Normalized to: Rambaux, N.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1911.13049 [pdf] - 2030649
(704) Interamnia: A transitional object between a dwarf planet and a
typical irregular-shaped minor body
Hanuš, J.;
Vernazza, P.;
Viikinkoski, M.;
Ferrais, M.;
Rambaux, N.;
Podlewska-Gaca, E.;
Drouard, A.;
Jorda, L.;
Jehin, E.;
Carry, B.;
Marsset, M.;
Marchis, F.;
Warner, B.;
Behrend, R.;
Asenjo, V.;
Berger, N.;
Bronikowska, M.;
Brothers, T.;
Charbonnel, S.;
Colazo, C.;
Coliac, J-F.;
Duffard, R.;
Jones, A.;
Leroy, A.;
Marciniak, A.;
Melia, R.;
Molina, D.;
Nadolny, J.;
Person, M.;
Pejcha, O.;
Riemis, H.;
Shappee, B.;
Sobkowiak, K.;
Soldán, F.;
Suys, D.;
Szakats, R.;
Vantomme, J.;
Birlan, M.;
Berthier, J.;
Bartczak, P.;
Dumas, C.;
Dudziński, G.;
Ďurech, J.;
Castillo-Rogez, J.;
Cipriani, F.;
Fetick, R.;
Fusco, T.;
Grice, J.;
Kaasalainen, M.;
Kryszczynska, A.;
Lamy, P.;
Michalowski, T.;
Michel, P.;
Santana-Ros, T.;
Tanga, P.;
Vachier, F.;
Vigan, A.;
Witasse, O.;
Yang, B.
Submitted: 2019-11-29, last modified: 2019-12-18
With an estimated diameter in the 320 to 350 km range, (704) Interamnia is
the fifth largest main belt asteroid and one of the few bodies that fills the
gap in size between the four largest bodies with $D$ > 400 km (Ceres, Vesta,
Pallas and Hygiea) and the numerous smaller bodies with $D$ $\lesssim$ 200 km.
However, despite its large size, little is known about the shape and spin state
of Interamnia and, therefore, about its bulk composition and past collisional
evolution. We aimed to test at what size and mass the shape of a small body
departs from a nearly ellipsoidal equilibrium shape (as observed in the case of
the four largest asteroids) to an irregular shape as routinely observed in the
case of smaller ($D$ $\lesssim$ 200 km) bodies. We observed Interamnia as part
of our ESO VLT/SPHERE large program (ID: 199.C-0074) at thirteen different
epochs. In addition, several new optical lightcurves were recorded. These data,
along with stellar occultation data from the literature, were fed to the
All-Data Asteroid Modeling (ADAM) algorithm to reconstruct the 3D-shape model
of Interamnia and to determine its spin state. Interamnia's volume-equivalent
diameter of 332 $\pm$ 6 km implies a bulk density of $\rho$=1.98 $\pm$ 0.68
gcm$^{-3}$ , which suggests that Interamnia - like Ceres and Hygiea - contains
a high fraction of water ice, consistent with the paucity of apparent craters.
Our observations reveal a shape that can be well approximated by an ellipsoid,
and that is compatible with a fluid hydrostatic equilibrium at the 2 $\sigma$
level. The rather regular shape of Interamnia implies that the size and mass
limit, under which the shapes of minor bodies with a high amount of water ice
in the subsurface become irregular, has to be searched among smaller ($D$
$\lesssim$ 300km) less massive ($m$ $\lesssim$ 3x10$^{19}$ kg) bodies.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1903.07205 [pdf] - 1922447
Observational constraint on the radius and oblateness of the lunar
core-mantle boundary
Submitted: 2019-03-17, last modified: 2019-06-21
Lunar laser ranging (LLR) data and Apollo seismic data analyses, revealed
independent evidence for the presence of a fluid lunar core. However, the size
of the lunar fluid core remained uncertain by $\pm55$ km (encompassing two
contrasting 2011 Apollo seismic data analyses). Here we show that a new
description of the lunar interior's dynamical model provides a determination of
the radius and geometry of the lunar core-mantle boundary (CMB) from the LLR
observations. We compare the present-day lunar core oblateness obtained from
LLR analysis with the expected hydrostatic model values, over a range of
previously expected CMB radii. The findings suggest a core oblateness
($f_c=(2.2\pm0.6)\times10^{-4}$) that satisfies the assumption of hydrostatic
equilibrium over a tight range of lunar CMB radii ($\mathcal{R}_{CMB}=381\pm12$
km). Our estimates of a presently-relaxed lunar CMB translates to a core mass
fraction in the range of $1.59-1.77\%$ with a present-day Free Core Nutation
(FCN) within $(367\pm100)$ years.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1808.10384 [pdf] - 1849858
Long-term orbital and rotational motions of Ceres and Vesta
Submitted: 2018-08-30, last modified: 2019-03-15
Context. The dwarf planet Ceres and the asteroid Vesta have been studied by
the Dawn space mission. They are the two heaviest bodies of the main asteroid
belt and have different characteristics. Notably, Vesta appears to be dry and
inactive with two large basins at its south pole. Ceres is an ice-rich body
with signs of cryovolcanic activity.
Aims. The aim of this paper is to determine the obliquity variations of Ceres
and Vesta and to study their rotational stability.
Methods. The orbital and rotational motions have been integrated by
symplectic integration. The rotational stability has been studied by
integrating secular equations and by computing the diffusion of the precession
frequency.
Results. The obliquity variations of Ceres over $[-20:0]\,\mathrm{Myr}$ are
between $2$ and $20{\deg}$ and the obliquity variations of Vesta are between
$21$ and $45{\deg}$. The two giant impacts suffered by Vesta modified the
precession constant and could have put Vesta closer to the resonance with the
orbital frequency $2s_6-s_V$. Given the uncertainty on the polar moment of
inertia, the present Vesta could be in this resonance where the obliquity
variations can vary between $17$ and $48{\deg}$.
Conclusions. Although Ceres and Vesta have precession frequencies close to
the secular orbital frequencies of the inner planets, their long-term rotations
are relatively stable. The perturbations of Jupiter and Saturn dominate the
secular orbital dynamics of Ceres and Vesta and the perturbations of the inner
planets are much weaker. The secular resonances with the inner planets also
have smaller widths and do not overlap, contrary to the case of the inner
planets.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1903.03603 [pdf] - 1845152
Interior properties of the inner Saturnian moons from space astrometry
data
Submitted: 2019-03-08
During the thirteen years in orbit around Saturn before its final plunge, the
Cassini spacecraft provided more than ten thousand astrometric measurements.
Such large amounts of accurate data enable the search for extremely faint
signals in the orbital motion of the saturnian moons. Among these, the
detection of the dynamical feedback of the rotation of the inner moons of
Saturn on their respective orbits becomes possible. Using all the currently
available astrometric data associated with Atlas, Prometheus, Pandora, Janus
and Epimetheus, we first provide a detailed analysis of the Cassini Imaging
Science Subsystem (ISS) data, with special emphasis on their statistical
behavior and sources of bias. Then, we give updated estimates of the moons'
averaged densities and try to infer more details about their interior
properties by estimating the physical librations for Prometheus, Pandora,
Epimetheus and Janus from anomalies in their apsidal precession. Our results
are compatible with a homogeneous interior for Janus and Epimetheus, within the
uncertainty of the measurements. On the other hand, we found some inconsistency
for Pandora and Prometheus, which might result from a dynamical mismodeling of
Saturn's gravity field. Last, we show how the synergistic introduction of
libration measurements directly derived from imaging should allow the moons'
moments of inertia to be better constrained.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1809.11065 [pdf] - 1791082
Strong tidal energy dissipation in Saturn at Titan's frequency as an
explanation for Iapetus orbit
Submitted: 2018-09-28
Natural satellite systems present a large variety of orbital configurations
in the solar system. While some are clearly the result of known processes,
others still have largely unexplained eccentricity and inclination values.
Iapetus has a still unexplained 3% orbital eccentricity and its orbital plane
is tilted with respect to its local Laplace plane. On the other hand,
astrometric measurements of saturnian moons have revealed high tidal migration
rates, corresponding to a quality factor Q of Saturn of around 1600 for the
mid-sized icy moons. We show how a past crossing of the 5:1 mean motion
resonance between Titan and Iapetus may be a plausible scenario to explain
Iapetus' orbit. We have carried out numerical simulations of the resonance
crossing using an N-Body code as well as using averaged equations of motion. A
large span of migration rates were explored for Titan and Iapetus was started
on its local Laplace plane with a circular orbit. The resonance crossing can
trigger a chaotic evolution of the eccentricity and the inclination of Iapetus.
