;
Aasi, J.;
Abadie, J.;
Abbott, B. P.;
Abbott, R.;
Abbott, T.;
Abernathy, M. R.;
Accadia, T.;
Acernese, F.;
Adams, C.;
Adams, T.;
Addesso, P.;
Adhikari, R. X.;
Affeldt, C.;
Agathos, M.;
Aggarwal, N.;
Aguiar, O. D.;
Ajith, P.;
Allen, B.;
Allocca, A.;
Ceron, E. Amado.;
Amariutei, D.;
Anderson, R. A.;
Anderson, S. B.;
Anderson, W. G.;
Arai, K.;
Araya, M. C.;
Arceneaux, C.;
Areeda, J.;
Ast, S.;
Aston, S. M.;
Astone, P.;
Aufmuth, P.;
Aulbert, C.;
Austin, L.;
Aylott, B. E.;
Babak, S.;
Baker, P. T.;
Ballardin, G.;
Ballmer, S. W.;
Barayoga, J. C.;
Barker, D.;
Barnum, S. H.;
Barone, F.;
Barr, B.;
Barsotti, L.;
Barsuglia, M.;
Barton, M. A.;
Bartos, I.;
Bassiri, R.;
Basti, A.;
Batch, J.;
Bauchrowitz, J.;
Bauer, Th. S.;
Bebronne, M.;
Behnke, B.;
Bejger, M.;
Beker, M. G.;
Bell, A. S.;
Bell, C.;
Belopolski, I.;
Bergmann, G.;
Berliner, J. M.;
Bersanetti, D.;
Bertolini, A.;
Bessis, D.;
Betzwieser, J.;
Beyersdorf, P. T.;
Bhadbhade, T.;
Bilenko, I. A.;
Billingsley, G.;
Birch, J.;
Biscans, S.;
Bitossi, M.;
Bizouard, M. A.;
Black, E.;
Blackburn, J. K.;
Blackburn, L.;
Blair, D.;
Blom, M.;
Bock, O.;
Bodiya, T. P.;
Boer, M.;
Bogan, C.;
Bond, C.;
Bondu, F.;
Bonelli, L.;
Bonnand, R.;
Bork, R.;
Born, M.;
Boschi, V.;
Bose, S.;
Bosi, L.;
Bowers, J.;
Bradaschia, C.;
Brady, P. R.;
Braginsky, V. B.;
Branchesi, M.;
Brannen, C. A.;
Brau, J. E.;
Breyer, J.;
Briant, T.;
Bridges, D. O.;
Brillet, A.;
Brinkmann, M.;
Brisson, V.;
Britzger, M.;
Brooks, A. F.;
Brown, D. A.;
Brown, D. D.;
Brückner, F.;
Bulik, T.;
Bulten, H. J.;
Buonanno, A.;
Buskulic, D.;
Buy, C.;
Byer, R. L.;
Cadonati, L.;
Cagnoli, G.;
Bustillo, J. Calderó.;
Calloni, E.;
Camp, J. B.;
Campsie, P.;
Cannon, K. C.;
Canuel, B.;
Cao, J.;
Capano, C. D.;
Carbognani, F.;
Carbone, L.;
Caride, S.;
Castiglia, A.;
Caudill, S.;
Cavaglià, M.;
Cavalier, F.;
Cavalieri, R.;
Cella, G.;
Cepeda, C.;
Cesarini, E.;
Chakraborty, R.;
Chalermsongsak, T.;
Chao, S.;
Charlton, P.;
Chassande-Mottin, E.;
Chen, X.;
Chen, Y.;
Chincarini, A.;
Chiummo, A.;
Cho, H. S.;
Chow, J.;
Christensen, N.;
Chu, Q.;
Chua, S. S. Y.;
Chung, S.;
Ciani, G.;
Clara, F.;
Clark, D. E.;
Clark, J. A.;
Cleva, F.;
Coccia, E.;
Cohadon, P. -F.;
Colla, A.;
Colombini, M.;
Constanci., M.;
Conte, A.;
Cook, D.;
Corbitt, T. R.;
Cordier, M.;
Cornish, N.;
Corsi, A.;
Costa, C. A.;
Coughlin, M. W.;
Coulon, J. -P.;
Countryman, S.;
Couvares, P.;
Coward, D. M.;
