Normalized to: Refsdal, S.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0205424 [pdf] - 49498
Bias and consistency in time delay estimation methods: case of the
double quasar HE 1104-1805
Submitted: 2002-05-24
We present a short re-evaluation of a recently published time delay estimate
for the gravitational lens system HE 1104-1805 with emphasis on important
methodological aspects: bias of the statistics, inconsistency of the methods
and use of the purposeful selection of data points(or so-called "cleaning") at
the preprocessing stage. We show how the inadequate use of simple analysis
methods can lead to too strong conclusions. Our analysis shows that there are
indications for the time delay in HE 1104-1805 to be between -0.9 and -0.7
years, but still with a large uncertainty.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0005371 [pdf] - 36142
Constraints on source and lens parameters from microlensing variability
in QSO 0957+561 A,B
Submitted: 2000-05-18
From regular monitoring of the Double Quasar QSO 0957+561 A,B there is now
general agreement on a time delay of about 416 days. This has made it possible
to determine the microlensing residual in the light-curve, see Pelt et al.
(1998). We have used two significant microlensing features: 1) A ``quiet''
period with a variability less than 0.05 mag lasting about 8 years, and 2) A
change in the residual of 0.25 mag during a time interval of about 5 years. The
first feature gives a lower limit for the lens mass, 'M', for a given
normalized source radius, 'r', whereas the second feature gives an upper limit.
We have considered the amount of mass in a continuum to be a free parameter
with possible values between 0% (all mass in lenses) and 90%. At a significance
level of 1% the mass can only be constrained within a rather wide range (1e-06
M_solar to 5 M_solar). For the radius 'R' of the source an upper limit of 1e16
cm is found, whereas the normalized source radius 'r' is restricted to be
smaller than 30. At a level of 10%, however, the range of possible masses is
much narrower (2e-03 M_solar to 0.5 M_solar), and the upper limit of R is about
6e15 cm, whereas the value of 'r' is restricted to be less than 2. We have used
an effective transverse velocity 'V' equal to 600 km/s.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9909291 [pdf] - 108327
Degeneracies of the radial mass profile in lens models
Submitted: 1999-09-16
We discuss a simple parameter degeneracy in lens models which follows
directly from the well known mass sheet degeneracy and prevents determining the
radial mass distribution from lensing alone for many systems. For cosmological
important systems like 1115+080 it is shown that no exact value of H0 can be
determined without assuming a mass index beta.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9809107 [pdf] - 102811
Three photometric methods tested on ground-based data of Q 2237+0305
Submitted: 1998-09-09
The Einstein Cross, Q~2237+0305, has been photometrically observed in four
bands on two successive nights at NOT (La Palma, Spain) in October 1995. Three
independent algorithms have been used to analyse the data: an automatic image
decomposition technique, a CLEAN algorithm and the new MCS deconvolution code.
The photometric and astrometric results obtained with the three methods are
presented. No photometric variations were found in the four quasar images.
Comparison of the photometry from the three techniques shows that both
systematic and random errors affect each method. When the seeing is worse than
1.0", the errors from the automatic image decomposition technique and the Clean
algorithm tend to be large (0.04-0.1 magnitudes) while the deconvolution code
still gives accurate results (1{sigma} error below 0.04) even for frames with
seeing as bad as 1.7". Reddening is observed in the quasar images and is found
to be compatible with either extinction from the lensing galaxy or colour
dependent microlensing. The photometric accuracy depends on the light
distribution used to model the lensing galaxy. In particular, using a numerical
galaxy model, as done with the MCS algorithm, makes the method less seeing
dependent. Another advantage of using a numerical model is that eventual
non-homogeneous structures in the galaxy can be modeled. Finally, we propose an
observational strategy for a future photometric monitoring of the Einstein
Cross.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9803175 [pdf] - 100710
High resolution optical and near-IR imaging of the quadruple quasar RX
J0911.4+0551
Burud, I.;
Courbin, F.;
Lidman, C.;
Jaunsen, A.;
Hjorth, J.;
Ostensen, R.;
Andersen, M.;
Clasen, J.;
Wucknitz, O.;
Meylan, G.;
Magain, P.;
Stabell, R.;
Refsdal, S.
