The Einstein Cross, Q~2237+0305, has been photometrically observed in four bands on two successive nights at NOT (La Palma, Spain) in October 1995. Three independent algorithms have been used to analyse the data: an automatic image decomposition technique, a CLEAN algorithm and the new MCS deconvolution code. The photometric and astrometric results obtained with the three methods are presented. No photometric variations were found in the four quasar images. Comparison of the photometry from the three techniques shows that both systematic and random errors affect each method. When the seeing is worse than 1.0", the errors from the automatic image decomposition technique and the Clean algorithm tend to be large (0.04-0.1 magnitudes) while the deconvolution code still gives accurate results (1{sigma} error below 0.04) even for frames with seeing as bad as 1.7". Reddening is observed in the quasar images and is found to be compatible with either extinction from the lensing galaxy or colour dependent microlensing. The photometric accuracy depends on the light distribution used to model the lensing galaxy. In particular, using a numerical galaxy model, as done with the MCS algorithm, makes the method less seeing dependent. Another advantage of using a numerical model is that eventual non-homogeneous structures in the galaxy can be modeled. Finally, we propose an observational strategy for a future photometric monitoring of the Einstein Cross.

The spatial distribution of the Ly$\alpha$ forest is studied using new HST data for the quasar pair Q~1026--0045 A and B at $z_{em}$ = 1.438 and 1.520 respectively. The angular separation is 36 arcsec and corresponds to transverse linear separations between lines of sight of $\sim300h^{-1}_{50}$ kpc ($q_{o}$ = 0.5) over the redshift range 0.833 < z < 1.438. From the observed numbers of coincident and anti-coincident Ly$\alpha$ absorption lines, we conclude that, at this redshift, the Ly$\alpha$ structures have typical dimensions of $\sim500h^{-1}_{50}$ kpc, larger than the mean separation of the two lines of sight. The velocity difference, $\Delta V$, between coincident lines is surprisingly small (4 and 8 pairs with $\Delta V < 50 and 200 km/s respectively). Metal line systems are present at $z_{abs}$ = 1.2651 and 1.2969 in A, $z_{abs}$ = 0.6320, 0.7090, 1.2651 and 1.4844 in B. In addition we tentatively identify a weak Mg II system at $z_{abs}$ = 0.11 in B. It is remarkable that the $z_{abs}$ = 1.2651 system is common to both lines of sight. The system at $z_{abs}$ = 1.4844 %is probably associated and has strong O~VI absorption. There is a metal-poor associated system at $z_{abs}$ = 1.4420 along the line of sight to A with complex velocity profile. We detect a strong Ly$\alpha$ absorption along the line of sight to B redshifted by only 300 km/s relatively to the associated system. It is tempting to interpret this as the presence of a disk of radius larger than 300$h^{-1}_{50}$ kpc surrounding quasar A.

We present the results of a 7 year long photometric monitoring of two components (A and B) of UM 425, thought to be images, separated by 6.5", of the same z = 1.47 quasar. These components have been imaged through an R filter in order to obtain their light curves. The photometry was obtained by simultaneously fitting a stellar two-dimensional profile on each component. The brightest image (component A, m(R) = 15.7) shows a slow and smooth increase in brightness of 0.2 magnitude in seven years, while the faintest one (component B, m(R) = 20.1) displays an outburst of 0.4 magnitude which lasts approximately two years. The variation of component B may be interpreted in two ways, assuming UM 425 is gravitationally lensed. If it is due to an intrinsic variation of the quasar, we derive a lower limit of 3 years on the time delay from the fact that it is not observed in component A. On the other hand, if it is a microlensing ``High Amplification Event'', we estimate the size of the source to be ~ 10^{-3} pc, in agreement with standard models of AGNs. These observations are consistent with the gravitational lens interpretation of the object. Furthermore, all the CCD frames obtained under the best seeing conditions have been co-added, in an attempt to detect the deflector. The final R image reveals a rich field of faint galaxies in the magnitude range m(R) 22-24. No obvious deflector, nor any system of arcs or arclets is detected, down to a limiting magnitude of m(R) 24.