Normalized to: Richard, F.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1711.02429 [pdf] - 1590882
Against the biases in spins and shapes of asteroids
Marciniak, A.;
Pilcher, F.;
Oszkiewicz, D.;
Santana-Ros, T.;
Urakawa, S.;
Fauvaud, S.;
Kankiewicz, P.;
Tychoniec, Ł.;
Fauvaud, M.;
Hirsch, R.;
Horbowicz, J.;
Kamiński, K.;
Konstanciak, I.;
Kosturkiewicz, E.;
Murawiecka, M.;
Nadolny, J.;
Nishiyama, K.;
Okumura, S.;
Polińska, M.;
Richard, F.;
Sakamoto, T.;
Sobkowiak, K.;
Stachowski, G.;
Trela, P.
Submitted: 2017-11-07
Physical studies of asteroids depend on an availability of lightcurve data.
Targets that are easy to observe and analyse naturally have more data
available, so their synodic periods are confirmed from multiple sources. Also,
thanks to availability of data from a number of apparitions, their spin and
shape models can often be obtained.
Almost half of bright (H<=11 mag) main-belt asteroid population with known
lightcurve parameters have rotation periods considered long (P>12 hours) and
are rarely chosen for photometric observations. There is a similar selection
effect against asteroids with low lightcurve amplitudes (a_max<=0.25 mag). As a
result such targets, though numerous in this brightness range, are
underrepresented in the sample of spin and shape modelled asteroids. In the
range of fainter targets such effects are stronger. These selection effects can
influence what is now known about asteroid spin vs. size distribution, on
asteroid internal structure and densities and on spatial orientation of
asteroid spin axes.
To reduce both biases at the same time, we started a photometric survey of a
substantial sample of those bright main-belt asteroids that displayed both
features: periods longer than 12 hours, and amplitudes that did not exceed 0.25
magnitude. First we aim at finding synodic periods of rotation, and after a few
observed apparitions, obtaining spin and shape models.
As an initial result of our survey we found that a quarter of the studied
sample (8 out of 34 targets) have rotation periods different from those widely
accepted. We publish here these newly found period values with the lightcurves.
The size/frequency plot might in reality look different in the long-period
range. Further studies of asteroid spins, shapes, and structure should take
into account serious biases that are present in the parameters available today.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1510.07422 [pdf] - 1449873
New and updated convex shape models of asteroids based on optical data
from a large collaboration network
Hanuš, J.;
Ďurech, J.;
Oszkiewicz, D. A.;
Behrend, R.;
Carry, B.;
Delbo', M.;
Adam, O.;
Afonina, V.;
Anquetin, R.;
Antonini, P.;
Arnold, L.;
Audejean, M.;
Aurard, P.;
Bachschmidt, M.;
Badue, B.;
Barbotin, E.;
Barroy, P.;
Baudouin, P.;
Berard, L.;
Berger, N.;
Bernasconi, L.;
Bosch, J-G.;
Bouley, S.;
Bozhinova, I.;
Brinsfield, J.;
Brunetto, L.;
Canaud, G.;
Caron, J.;
Carrier, F.;
Casalnuovo, G.;
Casulli, S.;
Cerda, M.;
Chalamet, L.;
Charbonnel, S.;
Chinaglia, B.;
Cikota, A.;
Colas, F.;
Coliac, J-F.;
Collet, A.;
Coloma, J.;
Conjat, M.;
Conseil, E.;
Costa, R.;
Crippa, R.;
Cristofanelli, M.;
Damerdji, Y.;
Debackere, A.;
Decock, A.;
Déhais, Q.;