The outcome of the resonance is highly dependent on the migration rate. For a
quality factor Q of over around 2000, the chaotic evolution of Iapetus in the
resonance leads in most cases to its ejection, while simulations with a quality
factor between 100 and 2000 show a departure from the resonance with
post-resonant eccentricities spanning from 0 up to 15%, and free inclinations
capable of reaching 11 degrees. Usually high inclinations come with high
eccentricities but some simulations show elements compatible with Iapetus'
current orbit. A quality factor between 100 and 2000 at the frequency of Titan
would bring Titan and Iapetus into a 5:1 resonance, which would perturb
Iapetus' eccentricity and inclination to values observed today. Such rapid
tidal migration would have avoided Iapetus' ejection around 40 to 800 million
years ago.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.09378 [pdf] - 1732652
Gaia Data Release 2: Observational Hertzsprung-Russell diagrams
Gaia Collaboration;
Babusiaux, C.;
van Leeuwen, F.;
Barstow, M. A.;
Jordi, C.;
Vallenari, A.;
Bossini, D.;
Bressan, A.;
Cantat-Gaudin, T.;
van Leeuwen, M.;
Brown, A. G. A.;
Prusti, T.;
de Bruijne, J. H. J.;
Bailer-Jones, C. A. L.;
Biermann, M.;
Evans, D. W.;
Eyer, L.;
Jansen, F.;
Klioner, S. A.;
Lammers, U.;
Lindegren, L.;
Luri, X.;
Mignard, F.;
Panem, C.;
Pourbaix, D.;
Randich, S.;
Sartoretti, P.;
Siddiqui, H. I.;
Soubiran, C.;
Walton, N. A.;
Arenou, F.;
Bastian, U.;
Cropper, M.;
Drimmel, R.;
Katz, D.;
Lattanzi, M. G.;
Bakker, J.;
Cacciari, C.;
Castañeda, J.;
Chaoul, L.;
Cheek, N.;
DeAngeli, F.;
Fabricius, C.;
Guerra, R.;
Holl, B.;
Masana, E.;
Messineo, R.;
Mowlavi, N.;
Nienartowicz, K.;
Panuzzo, P.;
Portell, J.;
Riello, M.;
Seabroke, G. M.;
Tanga, P.;
Thévenin, F.;
Gracia-Abril, G.;
Comoretto, G.;
Garcia-Reinaldos, M.;
Teyssier, D.;
Altmann, M.;
Andrae, R.;
Audard, M.;
Bellas-Velidis, I.;
Benson, K.;
Berthier, J.;
Blomme, R.;
Burgess, P.;
Busso, G.;
Carry, B.;
Cellino, A.;
Clementini, G.;
Clotet, M.;
Creevey, O.;
Davidson, M.;
DeRidder, J.;
Delchambre, L.;
Dell'Oro, A.;
Ducourant, C.;
Fernández-Hernández, J.;
Fouesneau, M.;
Frémat, Y.;
Galluccio, L.;
García-Torres, M.;
González-Núñez, J.;
González-Vidal, J. J.;
Gosset, E.;
Guy, L. P.;
Halbwachs, J. -L.;
Hambly, N. C.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Hernández, J.;
Hestroffer, D.;
Hodgkin, S. T.;
Hutton, A.;
Jasniewicz, G.;
Jean-Antoine-Piccolo, A.;
Jordan, S.;
Korn, A. J.;
Krone-Martins, A.;
Lanzafame, A. C.;
Lebzelter, T.;
Löffler, W.;
Manteiga, M.;
Marrese, P. M.;
Martín-Fleitas, J. M.;
Moitinho, A.;
Mora, A.;
Muinonen, K.;
Osinde, J.;
Pancino, E.;
Pauwels, T.;
Petit, J. -M.;
Recio-Blanco, A.;
Richards, P. J.;
Rimoldini, L.;
Robin, A. C.;
Sarro, L. M.;
Siopis, C.;
Smith, M.;
Sozzetti, A.;
Süveges, M.;
Torra, J.;
vanReeven, W.;
Abbas, U.;
Aramburu, A. Abreu;
Accart, S.;
Aerts, C.;
Altavilla, G.;
Álvarez, M. A.;
Alvarez, R.;
Alves, J.;
Anderson, R. I.;
Andrei, A. H.;
Varela, E. Anglada;
Antiche, E.;
Antoja, T.;
Arcay, B.;
Astraatmadja, T. L.;
Bach, N.;
Baker, S. G.;
Balaguer-Núñez, L.;
Balm, P.;
Barache, C.;
Barata, C.;
Barbato, D.;
Barblan, F.;
Barklem, P. S.;
Barrado, D.;
Barros, M.;
Muñoz, S. Bartholomé;
Bassilana, J. -L.;
Becciani, U.;
Bellazzini, M.;
Berihuete, A.;
Bertone, S.;
Bianchi, L.;
Bienaymé, O.;
Blanco-Cuaresma, S.;
Boch, T.;
Boeche, C.;
Bombrun, A.;
Borrachero, R.;
Bouquillon, S.;
Bourda, G.;
Bragaglia, A.;
Bramante, L.;
Breddels, M. A.;
Brouillet, N.;
Brüsemeister, T.;
Brugaletta, E.;
Bucciarelli, B.;
Burlacu, A.;
Busonero, D.;
Butkevich, A. G.;
Buzzi, R.;
Caffau, E.;
Cancelliere, R.;
Cannizzaro, G.;
Carballo, R.;
Carlucci, T.;
Carrasco, J. M.;
Casamiquela, L.;
Castellani, M.;
Castro-Ginard, A.;
Charlot, P.;
Chemin, L.;
Chiavassa, A.;
Cocozza, G.;
Costigan, G.;
Cowell, S.;
Crifo, F.;
Crosta, M.;
Crowley, C.;
Cuypers, J.;
Dafonte, C.;
Damerdji, Y.;
Dapergolas, A.;
David, P.;
David, M.;
deLaverny, P.;
DeLuise, F.;
DeMarch, R.;
deMartino, D.;
deSouza, R.;
deTorres, A.;
Debosscher, J.;
delPozo, E.;
Delbo, M.;
Delgado, A.;
Delgado, H. E.;
Diakite, S.;
Diener, C.;
Distefano, E.;
Dolding, C.;
Drazinos, P.;
Durán, J.;
Edvardsson, B.;
Enke, H.;
Eriksson, K.;
Esquej, P.;
Bontemps, G. Eynard;
Fabre, C.;
Fabrizio, M.;
Faigler, S.;
Falcão, A. J.;
Casas, M. Farràs;
Federici, L.;
Fedorets, G.;
Fernique, P.;
Figueras, F.;
Filippi, F.;
Findeisen, K.;
Fonti, A.;
Fraile, E.;
Fraser, M.;
Frézouls, B.;
Gai, M.;
Galleti, S.;
Garabato, D.;
García-Sedano, F.;
Garofalo, A.;
Garralda, N.;
Gavel, A.;
Gavras, P.;
Gerssen, J.;
Geyer, R.;
Giacobbe, P.;
Gilmore, G.;
Girona, S.;
Giuffrida, G.;
Glass, F.;
Gomes, M.;
Granvik, M.;
Gueguen, A.;
Guerrier, A.;
Guiraud, J.;
Gutiérrez-Sánchez, R.;
Haigron, R.;
Hatzidimitriou, D.;
Hauser, M.;
Haywood, M.;
Heiter, U.;
Helmi, A.;
Heu, J.;
Hilger, T.;
Hobbs, D.;
Hofmann, W.;
Holland, G.;
Huckle, H. E.;
Hypki, A.;
Icardi, V.;
Janßen, K.;
JevardatdeFombelle, G.;
Jonker, P. G.;
Juhász, Á. L.;
Julbe, F.;
Karampelas, A.;
Kewley, A.;
Klar, J.;
Kochoska, A.;
Kohley, R.;
Kolenberg, K.;
Kontizas, M.;
Kontizas, E.;
Koposov, S. E.;
Kordopatis, G.;
Kostrzewa-Rutkowska, Z.;
Koubsky, P.;
Lambert, S.;
Lanza, A. F.;
Lasne, Y.;
Lavigne, J. -B.;
LeFustec, Y.;
LePoncin-Lafitte, C.;
Lebreton, Y.;
Leccia, S.;
Leclerc, N.;
Lecoeur-Taibi, I.;
Lenhardt, H.;
Leroux, F.;
Liao, S.;
Licata, E.;
Lindstrøm, H. E. P.;
Lister, T. A.;
Livanou, E.;
Lobel, A.;
López, M.;
Managau, S.;
Mann, R. G.;
Mantelet, G.;
Marchal, O.;
Marchant, J. M.;
Marconi, M.;
Marinoni, S.;
Marschalkó, G.;
Marshall, D. J.;
Martino, M.;
Marton, G.;
Mary, N.;
Massari, D.;
Matijevič, G.;
Mazeh, T.;
McMillan, P. J.;
Messina, S.;
Michalik, D.;
Millar, N. R.;
Molina, D.;
Molinaro, R.;
Molnár, L.;
Montegriffo, P.;
Mor, R.;
Morbidelli, R.;
Morel, T.;
Morris, D.;
Mulone, A. F.;
Muraveva, T.;
Musella, I.;
Nelemans, G.;
Nicastro, L.;
Noval, L.;
O'Mullane, W.;
Ordénovic, C.;
Ordóñez-Blanco, D.;
Osborne, P.;
Pagani, C.;
Pagano, I.;
Pailler, F.;
Palacin, H.;
Palaversa, L.;
Panahi, A.;
Pawlak, M.;
Piersimoni, A. M.;
Pineau, F. -X.;
Plachy, E.;
Plum, G.;
Poggio, E.;
Poujoulet, E.;
Prša, A.;
Pulone, L.;
Racero, E.;
Ragaini, S.;
Rambaux, N.;
Ramos-Lerate, M.;
Regibo, S.;
Reylé, C.;
Riclet, F.;
Ripepi, V.;
Riva, A.;
Rivard, A.;
Rixon, G.;
Roegiers, T.;
Roelens, M.;
Romero-Gómez, M.;
Rowell, N.;
Royer, F.;
Ruiz-Dern, L.;
Sadowski, G.;
Sellés, T. Sagristà;
Sahlmann, J.;
Salgado, J.;
Salguero, E.;
Sanna, N.;
Santana-Ros, T.;
Sarasso, M.;
Savietto, H.;
Schultheis, M.;
Sciacca, E.;
Segol, M.;
Segovia, J. C.;
Ségransan, D.;
Shih, I-C.;
Siltala, L.;
Silva, A. F.;
Smart, R. L.;
Smith, K. W.;
Solano, E.;
Solitro, F.;
Sordo, R.;
SoriaNieto, S.;
Souchay, J.;
Spagna, A.;
Spoto, F.;
Stampa, U.;
Steele, I. A.;
Steidelmüller, H.;
Stephenson, C. A.;
Stoev, H.;
Suess, F. F.;
Surdej, J.;
Szabados, L.;
Szegedi-Elek, E.;
Tapiador, D.;
Taris, F.;
Tauran, G.;
Taylor, M. B.;
Teixeira, R.;
Terrett, D.;
Teyssandier, P.;
Thuillot, W.;
Titarenko, A.;
TorraClotet, F.;
Turon, C.;
Ulla, A.;
Utrilla, E.;
Uzzi, S.;
Vaillant, M.;
Valentini, G.;
Valette, V.;
vanElteren, A.;
Van Hemelryck, E.;
Vaschetto, M.;
Vecchiato, A.;
Veljanoski, J.;
Viala, Y.;
Vicente, D.;
Vogt, S.;
vonEssen, C.;
Voss, H.;
Votruba, V.;
Voutsinas, S.;
Walmsley, G.;
Weiler, M.;
Wertz, O.;
Wevers, T.;
Wyrzykowski, Ł.;
Yoldas, A.;
Žerjal, M.;
Ziaeepour, H.;
Zorec, J.;
Zschocke, S.;
Zucker, S.;
Zurbach, C.;
Zwitter, T.
