sort results by

Use logical operators AND, OR, NOT and round brackets to construct complex queries. Whitespace-separated words are treated as ANDed.

Show articles per page in mode

Rechy-Garcia, Jackeline S.

Normalized to: Rechy-Garcia, J.

3 article(s) in total. 16 co-authors. Median position in authors list is 3,0.

[1]  oai:arXiv.org:1912.07754  [pdf] - 2050307
Space Velocity and Time Span of Jets in Planetary Nebulae
Comments: 19 pages, 8 figures, accepted for publication by ApJ
Submitted: 2019-12-16
Fast highly-collimated outflows including bipolar knots, jet-like features, and point-symmetric filaments or string of knots are common in planetary nebulae (PNe). These features, generally named as jets, are thought to play an active role in the nebular shaping immediately before or at the same time that fast stellar winds and D-type ionization fronts shock and sweep up the nebular envelope. The space velocity, radial distance from the central star and kinematic age of jets in PNe cannot be determined because the inclination anglewith the line-of-sight is usually unknown. Here we have used the large number of jets already detected in PNe to derive orientation-independent properties from a statistical point of view. We find that jets in PNe can be assigned to two different populations: a significant fraction ($\simeq$70%) have space velocities below 100 km s$^{-1}$, whereas only $\simeq$30% have larger velocities. Many jets move at velocities similar to that of their parent PNe and are found close to the nebular edge. We propose that these jets have been slowed down in their interaction with the nebular envelope, contributing to the expansion of their PN. The time span before a jet dissolves is found to be generally shorter than 2,500 yrs. Since most jets are found in young PNe of similar (1,000-3,000 yrs) age, it can be concluded that jets are mostly coeval with their PNe.
[2]  oai:arXiv.org:1708.01585  [pdf] - 1586789
Proper motions of the HH1 jet
Comments: 12 pages, 8 figures
Submitted: 2017-08-04
We describe a new method for determining proper motions of extended objects, and a pipeline developed for the application of this method. We then apply this method to an analysis of four epochs of [S~II] HST images of the HH~1 jet (covering a period of $\sim 20$~yr). We determine the proper motions of the knots along the jet, and make a reconstruction of the past ejection velocity time-variability (assuming ballistic knot motions). This reconstruction shows an "acceleration" of the ejection velocities of the jet knots, with higher velocities at more recent times. This acceleration will result in an eventual merging of the knots in $\sim 450$~yr and at a distance of $\sim 80"$ from the outflow source, close to the present-day position of HH~1.
[3]  oai:arXiv.org:1708.00559  [pdf] - 1586659
The kinematical behaviour of ORLs and CELs in Galactic PNe
Comments: 14 pages, 4 figures, 3 tables, full version of Table 2 on-line only, accepted in MNRAS
Submitted: 2017-08-01
The kinematics of the plasma in 14 PNe is analysed by measuring the expansion velocities (V$_{exp}$) of different ions as derived from their collisionally excited lines (CELs) and optical recombination lines (ORLs). V$_{exp}$ are analysed as a function of the ionisation potential of ions that at first approximation represents the distance of the ion to the central star. In most cases the kinematics of ORLs is incompatible with the kinematics of CELs at the same ionisation potential, specially if CELs and ORLs of the same ion are considered. In general V$_{exp}$ from ORLs is lower than V$_{exp}$ from CELs indicating that, if the gas is in ionisation equilibrium, ORLs are emitted by a gas located closer to the central star. The velocity field derived from CELs shows a gradient accelerating outwards as predicted from hydrodynamic modelling of PNe ionisation structures. The velocity field derived from ORLs is different, in many cases the velocity gradient is flatter or nonexistent and high and low ionised species present nearly the same V$_{exp}$. In addition, the FWHM(ORLs) is usually smaller that the FWHM(CELs). Our interpretation is that ORLs are mainly emitted by a plasma that coexists with the plasma emitting CELs, but does not fit the ionisation structures predicted by models. Such a plasma should have been ejected in a different event that the plasma emitting CELs.