Déléage, T.;
Delmelle, S.;
Demeautis, C.;
Dróżdż, M.;
Dubos, G.;
Dulcamara, T.;
Dumont, M.;
Durkee, R.;
Dymock, R.;
del Valle, A. Escalante;
Esseiva, N.;
Esseiva, R.;
Esteban, M.;
Fauchez, T.;
Fauerbach, M.;
Fauvaud, M.;
Fauvaud, S.;
Forné, E.;
Fournel, C.;
Fradet, D.;
Garlitz, J.;
Gerteis, O.;
Gillier, C.;
Gillon, M.;
Giraud, R.;
Godard, J-P.;
Goncalves, R.;
Hamanowa, H.;
Hamanowa, H.;
Hay, K.;
Hellmich, S.;
Heterier, S.;
Higgins, D.;
Hirsch, R.;
Hodosan, G.;
Hren, M.;
Hygate, A.;
Innocent, N.;
Jacquinot, H.;
Jawahar, S.;
Jehin, E.;
Jerosimic, L.;
Klotz, A.;
Koff, W.;
Korlevic, P.;
Kosturkiewicz, E.;
Krafft, P.;
Krugly, Y.;
Kugel, F.;
Labrevoir, O.;
Lecacheux, J.;
Lehký, M.;
Leroy, A.;
Lesquerbault, B.;
Lopez-Gonzales, M. J.;
Lutz, M.;
Mallecot, B.;
Manfroid, J.;
Manzini, F.;
Marciniak, A.;
Martin, A.;
Modave, B.;
Montaigut, R.;
Montier, J.;
Morelle, E.;
Morton, B.;
Mottola, S.;
Naves, R.;
Nomen, J.;
Oey, J.;
Ogłoza, W.;
Paiella, M.;
Pallares, H.;
Peyrot, A.;
Pilcher, F.;
Pirenne, J-F.;
Piron, P.;
Polinska, M.;
Polotto, M.;
Poncy, R.;
Previt, J. P.;
Reignier, F.;
Renauld, D.;
Ricci, D.;
Richard, F.;
Rinner, C.;
Risoldi, V.;
Robilliard, D.;
Romeuf, D.;
Rousseau, G.;
Roy, R.;
Ruthroff, J.;
Salom, P. A.;
Salvador, L.;
Sanchez, S.;
Santana-Ros, T.;
Scholz, A.;
Séné, G.;
Skiff, B.;
Sobkowiak, K.;
Sogorb, P.;
Soldán, F.;
Spiridakis, A.;
Splanska, E.;
Sposetti, S.;
Starkey, D.;
Stephens, R.;
Stiepen, A.;
Stoss, R.;
Strajnic, J.;
Teng, J-P.;
Tumolo, G.;
Vagnozzi, A.;
Vanoutryve, B.;
Vugnon, J. M.;
Warner, B. D.;
Waucomont, M.;
Wertz, O.;
Winiarski, M.;
Wolf, M.
Submitted: 2015-10-26
Asteroid modeling efforts in the last decade resulted in a comprehensive
dataset of almost 400 convex shape models and their rotation states. This
amount already provided a deep insight into physical properties of main-belt
asteroids or large collisional families. We aim to increase the number of
asteroid shape models and rotation states. Such results are an important input
for various further studies such as analysis of asteroid physical properties in
different populations, including smaller collisional families, thermophysical
modeling, and scaling shape models by disk-resolved images, or stellar
occultation data. This provides, in combination with known masses, bulk density
estimates, but constrains also theoretical collisional and evolutional models
of the Solar System. We use all available disk-integrated optical data (i.e.,
classical dense-in-time photometry obtained from public databases and through a
large collaboration network as well as sparse-in-time individual measurements
from a few sky surveys) as an input for the convex inversion method, and derive
3D shape models of asteroids, together with their rotation periods and
orientations of rotation axes. The key ingredient is the support of more that
one hundred observers who submit their optical data to publicly available
databases. We present updated shape models for 36 asteroids, for which mass
estimates are currently available in the literature or their masses will be
most likely determined from their gravitational influence on smaller bodies,
which orbital deflection will be observed by the ESA Gaia astrometric mission.
