sort results by

Use logical operators AND, OR, NOT and round brackets to construct complex queries. Whitespace-separated words are treated as ANDed.

Show articles per page in mode

Richard, F.

Normalized to: Richard, F.

5 article(s) in total. 426 co-authors, from 1 to 3 common article(s). Median position in authors list is 114,0.

[1]  oai:arXiv.org:1711.02429  [pdf] - 1590882
Against the biases in spins and shapes of asteroids
Comments: Published in Planetary and Space Science. 13 pages, 20 figures
Submitted: 2017-11-07
Physical studies of asteroids depend on an availability of lightcurve data. Targets that are easy to observe and analyse naturally have more data available, so their synodic periods are confirmed from multiple sources. Also, thanks to availability of data from a number of apparitions, their spin and shape models can often be obtained. Almost half of bright (H<=11 mag) main-belt asteroid population with known lightcurve parameters have rotation periods considered long (P>12 hours) and are rarely chosen for photometric observations. There is a similar selection effect against asteroids with low lightcurve amplitudes (a_max<=0.25 mag). As a result such targets, though numerous in this brightness range, are underrepresented in the sample of spin and shape modelled asteroids. In the range of fainter targets such effects are stronger. These selection effects can influence what is now known about asteroid spin vs. size distribution, on asteroid internal structure and densities and on spatial orientation of asteroid spin axes. To reduce both biases at the same time, we started a photometric survey of a substantial sample of those bright main-belt asteroids that displayed both features: periods longer than 12 hours, and amplitudes that did not exceed 0.25 magnitude. First we aim at finding synodic periods of rotation, and after a few observed apparitions, obtaining spin and shape models. As an initial result of our survey we found that a quarter of the studied sample (8 out of 34 targets) have rotation periods different from those widely accepted. We publish here these newly found period values with the lightcurves. The size/frequency plot might in reality look different in the long-period range. Further studies of asteroid spins, shapes, and structure should take into account serious biases that are present in the parameters available today.
[2]  oai:arXiv.org:1510.07422  [pdf] - 1449873
New and updated convex shape models of asteroids based on optical data from a large collaboration network
Hanuš, J.; Ďurech, J.; Oszkiewicz, D. A.; Behrend, R.; Carry, B.; Delbo', M.; Adam, O.; Afonina, V.; Anquetin, R.; Antonini, P.; Arnold, L.; Audejean, M.; Aurard, P.; Bachschmidt, M.; Badue, B.; Barbotin, E.; Barroy, P.; Baudouin, P.; Berard, L.; Berger, N.; Bernasconi, L.; Bosch, J-G.; Bouley, S.; Bozhinova, I.; Brinsfield, J.; Brunetto, L.; Canaud, G.; Caron, J.; Carrier, F.; Casalnuovo, G.; Casulli, S.; Cerda, M.; Chalamet, L.; Charbonnel, S.; Chinaglia, B.; Cikota, A.; Colas, F.; Coliac, J-F.; Collet, A.; Coloma, J.; Conjat, M.; Conseil, E.; Costa, R.; Crippa, R.; Cristofanelli, M.; Damerdji, Y.; Debackere, A.; Decock, A.; Déhais, Q.; Déléage, T.; Delmelle, S.; Demeautis, C.; Dróżdż, M.; Dubos, G.; Dulcamara, T.; Dumont, M.; Durkee, R.; Dymock, R.; del Valle, A. Escalante; Esseiva, N.; Esseiva, R.; Esteban, M.; Fauchez, T.; Fauerbach, M.; Fauvaud, M.; Fauvaud, S.; Forné, E.; Fournel, C.; Fradet, D.; Garlitz, J.; Gerteis, O.; Gillier, C.; Gillon, M.; Giraud, R.; Godard, J-P.; Goncalves, R.; Hamanowa, H.; Hamanowa, H.; Hay, K.; Hellmich, S.; Heterier, S.; Higgins, D.; Hirsch, R.; Hodosan, G.; Hren, M.; Hygate, A.; Innocent, N.; Jacquinot, H.; Jawahar, S.; Jehin, E.; Jerosimic, L.; Klotz, A.; Koff, W.; Korlevic, P.; Kosturkiewicz, E.; Krafft, P.; Krugly, Y.; Kugel, F.; Labrevoir, O.; Lecacheux, J.; Lehký, M.; Leroy, A.; Lesquerbault, B.; Lopez-Gonzales, M. J.; Lutz, M.; Mallecot, B.; Manfroid, J.; Manzini, F.; Marciniak, A.; Martin, A.; Modave, B.; Montaigut, R.; Montier, J.; Morelle, E.; Morton, B.; Mottola, S.; Naves, R.; Nomen, J.; Oey, J.; Ogłoza, W.; Paiella, M.; Pallares, H.; Peyrot, A.; Pilcher, F.; Pirenne, J-F.; Piron, P.; Polinska, M.; Polotto, M.; Poncy, R.; Previt, J. P.; Reignier, F.; Renauld, D.; Ricci, D.; Richard, F.; Rinner, C.; Risoldi, V.; Robilliard, D.; Romeuf, D.; Rousseau, G.; Roy, R.; Ruthroff, J.; Salom, P. A.; Salvador, L.; Sanchez, S.; Santana-Ros, T.; Scholz, A.; Séné, G.; Skiff, B.; Sobkowiak, K.; Sogorb, P.; Soldán, F.; Spiridakis, A.; Splanska, E.; Sposetti, S.; Starkey, D.; Stephens, R.; Stiepen, A.; Stoss, R.; Strajnic, J.; Teng, J-P.; Tumolo, G.; Vagnozzi, A.; Vanoutryve, B.; Vugnon, J. M.; Warner, B. D.; Waucomont, M.; Wertz, O.; Winiarski, M.; Wolf, M.
