sort results by

Use logical operators AND, OR, NOT and round brackets to construct complex queries. Whitespace-separated words are treated as ANDed.

Show articles per page in mode

Ramya, P.

Normalized to: Ramya, P.

3 article(s) in total. 3 co-authors, from 1 to 3 common article(s). Median position in authors list is 1,0.

[1]  oai:arXiv.org:1901.06050  [pdf] - 1817273
Chemical compositions of giants in the Hyades And Sirius superclusters
Comments:
Submitted: 2019-01-17
An abundance analysis for 20 elements from Na to Eu is reported for 34 K giants from the Hyades supercluster and for 22 K giants from the Sirius supercluster. Observed giants were identified as highly probable members of their respective superclusters by Famaey et al. (2005, A&A, 430, 165). Three giants each from the Hyades and Praesepe open clusters were similarly observed and analysed. Each supercluster shows a range in metallicity: $-0.20 \leq$ [Fe/H] $\leq +0.25$ for the Hyades supercluster and $-0.22 \leq $ [Fe/H] $\leq +0.15$ for the Sirius supercluster with the metal-rich tail of the metallicity distribution of the Hyades supercluster extending beyond that of the Sirius supercluster and spanning the metallicity of the Hyades and Praesepe cluster giants. Relative elemental abundances [El/Fe] across the supercluster giants are representative of the Galactic thin disc as determined from giants in open clusters analysed in a similar way to our approach. Judged by metallicity and age, very few and likely none of the giants in these superclusters originated in an open cluster: the pairings include the Hyades supercluster with the Hyades - Praesepe open clusters and the Sirius supercluster with the U Ma open cluster. Literature on main sequence stars attributed to the two superclusters and the possible relation to the associated open cluster is reviewed. It is suggested that the Hyades supercluster's main sequence population contains few stars from the two associated open clusters. As suggested by some previous investigations, the Sirius supercluster, when tightly defined kinematically, appears to be well populated by stars shed by the U Ma open cluster.
[2]  oai:arXiv.org:1604.04821  [pdf] - 1406027
Chemical compositions and kinematics of the Hercules stream
Comments:
Submitted: 2016-04-16, last modified: 2016-05-13
An abundance analysis is reported of 58 K giants identified by Famaey et al. (2005) as highly probable members of the Hercules stream selected from stars north of the celestial equator in the Hipparcos catalogue. The giants have compositions spanning the interval [Fe/H] from $-$0.17 to $+$0.42 with a mean value of $+$0.15 and relative elemental abundances [El/Fe] representative of the Galactic thin disc. Selection effects may have biassed the selection from the Hipparcos catalogue against the selection of metal-poor stars. Our reconsideration of the recent extensive survey of FG dwarfs which included metal-poor stars (Bensby et al. 2014) provides a [Fe/H] distribution for the Hercules stream which is similar to that from the 58 giants. It appears that the stream is dominated by metal-rich stars from the thin disc. Suggestions in the literature that the stream includes metal-poor stars from the thick disc are discussed.
[3]  oai:arXiv.org:1207.0767  [pdf] - 1124572
Chemical compositions of stars in two stellar streams from the Galactic thick disk
Comments: 10 figures, Accepted for publication in MNRAS
Submitted: 2012-07-03
We present abundances for 20 elements for stars in two stellar streams identified by Arifyanto & Fuchs (2006, A&A, 449, 533): 18 stars from the Arcturus stream and 26 from a new stream, which we call AF06 stream, both from the Galactic thick disk. Results show both streams are metal-poor and very old (10$-$14 Gyrs) with kinematics and abundances overlapping with the properties of local field thick disk stars. Both streams exhibit a range in metallicity but with relative elemental abundances that are identical to those of thick disk stars of the same metallicity. These results show that neither stream can result from dissolution of an open cluster. It is highly unlikely that either stream represents tidal debris from an accreted satellite galaxy. Both streams most probably owe their origin to dynamical perturbations within the Galaxy.