Normalized to: Racz, I.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1909.01905 [pdf] - 1955456
Studying the variability of the X-ray spectral parameters of
high-redshift GRBs' afterglows
Submitted: 2019-09-04
The Swift satellite has observed more than a thousand GRBs with X-ray data.
Almost a third of them have redshift measurement, too. Here we start to
investigate the X-ray spectral fitting of the data considering the low energy
part where the N(H) absorption happens. Based on the available more accurate
input data we examined the robustness of previous fittings and tested how
sensitive the changes of the starting parameters are. We studied the change of
the intrinsic hydrogen column density during the outburst for a few events. No
significant variability of N(H) column density was identified.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1909.01995 [pdf] - 1955975
The Fermi GBM GRBs' multivariate statistics
Submitted: 2019-09-04
Studying the GRBs' gamma-ray spectra may reveal some physical information of
Gamma-ray Bursts. The Fermi satellite observed more than two thousand GRBs. The
FERMIGBRST catalog contains GRB parameters (peak energy, spectral indices,
intensity) estimated for both the total emission (fluence), and the emission
during the interval of the peak flux. We found a relationship with linear
discriminant analysis between the spectral categories and the model independent
physical data. We compared the Swift and Fermi spectral types. We found a
connection between the Fermi fluence spectra and the Swift spectra but the
result of the peak flux spectra can be disputable. We found that those GRBs
which were observed by both Swift and Fermi can similarly discriminate as the
complete Fermi sample. We concluded that the common observation probably did
not mean any trace of selection effects in the spectral behavior of GRBs.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1909.00622 [pdf] - 1967037
Exploring the pattern of the Galactic HI foreground of GRBs with the
ATCA
Denes, H.;
Jones, P. A.;
Toth, L. V.;
Zahorecz, S.;
Koo, B-C.;
Pinter, S.;
Racz, I. I.;
Balazs, L. G.;
Cunningham, M. R.;
Doi, Y.;
Horvath, I.;
Kovacs, T.;
Onishi, T.;
Suleiman, N.;
Bagoly, Z.
Submitted: 2019-09-02
The afterglow of a gamma ray burst (GRB) can give us valuable insight into
the properties of its host galaxy. To correctly interpret the spectra of the
afterglow we need to have a good understanding of the foreground interstellar
medium (ISM) in our own Galaxy. The common practice to correct for the
foreground is to use neutral hydrogen (HI) data from the Leiden/Argentina/Bonn
(LAB) survey. However, the poor spatial resolution of the single dish data may
have a significant effect on the derived column densities. To investigate this,
we present new high-resolution HI observations with the Australia Telescope
Compact Array (ATCA) towards 4 GRBs. We combine the interferometric ATCA data
with single dish data from the Galactic All Sky Survey (GASS) and derive new
Galactic HI column densities towards the GRBs. We use these new foreground
column densities to fit the Swift XRT X-ray spectra and calculate new intrinsic
hydrogen column density values for the GRB host galaxies. We find that the new
ATCA data shows higher Galactic HI column densities compared to the previous
single dish data, which results in lower intrinsic column densities for the
hosts. We investigate the line of sight optical depth near the GRBs and find
that it may not be negligible towards one of the GRBs, which indicates that the
intrinsic hydrogen column density of its host galaxy may be even lower. In
addition, we compare our results to column densities derived from far-infrared
data and find a reasonable agreement with the HI data.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1905.12998 [pdf] - 1912890
Multidimensional analysis of Fermi GBM gamma-ray bursts
Submitted: 2019-05-30
The Fermi GBM catalog provides a large database with many measured variables
that can be used to explore and verify gamma-ray burst classification results.
We have used Principal Component Analysis and statistical clustering techniques
to look for clustering in a sample of 801 gamma-ray bursts described by sixteen
classification variables. The analysis recovers what appears to be the Short
class and two long-duration classes that differ from one another via peak flux,
with negligible variations in fluence, duration and spectral hardness. Neither
class has properties entirely consistent with the Intermediate GRB class.
