Normalized to: Raney, C.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:2004.05952 [pdf] - 2077456
Systematic vs. Statistical Uncertainties in Masses and Magnifications of
the Hubble Frontier Fields
Submitted: 2020-04-13
The Hubble Frontier Fields data, along with multiple data sets obtained by
other telescopes, have provided some of the most extensive constraints on
cluster lenses to date. Multiple lens modeling teams analyzed the fields and
made public a number of deliverables. By comparing these results, we can then
undertake a unique and vital test of the state of cluster lens modeling.
Specifically, we see how well the different teams can reproduce similar
magnifications and mass profiles. We find that the circularly averaged mass
profiles of the fields are remarkably constrained (scatter <5%) at distances of
1 arcmin from the cluster core, yet magnifications can vary significantly.
Averaged across the six fields, we find a bias of -6% (-17%) and a scatter of
~40% (~65%) at a modest magnification of 3 (10). Statistical errors reported by
individual teams are often significantly smaller than the differences among all
the teams, indicating the importance of continued systematics studies in
cluster lensing.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1911.02101 [pdf] - 2026255
Exploring Effects on Magnifications due to Line-of-Sight Galaxies in the
Hubble Frontier Fields
Submitted: 2019-11-05
Cluster lensing has become an important tool in the search for high redshift
galaxies through its ability to magnify sources. In order to determine the
intrinsic properties of these galaxies, lensing mass models must be constructed
to determine the magnification of the images. These models are traditionally
two-dimensional, focusing on the mass within the cluster and either ignoring or
approximating any contribution from line-of-sight galaxies. In this paper, we
present the first full set of three-dimensional mass models of the six Hubble
Frontier Fields and use them to test for systematic biases in magnifications
due to using the traditional 2D approach. We find that omitting foreground or
background galaxies causes image position offsets between 0.1-0.4", a
non-negligible fraction of the typical 0.3-0.7" residuals of current
state-of-the-art models. We also find that median image magnifications can
shift by up to 6%, though it is dependent on the field. This can be alleviated
in some cases by approximating the mass in the lensing plane, but a 5%
magnification bias still exists in other cases; image position offsets are also
improved, but are still present at 0.10".
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1811.04174 [pdf] - 1912706
The z=0.54 LoBAL Quasar SDSS J085053.12+445122.5: II. The Nature of
Partial Covering in the Broad-Absorption-Line Outflow
Submitted: 2018-11-09, last modified: 2019-04-30
It has been known for 20 years that the absorbing gas in broad absorption
line quasars does not completely cover the continuum emission region, and that
partial covering must be accounted for to accurately measure the column density
of the outflowing gas. However, the nature of partial covering itself is not
understood. Extrapolation of the SimBAL spectral synthesis model of the HST COS
UV spectrum from SDSS J0850+4451 reported by Leighly et al. 2018 to
non-simultaneous rest-frame optical and near-infrared spectra reveals evidence
that the covering fraction has wavelength dependence, and is a factor of 2.5
times higher in the UV than in the optical and near-infrared bands. The
difference in covering fraction can be explained if the outflow consists of
clumps that are small and either structured or clustered relative to the
projected size of the UV continuum emission region, and have a more diffuse
distribution on size scales comparable to the near-infrared continuum emission
region size. The lower covering fraction over the larger physical area results
in a reduction of the measured total column density by a factor of 1.6 compared
with the UV-only solution. This experiment demonstrates that we can compare
rest-frame UV and near-infrared absorption lines, specifically HeI*10830, to
place constraints on the uniformity of absorption gas in broad absorbing line
quasars.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1705.03901 [pdf] - 1583314
Joint Strong and Weak Lensing Analysis of the Massive Cluster Field
J0850+3604
Submitted: 2017-05-10, last modified: 2017-06-25
We present a combined strong and weak lensing analysis of the
J085007.6+360428 (J0850) field, which was selected by its high projected
concentration of luminous red galaxies and contains the massive cluster Zwicky
1953. Using Subaru/Suprime-Cam $BVR_{c}I_{c}i^{\prime}z^{\prime}$ imaging and
MMT/Hectospec spectroscopy, we first perform a weak lensing shear analysis to
constrain the mass distribution in this field, including the cluster at $z =
0.3774$ and a smaller foreground halo at $z = 0.2713$. We then add a strong
lensing constraint from a multiply-imaged galaxy in the imaging data with a
photometric redshift of $z \approx 5.03$. Unlike previous cluster-scale lens
analyses, our technique accounts for the full three-dimensional mass structure
in the beam, including galaxies along the line of sight. In contrast with past
cluster analyses that use only lensed image positions as constraints, we use
the full surface brightness distribution of the images. This method predicts
that the source galaxy crosses a lensing caustic such that one image is a
highly-magnified "fold arc", which could be used to probe the source galaxy's
structure at ultra-high spatial resolution ($< 30$ pc). We calculate the mass
of the primary cluster to be $\mathrm{M_{vir}} = 2.93_{-0.65}^{+0.71} \times
10^{15}~\mathrm{M_{\odot}}$ with a concentration of $\mathrm{c_{vir}} =
3.46_{-0.59}^{+0.70}$, consistent with the mass-concentration relation of
massive clusters at a similar redshift. The large mass of this cluster makes
J0850 an excellent field for leveraging lensing magnification to search for
high-redshift galaxies, competitive with and complementary to that of
well-studied clusters such as the HST Frontier Fields.