Normalized to: Rodrigues, X.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:2004.10105 [pdf] - 2096410
Probing the magnetic field in the GW170817 outflow using H.E.S.S.
observations
Collaboration, H. E. S. S.;
:;
Abdalla, H.;
Adam, R.;
Aharonian, F.;
Benkhali, F. Ait;
Angüner, E. O.;
Arakawa, M.;
Arcaro, C.;
Armand, C.;
Armstrong, T.;
Ashkar, H.;
Backes, M.;
Baghmanyan, V.;
Barbosa-Martins, V.;
Barnacka, A.;
Barnard, M.;
Becherini, Y.;
Berge, D.;
Bernlöhr, K.;
Blackwell, R.;
Böttcher, M.;
Boisson, C.;
Bolmont, J.;
Bonnefoy, S.;
Bregeon, J.;
Breuhaus, M.;
Brun, F.;
Brun, P.;
Bryan, M.;
Büchele, M.;
Bulik, T.;
Bylund, T.;
Caroff, S.;
Carosi, A.;
Casanova, S.;
Cerruti, M.;
Chand, T.;
Chandra, S.;
Chen, A.;
Cotter, G.;
Curyło, M.;
Davids, I. D.;
Davies, J.;
Deil, C.;
Devin, J.;
deWilt, P.;
Dirson, L.;
Djannati-Ataï, A.;
Dmytriiev, A.;
Donath, A.;
Doroshenko, V.;
Dyks, J.;
Egberts, K.;
Eichhorn, F.;
Emery, G.;
Ernenwein, J. -P.;
Eschbach, S.;
Feijen, K.;
Fegan, S.;
Fiasson, A.;
Fontaine, G.;
Funk, S.;
Füßling, M.;
Gabici, S.;
Gallant, Y. A.;
Giavitto, G.;
Giunti, L.;
Glawion, D.;
Glicenstein, J. F.;
Gottschall, D.;
Grondin, M. -H.;
Hahn, J.;
Haupt, M.;
Heinzelmann, G.;
Hermann, G.;
Hinton, J. A.;
Hofmann, W.;
Hoischen, C.;
Holch, T. L.;
Holler, M.;
Hörbe, M.;
Horns, D.;
Huber, D.;
Iwasaki, H.;
Jamrozy, M.;
Jankowsky, D.;
Jankowsky, F.;
Jardin-Blicq, A.;
Joshi, V.;
Jung-Richardt, I.;
Kastendieck, M. A.;
Katarzyński, K.;
Katsuragawa, M.;
Katz, U.;
Khangulyan, D.;
Khélifi, B.;
Klepser, S.;
Kluźniak, W.;
Komin, Nu.;
Konno, R.;
Kosack, K.;
Kostunin, D.;
Kreter, M.;
Lamanna, G.;
Lemière, A.;
Lemoine-Goumard, M.;
Lenain, J. -P.;
Leser, E.;
Levy, C.;
Lohse, T.;
Lypova, I.;
Mackey, J.;
Majumdar, J.;
Malyshev, D.;
Malyshev, D.;
Marandon, V.;
Marchegiani, P.;
Marcowith, A.;
Mares, A.;
Martí-Devesa, G.;
Marx, R.;
Maurin, G.;
Meintjes, P. J.;
Moderski, R.;
Mohamed, M.;
Mohrmann, L.;
Moore, C.;
Morris, P.;
Moulin, E.;
Muller, J.;
Murach, T.;
Nakashima, S.;
Nakashima, K.;
de Naurois, M.;
Ndiyavala, H.;
Niederwanger, F.;
Niemiec, J.;
Oakes, L.;
O'Brien, P.;
Odaka, H.;
Ohm, S.;
Wilhelmi, E. de Ona;
Ostrowski, M.;
Panter, M.;
Parsons, R. D.;
Peyaud, B.;
Piel, Q.;
Pita, S.;
Poireau, V.;
Noel, A. Priyana;
Prokhorov, D. A.;
Prokoph, H.;
Pühlhofer, G.;
Punch, M.;
Quirrenbach, A.;
Raab, S.;
Rauth, R.;
Reimer, A.;
Reimer, O.;
Remy, Q.;
Renaud, M.;
Rieger, F.;
Rinchiuso, L.;
Romoli, C.;
Rowell, G.;
Rudak, B.;
Ruiz-Velasco, E.;
Sahakian, V.;
Sailer, S.;
Saito, S.;
Sanchez, D. A.;
Santangelo, A.;
Sasaki, M.;
Scalici, M.;
Schlickeiser, R.;
Schüssler, F.;
Schulz, A.;
Schutte, H.;
Schwanke, U.;
Schwemmer, S.;
Seglar-Arroyo, M.;
Senniappan, M.;
Seyffert, A. S.;
Shafi, N.;
Shiningayamwe, K.;
Simoni, R.;
Sinha, A.;
Sol, H.;
Specovius, A.;
Spencer, S.;
Spir-Jacob, M.;
Stawarz, Ł.;
Steenkamp, R.;
Stegmann, C.;
Steppa, C.;
Takahashi, T.;
Tavernier, T.;
Taylor, A. M.;
Terrier, R.;
Tiziani, D.;
Tluczykont, M.;
Tomankova, L.;
Trichard, C.;
Tsirou, M.;
Tsuji, N.;
Tuffs, R.;
Uchiyama, Y.;
van der Walt, D. J.;
van Eldik, C.;
van Rensburg, C.;
van Soelen, B.;
Vasileiadis, G.;
Veh, J.;
Venter, C.;
Vincent, P.;
Vink, J.;
Völk, H. J.;
Vuillaume, T.;
Wadiasingh, Z.;
Wagner, S. J.;
Watson, J.;
Werner, F.;
White, R.;
Wierzcholska, A.;
Yang, R.;
Yoneda, H.;
Zacharias, M.;
Zanin, R.;
Zdziarski, A. A.;
Zech, A.;
Zorn, J.;
Zywucka, N.;
Rodrigues, X.
