Normalized to: Rodriguez, O.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:2006.07385 [pdf] - 2114306
Constraints on the Physical Properties of S190814bv through Simulations
based on DECam Follow-up Observations by the Dark Energy Survey
Morgan, R.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Annis, J.;
Herner, K.;
Garcia, A.;
Palmese, A.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Kessler, R.;
Garcia-Bellido, J.;
Sherman, T. G. Bachmann N.;
Allam, S.;
Bechtol, K.;
Bom, C. R.;
Brout, D.;
Butler, R. E.;
Butner, M.;
Cartier, R.;
Chen, H.;
Conselice, C.;
Cook, E.;
Davis, T. M.;
Doctor, Z.;
Farr, B.;
Figueiredo, A. L.;
Finley, D. A.;
Foley, R. J.;
Galarza, J. Y.;
Gill, M. S. S.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Holz, D. E.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lidman, C.;
Lin, H.;
Malik, U.;
Mann, A. W.;
Marriner, J.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martinez-Vazquez, C. E.;
Meza, N.;
Neilsen, E.;
Nicolaou, C.;
E., F. Olivares;
Paz-Chinchon, F.;
Points, S.;
Quirola, J.;
Rodriguez, O.;
Sako, M.;
Scolnic, D.;
Smith, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Vivas, A. K.;
Wiesner, M.;
Wood, M. L.;
Yanny, B.;
Zenteno, A.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Aguena, M.;
Avila, S.;
Bertin, E.;
Bhargava, S.;
Brooks, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Costanzi, M.;
De Vicente, J.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Everett, S.;
Flaugher, B.;
Frieman, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruen, D.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hinton, S. R.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Kuehn, K.;
Lahav, O.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
March, M.;
Miquel, R.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Roodman, A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Suchyta, E.;
Tarle, G.
Submitted: 2020-06-12
On 14 August 2019, the LIGO and Virgo Collaborations alerted the astronomical
community of a high significance detection of gravitational waves and
classified the source as a neutron star - black hole (NSBH) merger, the first
event of its kind. In search of an optical counterpart, the Dark Energy Survey
(DES) Gravitational Wave Search and Discovery Team performed the most thorough
and accurate analysis to date, targeting the entire 90 percent confidence level
localization area with Blanco/DECam 0, 1, 2, 3, 6, and 16 nights after the
merger was detected. Objects with varying brightness were detected by the DES
Search and Discovery Pipeline and we systematically reduced the list of
candidate counterparts through catalog matching, light curve properties,
host-galaxy photometric redshifts, SOAR spectroscopic follow-up observations,
and machine-learning-based photometric classification. All candidates were
rejected as counterparts to the merger. To quantify the sensitivity of our
search, we applied our selection criteria to simulations of supernovae and
kilonovae as they would appear in the DECam observations. Since there are no
explicit light curve models for NSBH mergers, we characterize our sensitivity
with binary NS models that are expected to have similar optical signatures as
NSBH mergers. We find that if a kilonova occurred during this merger,
configurations where the ejected matter is greater than 0.07 solar masses, has
lanthanide abundance less than $10^{-8.56}$, and has a velocity between $0.18c$
and $0.21c$ are disfavored at the $2\sigma$ level. Furthermore, we estimate
that our background reduction methods are capable of associating gravitational
wave signals with a detected electromagnetic counterpart at the $4\sigma$ level
in $95\%$ of future follow-up observations.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1909.13617 [pdf] - 2107252
SN 2016gsd: An unusually luminous and linear type II supernova with high
velocities
Reynolds, T. M.;
Fraser, M.;
Mattila, S.;
Ergon, M.;
Lundqvist, P.;
Dessart, L.;
Dong, Subo;
Elias-Rosa, N.;
Galbany, L.;
GutiƩrrez, C. P.;
Kangas, T.;
Kankare, E.;
Kotak, R.;
Kuncarayakti, H.;
Pastorello, A.;
Rodriguez, O.;
Smartt, S. J.;
Stritzinger, M.;
Tomasella, L.;
Chen, Ping;
Harmanen, J.;
Hozzeinzadeh, G.;
Howell, D. Andrew;
Inserra, C.;
Nicholl, M.;
Nielsen, M.;
Smith, K.;
Somero, A.;
Tronsgaard, R.;
Young, D. R.
Submitted: 2019-09-30, last modified: 2020-06-03
We present observations of the unusually luminous Type II supernova (SN)
2016gsd. With a peak absolute magnitude of V = $-$19.95 $\pm$ 0.08, this object
is one of the brightest Type II SNe, and lies in the gap of magnitudes between
the majority of Type II SNe and the superluminous SNe. Its light curve shows
little evidence of the expected drop from the optically thick phase to the
radioactively powered tail. The velocities derived from the absorption in
H$\alpha$ are also unusually high with the blue edge tracing the fastest moving
gas initially at 20000 km s$^{-1}$, and then declining approximately linearly
to 15000 km s$^{-1}$ over $\sim$100 d. The dwarf host galaxy of the SN
indicates a low-metallicity progenitor which may also contribute to the
weakness of the metal lines in its spectra. We examine SN 2016gsd with
reference to similarly luminous, linear Type II SNe such as SNe 1979C and
1998S, and discuss the interpretation of its observational characteristics. We
compare the observations with a model produced by the JEKYLL code and find that
a massive star with a depleted and inflated hydrogen envelope struggles to
reproduce the high luminosity and extreme linearity of SN 2016gsd. Instead, we
suggest that the influence of interaction between the SN ejecta and
circumstellar material can explain the majority of the observed properties of
the SN. The high velocities and strong H$\alpha$ absorption present throughout
the evolution of the SN may imply a circumstellar medium configured in an
asymmetric geometry.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1906.00814 [pdf] - 1953540
A luminous stellar outburst during a long-lasting eruptive phase first,
and then SN IIn 2018cnf
Pastorello, A.;
Reguitti, A.;
Morales-Garoffolo, A.;
Cano, Z.;
Prentice, S. J.;
Hiramatsu, D.;
Burke, J.;
Kankare, E.;
Kotak, R.;
Reynolds, T.;
Smartt, S. J.;
Bose, S.;
Chen, Ping;
Congiu, E.;
Dong, Subo;
Geier, S.;
Gromadzki, M.;
Hsiao, E. Y.;
Kumar, S.;
Ochner, P.;
Pignata, G.;
Tomasella, L.;
Wang, L.;
Arcavi, I.;
Ashall, C.;
Callis, E.;
Postigo, A. de Ugarte;
Fraser, M.;
Hosseinzadeh, G.;
Howell, D. A.;
Inserra, C.;
Kann, D. A.;
Mason, E.;
Mazzali, P. A.;
McCully, C.;
Rodriguez, O.;
Phillips, M. M.;
Smith, K. W.;
Tartaglia, L.;
Thoene, C. C.;
Wevers, T.;
Young, D. R.;
Pumo, M. L.;
Lowe, T. B.;
Magnier, E. A.;
Wainscoat, R. J.;
Waters, C.;
Wright, D. E.