Spectral hardness has been a critical Intermediate class property. Rather than
providing spectral hardness, Fermi GBM provides a range of fitting variables
for four different spectral models; it is not intuitive how these variables can
be used to support or disprove previous GRB classification results.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1806.05195 [pdf] - 1916735
Black holes, gravitational waves and fundamental physics: a roadmap
Barack, Leor;
Cardoso, Vitor;
Nissanke, Samaya;
Sotiriou, Thomas P.;
Askar, Abbas;
Belczynski, Krzysztof;
Bertone, Gianfranco;
Bon, Edi;
Blas, Diego;
Brito, Richard;
Bulik, Tomasz;
Burrage, Clare;
Byrnes, Christian T.;
Caprini, Chiara;
Chernyakova, Masha;
Chrusciel, Piotr;
Colpi, Monica;
Ferrari, Valeria;
Gaggero, Daniele;
Gair, Jonathan;
Garcia-Bellido, Juan;
Hassan, S. F.;
Heisenberg, Lavinia;
Hendry, Martin;
Heng, Ik Siong;
Herdeiro, Carlos;
Hinderer, Tanja;
Horesh, Assaf;
Kavanagh, Bradley J.;
Kocsis, Bence;
Kramer, Michael;
Tiec, Alexandre Le;
Mingarelli, Chiara;
Nardini, Germano;
Nelemans, Gijs;
Palenzuela, Carlos;
Pani, Paolo;
Perego, Albino;
Porter, Edward K.;
Rossi, Elena M.;
Schmidt, Patricia;
Sesana, Alberto;
Sperhake, Ulrich;
Stamerra, Antonio;
Stein, Leo C.;
Tamanini, Nicola;
Tauris, Thomas M.;
Urena-Lopez, L. Arturo;
Vincent, Frederic;
Volonteri, Marta;
Wardell, Barry;
Wex, Norbert;
Yagi, Kent;
Abdelsalhin, Tiziano;
Aloy, Miguel Angel;
Amaro-Seoane, Pau;
Annulli, Lorenzo;
Arca-Sedda, Manuel;
Bah, Ibrahima;
Barausse, Enrico;
Barakovic, Elvis;
Benkel, Robert;
Bennett, Charles L.;
Bernard, Laura;
Bernuzzi, Sebastiano;
Berry, Christopher P. L.;
Berti, Emanuele;
Bezares, Miguel;
Blanco-Pillado, Jose Juan;
Blazquez-Salcedo, Jose Luis;
Bonetti, Matteo;
Boskovic, Mateja;
Bosnjak, Zeljka;
Bricman, Katja;
Bruegmann, Bernd;
Capelo, Pedro R.;
Carloni, Sante;
Cerda-Duran, Pablo;
Charmousis, Christos;
Chaty, Sylvain;
Clerici, Aurora;
Coates, Andrew;
Colleoni, Marta;
Collodel, Lucas G.;
Compere, Geoffrey;
Cook, William;
Cordero-Carrion, Isabel;
Correia, Miguel;
de la Cruz-Dombriz, Alvaro;
Czinner, Viktor G.;
Destounis, Kyriakos;
Dialektopoulos, Kostas;
Doneva, Daniela;
Dotti, Massimo;
Drew, Amelia;
Eckner, Christopher;
Edholm, James;
Emparan, Roberto;
Erdem, Recai;
Ferreira, Miguel;
Ferreira, Pedro G.;
Finch, Andrew;
Font, Jose A.;
Franchini, Nicola;
Fransen, Kwinten;
Gal'tsov, Dmitry;
Ganguly, Apratim;
Gerosa, Davide;
Glampedakis, Kostas;
Gomboc, Andreja;
Goobar, Ariel;
Gualtieri, Leonardo;
Guendelman, Eduardo;
Haardt, Francesco;
Harmark, Troels;
Hejda, Filip;
Hertog, Thomas;
Hopper, Seth;
Husa, Sascha;
Ihanec, Nada;
Ikeda, Taishi;
Jaodand, Amruta;
Jimenez-Forteza, Philippe Jetzer Xisco;
Kamionkowski, Marc;
Kaplan, David E.;
Kazantzidis, Stelios;
Kimura, Masashi;
Kobayashi, Shiho;
Kokkotas, Kostas;
Krolik, Julian;
Kunz, Jutta;
Lammerzahl, Claus;
Lasky, Paul;
Lemos, Jose P. S.;
Said, Jackson Levi;
Liberati, Stefano;
Lopes, Jorge;
Luna, Raimon;
Ma, Yin-Zhe;
Maggio, Elisa;
Montero, Marina Martinez;
Maselli, Andrea;
Mayer, Lucio;
Mazumdar, Anupam;
Messenger, Christopher;
Menard, Brice;
Minamitsuji, Masato;
Moore, Christopher J.;
Mota, David;
Nampalliwar, Sourabh;
Nerozzi, Andrea;
Nichols, David;
Nissimov, Emil;
Obergaulinger, Martin;
Obers, Niels A.;
Oliveri, Roberto;
Pappas, George;
Pasic, Vedad;
Peiris, Hiranya;
Petrushevska, Tanja;
Pollney, Denis;
Pratten, Geraint;
Rakic, Nemanja;
Racz, Istvan;
Radia, Miren;
Ramazanouglu, Fethi M.;
Ramos-Buades, Antoni;
Raposo, Guilherme;
Rosca-Mead, Roxana;
Rogatko, Marek;
Rosinska, Dorota;
Rosswog, Stephan;
Morales, Ester Ruiz;
Sakellariadou, Mairi;
Sanchis-Gual, Nicolas;
Salafia, Om Sharan;
Samajdar, Anuradha;
Sintes, Alicia;
Smole, Majda;
Sopuerta, Carlos;
Souza-Lima, Rafael;
Stalevski, Marko;
Stergioulas, Nikolaos;
Stevens, Chris;
Tamfal, Tomas;
Torres-Forne, Alejandro;
Tsygankov, Sergey;
Unluturk, Kivanc;
Valiante, Rosa;
van de Meent, Maarten;
Velhinho, Jose;
Verbin, Yosef;
Vercnocke, Bert;
Vernieri, Daniele;
Vicente, Rodrigo;
Vitagliano, Vincenzo;
Weltman, Amanda;
Whiting, Bernard;
Williamson, Andrew;
Witek, Helvi;
Wojnar, Aneta;
Yakut, Kadri;
Yan, Haopeng;
Yazadjiev, Stoycho;
Zaharijas, Gabrijela;
Zilhao, Miguel
Submitted: 2018-06-13, last modified: 2019-02-01
The grand challenges of contemporary fundamental physics---dark matter, dark