Submitted: 2018-04-25, last modified: 2018-08-13
We highlight the power of the Gaia DR2 in studying many fine structures of
the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram (HRD). Gaia allows us to present many different
HRDs, depending in particular on stellar population selections. We do not aim
here for completeness in terms of types of stars or stellar evolutionary
aspects. Instead, we have chosen several illustrative examples. We describe
some of the selections that can be made in Gaia DR2 to highlight the main
structures of the Gaia HRDs. We select both field and cluster (open and
globular) stars, compare the observations with previous classifications and
with stellar evolutionary tracks, and we present variations of the Gaia HRD
with age, metallicity, and kinematics. Late stages of stellar evolution such as
hot subdwarfs, post-AGB stars, planetary nebulae, and white dwarfs are also
analysed, as well as low-mass brown dwarf objects. The Gaia HRDs are
unprecedented in both precision and coverage of the various Milky Way stellar
populations and stellar evolutionary phases. Many fine structures of the HRDs
are presented. The clear split of the white dwarf sequence into hydrogen and
helium white dwarfs is presented for the first time in an HRD. The relation
between kinematics and the HRD is nicely illustrated. Two different populations
in a classical kinematic selection of the halo are unambiguously identified in
the HRD. Membership and mean parameters for a selected list of open clusters
are provided. They allow drawing very detailed cluster sequences, highlighting
fine structures, and providing extremely precise empirical isochrones that will
lead to more insight in stellar physics. Gaia DR2 demonstrates the potential of
combining precise astrometry and photometry for large samples for studies in
stellar evolution and stellar population and opens an entire new area for
HRD-based studies.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1709.04623 [pdf] - 1588372
Rotation of a rigid satellite with a fluid component. A new light onto
Titan's obliquity
Submitted: 2017-09-14
We revisit the rotation dynamics of a rigid satellite with either a liquid
core or a global sub-surface ocean. In both problems, the flow of the fluid
component is assumed inviscid. The study of a hollow satellite with a liquid
core is based on the Poincare-Hough model which provides exact equations of
motion. We introduce an approximation when the ellipticity of the cavity is
low. This simplification allows to model both types of satellite in the same
manner. The analysis of their rotation is done in a non-canonical Hamiltonian
formalism closely related to Poincare's "forme nouvelle des equations de la
mecanique". In the case of a satellite with a global ocean, we obtain a
seven-degree of freedom system. Six of them account for the motion of the two
rigid components, and the last one is associated with the fluid layer. We apply
our model to Titan for which the origin of the obliquity is still a debated
question. We show that the observed value is compatible with Titan slightly
departing from the hydrostatic equilibrium and being in a Cassini equilibrium
state.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1705.00688 [pdf] - 1583007
Gaia Data Release 1. Testing the parallaxes with local Cepheids and RR
Lyrae stars
Gaia Collaboration;
Clementini, G.;
Eyer, L.;
Ripepi, V.;
Marconi, M.;
Muraveva, T.;
Garofalo, A.;
Sarro, L. M.;
Palmer, M.;
Luri, X.;
Molinaro, R.;
Rimoldini, L.;
Szabados, L.;
Musella, I.;
Anderson, R. I.;
Prusti, T.;
de Bruijne, J. H. J.;
Brown, A. G. A.;
Vallenari, A.;
Babusiaux, C.;
Bailer-Jones, C. A. L.;
Bastian, U.;
Biermann, M.;
Evans, D. W.;
Jansen, F.;
Jordi, C.;
Klioner, S. A.;
Lammers, U.;
Lindegren, L.;
Mignard, F.;
Panem, C.;
Pourbaix, D.;
Randich, S.;
Sartoretti, P.;
Siddiqui, H. I.;
Soubiran, C.;
Valette, V.;
van Leeuwen, F.;
Walton, N. A.;
Aerts, C.;
Arenou, F.;
Cropper, M.;
Drimmel, R.;
Høg, E.;
Katz, D.;
Lattanzi, M. G.;
O'Mullane, W.;
Grebel, E. K.;
Holland, A. D.;
Huc, C.;
Passot, X.;
Perryman, M.;
Bramante, L.;
Cacciari, C.;
Castañeda, J.;
Chaoul, L.;
Cheek, N.;
De Angeli, F.;
Fabricius, C.;
Guerra, R.;
Hernández, J.;
Jean-Azntoine-Piccolo, A.;
Masana, E.;
Messineo, R.;
Mowlavi, N.;
Nienartowicz, K.;
Ordóñez-Blanco, D.;
Panuzzo, P.;
Portell, J.;
Richards, P. J.;
Riello, M.;
Seabroke, G. M.;
Tanga, P.;
Thévenin, F.;
Torra, J.;
Els, S. G.;
Gracia-Abril, G.;
Comoretto, G.;
Garcia-Reinaldos, M.;
Lock, T.;
Mercier, E.;
Altmann, M.;
Andrae, R.;
Astraatmadja, T. L.;
Bellas-Velidis, I.;
Benson, K.;
Berthier, J.;
Blomme, R.;
Busso, G.;
Carry, B.;
Cellino, A.;
Cowell, S.;
Creevey, O.;
Cuypers, J.;
Davidson, M.;
De Ridder, J.;
de Torres, A.;
Delchambre, L.;
Dell'Oro, A.;
Ducourant, C.;
Frémat, Y.;
García-Torres, M.;
Gosset, E.;
Halbwachs, J. -L.;
Hambly, N. C.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Hauser, M.;
Hestroffer, D.;
Hodgkin, S. T.;
Huckle, H. E.;
Hutton, A.;
Jasniewicz, G.;
Jordan, S.;
Kontizas, M.;
Korn, A. J.;
Lanzafame, A. C.;
Manteiga, M.;
Moitinho, A.;
Muinonen, K.;
Osinde, J.;
Pancino, E.;
Pauwels, T.;
Petit, J. -M.;
Recio-Blanco, A.;
Robin, A. C.;
Siopis, C.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, K. W.;
Sozzetti, A.;
Thuillot, W.;
van Reeven, W.;
Viala, Y.;
Abbas, U.;
Aramburu, A. Abreu;
Accart, S.;
Aguado, J. J.;
Allan, P. M.;
Allasia, W.;
Altavilla, G.;
Álvarez, M. A.;
Alves, J.;
Andrei, A. H.;
Varela, E. Anglada;
Antiche, E.;
Antoja, T.;
Antón, S.;
Arcay, B.;
Bach, N.;
Baker, S. G.;
Balaguer-Núñez, L.;
Barache, C.;
Barata, C.;
Barbier, A.;
Barblan, F.;
Navascués, D. Barrado y;
Barros, M.;
Barstow, M. A.;
Becciani, U.;
Bellazzini, M.;
García, A. Bello;
Belokurov, V.;
Bendjoya, P.;
Berihuete, A.;
Bianchi, L.;
Bienaymé, O.;
Billebaud, F.;
Blagorodnova, N.;
Blanco-Cuaresma, S.;
Boch, T.;
Bombrun, A.;
