Normalized to: Rajkumar, B.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1911.03675 [pdf] - 2034466
A Fractal Analysis of Magnetograms within Active Regions
Submitted: 2019-11-09
The magnetograms of sixteen Active Regions, observed during June - November
2015, were obtained from the Joint Science Operations Center and used to
determine the fractal dimensions of various magnetic field groups. The fields
were divided into strong (positive and negative) and weak (positive and
negative) groupings. The area-perimeter method was used to determine the
fractal dimensions for the umbral and penumbral regions of the magnetograms.
The fractal dimensions were found to be 1.79 \pm 0.49 and 1.96 \pm 0.29 for
strong and weak magnetic fields respectively. When compared to the umbral and
penumbral fractal dimensions determined by (Rajkumar, Haque and Hrudey, 2017)
using white light images, an inverse relationship was found, with the umbra
showing lower fractal dimensions than the penumbra for the magnetic field
groups compared to the intensity images. This directly implies that there is
greater complexity in the penumbral magnetic field groupings than the umbral
region. This has implications for models that constrain how the magnetic field
groups are contained in the cooler umbral regions.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1709.04457 [pdf] - 1739825
Stochastic modeling of multiwavelength variability of the classical BL
Lac object OJ 287 on timescales ranging from decades to hours
Goyal, A.;
Stawarz, L.;
Zola, S.;
Marchenko, V.;
Soida, M.;
Nilsson, K.;
Ciprini, S.;
Baran, A.;
Ostrowski, M.;
Wiita, P. J.;
Gopal-Krishna;
Siemiginowska, A.;
Sobolewska, M.;
Jorstad, S.;
Marscher, A.;
Hovatta, M. F. Aller H. D. Aller T.;
Caton, D. B.;
Reichart, D.;
Matsumoto, K.;
Sadakane, K.;
Gazeas, K.;
Kidger, M.;
Piirola, V.;
Jermak, H.;
Alicavus, F.;
Baliyan, K. S.;
Baransky, A.;
Berdyugin, A.;
Blay, P.;
Boumis, P.;
Boyd, D.;
Bufan, Y.;
Torrent, M. Campas;
Campos, F.;
Gomez, J. Carrillo;
Dalessio, J.;
Debski, B.;
Dimitrov, D.;
Drozdz, M.;
Er, H.;
Erdem, A.;
Perez, A. Escartin;
Ramazani, V. Fallah;
Filippenko, A. V.;
Gafton, E.;
Garcia, F.;
Godunova, V.;
Pinilla, F. Gomez;
Gopinathan, M.;
Haislip, J. B.;
Haque, S.;
Harmanen, J.;
Hudec, R.;
Hurst, G.;
Ivarsen, K. M.;
Joshi, A.;
Kagitani, M.;
Karaman, N.;
Karjalainen, R.;
Kaur, N.;
l-Wierzbowska, D. Kozie;
Kuligowska, E.;
Kundera, T.;
Kurowski, S.;
Kvammen, A.;
LaCluyze, A. P.;
Lee, B. C.;
Liakos, A.;
de Haro, J. Lozano;
Mohammed, I.;
Moore, J. P.;
Mugrauer, M.;
Nogues, R. Naves;
Neely, A. W.;
Ogloza, W.;
Okano, S.;
Pajdosz, U.;
Pandey, J. C.;
Perri, M.;
Poyner, G.;
Provencal, J.;
Pursimo, T.;
Raj, A.;
Rajkumar, B.;
Reinthal, R.;
Reynolds, T.;
Saario, J.;
Sadegi, S.;
Sakanoi, T.;
Gonzalez, J. L. Salto;
Sameer;
Heung, A.;
Simon, O.;
Siwak, M.;
Schweyer, T.;
Alfaro, F. C. Soldan;
Sonbas, E.;
Strobl, J.;
Takalo, L. O.;
Espasa, L. Tremosa;
Valdes, J. R.;
Vasylenko, V. V.;
Verrecchia, F.;
Webb, J. R.;
Yoneda, M.;
Zejmo, M.;
Zheng, W.;
Zielinski, P.;
Janik, J.;
Chavushyan, V.;
Cheung, C. C.;
Giroletti, M.
