Strong gravitational lensing along with the distance sum rule method can constrain both cosmological parameters as well as density profiles of galaxies without assuming any fiducial cosmological model. To constrain galaxy parameters and cosmic curvature, we use a newly compiled database of $161$ galactic scale strong lensing systems for distance ratio data. For the luminosity distance in the distance sum rule method, we use databases of supernovae type-Ia (Pantheon) and Gamma Ray Bursts (GRBs). We use a general lens model, namely the Extended Power-Law lens model. We consider three different parametrisations of mass density power-law index $(\gamma)$ to study the dependence of $\gamma$ on redshift. We find that parametrisations of $\gamma$ have a negligible impact on the best fit value of cosmic curvature parameter. Furthermore, measurement of time delay can provide a promising cosmographic probe via the "time delay distance" that includes the ratio of distances between the observer, lens and the source. We use the distance sum rule method with $12$ datapoints of time-delay distance data to put constraints on the Cosmic Distance Duality Relation (CDDR) and the cosmic curvature parameter. For this we consider three different parametrisations of distance duality parameter $(\eta)$. Our results indicate that a flat universe can be accommodated within $95\%$ confidence level for all the parametrisations of $\eta$. Further, we find that within 95\% confidence level, there is no violation of CDDR if $\eta$ is assumed to be redshift dependent but CDDR is violated if $\eta$ is considered redshift independent. Hence, we need a larger sample of strong gravitational lensing systems in order to improve the constraints on the cosmic curvature and distance duality parameter.

In this work, we use a test based on the differential ages of galaxies for distinguishing the dark energy models. As proposed by Jimenez and Loeb, relative ages of galaxies can be used to put constraints on various cosmological parameters. In the same vein, we reconstruct $H_0dt/dz$ and its derivative ($H_0d^2t/dz^2$) using a model independent technique called non-parametric smoothing. Basically, $dt/dz$ is the change in the age of the object as a function of redshift which is directly link with the Hubble parameter. Hence for reconstruction of this quantity, we use the most recent $H(z)$ data. Further, we calculate $H_0dt/dz$ and its derivative for several models like Phantom, Einstein de Sitter (EdS), $\Lambda$CDM, Chevallier-Polarski-Linder (CPL) parametrization, Jassal-Bagla-Padmanabhan (JBP) parametrization and Feng-Shen-Li-Li (FSLL) parametrization. We check the consistency of these models with the results of reconstruction obtained in model independent way from the data. It is observed that $H_0dt/dz$ as a tool is not able to distinguish between the $\Lambda$CDM, CPL, JBP and FSLL parametrizations but as expected EdS and Phantom models show noticeable deviation from the reconstructed results. Further, the derivative of $H_0dt/dz$ for various dark energy models is more sensitive at low redshift. It is observed that the FSLL model is not consistent with the reconstructed results at redshifts less than $0.5$, however, the $\Lambda$CDM model is in concordance with the 3$\sigma$ region of the reconstruction.

In this paper, we use the Cosmokinematics approach to study the accelerated expansion of the Universe. This is a model independent approach and depends only on the assumption that the Universe is homogeneous and isotropic and is described by the FRW metric. We parametrize the deceleration parameter, $q(z)$, to constrain the transition redshift ($z_t$) at which the expansion of the Universe goes from a decelerating to an accelerating phase. We use three different parametrizations of $q(z)$ namely, $q_\I(z)=q_{\textnormal{\tiny\textsc{1}}}+q_{\textnormal{\tiny\textsc{2}}}z$, $q_\II (z) = q_\3 + q_\4 \ln (1 + z)$ and $q_\III(z)=\frac{1}{2}+\frac{q_{\textnormal{\tiny\textsc{5}}}}{(1+z)^2}$. A joint analysis of the age of galaxies, strong lensing and supernovae Ia data indicates that the transition redshift is less than unity i.e. $z_t<1$. We also use a nonparametric approach (LOESS+SIMEX) to constrain $z_t$. This too gives $z_t<1$ which is consistent with the value obtained by the parametric approach.