Borrachero, R.;
Bouquillon, S.;
Bourda, G.;
Bouy, H.;
Bragaglia, A.;
Breddels, M. A.;
Brouillet, N.;
Brüsemeister, T.;
Bucciarelli, B.;
Burgess, P.;
Burgon, R.;
Burlacu, A.;
Busonero, D.;
Buzzi, R.;
Caffau, E.;
Cambras, J.;
Campbell, H.;
Cancelliere, R.;
Cantat-Gaudin, T.;
Carlucci, T.;
Carrasco, J. M.;
Castellani, M.;
Charlot, P.;
Charnas, J.;
Chiavassa, A.;
Clotet, M.;
Cocozza, G.;
Collins, R. S.;
Costigan, G.;
Crifo, F.;
Cross, N. J. G.;
Crosta, M.;
Crowley, C.;
Dafonte, C.;
Damerdji, Y.;
Dapergolas, A.;
David, P.;
David, M.;
De Cat, P.;
de Felice, F.;
de Laverny, P.;
De Luise, F.;
De March, R.;
de Souza, R.;
Debosscher, J.;
del Pozo, E.;
Delbo, M.;
Delgado, A.;
Delgado, H. E.;
Di Matteo, P.;
Diakite, S.;
Distefano, E.;
Dolding, C.;
Anjos, S. Dos;
Drazinos, P.;
Durán, J.;
Dzigan, Y.;
Edvardsson, B.;
Enke, H.;
Evans, N. W.;
Bontemps, G. Eynard;
Fabre, C.;
Fabrizio, M.;
Faigler, S.;
Falcão, A. J.;
Casas, M. Farràs;
Federici, L.;
Fedorets, G.;
Fernández-Hernánde, J.;
Fernique, P.;
Fienga, A.;
Figueras, F.;
Filippi, F.;
Findeisen, K.;
Fonti, A.;
Fouesneau, M.;
Fraile, E.;
Fraser, M.;
Fuchs, J.;
Gai, M.;
Galleti, S.;
Galluccio, L.;
Garabato, D.;
García-Sedano, F.;
Garralda, N.;
Gavras, P.;
Gerssen, J.;
Geyer, R.;
Gilmore, G.;
Girona, S.;
Giuffrida, G.;
Gomes, M.;
González-Marcos, A.;
González-Núñez, J.;
González-Vidal, J. J.;
Granvik, M.;
Guerrier, A.;
Guillout, P.;
Guiraud, J.;
Gúrpide, A.;
Gutiérrez-Sánchez, R.;
Guy, L. P.;
Haigron, R.;
Hatzidimitriou, D.;
Haywood, M.;
Heiter, U.;
Helmi, A.;
Hobbs, D.;
Hofmann, W.;
Holl, B.;
Holland, G.;
Hunt, J. A. S.;
Hypki, A.;
Icardi, V.;
Irwin, M.;
de Fombelle, G. Jevardat;
Jofré, P.;
Jonker, P. G.;
Jorissen, A.;
Julbe, F.;
Karampelas, A.;
Kochoska, A.;
Kohley, R.;
Kolenberg, K.;
Kontizas, E.;
Koposov, S. E.;
Kordopatis, G.;
Koubsky, P.;
Krone-Martins, A.;
Kudryashova, M.;
Kull, I.;
Bachchan, R. K.;
Lacoste-Seris, F.;
Lanza, A. F.;
Lavigne, J. -B.;
Poncin-Lafitte, C. Le;
Lebreton, Y.;
Lebzelter, T.;
Leccia, S.;
Leclerc, N.;
Lecoeur-Taibi, I.;
Lemaitre, V.;
Lenhardt, H.;
Leroux, F.;
Liao, S.;
Licata, E.;
Lindstrøm, H. E. P.;
Lister, T. A.;
Livanou, E.;
Lobel, A.;
Löffler, W.;
López, M.;
Lorenz, D.;
MacDonald, I.;
Fernandes, T. Magalhães;
Managau, S.;
Mann, R. G.;
Mantelet, G.;
Marchal, O.;
Marchant, J. M.;
Marinoni, S.;
Marrese, P. M.;
Marschalkó, G.;
Marshall, D. J.;
Martín-Fleitas, J. M.;
Martino, M.;
Mary, N.;
Matijevič, G.;
Mazeh, T.;
McMillan, P. J.;
Messina, S.;
Michalik, D.;
Millar, N. R.;
Miranda, B. M. H.;
Molina, D.;
Molinaro, M.;
Molnár, L.;
Moniez, M.;
Montegriffo, P.;
Mor, R.;
Mora, A.;
Morbidelli, R.;
Morel, T.;
Morgenthaler, S.;
Morris, D.;
Mulone, A. F.;
Narbonne, J.;
Nelemans, G.;
Nicastro, L.;
Noval, L.;
Ordénovic, C.;
Ordieres-Meré, J.;
Osborne, P.;
Pagani, C.;
Pagano, I.;
Pailler, F.;
Palacin, H.;
Palaversa, L.;
Parsons, P.;
Pecoraro, M.;
Pedrosa, R.;
Pentikäinen, H.;
Pichon, B.;
Piersimoni, A. M.;
Pineau, F. -X.;
Plachy, E.;
Plum, G.;
Poujoulet, E.;
Prša, A.;
Pulone, L.;
Ragaini, S.;
Rago, S.;
Rambaux, N.;
Ramos-Lerate, M.;
Ranalli, P.;
Rauw, G.;
Read, A.;
Regibo, S.;
Reylé, C.;
Ribeiro, R. A.;
Riva, A.;
Rixon, G.;
Roelens, M.;
Romero-Gómez, M.;
Rowell, N.;
Royer, F.;
Ruiz-Dern, L.;
Sadowski, G.;
Sellés, T. Sagristà;
Sahlmann, J.;
Salgado, J.;
Salguero, E.;
Sarasso, M.;
Savietto, H.;
Schultheis, M.;
Sciacca, E.;
Segol, M.;
Segovia, J. C.;
Segransan, D.;
Shih, I-C.;
Smareglia, R.;
Smart, R. L.;
Solano, E.;
Solitro, F.;
Sordo, R.;
Nieto, S. Soria;
Souchay, J.;
Spagna, A.;
Spoto, F.;
Stampa, U.;
Steele, I. A.;
Steidelmüller, H.;
Stephenson, C. A.;
Stoev, H.;
Suess, F. F.;
Süveges, M.;
Surdej, J.;
Szegedi-Elek, E.;
Tapiador, D.;
Taris, F.;
Tauran, G.;
Taylor, M. B.;
Teixeira, R.;
Terrett, D.;
Tingley, B.;
Trager, S. C.;
Turon, C.;
Ulla, A.;
Utrilla, E.;
Valentini, G.;
van Elteren, A.;
Van Hemelryck, E.;
van Leeuwen, M.;
Varadi, M.;
Vecchiato, A.;
Veljanoski, J.;
Via, T.;
Vicente, D.;
Vogt, S.;
Voss, H.;
Votruba, V.;
Voutsinas, S.;
Walmsley, G.;
Weiler, M.;
Weingrill, K.;
Wevers, T.;
Wyrzykowski, Ł.;
Yoldas, A.;
Žerjal, M.;
Zucker, S.;
Zurbach, C.;
Zwitter, T.;
Alecu, A.;
Allen, M.;
Prieto, C. Allende;
Amorim, A.;
Anglada-Escudé, G.;
Arsenijevic, V.;
Azaz, S.;
Balm, P.;
Beck, M.;
Bernstein, H. -H.;
Bigot, L.;
Bijaoui, A.;
Blasco, C.;
Bonfigli, M.;
Bono, G.;
Boudreault, S.;
Bressan, A.;
Brown, S.;
Brunet, P. -M.;
Bunclark, P.;
Buonanno, R.;
Butkevich, A. G.;
Carret, C.;
Carrion, C.;
Chemin, L.;
Chéreau, F.;
Corcione, L.;
Darmigny, E.;
de Boer, K. S.;
de Teodoro, P.;
de Zeeuw, P. T.;
Luche, C. Delle;
Domingues, C. D.;
Dubath, P.;
Fodor, F.;
Frézouls, B.;
Fries, A.;
Fustes, D.;
Fyfe, D.;
Gallardo, E.;
Gallegos, J.;
Gardiol, D.;
Gebran, M.;
Gomboc, A.;
Gómez, A.;
Grux, E.;
Gueguen, A.;
Heyrovsky, A.;
Hoar, J.;
Iannicola, G.;
Parache, Y. Isasi;
Janotto, A. -M.;
Joliet, E.;
Jonckheere, A.;
Keil, R.;
Kim, D. -W.;
Klagyivik, P.;
Klar, J.;
Knude, J.;
Kochukhov, O.;
Kolka, I.;
Kos, J.;
Kutka, A.;
Lainey, V.;
LeBouquin, D.;
Liu, C.;
Loreggia, D.;
Makarov, V. V.;
Marseille, M. G.;
Martayan, C.;
Martinez-Rubi, O.;
Massart, B.;
Meynadier, F.;
Mignot, S.;
Munari, U.;
Nguyen, A. -T.;
Nordlander, T.;
O'Flaherty, K. S.;
Ocvirk, P.;
Sanz, A. Olias;
Ortiz, P.;
Osorio, J.;
Oszkiewicz, D.;
Ouzounis, A.;
Park, P.;
Pasquato, E.;
Peltzer, C.;
Peralta, J.;
Péturaud, F.;
Pieniluoma, T.;
Pigozzi, E.;
Poels, J.;
Prat, G.;
Prod'homme, T.;
Raison, F.;
Rebordao, J. M.;
Risquez, D.;
Rocca-Volmerange, B.;
Rosen, S.;
Ruiz-Fuertes, M. I.;
Russo, F.;
Sembay, S.;
Vizcaino, I. Serraller;
Short, A.;
Siebert, A.;
Silva, H.;
Sinachopoulos, D.;
Slezak, E.;
Soffel, M.;
Sosnowska, D.;
Straižys, V.;
ter Linden, M.;
Terrell, D.;
Theil, S.;
Tiede, C.;
Troisi, L.;
Tsalmantza, P.;
Tur, D.;
Vaccari, M.;
Vachier, F.;
Valles, P.;
Van Hamme, W.;
Veltz, L.;
Virtanen, J.;
Wallut, J. -M.;
Wichmann, R.;
Wilkinson, M. I.;
Ziaeepour, H.;
Zschocke, S.