Cowart, M.;
Coyne, D. C.;
Craig, K.;
Creighton, J. D. E.;
Creighton, T. D.;
Crowder, S. G.;
Cumming, A.;
Cunningham, L.;
Cuoco, E.;
Dahl, K.;
Canton, T. Da.;
Damjanic, M.;
Danilishin, S. L.;
D'Antonio, S.;
Danzmann, K.;
Dattilo, V.;
Daudert, B.;
Daveloza, H.;
Davier, M.;
Davies, G. S.;
Daw, E. J.;
Day, R.;
Dayanga, T.;
Debreczeni, G.;
Degallaix, J.;
Deleeuw, E.;
Deléglise, S.;
Pozzo, W. De.;
Denker, T.;
Dent, T.;
Dereli, H.;
Dergachev, V.;
DeRosa, R. T.;
Rosa, R. D.;
DeSalvo, R.;
Dhurandhar, S.;
Díaz, M.;
Dietz, A.;
Fiore, L. D.;
Lieto, A. D.;
Palma, I. D.;
Virgilio, A. D.;
Dmitry, K.;
Donovan, F.;
Dooley, K. L.;
Doravari, S.;
Drago, M.;
Drever, R. W. P.;
Driggers, J. C.;
Du, Z.;
Dumas, J. -C.;
Dwyer, S.;
Eberle, T.;
Edwards, M.;
Effler, A.;
Ehrens, P.;
Eichholz, J.;
Eikenberry, S. S.;
Endrőczi, G.;
Essick, R.;
Etzel, T.;
Evans, K.;
Evans, M.;
Evans, T.;
Factourovich, M.;
Fafone, V.;
Fairhurst, S.;
Fang, Q.;
Farr, B.;
Farr, W.;
Favata, M.;
Fazi, D.;
Fehrmann, H.;
Feldbaum, D.;
Ferrante, I.;
Ferrini, F.;
Fidecaro, F.;
Finn, L. S.;
Fiori, I.;
Fisher, R.;
Flaminio, R.;
Foley, E.;
Foley, S.;
Forsi, E.;
Fotopoulos, N.;
Fournier, J. -D.;
Franco, S.;
Frasca, S.;
Frasconi, F.;
Frede, M.;
Frei, M.;
Frei, Z.;
Freise, A.;
Frey, R.;
Fricke, T. T.;
Fritschel, P.;
Frolov, V. V.;
Fujimoto, M. -K.;
Fulda, P.;
Fyffe, M.;
Gair, J.;
Gammaitoni, L.;
Garcia, J.;
Garufi, F.;
Gehrels, N.;
Gemme, G.;
Genin, E.;
Gennai, A.;
Gergely, L.;
Ghosh, S.;
Giaime, J. A.;
Giampanis, S.;
Giardina, K. D.;
Giazotto, A.;
Gil-Casanova, S.;
Gill, C.;
Gleason, J.;
Goetz, E.;
Goetz, R.;
Gondan, L.;
González, G.;
Gordon, N.;
Gorodetsky, M. L.;
Gossan, S.;
Goßler, S.;
Gouaty, R.;
Graef, C.;
Graff, P. B.;
Granata, M.;
Grant, A.;
Gras, S.;
Gray, C.;
Greenhalgh, R. J. S.;
Gretarsson, A. M.;
Griffo, C.;
Grote, H.;
Grover, K.;
Grunewald, S.;
Guidi, G. M.;
Guido, C.;
Gushwa, K. E.;
Gustafson, E. K.;
Gustafson, R.;
Hall, B.;
Hall, E.;
Hammer, D.;
Hammond, G.;
Hanke, M.;
Hanks, J.;
Hanna, C.;
Hanson, J.;
Harms, J.;
Harry, G. M.;
Harry, I. W.;
Harstad, E. D.;
Hartman, M. T.;
Haughian, K.;
Hayama, K.;
Heefner, J.;
Heidmann, A.;
Heintze, M.;
Heitmann, H.;
Hello, P.;
Hemming, G.;
Hendry, M.;
Heng, I. S.;
Heptonstall, A. W.;
Heurs, M.;
Hild, S.;
Hoak, D.;
Hodge, K. A.;
Holt, K.;
Hong, T.;
Hooper, S.;
Horrom, T.;
Hosken, D. J.;
Hough, J.;
Howell, E. J.;
Hu, Y.;