Comments: Accepted for publication in A&A
Submitted: 2015-10-26
Asteroid modeling efforts in the last decade resulted in a comprehensive dataset of almost 400 convex shape models and their rotation states. This amount already provided a deep insight into physical properties of main-belt asteroids or large collisional families. We aim to increase the number of asteroid shape models and rotation states. Such results are an important input for various further studies such as analysis of asteroid physical properties in different populations, including smaller collisional families, thermophysical modeling, and scaling shape models by disk-resolved images, or stellar occultation data. This provides, in combination with known masses, bulk density estimates, but constrains also theoretical collisional and evolutional models of the Solar System. We use all available disk-integrated optical data (i.e., classical dense-in-time photometry obtained from public databases and through a large collaboration network as well as sparse-in-time individual measurements from a few sky surveys) as an input for the convex inversion method, and derive 3D shape models of asteroids, together with their rotation periods and orientations of rotation axes. The key ingredient is the support of more that one hundred observers who submit their optical data to publicly available databases. We present updated shape models for 36 asteroids, for which mass estimates are currently available in the literature or their masses will be most likely determined from their gravitational influence on smaller bodies, which orbital deflection will be observed by the ESA Gaia astrometric mission. This was achieved by using additional optical data from recent apparitions for the shape optimization. Moreover, we also present new shape model determinations for 250 asteroids, including 13 Hungarias and 3 near-Earth asteroids.
[3]  oai:arXiv.org:1411.0872  [pdf] - 1222984
The small binary asteroid (939) Isberga
Comments: 12 pages, 6 figures, 4 tables
Submitted: 2014-11-04
In understanding the composition and internal structure of asteroids, their density is perhaps the most diagnostic quantity. We aim here to characterize the surface composition, mutual orbit, size, mass, and density of the small main-belt binary asteroid (939) Isberga. For that, we conduct a suite of multi-technique observations, including optical lightcurves over many epochs, near-infrared spectroscopy, and interferometry in the thermal infrared. We develop a simple geometric model of binary systems to analyze the interferometric data in combination with the results of the lightcurve modeling. From spectroscopy, we classify Ibserga as a Sq-type asteroid, consistent with the albedo of 0.14$^{+0.09}_{-0.06}$ (all uncertainties are reported as 3-$\sigma$ range) we determine (average albedo of S-types is 0.197 $\pm$ 0.153, Pravec et al., 2012, Icarus 221, 365-387). Lightcurve analysis reveals that the mutual orbit has a period of 26.6304 $\pm$ 0.0001 h, is close to circular, and has pole coordinates within 7 deg. of (225, +86) in ECJ2000, implying a low obliquity of 1.5 deg. The combined analysis of lightcurves and interferometric data allows us to determine the dimension of the system and we find volume-equivalent diameters of 12.4$^{+2.5}_{-1.2}$ km and 3.6$^{+0.7}_{-0.3}$ km for Isberga and its satellite, circling each other on a 33 km wide orbit. Their density is assumed equal and found to be $2.91^{+1.72}_{-2.01}$ g.cm$^{-3}$, lower than that of the associated ordinary chondrite meteorites, suggesting the presence of some macroporosity, but typical of S-types of the same size range (Carry, 2012, P\&SS 73, 98-118). The present study is the first direct measurement of the size of a small main-belt binary. Although the interferometric observations of Isberga are at the edge of MIDI capabilities, the method described here is applicable to others suites of instruments (e.g, LBT, ALMA).