Submitted: 2017-05-01
Parallaxes for 331 classical Cepheids, 31 Type II Cepheids and 364 RR Lyrae
stars in common between Gaia and the Hipparcos and Tycho-2 catalogues are
published in Gaia Data Release 1 (DR1) as part of the Tycho-Gaia Astrometric
Solution (TGAS). In order to test these first parallax measurements of the
primary standard candles of the cosmological distance ladder, that involve
astrometry collected by Gaia during the initial 14 months of science operation,
we compared them with literature estimates and derived new period-luminosity
($PL$), period-Wesenheit ($PW$) relations for classical and Type II Cepheids
and infrared $PL$, $PL$-metallicity ($PLZ$) and optical luminosity-metallicity
($M_V$-[Fe/H]) relations for the RR Lyrae stars, with zero points based on
TGAS. The new relations were computed using multi-band
($V,I,J,K_{\mathrm{s}},W_{1}$) photometry and spectroscopic metal abundances
available in the literature, and applying three alternative approaches: (i) by
linear least squares fitting the absolute magnitudes inferred from direct
transformation of the TGAS parallaxes, (ii) by adopting astrometric-based
luminosities, and (iii) using a Bayesian fitting approach. TGAS parallaxes
bring a significant added value to the previous Hipparcos estimates. The
relations presented in this paper represent first Gaia-calibrated relations and
form a "work-in-progress" milestone report in the wait for Gaia-only parallaxes
of which a first solution will become available with Gaia's Data Release 2
(DR2) in 2018.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:1703.01131 [pdf] - 1567701
Gaia Data Release 1. Open cluster astrometry: performance, limitations,
and future prospects
Gaia Collaboration;
van Leeuwen, F.;
Vallenari, A.;
Jordi, C.;
Lindegren, L.;
Bastian, U.;
Prusti, T.;
de Bruijne, J. H. J.;
Brown, A. G. A.;
Babusiaux, C.;
Bailer-Jones, C. A. L.;
Biermann, M.;
Evans, D. W.;
Eyer, L.;
Jansen, F.;
Klioner, S. A.;
Lammers, U.;
Luri, X.;
Mignard, F.;
Panem, C.;
Pourbaix, D.;
Randich, S.;
Sartoretti, P.;
Siddiqui, H. I.;
Soubiran, C.;
Valette, V.;
Walton, N. A.;
Aerts, C.;
Arenou, F.;
Cropper, M.;
Drimmel, R.;
Høg, E.;
Katz, D.;
Lattanzi, M. G.;
O'Mullane, W.;
Grebel, E. K.;
Holland, A. D.;
Huc, C.;
Passot, X.;
Perryman, M.;
Bramante, L.;
Cacciari, C.;
Castañeda, J.;
Chaoul, L.;
Cheek, N.;
De Angeli, F.;
Fabricius, C.;
Guerra, R.;
Hernández, J.;
Jean-Antoine-Piccolo, A.;
Masana, E.;
Messineo, R.;
Mowlavi, N.;
Nienartowicz, K.;
Ordóñez-Blanco, D.;
Panuzzo, P.;
Portell, J.;
Richards, P. J.;
Riello, M.;
Seabroke, G. M.;
Tanga, P.;
Thévenin, F.;
Torra, J.;
Els, S. G.;
Gracia-Abril, G.;
Comoretto, G.;
Garcia-Reinaldos, M.;
Lock, T.;
Mercier, E.;
Altmann, M.;
Andrae, R.;
Astraatmadja, T. L.;
Bellas-Velidis, I.;
Benson, K.;
Berthier, J.;
Blomme, R.;
Busso, G.;
Carry, B.;
Cellino, A.;
Clementini, G.;
Cowell, S.;
Creevey, O.;
Cuypers, J.;
Davidson, M.;
De Ridder, J.;
de Torres, A.;
Delchambre, L.;
Dell'Oro, A.;
Ducourant, C.;
Frémat, Y.;
García-Torres, M.;
Gosset, E.;
Halbwachs, J. -L.;
Hambly, N. C.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Hauser, M.;
Hestroffer, D.;
Hodgkin, S. T.;
Huckle, H. E.;
Hutton, A.;
Jasniewicz, G.;
Jordan, S.;
Kontizas, M.;
Korn, A. J.;
Lanzafame, A. C.;
Manteiga, M.;
Moitinho, A.;
Muinonen, K.;
Osinde, J.;
Pancino, E.;
Pauwels, T.;
Petit, J. -M.;
Recio-Blanco, A.;
Robin, A. C.;
Sarro, L. M.;
Siopis, C.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, K. W.;
Sozzetti, A.;
Thuillot, W.;
van Reeven, W.;
Viala, Y.;
Abbas, U.;
Aramburu, A. Abreu;
Accart, S.;
Aguado, J. J.;
Allan, P. M.;
Allasia, W.;
Altavilla, G.;
Álvarez, M. A.;
Alves, J.;
Anderson, R. I.;
Andrei, A. H.;
Varela, E. Anglada;
Antiche, E.;
Antoja, T.;
Antón, S.;
Arcay, B.;
Bach, N.;
Baker, S. G.;
Balaguer-Núñez, L.;
Barache, C.;
Barata, C.;
Barbier, A.;
Barblan, F.;
Navascués, D. Barrado y;
Barros, M.;
Barstow, M. A.;
Becciani, U.;
Bellazzini, M.;
García, A. Bello;
Belokurov, V.;
Bendjoya, P.;
Berihuete, A.;
Bianchi, L.;
Bienaymé, O.;
Billebaud, F.;
Blagorodnova, N.;
Blanco-Cuaresma, S.;
Boch, T.;
Bombrun, A.;
Borrachero, R.;
Bouquillon, S.;
Bourda, G.;
Bouy, H.;
Bragaglia, A.;
Breddels, M. A.;
Brouillet, N.;
Brüsemeister, T.;
Bucciarelli, B.;
Burgess, P.;
Burgon, R.;
Burlacu, A.;
Busonero, D.;
Buzzi, R.;
Caffau, E.;
Cambras, J.;
Campbell, H.;
Cancelliere, R.;
Cantat-Gaudin, T.;
Carlucci, T.;
Carrasco, J. M.;
Castellani, M.;
Charlot, P.;
Charnas, J.;
Chiavassa, A.;
Clotet, M.;
Cocozza, G.;
Collins, R. S.;
Costigan, G.;
Crifo, F.;
Cross, N. J. G.;
Crosta, M.;
Crowley, C.;
Dafonte, C.;
Damerdji, Y.;
Dapergolas, A.;
David, P.;
David, M.;
De Cat, P.;
de Felice, F.;
de Laverny, P.;
De Luise, F.;
De March, R.;
de Martino, D.;
de Souza, R.;
Debosscher, J.;
del Pozo, E.;
Delbo, M.;
Delgado, A.;
Delgado, H. E.;
Di Matteo, P.;
Diakite, S.;
Distefano, E.;
Dolding, C.;
Anjos, S. Dos;
Drazinos, P.;
Durán, J.;
Dzigan, Y.;
Edvardsson, B.;
Enke, H.;
Evans, N. W.;
Bontemps, G. Eynard;
Fabre, C.;
Fabrizio, M.;
Faigler, S.;
Falcão, A. J.;
Casas, M. Farràs;
Federici, L.;
Fedorets, G.;
Fernández-Hernández, J.;
Fernique, P.;
Fienga, A.;
Figueras, F.;
Filippi, F.;
Findeisen, K.;
Fonti, A.;
Fouesneau, M.;
Fraile, E.;
Fraser, M.;
Fuchs, J.;
Gai, M.;
Galleti, S.;
Galluccio, L.;
Garabato, D.;
García-Sedano, F.;
Garofalo, A.;
Garralda, N.;
Gavras, P.;
Gerssen, J.;
Geyer, R.;
Gilmore, G.;
Girona, S.;
Giuffrida, G.;
Gomes, M.;
González-Marcos, A.;
González-Núñez, J.;
González-Vidal, J. J.;
Granvik, M.;
Guerrier, A.;
Guillout, P.;
Guiraud, J.;
Gúrpide, A.;
Gutiérrez-Sánchez, R.;
Guy, L. P.;
Haigron, R.;
Hatzidimitriou, D.;
Haywood, M.;
Heiter, U.;
Helmi, A.;
Hobbs, D.;
Hofmann, W.;
Holl, B.;
Holland, G.;
Hunt, J. A. S.;
Hypki, A.;
Icardi, V.;
Irwin, M.;
de Fombelle, G. Jevardat;
Jofré, P.;
Jonker, P. G.;
Jorissen, A.;
Julbe, F.;
Karampelas, A.;
Kochoska, A.;
Kohley, R.;
Kolenberg, K.;
Kontizas, E.;
Koposov, S. E.;
Kordopatis, G.;
Koubsky, P.;
Krone-Martins, A.;
Kudryashova, M.;
Kull, I.;
Bachchan, R. K.;
Lacoste-Seris, F.;
Lanza, A. F.;
Lavigne, J. -B.;
Poncin-Lafitte, C. Le;
Lebreton, Y.;
Lebzelter, T.;
Leccia, S.;
Leclerc, N.;
Lecoeur-Taibi, I.;
Lemaitre, V.;
Lenhardt, H.;
Leroux, F.;
Liao, S.;
Licata, E.;
Lindstrøm, H. E. P.;
Lister, T. A.;
Livanou, E.;
Lobel, A.;
Löffer, W.;
López, M.;
Lorenz, D.;
MacDonald, I.;
Fernandes, T. Magalhães;
Managau, S.;
Mann, R. G.;
Mantelet, G.;
Marchal, O.;
Marchant, J. M.;
Marconi, M.;
Marinoni, S.;
Marrese, P. M.;
Marschalkó, G.;
Marshall, D. J.;
Martín-Fleitas, J. M.;
Martino, M.;
Mary, N.;
Matijevič, G.;
Mazeh, T.;
McMillan, P. J.;
Messina, S.;
Michalik, D.;
Millar, N. R.;
Miranda, B. M. H.;
Molina, D.;
Molinaro, R.;
Molinaro, M.;
Molnár, L.;
Moniez, M.;
Montegrio, P.;
Mor, R.;
Mora, A.;
Morbidelli, R.;
Morel, T.;
Morgenthaler, S.;
Morris, D.;
Mulone, A. F.;
Muraveva, T.;
Musella, I.;
Narbonne, J.;
Nelemans, G.;
Nicastro, L.;
Noval, L.;