Hua, Z.;
Huang, V.;
Huerta, E. A.;
Hughey, B.;
Husa, S.;
Huttner, S. H.;
Huynh, M.;
Huynh-Dinh, T.;
Iafrate, J.;
Ingram, D. R.;
Inta, R.;
Isogai, T.;
Ivanov, A.;
Iyer, B. R.;
Izumi, K.;
Jacobson, M.;
James, E.;
Jang, H.;
Jang, Y. J.;
Jaranowski, P.;
Jiménez-Forteza, F.;
Johnson, W. W.;
Jones, D. I.;
Jones, D.;
Jones, R.;
Jonker, R. J. G.;
Ju, L.;
K, Hari.;
Kalmus, P.;
Kalogera, V.;
Kandhasamy, S.;
Kang, G.;
Kanner, J. B.;
Kasprzack, M.;
Kasturi, R.;
Katsavounidis, E.;
Katzman, W.;
Kaufer, H.;
Kaufman, K.;
Kawabe, K.;
Kawamura, S.;
Kawazoe, F.;
Kéfélian, F.;
Keitel, D.;
Kelley, D. B.;
Kells, W.;
Keppel, D. G.;
Khalaidovski, A.;
Khalili, F. Y.;
Khazanov, E. A.;
Kim, B. K.;
Kim, C.;
Kim, K.;
Kim, N.;
Kim, W.;
Kim, Y. -M.;
King, E.;
King, P. J.;
Kinzel, D. L.;
Kissel, J. S.;
Klimenko, S.;
Kline, J.;
Koehlenbeck, S.;
Kokeyama, K.;
Kondrashov, V.;
Koranda, S.;
Korth, W. Z.;
Kowalska, I.;
Kozak, D.;
Kremin, A.;
Kringel, V.;
Krishnan, B.;
Królak, A.;
Kucharczyk, C.;
Kudla, S.;
Kuehn, G.;
Kumar, A.;
Kumar, D. Nand.;
Kumar, P.;
Kumar, R.;
Kurdyumov, R.;
Kwee, P.;
Landry, M.;
Lantz, B.;
Larson, S.;
Lasky, P. D.;
Lawrie, C.;
Lazzarini, A.;
Leaci, P.;
Lebigot, E. O.;
Lee, C. -H.;
Lee, H. K.;
Lee, H. M.;
Lee, J. J.;
Lee, J.;
Leonardi, M.;
Leong, J. R.;
Roux, A. L.;
Leroy, N.;
Letendre, N.;
Levine, B.;
Lewis, J. B.;
Lhuillier, V.;
Li, T. G. F.;
Lin, A. C.;
Littenberg, T. B.;
Litvine, V.;
Liu, F.;
Liu, H.;
Liu, Y.;
Liu, Z.;
Lloyd, D.;
Lockerbie, N. A.;
Lockett, V.;
Lodhia, D.;
Loew, K.;
Logue, J.;
Lombardi, A. L.;
Lorenzini, M.;
Loriette, V.;
Lormand, M.;
Losurdo, G.;
Lough, J.;
Luan, J.;
Lubinski, M. J.;
Lück, H.;
Lundgren, A. P.;
Macarthur, J.;
Macdonald, E.;
Machenschalk, B.;
MacInnis, M.;
Macleod, D. M.;
Magana-Sandoval, F.;
Mageswaran, M.;
Mailand, K.;
Majorana, E.;
Maksimovic, I.;
Malvezzi, V.;
Man, N.;
Manca, G. M.;
Mandel, I.;
Mandic, V.;
Mangano, V.;
Mantovani, M.;
Marchesoni, F.;
Marion, F.;
Márka, S.;
Márka, Z.;
Markosyan, A.;
Maros, E.;
Marque, J.;
Martelli, F.;
Martellini, L.;
Martin, I. W.;
Martin, R. M.;
Martini, G.;
Martynov, D.;
Marx, J. N.;
Mason, K.;
Masserot, A.;
Massinger, T. J.;
Matichard, F.;
Matone, L.;
Matzner, R. A.;
Mavalvala, N.;
May, G.;
Mazumder, N.;
Mazzolo, G.;
McCarthy, R.;
McClelland, D. E.;
McGuire, S. C.;
McIntyre, G.;
McIver, J.;
Meacher, D.;
Meadors, G. D.;
Mehmet, M.;
Meidam, J.;
Meier, T.;
