Normalized to: Rawls, M.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:2006.12417 [pdf] - 2119207
Mitigation of LEO Satellite Brightness and Trail Effects on the Rubin
Observatory LSST
Tyson, J. Anthony;
Ivezić, Željko;
Bradshaw, Andrew;
Rawls, Meredith L.;
Xin, Bo;
Yoachim, Peter;
Parejko, John;
Greene, Jared;
Sholl, Michael;
Abbott, Timothy M. C.;
Polin, Daniel
Submitted: 2020-06-22
We report studies on mitigation of optical effects of bright Low-Earth-Orbit
(LEO) satellites on Vera C. Rubin Observatory and its Legacy Survey of Space
and Time (LSST). These include options for pointing the telescope to avoid
satellites, laboratory investigations of bright trails on the Rubin Observatory
LSST Camera sensors, algorithms for correcting image artifacts caused by bright
trails, experiments on darkening SpaceX Starlink satellites, and ground-based
follow-up observations. Starlink satellites with no brightness mitigation are
presently g ~ 5.1 mag, and an initial experiment "DarkSat" is g ~ 6.1 mag.
Future Starlink darkening plans may reach g ~ 7 mag, a brightness level that
enables non-linear image artifact correction to the same level as background
noise. However, the satellite trails will still exist at S/N ~ 100, generating
systematics that may impact data analysis and limiting some science. LEO
satellite trails are wider than a point-spread function because satellites are
slightly out of focus due to their finite distance; for Rubin Observatory's
8.4-m mirror and a satellite at 550 km, this widening effect is about 3 arcsec,
which helps avoid saturation by decreasing the trail's peak surface brightness.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1907.00095 [pdf] - 1945841
APOGEE/Kepler Overlap Yields Orbital Solutions for a Variety of
Eclipsing Binaries
Submitted: 2019-06-28
Spectroscopic Eclipsing Binaries (SEBs) are fundamental benchmarks in stellar
astrophysics and today are observed in breathtaking detail by missions like
TESS, Kepler, and APOGEE. We develop a methodology for simultaneous analysis of
high precision Kepler light curves and high resolution near-IR spectra from
APOGEE and present orbital solutions and evolutionary histories for a subset of
SEBs within this overlap. Radial velocities extracted from APOGEE spectra using
the Broadening Function technique are combined with Kepler light curves and to
yield binary orbital solutions. The Broadening Function approach yields more
precise radial velocities than the standard Cross-Correlation Function, which
in turn yields more precise orbital parameters and enables the identification
of tertiary stars. The orbital periods of these seven SEBs range from 4 to 40
days. Four of the systems (KIC 5285607, KIC 6864859, KIC 6778289, and KIC
4285087) are well-detached binaries. The remaining three systems have apparent
tertiary companions, but each exhibits two eclipses along with at least one
spectroscopically varying component (KIC 6449358, KIC 6131659, and KIC
6781535). Gaia distances are available for four targets which we use to
estimate temperatures of both members of these SEBs. We explore evolutionary
histories in H-R diagram space and estimate ages for this subset of our sample.
Finally, we consider the implications for the formation pathways of close
binary systems via interactions with tertiary companions. Our methodology
combined with the era of big data and observation overlap opens up the
possibility of discovering and analyzing large numbers of diverse SEBs,
including those with high flux ratios and those in triple systems.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1812.03248 [pdf] - 1794996
An Overview of the LSST Image Processing Pipelines
Bosch, James;
AlSayyad, Yusra;
Armstrong, Robert;
Bellm, Eric;
Chiang, Hsin-Fang;
Eggl, Siegfried;
Findeisen, Krzysztof;
Fisher-Levine, Merlin;
Guy, Leanne P.;
Guyonnet, Augustin;
Ivezić, Željko;
Jenness, Tim;
Kovács, Gábor;
Krughoff, K. Simon;
Lupton, Robert H.;
Lust, Nate B.;
MacArthur, Lauren A.;
Meyers, Joshua;
Moolekamp, Fred;
Morrison, Christopher B.;
Morton, Timothy D.;
O'Mullane, William;
Parejko, John K.;
Plazas, Andrés A.;
Price, Paul A.;
Rawls, Meredith L.;
Reed, Sophie L.;
Schellart, Pim;
Slater, Colin T.;
Sullivan, Ian;
Swinbank, John. D.;
Taranu, Dan;
Waters, Christopher Z.;
Wood-Vasey, W. M.