This was achieved by using additional optical data from recent apparitions for
the shape optimization. Moreover, we also present new shape model
determinations for 250 asteroids, including 13 Hungarias and 3 near-Earth
asteroids.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1411.0872 [pdf] - 1222984
The small binary asteroid (939) Isberga
Carry, B.;
Matter, A.;
Scheirich, P.;
Pravec, P.;
Molnar, L.;
Mottola, S.;
Carbognani, A.;
Jehin, E.;
Marciniak, A.;
Binzel, R. P.;
DeMeo, F. E.;
Birlan, M.;
Delbo, M.;
Barbotin, E.;
Behrend, R.;
Bonnardeau, M.;
Colas, F.;
Farissier, P.;
Fauvaud, M.;
Fauvaud, S.;
Gillier, C.;
Gillon, M.;
Hellmich, S.;
Hirsch, R.;
Leroy, A.;
Manfroid, J.;
Montier, J.;
Morelle, E.;
Richard, F.;
Sobkowiak, K.;
Strajnic, J.;
Vachier, F.
Submitted: 2014-11-04
In understanding the composition and internal structure of asteroids, their
density is perhaps the most diagnostic quantity. We aim here to characterize
the surface composition, mutual orbit, size, mass, and density of the small
main-belt binary asteroid (939) Isberga. For that, we conduct a suite of
multi-technique observations, including optical lightcurves over many epochs,
near-infrared spectroscopy, and interferometry in the thermal infrared. We
develop a simple geometric model of binary systems to analyze the
interferometric data in combination with the results of the lightcurve
modeling. From spectroscopy, we classify Ibserga as a Sq-type asteroid,
consistent with the albedo of 0.14$^{+0.09}_{-0.06}$ (all uncertainties are
reported as 3-$\sigma$ range) we determine (average albedo of S-types is 0.197
$\pm$ 0.153, Pravec et al., 2012, Icarus 221, 365-387). Lightcurve analysis
reveals that the mutual orbit has a period of 26.6304 $\pm$ 0.0001 h, is close
to circular, and has pole coordinates within 7 deg. of (225, +86) in ECJ2000,
implying a low obliquity of 1.5 deg. The combined analysis of lightcurves and
interferometric data allows us to determine the dimension of the system and we
find volume-equivalent diameters of 12.4$^{+2.5}_{-1.2}$ km and
3.6$^{+0.7}_{-0.3}$ km for Isberga and its satellite, circling each other on a
33 km wide orbit. Their density is assumed equal and found to be
$2.91^{+1.72}_{-2.01}$ g.cm$^{-3}$, lower than that of the associated ordinary
chondrite meteorites, suggesting the presence of some macroporosity, but
typical of S-types of the same size range (Carry, 2012, P\&SS 73, 98-118). The
present study is the first direct measurement of the size of a small main-belt
binary. Although the interferometric observations of Isberga are at the edge of
MIDI capabilities, the method described here is applicable to others suites of
instruments (e.g, LBT, ALMA).
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1108.1423 [pdf] - 520241
Scientific Potential of Einstein Telescope
Sathyaprakash, B.;
Abernathy, M.;
Acernese, F.;
Amaro-Seoane, P.;
Andersson, N.;
Arun, K.;
Barone, F.;
Barr, B.;
Barsuglia, M.;
Beker, M.;
Beveridge, N.;
