Rockenfeller, Boris
Normalized to: Rockenfeller, B.
2 article(s) in total. 3 co-authors, from 1 to 2 common article(s). Median position in authors list is 1,0.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0512185 [pdf] - 78385
Multiband photometric detection of a huge flare on the M9 dwarf 2MASSW
J1707183+643933
Submitted: 2005-12-07
We present simultaneous UV-G-R-I monitoring of 19 M dwarfs that revealed a
huge flare on the M9 dwarf 2MASSW J1707183+643933 with an amplitude in the UV
of at least 6 magnitudes. This is one of the strongest detections ever of an
optical flare on an M star and one of the first in an ultracool dwarf (UCD,
spectral types later than about M7). Four intermediate strength flares (Delta
m_UV < 4 mag) were found in this and three other targets. For the whole sample
we deduce a flare probability of 0.013 (rate of 0.018/hr), and 0.049 (0.090/hr)
for 2M1707+64 alone. Deviations of the flare emission from a blackbody is
consistent with strong Halpha line emission. We also confirm the previously
found rotation period for 2M1707+64 (Rockenfeller, Bailer-Jones & Mundt (2006),
http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0511614/) and determine it more precisely to be
3.619 +/- 0.015 hr.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0511614 [pdf] - 77972
Variability and periodicity of field M dwarfs revealed by multichannel
monitoring
Submitted: 2005-11-21
We present simultaneous, multiband monitoring of 19 field M dwarfs (spectral
types M2-M9). Significant variability was found in seven objects in at least
one out of the three channels I, R and G. Two objects, LHS370 (M5V) and
2M1707+64 (M9V), show periods of 5.9+-2.0 and 3.65+-0.1 hours respectively. On
account of the agreement with the typical values of v*sin(i) published for M
dwarfs (Mohanty & Basri 2003), we claim these to be the objects' rotation
periods. In the case of 2M1707+64 we furthermore find evidence for the presence
of magnetically-induced cool spots as the reason for the observed variability
(at a temperature contrast of 4-8 percent, with a projected surface coverage
factor of less than 0.075) and can rule out the scenario of dust clouds (as
represented by the COND or DUSTY models). Comparing the frequency of occurrence
of variability in this and various L dwarf samples published over the past few
years, we find that variability is more common in field L dwarfs than in field
M dwarfs. This implies a change in the physical nature and/or extent of surface
features when moving from M to L dwarfs.