Normalized to: Rapin, W.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1612.04308 [pdf] - 1533347
Evaluating the wind-induced mechanical noise on the InSight seismometers
Submitted: 2016-12-13
The SEIS (Seismic Experiment for Interior Structures) instrument onboard the
InSight mission to Mars is the critical instrument for determining the interior
structure of Mars, the current level of tectonic activity and the meteorite
flux. Meeting the performance requirements of the SEIS instrument is vital to
successfully achieve these mission objectives. Here we analyse in-situ wind
measurements from previous Mars space missions to understand the wind
environment that we are likely to encounter on Mars, and then we use an elastic
ground deformation model to evaluate the mechanical noise contributions on the
SEIS instrument due to the interaction between the Martian winds and the
InSight lander. Lander mechanical noise maps that will be used to select the
best deployment site for SEIS once the InSight lander arrives on Mars are also
presented. We find the lander mechanical noise may be a detectable signal on
the InSight seismometers. However, for the baseline SEIS deployment position,
the noise is expected to be below the total noise requirement >97% of the time
and is, therefore, not expected to endanger the InSight mission objectives.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1202.5852 [pdf] - 1116907
Planetary Candidates Observed by Kepler, III: Analysis of the First 16
Months of Data
Batalha, Natalie M.;
Rowe, Jason F.;
Bryson, Stephen T.;
Barclay, Thomas;
Burke, Christopher J.;
Caldwell, Douglas A.;
Christiansen, Jessie L.;
Mullally, Fergal;
Thompson, Susan E.;
Brown, Timothy M.;
Dupree, Andrea K.;
Fabrycky, Daniel C.;
Ford, Eric B.;
Fortney, Jonathan J.;
Gilliland, Ronald L.;
Isaacson, Howard;
Latham, David W.;
Marcy, Geoffrey W.;
Quinn, Samuel;
Ragozzine, Darin;
Shporer, Avi;
Borucki, William J.;
Ciardi, David R.;
Gautier, Thomas N.;
Haas, Michael R.;
Jenkins, Jon M.;
Koch, David G.;
Lissauer, Jack J.;
Rapin, William;
Basri, Gibor S.;
Boss, Alan P.;
Buchhave, Lars A.;
Charbonneau, David;
Christensen-Dalsgaard, Joergen;
Clarke, Bruce D.;
Cochran, William D.;
Demory, Brice-Olivier;
Devore, Edna;
Esquerdo, Gilbert A.;
Everett, Mark;
Fressin, Francois;
Geary, John C.;
Girouard, Forrest R.;
Gould, Alan;
Hall, Jennifer R.;
Holman, Matthew J.;
Howard, Andrew W.;
Howell, Steve B.;
Ibrahim, Khadeejah A.;
Kinemuchi, K.;
Kjeldsen, Hans;
Klaus, Todd C.;
Li, Jie;
Lucas, Philip W.;
Morris, Robert L.;
Prsa, Andrej;
Quintana, Elisa;
Sanderfer, Dwight T.;
Sasselov, Dimitar;
Seader, Shawn E.;
Smith, Jeffrey C.;
Steffen, Jason H.;
Still, Martin;
Stumpe, Martin C.;
Tarter, Jill C.;
Tenenbaum, Peter;
Torres, Guillermo;
Twicken, Joseph D.;
Uddin, Kamal;
Van Cleve, Jeffrey;
Walkowicz, Lucianne;
Welsh, William F.
Submitted: 2012-02-27
New transiting planet candidates are identified in sixteen months (May 2009 -
September 2010) of data from the Kepler spacecraft. Nearly five thousand
periodic transit-like signals are vetted against astrophysical and instrumental
false positives yielding 1,091 viable new planet candidates, bringing the total
count up to over 2,300. Improved vetting metrics are employed, contributing to
higher catalog reliability. Most notable is the noise-weighted robust averaging
of multi-quarter photo-center offsets derived from difference image analysis
which identifies likely background eclipsing binaries. Twenty-two months of
photometry are used for the purpose of characterizing each of the new
candidates. Ephemerides (transit epoch, T_0, and orbital period, P) are
tabulated as well as the products of light curve modeling: reduced radius
(Rp/R*), reduced semi-major axis (d/R*), and impact parameter (b). The largest
fractional increases are seen for the smallest planet candidates (197% for
candidates smaller than 2Re compared to 52% for candidates larger than 2Re) and
those at longer orbital periods (123% for candidates outside of 50-day orbits
versus 85% for candidates inside of 50-day orbits). The gains are larger than
expected from increasing the observing window from thirteen months (Quarter 1--
Quarter 5) to sixteen months (Quarter 1 -- Quarter 6). This demonstrates the
benefit of continued development of pipeline analysis software. The fraction of
all host stars with multiple candidates has grown from 17% to 20%, and the
paucity of short-period giant planets in multiple systems is still evident. The
progression toward smaller planets at longer orbital periods with each new
catalog release suggests that Earth-size planets in the Habitable Zone are
forthcoming if, indeed, such planets are abundant.