Melatos, A.;
Mendell, G.;
Mercer, R. A.;
Meshkov, S.;
Messenger, C.;
Meyer, M. S.;
Miao, H.;
Michel, C.;
Mikhailov, E.;
Milano, L.;
Miller, J.;
Minenkov, Y.;
Mingarelli, C. M. F.;
Mitra, S.;
Mitrofanov, V. P.;
Mitselmakher, G.;
Mittleman, R.;
Moe, B.;
Mohan, M.;
Mohapatra, S. R. P.;
Mokler, F.;
Moraru, D.;
Moreno, G.;
Morgado, N.;
Mori, T.;
Morriss, S. R.;
Mossavi, K.;
Mours, B.;
Mow-Lowry, C. M.;
Mueller, C. L.;
Mueller, G.;
Mukherjee, S.;
Mullavey, A.;
Munch, J.;
Murphy, D.;
Murray, P. G.;
Mytidis, A.;
Nagy, M. F.;
Nardecchia, I.;
Nash, T.;
Naticchioni, L.;
Nayak, R.;
Necula, V.;
Neri, I.;
Neri, M.;
Newton, G.;
Nguyen, T.;
Nishida, E.;
Nishizawa, A.;
Nitz, A.;
Nocera, F.;
Nolting, D.;
Normandin, M. E.;
Nuttall, L. K.;
Ochsner, E.;
O'Dell, J.;
Oelker, E.;
Ogin, G. H.;
Oh, J. J.;
Oh, S. H.;
Ohme, F.;
Oppermann, P.;
O'Reilly, B.;
Larcher, W. Orteg.;
O'Shaughnessy, R.;
Osthelder, C.;
Ottaway, D. J.;
Ottens, R. S.;
Ou, J.;
Overmier, H.;
Owen, B. J.;
Padilla, C.;
Pai, A.;
Palomba, C.;
Pan, Y.;
Pankow, C.;
Paoletti, F.;
Paoletti, R.;
Paris, H.;
Pasqualetti, A.;
Passaquieti, R.;
Passuello, D.;
Pedraza, M.;
Peiris, P.;
Penn, S.;
Perreca, A.;
Phelps, M.;
Pichot, M.;
Pickenpack, M.;
Piergiovanni, F.;
Pierro, V.;
Pinard, L.;
Pindor, B.;
Pinto, I. M.;
Pitkin, M.;
Poeld, J.;
Poggiani, R.;
Poole, V.;
Postiglione, F.;
Poux, C.;
Predoi, V.;
Prestegard, T.;
Price, L. R.;
Prijatelj, M.;
Privitera, S.;
Prodi, G. A.;
Prokhorov, L.;
Puncken, O.;
Punturo, M.;
Puppo, P.;
Quetschke, V.;
Quintero, E.;
Quitzow-James, R.;
Raab, F. J.;
Rabeling, D. S.;
Rácz, I.;
Radkins, H.;
Raffai, P.;
Raja, S.;
Rajalakshmi, G.;
Rakhmanov, M.;
Ramet, C.;
Rapagnani, P.;
Raymond, V.;
Re, V.;
Reed, C. M.;
Reed, T.;
Regimbau, T.;
Reid, S.;
Reitze, D. H.;
Ricci, F.;
Riesen, R.;
Riles, K.;
Robertson, N. A.;
Robinet, F.;
Rocchi, A.;
Roddy, S.;
Rodriguez, C.;
Rodruck, M.;
Roever, C.;
Rolland, L.;
Rollins, J. G.;
Romano, J. D.;
Romano, R.;
Romanov, G.;
Romie, J. H.;
Rosińska, D.;
Rowan, S.;
Rüdiger, A.;
Ruggi, P.;
Ryan, K.;
Salemi, F.;
Sammut, L.;
Sandberg, V.;
Sanders, J.;
Sannibale, V.;
Santiago-Prieto, I.;
Saracco, E.;
Sassolas, B.;
Sathyaprakash, B. S.;
Saulson, P. R.;
Savage, R.;
Schilling, R.;
Schnabel, R.;
Schofield, R. M. S.;
Schreiber, E.;
Schuette, D.;
Schulz, B.;
Schutz, B. F.;
Schwinberg, P.;
Scott, J.;
Scott, S. M.;
Seifert, F.;
Sellers, D.;