Submitted: 2020-04-21, last modified: 2020-05-18
The detection of the first electromagnetic counterpart to the binary neutron
star (BNS) merger remnant GW170817 established the connection between short
$\gamma$-ray bursts and BNS mergers. It also confirmed the forging of heavy
elements in the ejecta (a so-called kilonova) via the r-process
nucleosynthesis. The appearance of non-thermal radio and X-ray emission, as
well as the brightening, which lasted more than 100 days, were somewhat
unexpected. Current theoretical models attempt to explain this temporal
behavior as either originating from a relativistic off-axis jet or a
kilonova-like outflow. In either scenario, there is some ambiguity regarding
how much energy is transported in the non-thermal electrons versus the magnetic
field of the emission region. Combining the VLA (radio) and Chandra (X-ray)
measurements with observations in the GeV-TeV domain can help break this
ambiguity, almost independently of the assumed origin of the emission. Here we
report for the first time on deep H.E.S.S. observations of GW170817 / GRB
170817A between 124 and 272 days after the BNS merger with the full H.E.S.S.
array of telescopes, as well as on an updated analysis of the prompt (<5 days)
observations with the upgraded H.E.S.S. phase-I telescopes. We discuss
implications of the H.E.S.S. measurement for the magnetic field in the context
of different source scenarios.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:2003.08392 [pdf] - 2067034
Blazar origin of the UHECRs and perspectives for the detection of
astrophysical source neutrinos at EeV energies
Submitted: 2020-03-18
We demonstrate that a population of blazars can describe the observed
spectrum and composition of Ultra-High-Energy Cosmic Rays (UHECRs), and that
the dominant contribution comes from low-luminosity BL Lacs. However, a
sub-dominant contribution from high-luminosity blazars can lead to a
substantial neutrino flux which will peak at EeV energies. We find that it is
plausible that this neutrino flux from the sources outshines the cosmogenic
neutrino flux produced during the propagation of UHECRs. This has profound
implications for the high-energy (EeV) neutrino detection experiments: their
main target may be source neutrinos, for which additional search strategies can
be used, such as stacking searches, flare analyses, or multi-messenger
follow-ups.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1909.06289 [pdf] - 1961075
Multi-messenger interpretation of the neutrinos from TXS 0506+056
Submitted: 2019-09-13
We discuss possible interpretations of the neutrinos observed from the AGN
blazar TXS 0506+056 in the multi-messenger and multi-wavelength context,
including both the 2014-15 and 2017 neutrino flares. While the neutrino
observed in September 2017 has to describe contemporary data in e.g. the X-ray
and VHE gamma-ray ranges, data at the 2014-15 excess are much sparser. We
demonstrate that in both cases the simplest possible one-zone AGN blazar models
face challenges. While the 2017 flare can be well interpreted by considering
more sophisticated source geometries, the 2014-15 flare is much harder to
describe with conventional models. One challenge is the energy injected into
the electromagnetic cascade coming together with the neutrino production, which
cannot be reconciled with the 13 observed neutrino events. We also speculate if
a common interpretation of both flares is feasible.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1812.05939 [pdf] - 1868037
Leptohadronic blazar models applied to the 2014-15 flare of TXS 0506+056
Submitted: 2018-12-14, last modified: 2019-03-22
We investigate whether the emission of neutrinos observed in 2014-15 from the
direction of the blazar TXS 0506+056 can be accommodated with leptohadronic
multi-wavelength models of the source commonly adopted for the 2017 flare.