Submitted: 1998-03-16, last modified: 1998-05-10
We report the detection of four images in the recently discovered lensed QSO
RX J0911.4+0551. With a maximum angular separation of 3.1", it is the quadruply
imaged QSO with the widest known angular separation. Raw and deconvolved data
reveal an elongated lens galaxy. The observed reddening in at least two of the
four QSO images suggests differential extinction by this lensing galaxy. We
show that both an ellipticity of the galaxy (epsilon_{min}=0.075) and an
external shear (gamma_{min}=0.15) from a nearby mass has to be included in the
lensing potential in order to reproduce the complex geometry observed in RX
J0911.4+0551. A possible galaxy cluster is detected about 38", from RX
J0911.4+0551 and could contribute to the X-ray emission observed by ROSAT in
this field. The color of these galaxies indicates a plausible redshift in the
range of 0.6-0.8.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9512103 [pdf] - 93787
Monitoring of the Einstein Cross with the Nordic Optical Telscope
Oestensen, R.;
Refsdal, S.;
Stabell, R.;
Teuber, J.;
Emanuelsen, P. I.;
Festin, L.;
Florentin-Nielsen, R.;
Gahm, G.;
Gullbring, E.;
Hjorth, J.;
Jablonski, M.;
Jaunsen, A. O.;
Kaas, A. A.;
Karttunen, H.;
Kotilainen, J.;
Laurikainen, E.;
Lindgren, H.;
Maehoenen, P.;
Nilsson, K.;
Olofsson, G.;
Olsen, Oe.;
Pettersen, B. R.;
Piirola, V.;
Soerensen, A. N.;
Takalo, L.;
Thomsen, B.;
Valtaoja, E.;
Vestergaard, M.;
Vianborg, T. av
Submitted: 1995-12-15
We report results from five years of monitoring of the Einstein Cross (Q
2237+0305) with the Nordic Optical Telescope. The photometry, mainly in the R
and I bands, has been performed by a PSF fitting and `cleaning' procedure, in
which the four image components as well as the lens galaxy and its nucleus are
iteratively removed. The resulting lightcurves exhibit several microlensing
features; one event may have a timescale as short as 14 days. Variations of
timescales of several years are found in all four images. This becomes even
more convincing when our data are combined with data published for 1986-89. No
clear high amplification event was observed during the period. A brightening of
all four components during 1994 is interpreted as intrinsic variation.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9501036 [pdf] - 1469116
The light curve and the time delay of QSO 0957+561
Submitted: 1995-01-11
We present a new analysis of the presently available photometric data for the
gravitationally lensed quasar 0957+561 A,B with the aim of determining the time
delay between its two images. The basic method used is the dispersion
estimation technique. Even by using the simplest non-parametric form of our
method we can convincingly rule out a time delay near 536 days and show that
the time delay is in the vicinity of 420 days. We then introduce refinements to
our method in order to get a stable and reliable result for the time delay
independent of high frequency noise in the data and sampling errors. Our best
result for the time delay, checked by various statistical tests and using
bootstrap error estimates, is 423 +/- 6 days. We furthermore confirm our
earlier result that the radio data are compatible with this value. Using the
best available model for the mass distribution in the lensing galaxy and
cluster, our result for the time delay constrains the Hubble parameter to be
smaller than 70 km/(s Mpc).
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9401013 [pdf] - 91180
Time delay controversy on QSO 0957+561 not yet decided
Submitted: 1994-01-11
We present a new analysis of previously published optical and radio data sets
of the gravitationally lensed quasar 0957+561 A,B with the aim of determining
the time delay between its two images. We use a non-parametric estimate of the
dispersion of the combined data set where, however, we only make use of
alternating neighbours in order to avoid windowing effects.
From the optical data a time delay of (415 $\pm$ 32) days and from the radio
data a delay of (409 $\pm$ 23) days is suggested. We demonstrate a considerable
sensitivity of different delay estimation procedures against the removal of
only a few observational data points or against smoothing or detrending of the
original data sets. The radio data give us formally a slightly more precise
value for the time delay than the optical data. Also, due to the lack of
windowing effects, the result obtained for the radio data can be considered as
somewhat more reliable than the delay determined from the optical data.