Ordénovic, C.;
Ordieres-Meré, J.;
Osborne, P.;
Pagani, C.;
Pagano, I.;
Pailler, F.;
Palacin, H.;
Palaversa, L.;
Parsons, P.;
Pecoraro, M.;
Pedrosa, R.;
Pentikäinen, H.;
Pichon, B.;
Piersimoni, A. M.;
Pineau, F. -X.;
Plachy, E.;
Plum, G.;
Poujoulet, E.;
Prša, A.;
Pulone, L.;
Ragaini, S.;
Rago, S.;
Rambaux, N.;
Ramos-Lerate, M.;
Ranalli, P.;
Rauw, G.;
Read, A.;
Regibo, S.;
Reylé, C.;
Ribeiro, R. A.;
Rimoldini, L.;
Ripepi, V.;
Riva, A.;
Rixon, G.;
Roelens, M.;
Romero-Gómez, M.;
Rowell, N.;
Royer, F.;
Ruiz-Dern, L.;
Sadowski, G.;
Sellés, T. Sagristà;
Sahlmann, J.;
Salgado, J.;
Salguero, E.;
Sarasso, M.;
Savietto, H.;
Schultheis, M.;
Sciacca, E.;
Segol, M.;
Segovia, J. C.;
Segransan, D.;
Shih, I-C.;
Smareglia, R.;
Smart, R. L.;
Solano, E.;
Solitro, F.;
Sordo, R.;
Nieto, S. Soria;
Souchay, J.;
Spagna, A.;
Spoto, F.;
Stampa, U.;
Steele, I. A.;
Steidelmüller, H.;
Stephenson, C. A.;
Stoev, H.;
Suess, F. F.;
Süveges, M.;
Surdej, J.;
Szabados, L.;
Szegedi-Elek, E.;
Tapiador, D.;
Taris, F.;
Tauran, G.;
Taylor, M. B.;
Teixeira, R.;
Terrett, D.;
Tingley, B.;
Trager, S. C.;
Turon, C.;
Ulla, A.;
Utrilla, E.;
Valentini, G.;
van Elteren, A.;
Van Hemelryck, E.;
van Leeuwen, M.;
Varadi, M.;
Vecchiato, A.;
Veljanoski, J.;
Via, T.;
Vicente, D.;
Vogt, S.;
Voss, H.;
Votruba, V.;
Voutsinas, S.;
Walmsley, G.;
Weiler, M.;
Weingril, K.;
Wevers, T.;
Wyrzykowski, Ł.;
Yoldas, A.;
Žerjal, M.;
Zucker, S.;
Zurbach, C.;
Zwitter, T.;
Alecu, A.;
Allen, M.;
Prieto, C. Allende;
Amorim, A.;
Anglada-Escudé, G.;
Arsenijevic, V.;
Azaz, S.;
Balm, P.;
Beck, M.;
Bernsteiny, H. -H.;
Bigot, L.;
Bijaoui, A.;
Blasco, C.;
Bonfigli, M.;
Bono, G.;
Boudreault, S.;
Bressan, A.;
Brown, S.;
Brunet, P. -M.;
Bunclarky, P.;
Buonanno, R.;
Butkevich, A. G.;
Carret, C.;
Carrion, C.;
Chemin, L.;
Chéreau, F.;
Corcione, L.;
Darmigny, E.;
de Boer, K. S.;
de Teodoro, P.;
de Zeeuw, P. T.;
Luche, C. Delle;
Domingues, C. D.;
Dubath, P.;
Fodor, F.;
Frézouls, B.;
Fries, A.;
Fustes, D.;
Fyfe, D.;
Gallardo, E.;
Gallegos, J.;
Gardio, D.;
Gebran, M.;
Gomboc, A.;
Gómez, A.;
Grux, E.;
Gueguen, A.;
Heyrovsky, A.;
Hoar, J.;
Iannicola, G.;
Parache, Y. Isasi;
Janotto, A. -M.;
Joliet, E.;
Jonckheere, A.;
Keil, R.;
Kim, D. -W.;
Klagyivik, P.;
Klar, J.;
Knude, J.;
Kochukhov, O.;
Kolka, I.;
Kos, J.;
Kutka, A.;
Lainey, V.;
LeBouquin, D.;
Liu, C.;
Loreggia, D.;
Makarov, V. V.;
Marseille, M. G.;
Martayan, C.;
Martinez-Rubi, O.;
Massart, B.;
Meynadier, F.;
Mignot, S.;
Munari, U.;
Nguyen, A. -T.;
Nordlander, T.;
O'Flaherty, K. S.;
Ocvirk, P.;
Sanz, A. Olias;
Ortiz, P.;
Osorio, J.;
Oszkiewicz, D.;
Ouzounis, A.;
Palmer, M.;
Park, P.;
Pasquato, E.;
Peltzer, C.;
Peralta, J.;
Péturaud, F.;
Pieniluoma, T.;
Pigozzi, E.;
Poelsy, J.;
Prat, G.;
Prod'homme, T.;
Raison, F.;
Rebordao, J. M.;
Risquez, D.;
Rocca-Volmerange, B.;
Rosen, S.;
Ruiz-Fuertes, M. I.;
Russo, F.;
Sembay, S.;
Vizcaino, I. Serraller;
Short, A.;
Siebert, A.;
Silva, H.;
Sinachopoulos, D.;
Slezak, E.;
Soffel, M.;
Sosnowska, D.;
Straižys, V.;
ter Linden, M.;
Terrell, D.;
Theil, S.;
Tiede, C.;
Troisi, L.;
Tsalmantza, P.;
Tur, D.;
Vaccari, M.;
Vachier, F.;
Valles, P.;
Van Hamme, W.;
Veltz, L.;
Virtanen, J.;
Wallut, J. -M.;
Wichmann, R.;
Wilkinson, M. I.;
Ziaeepour, H.;
Zschocke, S.
Submitted: 2017-03-03
Context. The first Gaia Data Release contains the Tycho-Gaia Astrometric
Solution (TGAS). This is a subset of about 2 million stars for which, besides
the position and photometry, the proper motion and parallax are calculated
using Hipparcos and Tycho-2 positions in 1991.25 as prior information. Aims. We
investigate the scientific potential and limitations of the TGAS component by
means of the astrometric data for open clusters. Methods. Mean cluster parallax
and proper motion values are derived taking into account the error correlations
within the astrometric solutions for individual stars, an estimate of the
internal velocity dispersion in the cluster, and, where relevant, the effects
of the depth of the cluster along the line of sight. Internal consistency of
the TGAS data is assessed. Results. Values given for standard uncertainties are
still inaccurate and may lead to unrealistic unit-weight standard deviations of
least squares solutions for cluster parameters. Reconstructed mean cluster
parallax and proper motion values are generally in very good agreement with
earlier Hipparcos-based determination, although the Gaia mean parallax for the
Pleiades is a significant exception. We have no current explanation for that
discrepancy. Most clusters are observed to extend to nearly 15 pc from the
cluster centre, and it will be up to future Gaia releases to establish whether
those potential cluster-member stars are still dynamically bound to the
clusters. Conclusions. The Gaia DR1 provides the means to examine open clusters
far beyond their more easily visible cores, and can provide membership
assessments based on proper motions and parallaxes. A combined HR diagram shows
the same features as observed before using the Hipparcos data, with clearly
increased luminosities for older A and F dwarfs.
[10]
oai:arXiv.org:1506.06733 [pdf] - 1265739
Spin-orbit coupling and chaotic rotation for circumbinary bodies.
Application to the small satellites of the Pluto-Charon system
Submitted: 2015-06-22, last modified: 2015-08-20
We investigate the resonant rotation of circumbinary bodies in planar
quasi-circular orbits. Denoting $n_b$ and $n$ the orbital mean motion of the
inner binary and of the circumbinary body, respectively, we show that
spin-orbit resonances exist at the frequencies $n\pm k\nu/2$, where $\nu = n_b
- n$, and $k$ is an integer. Moreover, when the libration at natural frequency
has the same magnitude as $\nu$, the resonances overlap and the rotation
becomes chaotic. We apply these results to the small satellites in the
Pluto-Charon system, and conclude that their rotations are likely chaotic.
However, the rotation can also be stable and not synchronous for small axial
asymmetries.
[11]
oai:arXiv.org:1405.0473 [pdf] - 818275
Interests of a new lunar laser instrumentation on the ESO NTT Telescope
Fienga, A.;
Courde, C.;
Torre, J. M.;
Manche, H.;
Murphy, T.;
Mueller, J.;
Laskar, J.;
Bouquillon, S.;
Biskupek, L.;
Hofmann, F.;
Capitaine, N.;
Rambaux, N.
Submitted: 2014-05-02, last modified: 2014-05-05
We analyze the impact of the installation of a lunar laser ranging device on
the NTT 3.6m ESO telescope. With such an instrument, the scientific communities
of fundamental physics and solar system formation will highly benefit of the
only LLR station in the Southern Hemisphere. The quality of the NTT 3.6 meter
telescope will also greatly complement the LLR 3.5 meter Apache Point telescope
(3.5 m) instrument in the Northern Hemisphere (USA) which is the best
instrument for tracking the Moon since 2006. Finally, we also consider the
technical characteristics of such installation including the observational
constraints.