Sengupta, A. S.;
Sentenac, D.;
Sequino, V.;
Sergeev, A.;
Shaddock, D.;
Shah, S.;
Shahriar, M. S.;
Shaltev, M.;
Shapiro, B.;
Shawhan, P.;
Shoemaker, D. H.;
Sidery, T. L.;
Siellez, K.;
Siemens, X.;
Sigg, D.;
Simakov, D.;
Singer, A.;
Singer, L.;
Sintes, A. M.;
Skelton, G. R.;
Slagmolen, B. J. J.;
Slutsky, J.;
Smith, J. R.;
Smith, M. R.;
Smith, R. J. E.;
Smith-Lefebvre, N. D.;
Soden, K.;
Son, E. J.;
Sorazu, B.;
Souradeep, T.;
Sperandio, L.;
Staley, A.;
Steinert, E.;
Steinlechner, J.;
Steinlechner, S.;
Steplewski, S.;
Stevens, D.;
Stochino, A.;
Stone, R.;
Strain, K. A.;
Straniero, N.;
Strigin, S.;
Stroeer, A. S.;
Sturani, R.;
Stuver, A. L.;
Summerscales, T. Z.;
Susmithan, S.;
Sutton, P. J.;
Swinkels, B.;
Szeifert, G.;
Tacca, M.;
Talukder, D.;
Tang, L.;
Tanner, D. B.;
Tarabrin, S. P.;
Taylor, R.;
Braack, A. P. M. te.;
Thirugnanasambandam, M. P.;
Thomas, M.;
Thomas, P.;
Thorne, K. A.;
Thorne, K. S.;
Thrane, E.;
Tiwari, V.;
Tokmakov, K. V.;
Tomlinson, C.;
Toncelli, A.;
Tonelli, M.;
Torre, O.;
Torres, C. V.;
Torrie, C. I.;
Travasso, F.;
Traylor, G.;
Tse, M.;
Ugolini, D.;
Unnikrishnan, C. S.;
Vahlbruch, H.;
Vajente, G.;
Vallisneri, M.;
Brand, J. F. J. va. de.;
Broeck, C. Va. De.;
Putten, S. va. de.;
Sluys, M. V. va. de.;
Heijningen, J. va.;
Veggel, A. A. va.;
Vass, S.;
Vasúth, M.;
Vaulin, R.;
Vecchio, A.;
Vedovato, G.;
Veitch, P. J.;
Veitch, J.;
Venkateswara, K.;
Verkindt, D.;
Verma, S.;
Vetrano, F.;
Viceré, A.;
Vincent-Finley, R.;
Vinet, J. -Y.;
Vitale, S.;
Vitale, S.;
Vlcek, B.;
Vo, T.;
Vocca, H.;
Vorvick, C.;
Vousden, W. D.;
Vrinceanu, D.;
Vyachanin, S. P.;
Wade, A.;
Wade, L.;
Wade, M.;
Waldman, S. J.;
Walker, M.;
Wallace, L.;
Wan, Y.;
Wang, J.;
Wang, M.;
Wang, X.;
Wanner, A.;
Ward, R. L.;
Was, M.;
Weaver, B.;
Wei, L. -W.;
Weinert, M.;
Weinstein, A. J.;
Weiss, R.;
Welborn, T.;
Wen, L.;
Wessels, P.;
West, M.;
Westphal, T.;
Wette, K.;
Whelan, J. T.;
White, D. J.;
Whiting, B. F.;
Wibowo, S.;
Wiesner, K.;
Wilkinson, C.;
Williams, L.;
Williams, R.;
Williams, T.;
Willis, J. L.;
Willke, B.;
Wimmer, M.;
Winkelmann, L.;
Winkler, W.;
Wipf, C. C.;
Wittel, H.;
Woan, G.;
Worden, J.;
Yablon, J.;
Yakushin, I.;
Yamamoto, H.;
Yancey, C. C.;
Yang, H.;
Yeaton-Massey, D.;
Yoshida, S.;
Yum, H.;
Yvert, M.;
Zadrożny, A.;
Zanolin, M.;
Zendri, J. -P.;
Zhang, F.;
Zhang, L.;
Zhao, C.;
Zhu, H.;
Zhu, X. J.;
Zotov, N.;
Zucker, M. E.;
Zweizig, J.