Birindelli, S.;
Bose, S.;
Bosi, L.;
Braccini, S.;
Bradaschia, C.;
Bulik, T.;
Calloni, E.;
Cella, G.;
Chassande-Mottin, E.;
Chelkowski, S.;
Chincarini, A.;
Clark, J.;
Coccia, E.;
Colacino, C.;
Colas, J.;
Cumming, A.;
Cunningham, L.;
Cuoco, E.;
Danilishin, S.;
Danzmann, K.;
Salvo, R. De.;
Dent, T.;
Rosa, R. De.;
Fiore, L. Di.;
Virgilio, A. Di.;
Doets, M.;
Fafone, V.;
Falferi, P.;
Flaminio, R.;
Franc, J.;
Frasconi, F.;
Freise, A.;
Friedrich, D.;
Fulda, P.;
Gair, J.;
Gemme, G.;
Genin, E.;
Gennai, A.;
Giazotto, A.;
Glampedakis, K.;
Gräf, C.;
Granata, M.;
Grote, H.;
Guidi, G.;
Gurkovsky, A.;
Hammond, G.;
Hannam, M.;
Harms, J.;
Heinert, D.;
Hendry, M.;
Heng, I.;
Hennes, E.;
Hild, S.;
Hough, J.;
Husa, S.;
Huttner, S.;
Jones, G.;
Khalili, F.;
Kokeyama, K.;
Kokkotas, K.;
Krishnan, B.;
Li, T. G. F.;
Lorenzini, M.;
Lück, H.;
Majorana, E.;
Mandel, I.;
Mandic, V.;
Mantovani, M.;
Martin, I.;
Michel, C.;
Minenkov, Y.;
Morgado, N.;
Mosca, S.;
Mours, B.;
Müller-Ebhardt, H.;
Murray, P.;
Nawrodt, R.;
Nelson, J.;
Oshaughnessy, R.;
Ott, C. D.;
Palomba, C.;
Paoli, A.;
Parguez, G.;
Pasqualetti, A.;
Passaquieti, R.;
Passuello, D.;
Pinard, L.;
Plastino, W.;
Poggiani, R.;
Popolizio, P.;
Prato, M.;
Punturo, M.;
Puppo, P.;
Rabeling, D.;
Racz, I.;
Rapagnani, P.;
Read, J.;
Regimbau, T.;
Rehbein, H.;
Reid, S.;
Rezzolla, L.;
Ricci, F.;
Richard, F.;
Rocchi, A.;
Rowan, S.;
Rüdiger, A.;
Santamaria, L.;
Sassolas, B.;
Schnabel, R.;
Schwarz, C.;
Seidel, P.;
Sintes, A.;
Somiya, K.;
Speirits, F.;
Strain, K.;
Strigin, S.;
Sutton, P.;
Tarabrin, S.;
Thüring, A.;
Brand, J. van den;
van Veggel, M;
Broeck, C. Van Den;
Vecchio, A.;
Veitch, J.;
Vetrano, F.;
Vicere, A.;
Vyatchanin, S.;
Willke, B.;
Woan, G.;
Yamamoto, K.
Submitted: 2011-08-05, last modified: 2012-06-01
Einstein gravitational-wave Telescope (ET) is a design study funded by the
European Commission to explore the technological challenges of and scientific
benefits from building a third generation gravitational wave detector. The
three-year study, which concluded earlier this year, has formulated the
conceptual design of an observatory that can support the implementation of new
technology for the next two to three decades. The goal of this talk is to
introduce the audience to the overall aims and objectives of the project and to
enumerate ET's potential to influence our understanding of fundamental physics,
astrophysics and cosmology.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1206.0331 [pdf] - 520339
Scientific Objectives of Einstein Telescope
Sathyaprakash, B.;
Abernathy, M.;
Acernese, F.;
Ajith, P.;
Allen, B.;
Amaro-Seoane, P.;
Andersson, N.;
Aoudia, S.;
Arun, K.;
Astone, P.;
Krishnan, B.;
Barack, L.;
Barone, F.;
Barr, B.;
Barsuglia, M.;
Bassan, M.;
Bassiri, R.;
Beker, M.;
Beveridge, N.;
Bizouard, M.;
Bond, C.;
Bose, S.;
Bosi, L.;
Braccini, S.;
Bradaschia, C.;
Britzger, M.;
Brueckner, F.;
Bulik, T.;
Bulten, H. J.;
Burmeister, O.;
Calloni, E.;
Campsie, P.;
Carbone, L.;
Cella, G.;
Chalkley, E.;
Chassande-Mottin, E.;