[12]
oai:arXiv.org:1402.2493 [pdf] - 1203293
Librational response of a deformed 3-layer Titan perturbed by
non-keplerian orbit and atmospheric couplings
Submitted: 2014-02-11
The analyses of Titan's gravity field obtained by Cassini space mission
suggest the presence of an internal ocean beneath its icy surface. The
characterization of the geophysical parameters of the icy shell and the ocean
is important to constrain the evolution models of Titan. The knowledge of the
librations, that are periodic oscillations around a uniform rotational motion,
can bring piece of information on the interior parameters. The objective of
this paper is to study the librational response in longitude from an analytical
approach for Titan composed of a deep atmosphere, an elastic icy shell, an
internal ocean, and an elastic rocky core perturbed by the gravitational
interactions with Saturn. We start from the librational equations developed for
a rigid satellite in synchronous spin-orbit resonance. We introduce explicitly
the atmospheric torque acting on the surface computed from the Titan IPSL GCM
(Institut Pierre Simon Laplace General Circulation Model) and the periodic
deformations of elastic solid layers due to the tides. We investigate the
librational response for various interior models in order to compare and to
identify the influence of the geophysical parameters and the impact of the
elasticity. The main librations arise at two well-separated forcing frequency
ranges: low forcing frequencies dominated by the Saturnian annual and
semi-annual frequencies, and a high forcing frequency regime dominated by
Titan's orbital frequency around Saturn. We find that internal structure models
including an internal ocean with elastic solid layers lead to the same order of
libration amplitude than the oceanless models, which makes more challenging to
differentiate them by the interpretation of librational motion.
[13]
oai:arXiv.org:1111.1076 [pdf] - 1091413
Influence of the coorbital resonance on the rotation of the Trojan
satellites of Saturn
Submitted: 2011-11-04, last modified: 2012-02-13
The Cassini spacecraft collects high resolution images of the saturnian
satellites and reveals the surface of these new worlds. The shape and rotation
of the satellites can be determined from the Cassini Imaging Science Subsystem
data, employing limb coordinates and stereogrammetric control points. This is
the case for Epimetheus (Tiscareno et al. 2009) that opens elaboration of new
rotational models (Tiscareno et al. 2009; Noyelles 2010; Robutel et al. 2011).
Especially, Epimetheus is characterized by its horseshoe shape orbit and the
presence of the swap is essential to introduce explicitly into rotational
models. During its journey in the saturnian system, Cassini spacecraft
accumulates the observational data of the other satellites and it will be
possible to determine the rotational parameters of several of them. To prepare
these future observations, we built rotational models of the coorbital (also
called Trojan) satellites Telesto, Calypso, Helene, and Polydeuces, in addition
to Janus and Epimetheus. Indeed, Telesto and Calypso orbit around the L_4 and
L_5 Lagrange points of Saturn-Tethys while Helene and Polydeuces are coorbital
of Dione. The goal of this study is to understand how the departure from the
Keplerian motion induced by the perturbations of the coorbital body, influences
the rotation of these satellites. To this aim, we introduce explicitly the
perturbation in the rotational equations by using the formalism developed by
Erdi (1977) to represent the coorbital motions, and so we describe the
rotational motion of the coorbitals, Janus and Epimetheus included, in compact
form.
[14]
oai:arXiv.org:1112.2384 [pdf] - 450203
A pre-Caloris synchronous rotation for Mercury
Submitted: 2011-12-11
The planet Mercury is locked in a spin-orbit resonance where it rotates three
times about its spin axis for every two orbits about the Sun. The current
explanation for this unique state assumes that the initial rotation of this
planet was prograde and rapid, and that tidal torques decelerated the planetary
spin to this resonance. When core-mantle boundary friction is accounted for,
capture into the 3/2 resonance occurs with a 26% probability, but the most
probable outcome is capture into one of the higher-order resonances. Here we
show that if the initial rotation of Mercury were retrograde, this planet would
be captured into synchronous rotation with a 68% probability. Strong spatial
variations of the impact cratering rate would have existed at this time, and
these are shown to be consistent with the distribution of pre-Calorian impact
basins observed by Mariner 10 and MESSENGER. Escape from this highly stable
resonance is made possible by the momentum imparted by large basin-forming
impact events, and capture into the 3/2 resonance occurs subsequently under
favourable conditions.
[15]
oai:arXiv.org:1109.4867 [pdf] - 1084316
The rotation of Mimas
Submitted: 2011-09-22
The Cassini mission in the Saturnian system is an outstanding opportunity to
improve our knowledge of the satellites of Saturn. The data obtained thanks to
this mission must be confronted to theoretical models. This paper aims at
modeling the rotation of Mimas, with respect to its possible internal
structure. For that, we first build different interior models, in considering
Mimas as composed of 2 rigid layers with different porosity. Then we simulate
the rotational behavior of these models in a 3-degree of freedom numerical
code, in considering complete ephemerides of a Mimas whose rotation is
disturbed by Saturn. We also estimate the deviation of its longitudinal
orientation due to tides. We expect a signature of the internal structure up to
0.53{\deg} in the longitudinal librations and an obliquity between 2 and 3
arcmin, the exact values depending on the interior. The longitudinal librations
should be detectable, inverting them to get clues on the internal structure of
Mimas is challenging.
[16]
oai:arXiv.org:1107.3643 [pdf] - 398588
High precision astrometry mission for the detection and characterization
of nearby habitable planetary systems with the Nearby Earth Astrometric
Telescope (NEAT)
Malbet, Fabien;
Léger, Alain;
Shao, Michael;
Goullioud, Renaud;
Lagage, Pierre-Olivier;
Brown, Anthony G. A.;
Cara, Christophe;
Durand, Gilles;
Eiroa, Carlos;
Feautrier, Philippe;
Jakobsson, Björn;
Hinglais, Emmanuel;
Kaltenegger, Lisa;
Labadie, Lucas;
Lagrange, Anne-Marie;
Laskar, Jacques;
Liseau, René;
Lunine, Jonathan;
Maldonado, Jesús;
Mercier, Manuel;
Mordasini, Christoph;
Queloz, Didier;
Quirrenbach, Andreas;
Sozzetti, Alessandro;
Traub, Wesley;
Absil, Olivier;
Alibert, Yann;
Andrei, Alexandre Humberto;
Arenou, Frédéric;
Beichman, Charles;
Chelli, Alain;
Cockell, Charles S.;
Duvert, Gilles;
Forveille, Thierry;
Garcia, Paulo J. V.;
Hobbs, David;
Krone-Martins, Alberto;
Lammer, Helmut;
Meunier, Nadège;
Minardi, Stefano;
de Almeida, André Moitinho;
Rambaux, Nicolas;
Raymond, Sean;
Röttgering, Huub J. A.;
Sahlmann, Johannes;
Schuller, Peter A.;
Ségransan, Damien;
Selsis, Franck;
Surdej, Jean;
Villaver, Eva;
White, Glenn J.;
Zinnecker, Hans
Submitted: 2011-07-19, last modified: 2011-08-16
(abridged) A complete census of planetary systems around a volume-limited
sample of solar-type stars (FGK dwarfs) in the Solar neighborhood with uniform
sensitivity down to Earth-mass planets within their Habitable Zones out to
several AUs would be a major milestone in extrasolar planets astrophysics. This
fundamental goal can be achieved with a mission concept such as NEAT - the
Nearby Earth Astrometric Telescope. NEAT is designed to carry out space-borne
extremely-high-precision astrometric measurements sufficient to detect
dynamical effects due to orbiting planets of mass even lower than Earth's
around the nearest stars. Such a survey mission would provide the actual
planetary masses and the full orbital geometry for all the components of the
detected planetary systems down to the Earth-mass limit. The NEAT performance
limits can be achieved by carrying out differential astrometry between the
targets and a set of suitable reference stars in the field. The NEAT instrument
design consists of an off-axis parabola single-mirror telescope, a detector
with a large field of view made of small movable CCDs located around a fixed
central CCD, and an interferometric calibration system originating from
metrology fibers located at the primary mirror. The proposed mission
architecture relies on the use of two satellites operating at L2 for 5 years,
flying in formation and offering a capability of more than 20,000
reconfigurations (alternative option uses deployable boom). The NEAT primary
science program will encompass an astrometric survey of our 200 closest F-, G-
and K-type stellar neighbors, with an average of 50 visits. The remaining time
might be allocated to improve the characterization of the architecture of
selected planetary systems around nearby targets of specific interest (low-mass
stars, young stars, etc.) discovered by Gaia, ground-based high-precision
radial-velocity surveys.
[17]
oai:arXiv.org:1107.2051 [pdf] - 1077890
Constraining Ceres' interior from its Rotational Motion
Submitted: 2011-07-11
Context. Ceres is the most massive body of the asteroid belt and contains
about 25 wt.% (weight percent) of water. Understanding its thermal evolution
and assessing its current state are major goals of the Dawn Mission.
Constraints on internal structure can be inferred from various observations.
Especially, detailed knowledge of the rotational motion can help constrain the
mass distribution inside the body, which in turn can lead to information on its
geophysical history. Aims. We investigate the signature of the interior on the
rotational motion of Ceres and discuss possible future measurements performed
by the spacecraft Dawn that will help to constrain Ceres' internal structure.
Methods. We compute the polar motion, precession-nutation, and length-of-day
variations. We estimate the amplitudes of the rigid and non-rigid response for
these various motions for models of Ceres interior constrained by recent shape
data and surface properties. Results. As a general result, the amplitudes of
oscillations in the rotation appear to be small, and their determination from
spaceborne techniques will be challenging. For example, the amplitudes of the
semi-annual and annual nutations are around ~364 and ~140 milli-arcseconds, and
they show little variation within the parametric space of interior models
envisioned for Ceres. This, combined with the very long-period of the
precession motion, requires very precise measurements. We also estimate the
timescale for Ceres' orientation to relax to a generalized Cassini State, and
we find that the tidal dissipation within that object was probably too small to
drive any significant damping of its obliquity since formation. However,
combining the shape and gravity observations by Dawn offers the prospect to
identify departures of non-hydrostaticity at the global and regional scale,
which will be instrumental in constraining Ceres' past and current thermal
state. We also discuss the existence of a possible Chandler mode in the
rotational motion of Ceres, whose potential excitation by endogenic and/or
exogenic processes may help detect the presence of liquid reservoirs within the
asteroid.