Submitted: 2014-10-22, last modified: 2014-12-02
Searches for a stochastic gravitational-wave background (SGWB) using
terrestrial detectors typically involve cross-correlating data from pairs of
detectors. The sensitivity of such cross-correlation analyses depends, among
other things, on the separation between the two detectors: the smaller the
separation, the better the sensitivity. Hence, a co-located detector pair is
more sensitive to a gravitational-wave background than a non-co-located
detector pair. However, co-located detectors are also expected to suffer from
correlated noise from instrumental and environmental effects that could
contaminate the measurement of the background. Hence, methods to identify and
mitigate the effects of correlated noise are necessary to achieve the potential
increase in sensitivity of co-located detectors. Here we report on the first
SGWB analysis using the two LIGO Hanford detectors and address the
complications arising from correlated environmental noise. We apply correlated
noise identification and mitigation techniques to data taken by the two LIGO
Hanford detectors, H1 and H2, during LIGO's fifth science run. At low
frequencies, 40 - 460 Hz, we are unable to sufficiently mitigate the correlated
noise to a level where we may confidently measure or bound the stochastic
gravitational-wave signal. However, at high frequencies, 460-1000 Hz, these
techniques are sufficient to set a $95%$ confidence level (C.L.) upper limit on
the gravitational-wave energy density of \Omega(f)<7.7 x 10^{-4} (f/ 900 Hz)^3,
which improves on the previous upper limit by a factor of $\sim 180$. In doing
so, we demonstrate techniques that will be useful for future searches using
advanced detectors, where correlated noise (e.g., from global magnetic fields)
may affect even widely separated detectors.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1312.6013 [pdf] - 812505
Reconstructing the sky location of gravitational-wave detected compact
binary systems: methodology for testing and comparison
Sidery, Trevor;
Aylott, Ben;
Christensen, Nelson;
Farr, Ben;
Farr, Will;
Feroz, Farhan;
Gair, Jonathan;
Grover, Katherine;
Graff, Philip;
Hanna, Chad;
Kalogera, Vassiliki;
Mandel, Ilya;
O'Shaughnessy, Richard;
Pitkin, Matthew;
Price, Larry;
Raymond, Vivien;
Roever, Christian;
Singer, Leo;
Van der Sluys, Marc;
Smith, Rory J. E.;
Vecchio, Alberto;
Veitch, John;
Vitale, Salvatore
Submitted: 2013-12-20
The problem of reconstructing the sky position of compact binary coalescences
detected via gravitational waves is a central one for future observations with
the ground-based network of gravitational-wave laser interferometers, such as
Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo. Different techniques for sky localisation
have been independently developed. They can be divided in two broad categories:
fully coherent Bayesian techniques, which are high-latency and aimed at
in-depth studies of all the parameters of a source, including sky position, and
"triangulation-based" techniques, which exploit the data products from the
search stage of the analysis to provide an almost real-time approximation of
the posterior probability density function of the sky location of a detection
candidate. These techniques have previously been applied to data collected
during the last science runs of gravitational-wave detectors operating in the
so-called initial configuration.
Here, we develop and analyse methods for assessing the self-consistency of
parameter estimation methods and carrying out fair comparisons between
different algorithms, addressing issues of efficiency and optimality. These
methods are general, and can be applied to parameter estimation problems other
than sky localisation. We apply these methods to two existing sky localisation
techniques representing the two above-mentioned categories, using a set of
simulated inspiral-only signals from compact binary systems with total mass
$\le 20\,M_\odot$ and non-spinning components. We compare the relative
advantages and costs of the two techniques and show that sky location
uncertainties are on average a factor $\approx 20$ smaller for fully coherent
techniques than for the specific variant of the "triangulation-based" technique
used during the last science runs, at the expense of a factor $\approx 1000$
longer processing time.
[10]
oai:arXiv.org:0905.1323 [pdf] - 24082
Parameter estimation for signals from compact binary inspirals injected
into LIGO data
Submitted: 2009-05-08
During the fifth science run of the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave
Observatory (LIGO), signals modelling the gravitational waves emitted by
coalescing non-spinning compact-object binaries were injected into the LIGO
data stream. We analysed the data segments into which such injections were made
using a Bayesian approach, implemented as a Markov-chain Monte-Carlo technique
in our code SPINspiral. This technique enables us to determine the physical
parameters of such a binary inspiral, including masses and spin, following a
possible detection trigger. For the first time, we publish the results of a
realistic parameter-estimation analysis of waveforms embedded in real detector
noise. We used both spinning and non-spinning waveform templates for the data
analysis and demonstrate that the intrinsic source parameters can be estimated
with an accuracy of better than 1-3% in the chirp mass and 0.02-0.05 (8-20%) in
the symmetric mass ratio if non-spinning waveforms are used. We also find a
bias between the injected and recovered parameters, and attribute it to the
difference in the post-Newtonian orders of the waveforms used for injection and
analysis.