While multi-wavelength data during the neutrino flare are sparse, the large
number of neutrino events ($13\pm5$) challenges the missing activity in gamma
rays. We illustrate that two to five neutrino events during the flare can be
explained with leptohadronic models of different categories: a one-zone model,
a compact core model, and an external radiation field model. If, however,
significantly more events were to be accommodated, the predicted
multi-wavelength emission levels would be in conflict with observational X-ray
constraints, or with the high-energy gamma ray fluxes observed by the Fermi
LAT, depending on the model. For example, while the external radiation field
model can predict up to five neutrino events without violating X-ray
constraints, the absorption of high-energy gamma rays is in minor tension with
data. We therefore do not find any model that can simultaneously explain the
high event number quoted by IceCube and the (sparse) electromagnetic data
during the neutrino flare.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1806.04769 [pdf] - 1836491
Interpretation of the diffuse astrophysical neutrino flux in terms of
the blazar sequence
Submitted: 2018-06-12, last modified: 2018-12-03
We study if the diffuse astrophysical neutrino flux can come from blazar jets
-- a subclass of Active Galactic Nuclei (AGNs) -- while it, at the same time,
respects the blazar stacking limit based on source catalogs and is consistent
with the observation from TXS 0506+056. We compute the neutrino flux from
resolved and unresolved sources using an averaged, empirical relationship
between electromagnetic spectrum and luminosity, known as the {\em blazar
sequence}, for two populations of blazars (BL Lacs and FSRQs). Using a source
model with realistic neutrino flux computations, we demonstrate that blazars
can indeed power the diffuse neutrino flux at the highest energies and obey the
stacking limit at the same time, and we derive the conditions for the baryonic
loading (proton versus $\gamma$-ray luminosity) evolving over the blazar
sequence. Under the hypothesis that low-luminosity blazars power the diffuse
astrophysical neutrino flux, we find that the dominant contribution of the
diffuse flux up to PeV energies must come from unresolved BL Lacs with baryonic
loadings larger than about $10^5$ -- while only a very small contribution may
come from resolved high-luminosity BL Lacs or FSRQs, which can be directly
tested by the stacking limit. We find that the blazar TXS 0506+056 is on the
verge of these populations in our baseline scenario, at a relatively high
luminosity and redshift; as a consequence we predict about 0.3
$\gamma$-ray-neutrino associations per year from the whole population,
dominated by BL Lacs with $L_\gamma \simeq 10^{45} \, \mathrm{erg/s}$ and $z
\sim 0.1$.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1806.01624 [pdf] - 1778543
Binary Neutron Star Merger Remnants as Sources of Cosmic Rays Below the
"Ankle"
Submitted: 2018-06-05, last modified: 2018-11-05
We investigate non-thermal electron and nuclei energy losses within the
binary neutron star merger remnant produced by the event GW170817. The lack of
a cooling feature within the detected synchrotron emission from the source is
used to constrain the magnetic field at the mG level, assuming that this
emission is electron synchrotron in origin, and that the accelerated spectrum
in the electrons follows the form $dN/dE_e \propto E_e^{-2}$. The level of
subsequent gamma-ray emission from the source is demonstrated to provide a
further constraint on the source magnetic field strength. We also put forward
alternative strong ($\sim$G) magnetic field scenarios able to support this
emission. For such stronger fields, the photo-disintegration of non-thermal
nuclei within the source is considered, and a bottleneck period of $\sim$5-30
days is found when this process peaks. We find that this class of source is in
principle able to support the population of cosmic rays detected at Earth below
the "ankle".
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1711.02091 [pdf] - 1685639
Neutrinos and Ultra-High-Energy Cosmic-Ray Nuclei from Blazars
Submitted: 2017-11-06, last modified: 2018-05-18
We discuss the production of ultra-high-energy cosmic ray (UHECR) nuclei and
neutrinos from blazars. We compute the nuclear cascade in the jet for both BL
Lac objects and flat-spectrum radio quasars (FSRQs), and in the ambient
radiation zones for FSRQs as well. By modeling representative spectral energy
distributions along the blazar sequence, two distinct regimes are identified,
which we call "nuclear survival" -- typically found in low-luminosity BL Lacs,
and "nuclear cascade" -- typically found in high-luminosity FSRQs. We quantify
how the neutrino and cosmic-ray (CR) emission efficiencies evolve over the
blazar sequence, and demonstrate that neutrinos and CRs come from very
different object classes. For example, high-frequency peaked BL Lacs (HBLs)
tend to produce CRs, and HL-FSRQs are the more efficient neutrino emitters.
This conclusion does not depend on the CR escape mechanism, for which we
discuss two alternatives (diffusive and advective escape). Finally, the
neutrino spectrum from blazars is shown to significantly depend on the
injection composition into the jet, especially in the nuclear cascade case:
Injection compositions heavier than protons lead to reduced neutrino production
at the peak, which moves at the same time to lower energies. Thus, these
sources will exhibit better compatibility with the observed IceCube and UHECR
data.