energy, vacuum energy, inflation and early universe cosmology, singularities
and the hierarchy problem---all involve gravity as a key component. And of all
gravitational phenomena, black holes stand out in their elegant simplicity,
while harbouring some of the most remarkable predictions of General Relativity:
event horizons, singularities and ergoregions. The hitherto invisible landscape
of the gravitational Universe is being unveiled before our eyes: the historical
direct detection of gravitational waves by the LIGO-Virgo collaboration marks
the dawn of a new era of scientific exploration. Gravitational-wave astronomy
will allow us to test models of black hole formation, growth and evolution, as
well as models of gravitational-wave generation and propagation. It will
provide evidence for event horizons and ergoregions, test the theory of General
Relativity itself, and may reveal the existence of new fundamental fields. The
synthesis of these results has the potential to radically reshape our
understanding of the cosmos and of the laws of Nature. The purpose of this work
is to present a concise, yet comprehensive overview of the state of the art in
the relevant fields of research, summarize important open problems, and lay out
a roadmap for future progress.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1710.11509 [pdf] - 1648676
Classifying GRB170817A / GW170817 in a Fermi duration - hardness plane
Submitted: 2017-10-31, last modified: 2018-02-21
GRB170817A, associated with the LIGO-Virgo GW170817 neutron-star merger
event, lacks the short duration and hard spectrum of a Short gamma-ray burst
(GRB) expected from long-standing classification models. Correctly identifying
the class to which this burst belongs requires comparison with other GRBs
detected by the Fermi GBM. The aim of our analysis is to classify Fermi GRBs
and to test whether or not GRB170817A belongs - as suggested - to the Short GRB
class. The Fermi GBM catalog provides a large database with many measured
variables that can be used to explore gamma-ray burst classification. We use
statistical techniques to look for clustering in a sample of 1298 gamma-ray
bursts described by duration and spectral hardness. Classification of the
detected bursts shows that GRB170817A most likely belongs to the Intermediate,
rather than the Short GRB class. We discuss this result in light of theoretical
neutron-star merger models and existing GRB classification schemes. It appears
that GRB classification schemes may not yet be linked to appropriate
theoretical models, and that theoretical models may not yet adequately account
for known GRB class properties. We conclude that GRB170817A may not fit into a
simple phenomenological classification scheme.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1712.00389 [pdf] - 1610070
Statistical properties of Fermi GBM GRBs' spectra
Submitted: 2017-12-01, last modified: 2017-12-28
Statistical studies of gamma-ray burst (GRB) spectra may result in important
information on the physics of GRBs. The Fermi GBM catalog contains GRB
parameters (peak energy, spectral indices, intensity) estimated fitting the
gamma-ray SED of the total emission (fluence, flnc), and during the time of the
peak flux pflx. Using contingency tables we studied the relationship of the
models best fitting pflx and flnc time intervals. Our analysis revealed an
ordering of the spectra into a power law - Comptonized - smoothly broken power
law - Band series. This result was further supported by a correspondence
analysis (CA) of the pflx and flnc spectra categorical variables. We performed
a linear discriminant analysis (LDA) to find a relationship between categorical
(spectral) and model independent physical data. LDA resulted in highly
significant physical differences among the spectral types, that is more
pronounced in the case of the pflx spectra, than for the flnc spectra. We
interpreted this difference as caused by the temporal variation of the spectrum
during the outburst. This spectral variability is confirmed by the differences
in the low energy spectral index and peak energy, between the pflx and flnc
spectra. We found that the synchrotron radiation is significant in GBM spectra.