Submitted: 2018-12-07
The Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST) is an ambitious astronomical
survey with a similarly ambitious Data Management component. Data Management
for LSST includes processing on both nightly and yearly cadences to generate
transient alerts, deep catalogs of the static sky, and forced photometry
light-curves for billions of objects at hundreds of epochs, spanning at least a
decade. The algorithms running in these pipelines are individually
sophisticated and interact in subtle ways. This paper provides an overview of
those pipelines, focusing more on those interactions than the details of any
individual algorithm.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1610.03159 [pdf] - 1494915
The Astropy Problem
Muna, Demitri;
Alexander, Michael;
Allen, Alice;
Ashley, Richard;
Asmus, Daniel;
Azzollini, Ruyman;
Bannister, Michele;
Beaton, Rachael;
Benson, Andrew;
Berriman, G. Bruce;
Bilicki, Maciej;
Boyce, Peter;
Bridge, Joanna;
Cami, Jan;
Cangi, Eryn;
Chen, Xian;
Christiny, Nicholas;
Clark, Christopher;
Collins, Michelle;
Comparat, Johan;
Cook, Neil;
Croton, Darren;
Davids, Isak Delberth;
Depagne, Éric;
Donor, John;
Santos, Leonardo A. dos;
Douglas, Stephanie;
Du, Alan;
Durbin, Meredith;
Erb, Dawn;
Faes, Daniel;
Fernández-Trincado, J. G.;
Foley, Anthony;
Fotopoulou, Sotiria;
Frimann, Søren;
Frinchaboy, Peter;
Garcia-Dias, Rafael;
Gawryszczak, Artur;
George, Elizabeth;
Gonzalez, Sebastian;
Gordon, Karl;
Gorgone, Nicholas;
Gosmeyer, Catherine;
Grasha, Katie;
Greenfield, Perry;
Grellmann, Rebekka;
Guillochon, James;
Gurwell, Mark;
Haas, Marcel;
Hagen, Alex;
Haggard, Daryl;
Haines, Tim;
Hall, Patrick;
Hellwing, Wojciech;
Herenz, Edmund Christian;
Hinton, Samuel;
Hlozek, Renee;
Hoffman, John;
Holman, Derek;
Holwerda, Benne Willem;
Horton, Anthony;
Hummels, Cameron;
Jacobs, Daniel;
Jensen, Jens Juel;
Jones, David;
Karick, Arna;
Kelley, Luke;
Kenworthy, Matthew;
Kitchener, Ben;
Klaes, Dominik;
Kohn, Saul;
Konorski, Piotr;
Krawczyk, Coleman;
Kuehn, Kyler;
Kuutma, Teet;
Lam, Michael T.;
Lane, Richard;
Liske, Jochen;
Lopez-Camara, Diego;
Mack, Katherine;
Mangham, Sam;
Mao, Qingqing;
Marsh, David J. E.;
Mateu, Cecilia;
Maurin, Loïc;
McCormac, James;
Momcheva, Ivelina;
Monteiro, Hektor;
Mueller, Michael;
Munoz, Roberto;
Naidu, Rohan;
Nelson, Nicholas;
Nitschelm, Christian;
North, Chris;
Nunez-Iglesias, Juan;
Ogaz, Sara;
Owen, Russell;
Parejko, John;
Patrício, Vera;
Pepper, Joshua;
Perrin, Marshall;
Pickering, Timothy;
Piscionere, Jennifer;
Pogge, Richard;
Poleski, Radek;
Pourtsidou, Alkistis;
Price-Whelan, Adrian M.;
Rawls, Meredith L.;
Read, Shaun;
Rees, Glen;
Rein, Hanno;
Rice, Thomas;
Riemer-Sørensen, Signe;
Rusomarov, Naum;
Sanchez, Sebastian F.;
Santander-García, Miguel;
Sarid, Gal;
Schoenell, William;
Scholz, Aleks;
Schuhmann, Robert L.;
Schuster, William;
Scicluna, Peter;
Seidel, Marja;
Shao, Lijing;
Sharma, Pranav;
Shulevski, Aleksandar;
Shupe, David;
Sifón, Cristóbal;
Simmons, Brooke;
Sinha, Manodeep;
Skillen, Ian;
Soergel, Bjoern;
Spriggs, Thomas;
Srinivasan, Sundar;
Stevens, Abigail;
Streicher, Ole;
Suchyta, Eric;
Tan, Joshua;
Telford, O. Grace;
Thomas, Romain;
Tonini, Chiara;
Tremblay, Grant;
Tuttle, Sarah;
Urrutia, Tanya;
Vaughan, Sam;
Verdugo, Miguel;
Wagner, Alexander;
Walawender, Josh;
Wetzel, Andrew;
Willett, Kyle;
Williams, Peter K. G.;