[4]  oai:arXiv.org:1108.1423  [pdf] - 520241
Scientific Potential of Einstein Telescope
Sathyaprakash, B.; Abernathy, M.; Acernese, F.; Amaro-Seoane, P.; Andersson, N.; Arun, K.; Barone, F.; Barr, B.; Barsuglia, M.; Beker, M.; Beveridge, N.; Birindelli, S.; Bose, S.; Bosi, L.; Braccini, S.; Bradaschia, C.; Bulik, T.; Calloni, E.; Cella, G.; Chassande-Mottin, E.; Chelkowski, S.; Chincarini, A.; Clark, J.; Coccia, E.; Colacino, C.; Colas, J.; Cumming, A.; Cunningham, L.; Cuoco, E.; Danilishin, S.; Danzmann, K.; Salvo, R. De.; Dent, T.; Rosa, R. De.; Fiore, L. Di.; Virgilio, A. Di.; Doets, M.; Fafone, V.; Falferi, P.; Flaminio, R.; Franc, J.; Frasconi, F.; Freise, A.; Friedrich, D.; Fulda, P.; Gair, J.; Gemme, G.; Genin, E.; Gennai, A.; Giazotto, A.; Glampedakis, K.; Gräf, C.; Granata, M.; Grote, H.; Guidi, G.; Gurkovsky, A.; Hammond, G.; Hannam, M.; Harms, J.; Heinert, D.; Hendry, M.; Heng, I.; Hennes, E.; Hild, S.; Hough, J.; Husa, S.; Huttner, S.; Jones, G.; Khalili, F.; Kokeyama, K.; Kokkotas, K.; Krishnan, B.; Li, T. G. F.; Lorenzini, M.; Lück, H.; Majorana, E.; Mandel, I.; Mandic, V.; Mantovani, M.; Martin, I.; Michel, C.; Minenkov, Y.; Morgado, N.; Mosca, S.; Mours, B.; Müller-Ebhardt, H.; Murray, P.; Nawrodt, R.; Nelson, J.; Oshaughnessy, R.; Ott, C. D.; Palomba, C.; Paoli, A.; Parguez, G.; Pasqualetti, A.; Passaquieti, R.; Passuello, D.; Pinard, L.; Plastino, W.; Poggiani, R.; Popolizio, P.; Prato, M.; Punturo, M.; Puppo, P.; Rabeling, D.; Racz, I.; Rapagnani, P.; Read, J.; Regimbau, T.; Rehbein, H.; Reid, S.; Rezzolla, L.; Ricci, F.; Richard, F.; Rocchi, A.; Rowan, S.; Rüdiger, A.; Santamaria, L.; Sassolas, B.; Schnabel, R.; Schwarz, C.; Seidel, P.; Sintes, A.; Somiya, K.; Speirits, F.; Strain, K.; Strigin, S.; Sutton, P.; Tarabrin, S.; Thüring, A.; Brand, J. van den; van Veggel, M; Broeck, C. Van Den; Vecchio, A.; Veitch, J.; Vetrano, F.; Vicere, A.; Vyatchanin, S.; Willke, B.; Woan, G.; Yamamoto, K.
Comments: Conforms to conference proceedings, several author names corrected
Submitted: 2011-08-05, last modified: 2012-06-01
Einstein gravitational-wave Telescope (ET) is a design study funded by the European Commission to explore the technological challenges of and scientific benefits from building a third generation gravitational wave detector. The three-year study, which concluded earlier this year, has formulated the conceptual design of an observatory that can support the implementation of new technology for the next two to three decades. The goal of this talk is to introduce the audience to the overall aims and objectives of the project and to enumerate ET's potential to influence our understanding of fundamental physics, astrophysics and cosmology.