The mean low energy spectral index is close to the canonical value of {\alpha}
= -2/3 during the peak flux. However, $\alpha$ is ~ -0.9 for the spectra of the
fluences. We interpret this difference as showing that the effect of cooling is
important only for the fluence spectra.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1706.01296 [pdf] - 1584249
Foreground of GRBs from AKARI FIS data
Toth, L. Viktor;
Doi, Yasuo;
Zahorecz, Sarolta;
Agas, Marton;
Balazs, Lajos G.;
Forro, Adrienn;
Racz, Istvan I.;
Bagoly, Zsolt;
Horvath, Istvan;
Pinter, Sandor
Submitted: 2017-06-05
A significant number of the parameters of a gamma-ray burst (GRB) and its
host galaxy are calculated from the afterglow. There are various methods
obtaining extinction values for the necessary correction for galactic
foreground. These are: galaxy counts, from HI 21 cm surveys, from spectroscopic
measurements and colors of nearby Galactic stars, or using extinction maps
calculated from infrared surveys towards the GRB. We demonstrate that AKARI
Far-Infrared Surveyor sky surface brightness maps are useful uncovering the
fine structure of the galactic foreground of GRBs. Galactic cirrus structures
of a number of GRBs are calculated with a 2 arcminute resolution, and the
results are compared to that of other methods.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:1508.02193 [pdf] - 1260427
Survival analysis of the optical brightness of GRB host galaxies
Submitted: 2015-08-10
We studied the unbiased optical brightness distribution which was calculated
from the survival analysis of host galaxies and its relationship with the Swift
GRB data of the host galaxies observed by the Keck telescopes. Based on the
sample obtained from merging the Swift GRB table and the Keck optical data we
also studied the dependence of this distribution on the data of the GRBs.
Finally, we compared the HGs distribution with standard galaxies distribution
which is in the DEEP2 galaxies catalog.
[10]
oai:arXiv.org:1507.00675 [pdf] - 1259124
A giant ring-like structure at 0.78<z<0.86 displayed by GRBs
Submitted: 2015-07-02
According to the cosmological principle, Universal large-scale structure is
homogeneous and isotropic. The observable Universe, however, shows complex
structures even on very large scales. The recent discoveries of structures
significantly exceeding the transition scale of 370 Mpc pose a challenge to the
cosmological principle.
We report here the discovery of the largest regular formation in the
observable Universe; a ring with a diameter of 1720 Mpc, displayed by 9 gamma
ray bursts (GRBs), exceeding by a factor of five the transition scale to the
homogeneous and isotropic distribution. The ring has a major diameter of $43^o$
and a minor diameter of $30^o$ at a distance of 2770 Mpc in the 0.78<z<0.86
redshift range, with a probability of $2\times 10^{-6}$ of being the result of
a random fluctuation in the GRB count rate.
Evidence suggests that this feature is the projection of a shell onto the
plane of the sky. Voids and string-like formations are common outcomes of
large-scale structure. However, these structures have maximum sizes of 150 Mpc,
which are an order of magnitude smaller than the observed GRB ring diameter.
Evidence in support of the shell interpretation requires that temporal
information of the transient GRBs be included in the analysis.
This ring-shaped feature is large enough to contradict the cosmological
principle. The physical mechanism responsible for causing it is unknown.