[11]
oai:arXiv.org:0812.4302 [pdf] - 19787
Degeneracies in Sky Localisation Determination from a Spinning
Coalescing Binary through Gravitational Wave Observations: a Markov-Chain
Monte-Carlo Analysis for two Detectors
Submitted: 2008-12-22, last modified: 2009-04-02
Gravitational-wave signals from inspirals of binary compact objects (black
holes and neutron stars) are primary targets of the ongoing searches by
ground-based gravitational-wave interferometers (LIGO, Virgo, and GEO-600). We
present parameter-estimation simulations for inspirals of
black-hole--neutron-star binaries using Markov-chain Monte-Carlo methods. As a
specific example of the power of these methods, we consider source localisation
in the sky and analyse the degeneracy in it when data from only two detectors
are used. We focus on the effect that the black-hole spin has on the
localisation estimation. We also report on a comparative Markov-chain
Monte-Carlo analysis with two different waveform families, at 1.5 and 3.5
post-Newtonian order.
[12]
oai:arXiv.org:0710.1897 [pdf] - 5868
Gravitational-Wave Astronomy with Inspiral Signals of Spinning
Compact-Object Binaries
Submitted: 2007-10-09, last modified: 2008-08-02
Inspiral signals from binary compact objects (black holes and neutron stars)
are primary targets of the ongoing searches by ground-based gravitational-wave
interferometers (LIGO, Virgo, GEO-600 and TAMA-300). We present
parameter-estimation simulations for inspirals of black-hole--neutron-star
binaries using Markov-chain Monte-Carlo methods. For the first time, we have
both estimated the parameters of a binary inspiral source with a spinning
component and determined the accuracy of the parameter estimation, for
simulated observations with ground-based gravitational-wave detectors. We
demonstrate that we can obtain the distance, sky position, and binary
orientation at a higher accuracy than previously suggested in the literature.
For an observation of an inspiral with sufficient spin and two or three
detectors we find an accuracy in the determination of the sky position of
typically a few tens of square degrees.
[13]
oai:arXiv.org:0805.1689 [pdf] - 12533
Parameter estimation of spinning binary inspirals using Markov-chain
Monte Carlo
Submitted: 2008-05-12
We present a Markov-chain Monte-Carlo (MCMC) technique to study the source
parameters of gravitational-wave signals from the inspirals of stellar-mass
compact binaries detected with ground-based gravitational-wave detectors such
as LIGO and Virgo, for the case where spin is present in the more massive
compact object in the binary. We discuss aspects of the MCMC algorithm that
allow us to sample the parameter space in an efficient way. We show sample runs
that illustrate the possibilities of our MCMC code and the difficulties that we
encounter.
[14]
oai:arXiv.org:0704.0048 [pdf] - 5
Inference on white dwarf binary systems using the first round Mock LISA
Data Challenges data sets
Stroeer, Alexander;
Veitch, John;
Roever, Christian;
Bloomer, Ed;
Clark, James;
Christensen, Nelson;
Hendry, Martin;
Messenger, Chris;
Meyer, Renate;
Pitkin, Matthew;
Toher, Jennifer;
Umstaetter, Richard;
Vecchio, Alberto;
Woan, Graham
Submitted: 2007-03-31, last modified: 2007-04-03
We report on the analysis of selected single source data sets from the first
round of the Mock LISA Data Challenges (MLDC) for white dwarf binaries. We
implemented an end-to-end pipeline consisting of a grid-based coherent
pre-processing unit for signal detection, and an automatic Markov Chain Monte
Carlo post-processing unit for signal evaluation. We demonstrate that signal
detection with our coherent approach is secure and accurate, and is increased
in accuracy and supplemented with additional information on the signal
parameters by our Markov Chain Monte Carlo approach. We also demonstrate that
the Markov Chain Monte Carlo routine is additionally able to determine
accurately the noise level in the frequency window of interest.