[5]  oai:arXiv.org:1206.0331  [pdf] - 520339
Scientific Objectives of Einstein Telescope
Sathyaprakash, B.; Abernathy, M.; Acernese, F.; Ajith, P.; Allen, B.; Amaro-Seoane, P.; Andersson, N.; Aoudia, S.; Arun, K.; Astone, P.; Krishnan, B.; Barack, L.; Barone, F.; Barr, B.; Barsuglia, M.; Bassan, M.; Bassiri, R.; Beker, M.; Beveridge, N.; Bizouard, M.; Bond, C.; Bose, S.; Bosi, L.; Braccini, S.; Bradaschia, C.; Britzger, M.; Brueckner, F.; Bulik, T.; Bulten, H. J.; Burmeister, O.; Calloni, E.; Campsie, P.; Carbone, L.; Cella, G.; Chalkley, E.; Chassande-Mottin, E.; Chelkowski, S.; Chincarini, A.; Cintio, A. Di.; Clark, J.; Coccia, E.; Colacino, C. N.; Colas, J.; Colla, A.; Corsi, A.; Cumming, A.; Cunningham, L.; Cuoco, E.; Danilishin, S.; Danzmann, K.; Daw, E.; Salvo, R. De.; Pozzo, W. Del.; Dent, T.; Rosa, R. De.; Fiore, L. Di.; Emilio, M. Di. Paolo.; Virgilio, A. Di.; Dietz, A.; Doets, M.; Dueck, J.; Edwards, M.; Fafone, V.; Fairhurst, S.; Falferi, P.; Favata, M.; Ferrari, V.; Ferrini, F.; Fidecaro, F.; Flaminio, R.; Franc, J.; Frasconi, F.; Freise, A.; Friedrich, D.; Fulda, P.; Gair, J.; Galimberti, M.; Gemme, G.; Genin, E.; Gennai, A.; Giazotto, A.; Glampedakis, K.; Gossan, S.; Gouaty, R.; Graef, C.; Graham, W.; Granata, M.; Grote, H.; Guidi, G.; Hallam, J.; Hammond, G.; Hannam, M.; Harms, J.; Haughian, K.; Hawke, I.; Heinert, D.; Hendry, M.; Heng, I.; Hennes, E.; Hild, S.; Hough, J.; Huet, D.; Husa, S.; Huttner, S.; Iyer, B.; Jones, D. I.; Jones, G.; Kamaretsos, I.; Mishra, C. Kant; Kawazoe, F.; Khalili, F.; Kley, B.; Kokeyama, K.; Kokkotas, K.; Kroker, S.; Kumar, R.; Kuroda, K.; Lagrange, B.; Lastzka, N.; Li, T. G. F.; Lorenzini, M.; Losurdo, G.; Lück, H.; Majorana, E.; Malvezzi, V.; Mandel, I.; Mandic, V.; Marka, S.; Marin, F.; Marion, F.; Marque, J.; Martin, I.; Leod, D. Mc.; Mckechan, D.; Mehmet, M.; Michel, C.; Minenkov, Y.; Morgado, N.; Morgia, A.; Mosca, S.; Moscatelli, L.; Mours, B.; Müller-Ebhardt, H.; Murray, P.; Naticchioni, L.; Nawrodt, R.; Nelson, J.; Shaughnessy, R. O'.; Ott, C. D.; Palomba, C.; Paoli, A.; Parguez, G.; Pasqualetti, A.; Passaquieti, R.; Passuello, D.; Perciballi, M.; Piergiovanni, F.; Pinard, L.; Pitkin, M.; Plastino, W.; Plissi, M.; Poggiani, R.; Popolizio, P.; Porter, E.; Prato, M.; Prodi, G.; Punturo, M.; Puppo, P.; Rabeling, D.; Racz, I.; Rapagnani, P.; Re, V.; Read, J.; Regimbau, T.; Rehbein, H.; Reid, S.; Ricci, F.; Richard, F.; Robinson, C.; Rocchi, A.; Romano, R.; Rowan, S.; Rüdiger, A.; Samblowski, A.; Santamaría, L.; Sassolas, B.; Schilling, R.; Schmidt, P.; Schnabel, R.; Schutz, B.; Schwarz, C.; Scott, J.; Seidel, P.; Sintes, A. M.; Somiya, K.; Sopuerta, C. F.; Sorazu, B.; Speirits, F.; Storchi, L.; Strain, K.; Strigin, S.; Sutton, P.; Tarabrin, S.; Taylor, B.; Thürin, A.; Tokmakov, K.; Tonelli, M.; Tournefier, H.; Vaccarone, R.; Vahlbruch, H.; Brand, J. F. J. van. den.; Broeck, C. Van. Den.; Putten, S. van. der.; Veggel, M. van.; Vecchio, A.; Veitch, J.; Vetrano, F.; Vicere, A.; Vyatchanin, S.; Weßels, P.; Willke, B.; Winkler, W.; Woan, G.; Woodcraft, A.; Yamamoto, K.
Comments: 18 pages, 4 figures, Plenary talk given at Amaldi Meeting, July 2011
Submitted: 2012-06-01
The advanced interferometer network will herald a new era in observational astronomy. There is a very strong science case to go beyond the advanced detector network and build detectors that operate in a frequency range from 1 Hz-10 kHz, with sensitivity a factor ten better in amplitude. Such detectors will be able to probe a range of topics in nuclear physics, astronomy, cosmology and fundamental physics, providing insights into many unsolved problems in these areas.