Organizations that support science (astronomy) such as federal agencies, research centers, observatories, academic institutions, societies, etc. employ advisory committees and boards as a mechanism for reviewing their activities and giving advice on practices, policies and future directions. As with any scientific endeavor, there is concern over complementing these committees with enough members who have as broad a range of expertise and understanding as possible, so that bias is mitigated. However, for a number of reasons (logistical, practical, financial, etc.), committees can also not be infinitely large and thus trade-offs must be made. It is often recognized that conflicts of interest must be acknowledged within these committees, but what is not often recognized it the potential for unmitigated biases and "group think" that can be introduced as part of these committees. In this white paper, we recommend that advisory committees that collect community input, (e.g., the Decadal Survey review committee), also collect, compile and review input demographic data before finalizing reports, (e.g., the final 2020 Decadal Survey Report). A summary of these data should be released alongside the final survey report. This information would enable the committee to understand potential "blind spots" and biases of the data collection phase and inform future data collections of any barriers that affect the omission of perspectives from various demographics.

Using narrow-band images recorded on over 150 nights by the 35 cm coronagraph which comprises PSI's Io Input/Output Facility (IoIO), we detected a 6-month long enhancement in the Jovian sodium nebula. The onset of the enhancement occurred in the mid December 2017 -- early January 2018 timeframe. Sodium emission over the IoIO 0.4 degree field-of-view of was seen to increase through January 2018 and peak in early March 2018. By early June 2018, the surface brightness of the emission returned to the value seen 2017 April -- June, making this the longest such event observed by this technique (Brown & Bouchez 1997, Yoneda et al. 2015) and comparable in length to that observed by the Galileo Dust Detector in 2000 (Krueger et al. 2003). A new IR hot-spot was found on Io near Susanoo/Mulungu paterae between January 2 and 12, however this hot-spot was neither bright nor long-lasting enough to have been independently identified as the source of a major sodium nebula enhancement. Furthermore, no other report of this event has been made despite a significant number of observations of the Jovian system by and in support of NASA's Juno mission. This detection therefore places those observations in valuable context and highlights the importance of synoptic observations by facilities such as IoIO, which provide a global view of neutral material in the Jovian magnetosphere.

Tidal heating is the major source of heat in the outer Solar System. Because of its strong tidal interaction with Jupiter and the other Galilean Satellites, Io is incredibly volcanically active. We use the directly measured volcanic activity level of Io's volcanoes as a proxy for surface heat flow and compare to tidal heating model predictions. Volcanic activity is a better proxy for heat flow than simply the locations of volcanic constructs. We determine the volcanic activity level using three data sets: Galileo PPR, Galileo NIMS, and New Horizons LEISA. We also present a systematic reanalysis of the Galileo NIMS observations to determine the 3.5 micron brightness of 51 active volcanoes. We find that potential differences in volcanic style between high and low latitudes make high latitude observations unreliable in distinguishing between tidal heating models. Observations of Io's polar areas, such as those by JUNO, are necessary to unambiguously understand Io's heat flow. However, all three of the data sets examined show a relative dearth of volcanic brightness near 180 W (anti-Jovian point) and the equator and the only data set with good observations of the sub-Jovian point (LEISA) also shows a lack of volcanic brightness in that region. These observations are more consistent with the mantle-heating model than the asthenospheric-heating model. Furthermore, all three of the data sets are consistent with four-fold symmetry in longitude and peak heat flow at mid-latitudes, which best matches with the combined heating case of Tackley et al. (2001).

Future remote sensing of exoplanets will be enhanced by a thorough investigation of our solar system Ice Giants (Neptune-size planets). What can the configuration of the magnetic field tell us (remotely) about the interior, and what implications does that field have for the structure of the magnetosphere; energy input into the atmosphere, and surface geophysics (for example surface weathering of satellites that might harbour sub-surface oceans). How can monitoring of auroral emission help inform future remote observations of emission from exoplanets? Our Solar System provides the only laboratory in which we can perform in-situ experiments to understand exoplanet formation, dynamos, systems and magnetospheres.

Loki Patera is the most powerful volcano in the solar system. We have obtained measurements of Loki's 3.5 micron brightness from NASA's Infrared Telescope Facility (IRTF) and have witnessed a change from the periodic behavior previously noted. While Loki brightened by a factor of several every 540 days prior to 2001, from 2001 through 2004 Loki remained at a constant, medium brightness. We have constructed a quantitative model of Loki as a basaltic lava lake whose solidified crust overturns when it becomes buoyantly unstable. By altering the speed at which the overturn propagates across the patera, we can match our groundbased brightness data. In addition, we can match other data taken at other times and wavelengths. By slowing the propagation speed dramatically, we can match the observations from 2001-2004. This slowing may be due to a small change in volatile content in the magma.