[15]
oai:arXiv.org:1108.1423 [pdf] - 520241
Scientific Potential of Einstein Telescope
Sathyaprakash, B.;
Abernathy, M.;
Acernese, F.;
Amaro-Seoane, P.;
Andersson, N.;
Arun, K.;
Barone, F.;
Barr, B.;
Barsuglia, M.;
Beker, M.;
Beveridge, N.;
Birindelli, S.;
Bose, S.;
Bosi, L.;
Braccini, S.;
Bradaschia, C.;
Bulik, T.;
Calloni, E.;
Cella, G.;
Chassande-Mottin, E.;
Chelkowski, S.;
Chincarini, A.;
Clark, J.;
Coccia, E.;
Colacino, C.;
Colas, J.;
Cumming, A.;
Cunningham, L.;
Cuoco, E.;
Danilishin, S.;
Danzmann, K.;
Salvo, R. De.;
Dent, T.;
Rosa, R. De.;
Fiore, L. Di.;
Virgilio, A. Di.;
Doets, M.;
Fafone, V.;
Falferi, P.;
Flaminio, R.;
Franc, J.;
Frasconi, F.;
Freise, A.;
Friedrich, D.;
Fulda, P.;
Gair, J.;
Gemme, G.;
Genin, E.;
Gennai, A.;
Giazotto, A.;
Glampedakis, K.;
Gräf, C.;
Granata, M.;
Grote, H.;
Guidi, G.;
Gurkovsky, A.;
Hammond, G.;
Hannam, M.;
Harms, J.;
Heinert, D.;
Hendry, M.;
Heng, I.;
Hennes, E.;
Hild, S.;
Hough, J.;
Husa, S.;
Huttner, S.;
Jones, G.;
Khalili, F.;
Kokeyama, K.;
Kokkotas, K.;
Krishnan, B.;
Li, T. G. F.;
Lorenzini, M.;
Lück, H.;
Majorana, E.;
Mandel, I.;
Mandic, V.;
Mantovani, M.;
Martin, I.;
Michel, C.;
Minenkov, Y.;
Morgado, N.;
Mosca, S.;
Mours, B.;
Müller-Ebhardt, H.;
Murray, P.;
Nawrodt, R.;
Nelson, J.;
Oshaughnessy, R.;
Ott, C. D.;
Palomba, C.;
Paoli, A.;
Parguez, G.;
Pasqualetti, A.;
Passaquieti, R.;
Passuello, D.;
Pinard, L.;
Plastino, W.;
Poggiani, R.;
Popolizio, P.;
Prato, M.;
Punturo, M.;
Puppo, P.;
Rabeling, D.;
Racz, I.;
Rapagnani, P.;
Read, J.;
Regimbau, T.;
Rehbein, H.;
Reid, S.;
Rezzolla, L.;
Ricci, F.;
Richard, F.;
Rocchi, A.;
Rowan, S.;
Rüdiger, A.;
Santamaria, L.;
Sassolas, B.;
Schnabel, R.;
Schwarz, C.;
Seidel, P.;
Sintes, A.;
Somiya, K.;
Speirits, F.;
Strain, K.;
Strigin, S.;
Sutton, P.;
Tarabrin, S.;
Thüring, A.;
Brand, J. van den;
van Veggel, M;
Broeck, C. Van Den;
Vecchio, A.;
Veitch, J.;
Vetrano, F.;
Vicere, A.;
Vyatchanin, S.;
Willke, B.;
Woan, G.;
Yamamoto, K.
Submitted: 2011-08-05, last modified: 2012-06-01
Einstein gravitational-wave Telescope (ET) is a design study funded by the
European Commission to explore the technological challenges of and scientific
benefits from building a third generation gravitational wave detector. The
three-year study, which concluded earlier this year, has formulated the
conceptual design of an observatory that can support the implementation of new
technology for the next two to three decades. The goal of this talk is to
introduce the audience to the overall aims and objectives of the project and to
enumerate ET's potential to influence our understanding of fundamental physics,
astrophysics and cosmology.