Submitted: 2017-09-13, last modified: 2018-07-10
We present the results of our power spectral density analysis for the BL Lac
object OJ\,287, utilizing the {\it Fermi}-LAT survey at high-energy
$\gamma$-rays, {\it Swift}-XRT in X-rays, several ground-based telescopes and
the {\it Kepler} satellite in the optical, and radio telescopes at GHz
frequencies. The light curves are modeled in terms of continuous-time
auto-regressive moving average (CARMA) processes. Owing to the inclusion of the
{\it Kepler} data, we were able to construct \emph{for the first time} the
optical variability power spectrum of a blazar without any gaps across $\sim6$
dex in temporal frequencies. Our analysis reveals that the radio power spectra
are of a colored-noise type on timescales ranging from tens of years down to
months, with no evidence for breaks or other spectral features. The overall
optical power spectrum is also consistent with a colored noise on the
variability timescales ranging from 117 years down to hours, with no hints of
any quasi-periodic oscillations. The X-ray power spectrum resembles the radio
and optical power spectra on the analogous timescales ranging from tens of
years down to months. Finally, the $\gamma$-ray power spectrum is noticeably
different from the radio, optical, and X-ray power spectra of the source: we
have detected a characteristic relaxation timescale in the {\it Fermi}-LAT
data, corresponding to $\sim 150$\,days, such that on timescales longer than
this, the power spectrum is consistent with uncorrelated (white) noise, while
on shorter variability timescales there is correlated (colored) noise.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1709.08042 [pdf] - 2034289
Fractal dimensions of umbral and penumbral regions of sunspots
Submitted: 2017-09-23
The images of sunspots in sixteen active regions taken at the UCCI
Observatory in Grand Cayman during June - November 2015, were used to determine
their fractal dimensions using the perimeter-area method for the umbral and the
penumbral region. Scale free fractal dimensions of 2.09 $\pm$ 0.42 and 1.72
$\pm$ 0.4 were found respectively. This value was higher than the value
determined by Chumak and Chumak (1996) who used a similar method but for the
penumbral region only for their sample set. There is a positive correlation r =
0.58 between umbral and the penumbral fractal dimensions for the specific
sunspots. Furthermore, a time series analysis was done similarly on eight
images of AR 12403, from 21st August 2015 - 28th August 2015 taken from the
Debrecen Photoheliographic Data (DPD). The correlation, r = 0.623 between the
umbral and penumbral fractal dimensions in the time series indicating that the
complexity in morphology indicated by the fractal dimension between the umbra
and penumbra followed each other in time as well.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1705.10539 [pdf] - 1584026
The 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko observation campaign in support of the
Rosetta mission
Snodgrass, C.;
A'Hearn, M. F.;
Aceituno, F.;
Afanasiev, V.;
Bagnulo, S.;
Bauer, J.;
Bergond, G.;
Besse, S.;
Biver, N.;
Bodewits, D.;
Boehnhardt, H.;
Bonev, B. P.;
Borisov, G.;
Carry, B.;
Casanova, V.;
Cochran, A.;
Conn, B. C.;
Davidsson, B.;
Davies, J. K.;
de León, J.;
de Mooij, E.;
de Val-Borro, M.;
Delacruz, M.;
DiSanti, M. A.;
Drew, J. E.;
Duffard, R.;
Edberg, N. J. T.;
Faggi, S.;
Feaga, L.;
Fitzsimmons, A.;
Fujiwara, H.;
Gibb, E. L.;
Gillon, M.;
Green, S. F.;
Guijarro, A.;
Guilbert-Lepoutre, A.;
Gutiérrez, P. J.;
Hadamcik, E.;
Hainaut, O.;
Haque, S.;
Hedrosa, R.;
Hines, D.;
Hopp, U.;
Hoyo, F.;
Hutsemékers, D.;
Hyland, M.;
Ivanova, O.;
Jehin, E.;
Jones, G. H.;
Keane, J. V.;
Kelley, M. S. P.;
Kiselev, N.;
Kleyna, J.;
Kluge, M.;
Knight, M. M.;
Kokotanekova, R.;
Koschny, D.;
Kramer, E.;
López-Moreno, J. J.;
Lacerda, P.;
Lara, L. M.;
Lasue, J.;
Lehto, H. J.;
Levasseur-Regourd, A. C.;
Licandro, J.;
Lin, Z. Y.;
Lister, T.;
Lowry, S. C.;
Mainzer, A.;
Manfroid, J.;
Marchant, J.;
McKay, A. J.;
McNeill, A.;
Meech, K. J.;
Micheli, M.;
Mohammed, I.;
Monguió, M.;
Moreno, F.;
Muñoz, O.;
Mumma, M. J.;
Nikolov, P.;
Opitom, C.;
Ortiz, J. L.;
Paganini, L.;
Pajuelo, M.;
Pozuelos, F. J.;
Protopapa, S.;
Pursimo, T.;
Rajkumar, B.;
Ramanjooloo, Y.;
Ramos, E.;
Ries, C.;
Riffeser, A.;
Rosenbush, V.;
Rousselot, P.;
Ryan, E. L.;
Santos-Sanz, P.;
Schleicher, D. G.;
Schmidt, M.;
Schulz, R.;
Sen, A. K.;
Somero, A.;
Sota, A.;
Stinson, A.;
Sunshine, J.;
Thompson, A.;
Tozzi, G. P.;
Tubiana, C.;
Villanueva, G. L.;
Wang, X.;
Wooden, D. H.;
Yagi, M.;
Yang, B.;
Zaprudin, B.;
Zegmott, T. J.
Submitted: 2017-05-30
We present a summary of the campaign of remote observations that supported
the European Space Agency's Rosetta mission. Telescopes across the globe (and
in space) followed comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko from before Rosetta's
arrival until nearly the end of mission in September 2016. These provided
essential data for mission planning, large-scale context information for the
coma and tails beyond the spacecraft, and a way to directly compare 67P with
other comets. The observations revealed 67P to be a relatively `well behaved'
comet, typical of Jupiter family comets and with activity patterns that repeat
from orbit-to-orbit. Comparison between this large collection of telescopic
observations and the in situ results from Rosetta will allow us to better
understand comet coma chemistry and structure. This work is just beginning as
the mission ends -- in this paper we present a summary of the ground-based
observations and early results, and point to many questions that will be
addressed in future studies.