Chelkowski, S.;
Chincarini, A.;
Cintio, A. Di.;
Clark, J.;
Coccia, E.;
Colacino, C. N.;
Colas, J.;
Colla, A.;
Corsi, A.;
Cumming, A.;
Cunningham, L.;
Cuoco, E.;
Danilishin, S.;
Danzmann, K.;
Daw, E.;
Salvo, R. De.;
Pozzo, W. Del.;
Dent, T.;
Rosa, R. De.;
Fiore, L. Di.;
Emilio, M. Di. Paolo.;
Virgilio, A. Di.;
Dietz, A.;
Doets, M.;
Dueck, J.;
Edwards, M.;
Fafone, V.;
Fairhurst, S.;
Falferi, P.;
Favata, M.;
Ferrari, V.;
Ferrini, F.;
Fidecaro, F.;
Flaminio, R.;
Franc, J.;
Frasconi, F.;
Freise, A.;
Friedrich, D.;
Fulda, P.;
Gair, J.;
Galimberti, M.;
Gemme, G.;
Genin, E.;
Gennai, A.;
Giazotto, A.;
Glampedakis, K.;
Gossan, S.;
Gouaty, R.;
Graef, C.;
Graham, W.;
Granata, M.;
Grote, H.;
Guidi, G.;
Hallam, J.;
Hammond, G.;
Hannam, M.;
Harms, J.;
Haughian, K.;
Hawke, I.;
Heinert, D.;
Hendry, M.;
Heng, I.;
Hennes, E.;
Hild, S.;
Hough, J.;
Huet, D.;
Husa, S.;
Huttner, S.;
Iyer, B.;
Jones, D. I.;
Jones, G.;
Kamaretsos, I.;
Mishra, C. Kant;
Kawazoe, F.;
Khalili, F.;
Kley, B.;
Kokeyama, K.;
Kokkotas, K.;
Kroker, S.;
Kumar, R.;
Kuroda, K.;
Lagrange, B.;
Lastzka, N.;
Li, T. G. F.;
Lorenzini, M.;
Losurdo, G.;
Lück, H.;
Majorana, E.;
Malvezzi, V.;
Mandel, I.;
Mandic, V.;
Marka, S.;
Marin, F.;
Marion, F.;
Marque, J.;
Martin, I.;
Leod, D. Mc.;
Mckechan, D.;
Mehmet, M.;
Michel, C.;
Minenkov, Y.;
Morgado, N.;
Morgia, A.;
Mosca, S.;
Moscatelli, L.;
Mours, B.;
Müller-Ebhardt, H.;
Murray, P.;
Naticchioni, L.;
Nawrodt, R.;
Nelson, J.;
Shaughnessy, R. O'.;
Ott, C. D.;
Palomba, C.;
Paoli, A.;
Parguez, G.;
Pasqualetti, A.;
Passaquieti, R.;
Passuello, D.;
Perciballi, M.;
Piergiovanni, F.;
Pinard, L.;
Pitkin, M.;
Plastino, W.;
Plissi, M.;
Poggiani, R.;
Popolizio, P.;
Porter, E.;
Prato, M.;
Prodi, G.;
Punturo, M.;
Puppo, P.;
Rabeling, D.;
Racz, I.;
Rapagnani, P.;
Re, V.;
Read, J.;
Regimbau, T.;
Rehbein, H.;
Reid, S.;
Ricci, F.;
Richard, F.;
Robinson, C.;
Rocchi, A.;
Romano, R.;
Rowan, S.;
Rüdiger, A.;
Samblowski, A.;
Santamaría, L.;
Sassolas, B.;
Schilling, R.;
Schmidt, P.;
Schnabel, R.;
Schutz, B.;
Schwarz, C.;
Scott, J.;
Seidel, P.;
Sintes, A. M.;
Somiya, K.;
Sopuerta, C. F.;
Sorazu, B.;
Speirits, F.;
Storchi, L.;
Strain, K.;
Strigin, S.;
Sutton, P.;
Tarabrin, S.;
Taylor, B.;
Thürin, A.;
Tokmakov, K.;
Tonelli, M.;
Tournefier, H.;
Vaccarone, R.;
Vahlbruch, H.;
Brand, J. F. J. van. den.;
Broeck, C. Van. Den.;
Putten, S. van. der.;
Veggel, M. van.;
Vecchio, A.;
Veitch, J.;
Vetrano, F.;
Vicere, A.;
Vyatchanin, S.;
Weßels, P.;
Willke, B.;
Winkler, W.;
Woan, G.;
Woodcraft, A.;
Yamamoto, K.
Submitted: 2012-06-01
The advanced interferometer network will herald a new era in observational
astronomy. There is a very strong science case to go beyond the advanced
detector network and build detectors that operate in a frequency range from 1
Hz-10 kHz, with sensitivity a factor ten better in amplitude. Such detectors
will be able to probe a range of topics in nuclear physics, astronomy,
cosmology and fundamental physics, providing insights into many unsolved
problems in these areas.