[16]
oai:arXiv.org:1206.0331 [pdf] - 520339
Scientific Objectives of Einstein Telescope
Sathyaprakash, B.;
Abernathy, M.;
Acernese, F.;
Ajith, P.;
Allen, B.;
Amaro-Seoane, P.;
Andersson, N.;
Aoudia, S.;
Arun, K.;
Astone, P.;
Krishnan, B.;
Barack, L.;
Barone, F.;
Barr, B.;
Barsuglia, M.;
Bassan, M.;
Bassiri, R.;
Beker, M.;
Beveridge, N.;
Bizouard, M.;
Bond, C.;
Bose, S.;
Bosi, L.;
Braccini, S.;
Bradaschia, C.;
Britzger, M.;
Brueckner, F.;
Bulik, T.;
Bulten, H. J.;
Burmeister, O.;
Calloni, E.;
Campsie, P.;
Carbone, L.;
Cella, G.;
Chalkley, E.;
Chassande-Mottin, E.;
Chelkowski, S.;
Chincarini, A.;
Cintio, A. Di.;
Clark, J.;
Coccia, E.;
Colacino, C. N.;
Colas, J.;
Colla, A.;
Corsi, A.;
Cumming, A.;
Cunningham, L.;
Cuoco, E.;
Danilishin, S.;
Danzmann, K.;
Daw, E.;
Salvo, R. De.;
Pozzo, W. Del.;
Dent, T.;
Rosa, R. De.;
Fiore, L. Di.;
Emilio, M. Di. Paolo.;
Virgilio, A. Di.;
Dietz, A.;
Doets, M.;
Dueck, J.;
Edwards, M.;
Fafone, V.;
Fairhurst, S.;
Falferi, P.;
Favata, M.;
Ferrari, V.;
Ferrini, F.;
Fidecaro, F.;
Flaminio, R.;
Franc, J.;
Frasconi, F.;
Freise, A.;
Friedrich, D.;
Fulda, P.;
Gair, J.;
Galimberti, M.;
Gemme, G.;
Genin, E.;
Gennai, A.;
Giazotto, A.;
Glampedakis, K.;
Gossan, S.;
Gouaty, R.;
Graef, C.;
Graham, W.;
Granata, M.;
Grote, H.;
Guidi, G.;
Hallam, J.;
Hammond, G.;
Hannam, M.;
Harms, J.;
Haughian, K.;
Hawke, I.;
Heinert, D.;
Hendry, M.;
Heng, I.;
Hennes, E.;
Hild, S.;
Hough, J.;
Huet, D.;
Husa, S.;
Huttner, S.;
Iyer, B.;
Jones, D. I.;
Jones, G.;
Kamaretsos, I.;
Mishra, C. Kant;
Kawazoe, F.;
Khalili, F.;
Kley, B.;
Kokeyama, K.;
Kokkotas, K.;
Kroker, S.;
Kumar, R.;
Kuroda, K.;
Lagrange, B.;
Lastzka, N.;
Li, T. G. F.;
Lorenzini, M.;
Losurdo, G.;
Lück, H.;
Majorana, E.;
Malvezzi, V.;
Mandel, I.;
Mandic, V.;
Marka, S.;
Marin, F.;
Marion, F.;
Marque, J.;
Martin, I.;
Leod, D. Mc.;
Mckechan, D.;
Mehmet, M.;
Michel, C.;
Minenkov, Y.;
Morgado, N.;
Morgia, A.;
Mosca, S.;
Moscatelli, L.;
Mours, B.;
Müller-Ebhardt, H.;
Murray, P.;
Naticchioni, L.;
Nawrodt, R.;
Nelson, J.;
Shaughnessy, R. O'.;
Ott, C. D.;
Palomba, C.;
Paoli, A.;
Parguez, G.;
Pasqualetti, A.;
Passaquieti, R.;
Passuello, D.;
Perciballi, M.;
Piergiovanni, F.;
Pinard, L.;
Pitkin, M.;
Plastino, W.;
Plissi, M.;
Poggiani, R.;
Popolizio, P.;
Porter, E.;
Prato, M.;
Prodi, G.;
Punturo, M.;
Puppo, P.;
Rabeling, D.;
Racz, I.;
Rapagnani, P.;
Re, V.;
Read, J.;
Regimbau, T.;
Rehbein, H.;
Reid, S.;
Ricci, F.;
Richard, F.;
Robinson, C.;
Rocchi, A.;
Romano, R.;
Rowan, S.;
Rüdiger, A.;
Samblowski, A.;
Santamaría, L.;
Sassolas, B.;
Schilling, R.;
Schmidt, P.;
Schnabel, R.;
Schutz, B.;
Schwarz, C.;
Scott, J.;
Seidel, P.;
Sintes, A. M.;
Somiya, K.;
Sopuerta, C. F.;
Sorazu, B.;
Speirits, F.;
Storchi, L.;
Strain, K.;
Strigin, S.;
Sutton, P.;
Tarabrin, S.;
Taylor, B.;
Thürin, A.;
Tokmakov, K.;
Tonelli, M.;
Tournefier, H.;
Vaccarone, R.;
Vahlbruch, H.;
Brand, J. F. J. van. den.;
Broeck, C. Van. Den.;
Putten, S. van. der.;
Veggel, M. van.;
Vecchio, A.;
Veitch, J.;
Vetrano, F.;
Vicere, A.;
Vyatchanin, S.;
Weßels, P.;
Willke, B.;
Winkler, W.;
Woan, G.;
Woodcraft, A.;
Yamamoto, K.