Yang, Guang;
Zhu, Guangtun;
Zonca, Andrea
Submitted: 2016-10-10
The Astropy Project (http://astropy.org) is, in its own words, "a community
effort to develop a single core package for Astronomy in Python and foster
interoperability between Python astronomy packages." For five years this
project has been managed, written, and operated as a grassroots,
self-organized, almost entirely volunteer effort while the software is used by
the majority of the astronomical community. Despite this, the project has
always been and remains to this day effectively unfunded. Further, contributors
receive little or no formal recognition for creating and supporting what is now
critical software. This paper explores the problem in detail, outlines possible
solutions to correct this, and presents a few suggestions on how to address the
sustainability of general purpose astronomical software.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1609.06645 [pdf] - 1528227
Testing the asteroseismic scaling relations for Red Giants with
Eclipsing Binaries Observed by Kepler
Gaulme, Patrick;
McKeever, Jean;
Jackiewicz, Jason;
Rawls, Meredith L.;
Corsaro, Enrico;
Mosser, Benoit;
Southworth, John;
Mahadevan, Suvrath;
Bender, Chad;
Deshpande, Rohit
Submitted: 2016-09-21
Given the potential of ensemble asteroseismology for understanding
fundamental properties of large numbers of stars, it is critical to determine
the accuracy of the scaling relations on which these measurements are based.
From several powerful validation techniques, all indications so far show that
stellar radius estimates from the asteroseismic scaling relations are accurate
to within a few percent. Eclipsing binary systems hosting at least one star
with detectable solar-like oscillations constitute the ideal test objects for
validating asteroseismic radius and mass inferences. By combining
radial-velocity measurements and photometric time series of eclipses, it is
possible to determine the masses and radii of each component of a double-lined
spectroscopic binary. We report the results of a four-year radial-velocity
survey performed with the \'echelle spectrometer of the Astrophysical Research
Consortium's 3.5-m telescope and the APOGEE spectrometer at Apache Point
Observatory. We compare the masses and radii of 10 red giants obtained by
combining radial velocities and eclipse photometry with the estimates from the
asteroseismic scaling relations. We find that the asteroseismic scaling
relations overestimate red-giant radii by about 5% on average and masses by
about 15% for stars at various stages of red-giant evolution. Systematic
overestimation of mass leads to underestimation of stellar age, which can have
important implications for ensemble asteroseismology used for Galactic studies.
As part of a second objective, where asteroseismology is used for understanding
binary systems, we confirm that oscillations of red giants in close binaries
can be suppressed enough to be undetectable, an hypothesis that was proposed in
a previous work.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1601.00038 [pdf] - 1359131
KIC 9246715: The Double Red Giant Eclipsing Binary With Odd Oscillations
Rawls, Meredith L.;
Gaulme, Patrick;
McKeever, Jean;
Jackiewicz, Jason;
Orosz, Jerome A.;
Corsaro, Enrico;
Beck, Paul;
Mosser, Benoît;
Latham, David W.;
Latham, Christian A.