[18]
oai:arXiv.org:1104.4009 [pdf] - 1053491
About the various contributions in Venus rotation rate and LOD
Submitted: 2011-04-20
% context heading (optional) {Thanks to the Venus Express Mission, new data
on the properties of Venus could be obtained in particular concerning its
rotation.} % aims heading (mandatory) {In view of these upcoming results, the
purpose of this paper is to determine and compare the major physical processes
influencing the rotation of Venus, and more particularly the angular rotation
rate.} % methods heading (mandatory) {Applying models already used for the
Earth, the effect of the triaxiality of a rigid Venus on its period of rotation
are computed. Then the variations of Venus rotation caused by the elasticity,
the atmosphere and the core of the planet are evaluated.} % results heading
(mandatory) {Although the largest irregularities of the rotation rate of the
Earth at short time scales are caused by its atmosphere and elastic
deformations, we show that the Venus ones are dominated by the tidal torque
exerted by the Sun on its solid body. Indeed, as Venus has a slow rotation,
these effects have a large amplitude of 2 minutes of time (mn). These
variations of the rotation rate are larger than the one induced by atmospheric
wind variations that can reach 25-50 seconds of time (s), depending on the
simulation used. The variations due to the core effects which vary with its
size between 3 and 20s are smaller. Compared to these effects, the influence of
the elastic deformation cause by the zonal tidal potential is negligible.} %
conclusions heading (optional), leave it empty if necessary {As the variations
of the rotation of Venus reported here are of the order 3mn peak to peak, they
should influence past, present and future observations providing further
constraints on the planet internal structure and atmosphere.}
[19]
oai:arXiv.org:1003.0557 [pdf] - 1025473
Analytical description of physical librations of Saturnian coorbital
satellites Janus and Epimetheus
Submitted: 2010-03-02, last modified: 2010-09-10
Janus and Epimetheus are famously known for their distinctive
horseshoe-shaped orbits resulting from a 1:1 orbital resonance. Every four
years these two satellites swap their orbits by a few tens of kilometers as a
result of their close encounter. Recently Tiscareno et al. (2009) have proposed
a model of rotation based on images from the Cassini orbiter. These authors
inferred the amplitude of rotational librational motion in longitude at the
orbital period by fitting a shape model to the recent Cassini ISS images. By a
quasiperiodic approximation of the orbital motion, we describe how the orbital
swap impacts the rotation of the satellites. To that purpose, we have developed
a formalism based on quasi-periodic series with long and short-period
librations. In this framework, the amplitude of the libration at the orbital
period is found proportional to a term accounting for the orbital swap. We
checked the analytical quasi-periodic development by performing a numerical
simulation and find both results in good agreement. To complete this study, the
results regarding the short-period librations are studied with the help of an
adiabatic-like approach.
[20]
oai:arXiv.org:0709.1111 [pdf] - 4703
On the oscillations in Mercury's obliquity
Submitted: 2007-09-07
One major objective of MESSENGER and BepiColombo spatial missions is to
accurately measure Mercury's rotation and its obliquity in order to obtain
constraints on internal structure of the planet. Which is the obliquity's
dynamical behavior deriving from a complete spin-orbit motion of Mercury
simultaneously integrated with planetary interactions? We have used our SONYR
model integrating the spin-orbit N-body problem applied to the solar System
(Sun and planets). For lack of current accurate observations or ephemerides of
Mercury's rotation, and therefore for lack of valid initial conditions for a
numerical integration, we have built an original method for finding the
libration center of the spin-orbit system and, as a consequence, for avoiding
arbitrary amplitudes in librations of the spin-orbit motion as well as in
Mercury's obliquity. The method has been carried out in two cases: (1) the
spin-orbit motion of Mercury in the 2-body problem case (Sun-Mercury) where an
uniform precession of the Keplerian orbital plane is kinematically added at a
fixed inclination (S2K case), (2) the spin-orbit motion of Mercury in the
N-body problem case (Sun and planets) (Sn case). We find that the remaining
amplitude of the oscillations in the Sn case is one order of magnitude larger
than in the S2K case, namely 4 versus 0.4 arcseconds (peak-to-peak). The mean
obliquity is also larger, namely 1.98 versus 1.80 arcminutes, for a difference
of 10.8 arcseconds. These theoretical results are in a good agreement with
recent radar observations but it is not excluded that it should be possible to
push farther the convergence process by drawing nearer still more precisely to
the libration center.
[21]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0306387 [pdf] - 1468540
Theory of the Mercury's spin-orbit motion and analysis of its main
librations
Submitted: 2003-06-19, last modified: 2003-09-12
The upcoming space missions, MESSENGER and BepiColombo with onboard
instrumentation capable of measuring the rotational parameters stimulate the
objective to reach an accurate theory of the rotational motion of Mercury. For
obtaining the real motion of Mercury, we have used our relativistic BJV model
of solar system integration including the coupled spin-orbit motion of the
Moon. We have extended this model by generalizing the spin-orbit couplings to
the terrestrial planets, notably Mercury. The updated model is called SONYR
(acronym of Spin-Orbit N-BodY Relativistic model). The SONYR model giving an
accurate solution of the spin-orbit motion of Mercury permits to analyze the
different families of the Hermean rotational librations. The spin-orbit motion
of Mercury is characterized by two proper frequencies (namely 15.847 and 1066
years) and its 3:2 resonance presents a second synchronism which can be
understood as a spin-orbit secular resonance (278 898 years). By using the
SONYR model, we find a new determination of the mean obliquity, namely 1.6
arcminutes. Besides, we identify in the Hermean librations the impact of the
uncertainty of the greatest principal moment of inertia (\cmr2) on the
obliquity and on the libration in longitude (2.3 mas and 0.45 as respectively
for an increase of 1% on the \cmr2 value). These determinations prove to be
suitable for providing constraints on the internal structure of Mercury.
[22]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0301528 [pdf] - 54499
Conditions of Dynamical Stability for the HD 160691 Planetary System
Submitted: 2003-01-27, last modified: 2003-09-01
The orbits in the HD 160691 planetary system at first appeared highly
unstable, but using the MEGNO and FLI techniques of global dynamics analysis in
the orbital parameter space we have found a stabilizing mechanism that could be
the key to its existence. In order to be dynamically stable, the HD 160691
planetary system has to satisfy the following conditions: (1) a 2:1 mean motion
resonance, combined with (2) an apsidal secular resonance in (3) a
configuration $P_{c}(ap) - S - P_{b}(ap)$ where the two apsidal lines are
anti-aligned, and (4) specific conditions on the respective sizes of the
eccentricities (high eccentricity for the outer orbit is in particular the most
probable necessary condition). More generally, in this original orbital
topology, where the resonance variables $\theta_{1}$ and $\theta_{3}$ librate
about $180^{\circ}$ while $\theta_{2}$ librates about $0^{\circ}$, the HD
160691 system and its mechanism have revealed aspects of the 2:1 orbital
resonances that have not been observed nor analyzed before. The present
topology combined with the 2:1 resonance is indeed more wide-ranging than the
particular case of the HD 160691 planetary system. It is a new theoretical
possibility suitable for a stable regime despite relatively small semi-major
axes with respect to the important masses in interactions.
[23]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0307328 [pdf] - 58041
Mercury's spin-orbit model and signature of its dynamical parameters
Submitted: 2003-07-17
The 3:2 spin-orbit resonance between the rotational and orbital motions of
Mercury results from a functional dependance on a tidal friction adding to a
non-zero eccentricity with a permanent asymmetry in the equatorial plane of the
planet. The upcoming space missions, MESSENGER and BepiColombo with onboard
instrumentation capable of measuring the Mercury's rotational parameters,
stimulate the objective to attempt to an accurate theory of the planet's
rotation. We have used our BJV relativistic model of solar system integration
including the spin-orbit motion of the Moon. This model had been previously
built in accordance with the requirements of the Lunar Laser Ranging
observational accuracy. We extended this model to the spin-orbit couplings of
the terrestrial planets including Mercury; the updated model is called SONYR
(acronym of Spin-Orbit N-BodY Relativistic model). An accurate rotation of
Mercury has been then obtained. Moreover, the conception of the SONYR model is
suitable for analyzing the different families of hermean rotational librations.
We accurately identify the non-linear relations between the rotation of Mercury
and its dynamical figure (\cmr2, $C_{20}$, and $C_{22}$). Notably, for a
variation of 1% on the \cmr2 value, signatures in the $\phi$ hermean libration
in longitude as well as in the $\eta$ obliquity of the planet are respectively
0.45 arcseconds (as) and 2.4 milliarcseconds (mas). These determinations
provide new constraints on the internal structure of Mercury to be discussed
with the expected accuracy forecasted in the BepiColombo mission (respectively
3.2 and 3.7 as according to Milani et al 2001).
[24]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0207367 [pdf] - 50510
Global dynamics and stability limits for planetary systems around HD
12661, HD 38529, HD 37124 and HD 160691
Submitted: 2002-07-17, last modified: 2002-09-10
In order to distinguish between regular and chaotic planetary orbits we apply
a new technique called MEGNO in a wide neighbourhood of orbital parameters
determined using standard two-body Keplerian fits for HD 12661, HD 38529, HD
37124 and HD 160691 planetary systems. We show that the currently announced
orbital parameters place these systems in very different situations from the
point of view of dynamical stability. While HD 38529 and HD 37124 are located
within large stability zones in the phase space around their determined orbits,
the preliminary orbits in HD 160691 are highly unstable. The orbital parameters
of the HD 12661 planets are located in a border region between stable and
unstable dynamical regimes, so while its currently determined orbital
parameters produce stable regular orbits, a minor change within the margin of
error of just one parameter may result in a chaotic dynamical system.