Normalized to: Renneby, M.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:2007.01889 [pdf] - 2128470
Joint galaxy-galaxy lensing and clustering constraints on galaxy
formation
Submitted: 2020-07-03
We compare predictions for galaxy-galaxy lensing profiles and clustering from
the Henriques et al. (2015) public version of the Munich semi-analytical model
of galaxy formation (SAM) and the IllustrisTNG suite, primarily TNG300, with
observations from KiDS+GAMA and SDSS-DR7 using four different selection
functions for the lenses (stellar mass, stellar mass and group membership,
stellar mass and isolation criteria, stellar mass and colour). We find that
this version of the SAM does not agree well with the current data for stellar
mass-only lenses with $M_\ast > 10^{11}\,M_\odot$. By decreasing the merger
time for satellite galaxies as well as reducing the radio-mode AGN accretion
efficiency in the SAM, we obtain better agreement, both for the lensing and the
clustering, at the high mass end. We show that the new model is consistent with
the signals for central galaxies presented in Velliscig et al. (2017). Turning
to the hydrodynamical simulation, TNG300 produces good lensing predictions,
both for stellar mass-only ($\chi^2 = 1.81$ compared to $\chi^2 = 7.79$ for the
SAM), and locally brightest galaxies samples ($\chi^2 = 3.80$ compared to
$\chi^2 = 5.01$). With added dust corrections to the colours it matches the
SDSS clustering signal well for red low mass galaxies. We find that both the
SAMs and TNG300 predict $\sim 50\,\%$ excessive lensing signals for
intermediate mass red galaxies with $10.2 < \log_{10} M_\ast [ M_\odot ] <
11.2$ at $r \approx 0.6\,h^{-1}\,\mathrm{Mpc}$, which require further
theoretical development.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:2004.14390 [pdf] - 2086991
Comparing galaxy formation in the L-GALAXIES semi-analytical model and
the IllustrisTNG simulations
Submitted: 2020-04-29
We perform a comparison, object-by-object and statistically, between the
Munich semi-analytical model, L-Galaxies, and the IllustrisTNG hydrodynamical
simulations. By running L-Galaxies on the IllustrisTNG dark matter-only merger
trees, we identify the same galaxies in the two models. This allows us to
compare the stellar mass, star formation rate and gas content of galaxies, as
well as the baryonic content of subhaloes and haloes in the two models. We find
that both the stellar mass functions and the stellar masses of individual
galaxies agree to better than $\sim0.2\,$dex. On the other hand, specific star
formation rates and gas contents can differ more substantially. At $z=0$ the
transition between low-mass star-forming galaxies and high-mass, quenched
galaxies occurs at a stellar mass scale $\sim0.5\,$dex lower in IllustrisTNG
than in L-Galaxies. IllustrisTNG also produces substantially more quenched
galaxies at higher redshifts. Both models predict a halo baryon fraction close
to the cosmic value for clusters, but IllustrisTNG predicts lower baryon
fractions in group environments. These differences are due primarily to
differences in modelling feedback from stars and supermassive black holes. The
gas content and star formation rates of galaxies in and around clusters and
groups differ substantially, with IllustrisTNG satellites less star-forming and
less gas-rich. We show that environmental processes such as ram-pressure
stripping are stronger and operate to larger distances and for a broader host
mass range in IllustrisTNG. We suggest that the treatment of galaxy evolution
in the semi-analytic model needs to be improved by prescriptions which capture
local environmental effects more accurately.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1710.03251 [pdf] - 1709274
Halo mass and weak galaxy-galaxy lensing profiles in rescaled
cosmological $N$-body simulations
Submitted: 2017-10-09, last modified: 2018-07-03
We investigate 3D density and weak lensing profiles of dark matter haloes
predicted by a cosmology-rescaling algorithm for $N$-body simulations. We
extend the rescaling method of Angulo & White (2010) and Angulo & Hilbert
(2015) to improve its performance on intra-halo scales by using models for the
concentration-mass-redshift relation based on excursion set theory. The
accuracy of the method is tested with numerical simulations carried out with
different cosmological parameters. We find that predictions for median density
profiles are more accurate than $\sim 5\,\%$ for haloes with masses of
$10^{12.0} - 10^{14.5} h^{-1}\,M_{\odot}$ for radii $0.05 < r/r_{200\text{m}} <
0.5$, and for cosmologies with $\Omega_\text{m} \in [0.15,\,0.40]$ and
$\sigma_8 \in [0.6,\,1.0]$. For larger radii, $0.5 < r/r_{200\text{m}} < 5$,
the accuracy degrades to $\sim20\,\%$, due to inaccurate modelling of the
cosmological and redshift dependence of the splashback radius. For changes in
cosmology allowed by current data, the residuals decrease to $\lesssim2\,\%$ up
to scales twice the virial radius. We illustrate the usefulness of the method
by estimating the mean halo mass of a mock galaxy group sample. We find that
the algorithm's accuracy is sufficient for current data. Improvements in the
algorithm, particularly in the modelling of baryons, are likely required for
interpreting future (dark energy task force stage IV) experiments.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1501.02140 [pdf] - 985501
Integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect in massive bigravity
Submitted: 2015-01-09, last modified: 2015-04-21
We study the integrated Sachs-Wolfe (ISW) effect in ghost-free, massive
bigravity. We focus on the infinite-branch bigravity (IBB) model which exhibits
viable cosmic expansion histories and stable linear perturbations, while the
cosmological constant is set to zero and the late-time accelerated expansion of
the Universe is due solely to the gravitational interaction terms. The ISW
contribution to the CMB auto-correlation power spectrum is predicted, as well
as the cross-correlation between the CMB temperature anisotropies and
large-scale structure. We use ISW amplitudes as observed by the WMAP 9-year
temperature data together with galaxy and AGN data provided by the WISE mission
in order to compare the theoretical predictions to the observations. The ISW
amplitudes in IBB are found to be larger than the corresponding ones in the
standard LCDM model by roughly a factor of 1.5, but are still consistent with
the observations.