Submitted: 2019-06-03, last modified: 2019-09-03
We present the results of the monitoring campaign of the Type IIn supernova
(SN) 2018cnf (aka ASASSN-18mr). It was discovered about 10 days before the
maximum light (on MJD = 58293.4+-5.7 in the V band, with MV = -18.13+-0.15
mag). The multiband light curves show an immediate post-peak decline with some
minor luminosity fluctuations, followed by a flattening starting about 40 days
after maximum. The early spectra are relatively blue and show narrow Balmer
lines with P Cygni profiles. Additionally, Fe II, O I, He I and Ca II are
detected. The spectra show little evolution with time, with intermediate-width
features becoming progressively more prominent, indicating stronger interaction
of the SN ejecta with the circumstellar medium. The inspection of archival
images from the Panoramic Survey Telescope and Rapid Response System
(Pan-STARRS) survey has revealed a variable source at the SN position, with a
brightest detection in December 2015 at Mr = -14.66+-0.17 mag. This was likely
an eruptive phase from the massive progenitor star started from at least
mid-2011, and that produced the circumstellar environment within which the star
exploded as a Type IIn SN. The overall properties of SN 2018cnf closely
resemble those of transients such as SN 2009ip. This similarity favours a
massive hypergiant, perhaps a luminous blue variable, as progenitor for SN
2018cnf.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1703.06358 [pdf] - 1549567
The Extreme Energy Events HECR array: status and perspectives
Gnesi, I.;
Abbrescia, M.;
Avanzini, C.;
Baldini, L.;
Ferroli, R. Baldini;
Batignani, G.;
Bencivenni, G.;
Bossini, E.;
Chiavassa, A.;
Cicalo, C.;
Cifarelli, L.;
Coccetti, F.;
Coccia, E.;
Corvaglia, A.;
De Gruttola, D.;
De Pasquale, S.;
Di Giovanni, A.;
D'Incecco, M.;
Dreucci, M.;
Fabbri, F. L.;
Fattibene, E.;
Ferraro, A.;
Frolov, V.;
Galeotti, P.;
Garbini, M.;
Gemme, G.;
Grazzi, S.;
Gustavino, C.;
Hatzifotiadu, D.;
Liciulli, F.;
La Rocca, P.;
Maggiora, A.;
Rodriguez, O. Maragoto;
Maron, G.;
Martelli, B.;
Mazziotta, M. N.;
Miozzi, S.;
Nania, R.;
Noferini, F.;
Nozzoli, F.;
Panareo, M.;
Panetta, M. P.;
Paoletti, R.;
Park, W.;
Perasso, L.;
Pilo, F.;
Piragino, G.;
Riggi, F.;
Righini, G. C.;
Rizzi, M.;
Sartorelli, G.;
Scapparone, E.;
Schioppa, M.;
Scribano, A.;
Selvi, M.;
Serci, S.;
Siddi, E.;
Squarcia, S.;
Stori, L.;
Taiuti, M.;
Terreni, G.;
Visnyei, O. B.;
Vistoli, M. C.;
Votano, L.;
Williams, M. C. S.;
Zani, S.;
Zichichi, A.;
Zuyeuski, R.
Submitted: 2017-03-18
The Extreme Energy Events Project is a synchronous sparse array of 52
tracking detectors for studying High Energy Cosmic Rays (HECR) and Cosmic
Rays-related phenomena. The observatory is also meant to address Long Distance
Correlation (LDC) phenomena: the network is deployed over a broad area covering
10 degrees in latitude and 11 in longitude. An overview of a set of preliminary
results is given, extending from the study of local muon flux dependance on
solar activity to the investigation of the upward-going component of muon flux
traversing the EEE stations; from the search for anisotropies at the sub-TeV
scale to the hints for observations of km-scale Extensive Air Shower (EAS).
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1309.5537 [pdf] - 1179409
Perturbations to aquatic photosynthesis due to high-energy cosmic ray
induced muon flux in the extragalactic shock model
Submitted: 2013-09-21
We modify a mathematical model of photosynthesis to quantify the
perturbations that high energy muons could make on aquatic primary
productivity. Then we apply this in the context of the extragalactic shock
model, according to which Earth receives an enhanced dose of high-energy cosmic
rays when it is at the galactic north. We obtain considerable reduction in the
photosynthesis rates, consistent with potential drops in biodiversity.