Submitted: 2015-12-31
We combine Kepler photometry with ground-based spectra to present a
comprehensive dynamical model of the double red giant eclipsing binary KIC
9246715. While the two stars are very similar in mass (M1 = 2.171 [+0.006 /
-0.008], M2 = 2.149 [+0.006 / -0.008] Msun) and radius (R1 = 8.37 [+0.03 /
-0.07], R2 = 8.30 [+0.04 / -0.03] Rsun), an asteroseismic analysis finds one
main set of solar-like oscillations with unusually low-amplitude, wide modes. A
second set of oscillations from the other star may exist, but this marginal
detection is extremely faint. Because the two stars are nearly twins, KIC
9246715 is a difficult target for a precise test of the asteroseismic scaling
relations, which yield M = 2.17 +/- 0.14 Msun and R = 8.26 +/- 0.18 Rsun. Both
stars are consistent with the inferred asteroseismic properties, but we suspect
the main oscillator is Star 2 because it is less active than Star 1. We find
evidence for stellar activity and modest tidal forces acting over the 171-day
eccentric orbit, which are likely responsible for the essential lack of
solar-like oscillations in one star and weak oscillations in the other. Mixed
modes indicate the main oscillating star is on the secondary red clump (a
core-He-burning star), and stellar evolution modeling supports this with a
coeval history for a pair of red clump stars. This system is a useful case
study and paves the way for a detailed analysis of more red giants in eclipsing
binaries, an important benchmark for asteroseismology.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1303.1197 [pdf] - 1165029
Red Giants in Eclipsing Binary and Multiple-Star Systems: Modeling and
Asteroseismic Analysis of 70 Candidates from Kepler Data
Submitted: 2013-03-05
Red-giant stars are an incredible source of information for testing models of
stellar evolution, as asteroseismology has opened up a window into their
interiors. Such insights are a direct result of the unprecedented data from
space missions Kepler and CoRoT as well as recent theoretical advances.
Eclipsing binaries are also fundamental astrophysical objects, and when coupled
with asteroseismology, binaries would provide two independent methods to obtain
masses and radii and exciting opportunities to develop highly constrained
stellar models. The possibility of discovering pulsating red giants in
eclipsing binary systems is therefore an important goal that could potentially
offer very robust characterization of these systems. Hitherto, only 1 case has
been discovered with Kepler. We cross-correlated the detected red-giant and
eclipsing-binary catalogs from Kepler data to find candidate systems.
Light-curve modeling and mean asteroseismic properties are combined to yield
measurements of periods, masses, radii, temperatures, eclipse timing
variations, core rotation rates, and red-giant evolutionary state. After
elimination of false positives, out of the 70 systems common to the red-giant
and eclipsing-binary catalogs we find 13 new strong candidates that are
pulsating red giants in eclipsing binaries, and 10 more that are pulsating red
giants in hierarchical triple systems. The systems span a range of orbital
eccentricities, periods, and spectral types for the red-giant companion. One
case even suggests a system composed of two red-giants. The discovery of
pulsating red giants in multiple systems provides exciting test beds for
precise astrophysical modeling, and follow-up spectroscopic observations of the
candidate systems are encouraged.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1101.2465 [pdf] - 1051387
Refined Neutron-Star Mass Determinations for Six Eclipsing X-Ray Pulsar
Binaries
Submitted: 2011-01-12
We present an improved method for determining the mass of neutron stars in
eclipsing X-ray pulsar binaries and apply the method to six systems, namely
Vela X-1, 4U 1538-52, SMC X-1, LMC X-4, Cen X-3, and Her X-1. In previous
studies to determine neutron star mass, the X-ray eclipse duration has been
approximated analytically by assuming the companion star is spherical with an
effective Roche lobe radius. We use a numerical code based on Roche geometry
with various optimizers to analyze the published data for these systems, which
we supplement with new spectroscopic and photometric data for 4U 1538-52. This
allows us to model the eclipse duration more accurately and thus calculate an
improved value for the neutron star mass. The derived neutron star mass also
depends on the assumed Roche lobe filling factor beta of the companion star,
where beta = 1 indicates a completely filled Roche lobe. In previous work a
range of beta between 0.9 and 1.0 was usually adopted. We use optical
ellipsoidal lightcurve data to constrain beta. We find neutron star masses of
1.77 +/- 0.08 M_{sun} for Vela X-1, 0.87 +/- 0.07 M_{sun} for 4U 1538-52
(eccentric orbit), 1.00 +/- 0.10 M_{sun} for 4U 1538-52 (circular orbit), 1.04
+/- 0.09 M_{sun} for SMC X-1, 1.29 +/- 0.05 M_{sun} for LMC X-4, 1.49 +/- 0.08
M_{sun} for Cen X-3, and 1.07 +/- 0.36 M_{sun} for Her X-1. We discuss the
limits of the approximations that were used to derive the earlier mass
determinations, and we comment on the implications our new masses have for
observationally refining the upper and lower bounds of the neutron star mass
distribution.