Submitted: 2012-06-01
The advanced interferometer network will herald a new era in observational
astronomy. There is a very strong science case to go beyond the advanced
detector network and build detectors that operate in a frequency range from 1
Hz-10 kHz, with sensitivity a factor ten better in amplitude. Such detectors
will be able to probe a range of topics in nuclear physics, astronomy,
cosmology and fundamental physics, providing insights into many unsolved
problems in these areas.
[17]
oai:arXiv.org:1108.1598 [pdf] - 395855
Characterization of the Virgo Seismic Environment
The Virgo Collaboration;
Accadia, T.;
Acernese, F.;
Astone, P.;
Ballardin, G.;
Barone, F.;
Barsuglia, M.;
Basti, A.;
Bauer, Th. S.;
Bebronne, M.;
Beker, M. G.;
Belletoile, A.;
Bitossi, M.;
Bizouard, M. A.;
Blom, M.;
Bondu, F.;
Bonelli, L.;
Bonnand, R.;
Boschi, V.;
Bosi, L.;
Bouhou, B.;
Braccini, S.;
Bradaschia, C.;
Branchesi, M.;
Briant, T.;
Brillet, A.;
Brisson, V.;
Bulik, T.;
Bulten, H. J.;
Buskulic, D.;
Buy, C.;
Cagnoli, G.;
Calloni, E.;
Canuel, B.;
Carbognani, F.;
Cavalier, F.;
Cavalieri, R.;
Cella, G.;
Cesarini, E.;
Chaibi, O.;
Chassande-Mottin, E.;
Chincarini, A.;
Chiummo, A.;
Cleva, F.;
Coccia, E.;
Cohadon, P. -F.;
Colacino, C. N.;
Colas, J.;
Colla, A.;
Colombini, M.;
Conte, A.;
Coughlin, M.;
Coulon, J. -P.;
Cuoco, E.;
DAntonio, S.;
Dattilo, V.;
Davier, M.;
Day, R.;
De Rosa, R.;
Debreczeni, G.;
Del Pozzo, W.;
del Prete, M.;
Di Fiore, L.;
Di Lieto, A.;
Emilio, M. Di Paolo;
Di Virgilio, A.;
Dietz, A.;
Drago, M.;
Endroczi, G.;
Fafone, V.;
Ferrante, I.;
Fidecaro, F.;
Fiori, I.;
Flaminio, R.;
Forte, L. A.;
Fournier, J. -D.;
Franc, J.;
Frasca, S.;
Frasconi, F.;
Galimberti, M.;
Gammaitoni, L.;
Garufi, F.;
Gaspar, M. E.;
Gemme, G.;
Genin, E.;
Gennai, A.;
Giazotto, A.;
Gouaty, R.;
Granata, M.;
Greverie, C.;
Guidi, G. M.;
Hayau, J. -F.;
Heidmann, A.;
Heitmann, H.;
Hello, P.;
Jaranowski, P.;
Kowalska, I.;
Krolak, A.;
Leroy, N.;
Letendre, N.;
Li, T. G. F.;
Liguori, N.;
Lorenzini, M.;
Loriette, V.;
Losurdo, G.;
Majorana, E.;
Maksimovic, I.;
Man, N.;
Mantovani, M.;
Marchesoni, F.;
Marion, F.;
Marque, J.;
Martelli, F.;
Masserot, A.;
Michel, C.;
Milano, L.;
Minenkov, Y.;
Mohan, M.;
Morgado, N.;
Morgia, A.;
Mosca, S.;
Mours, B.;
Naticchioni, L.;
Nocera, F.;
Pagliaroli, G.;
Palladino, L.;
Palomba, C.;
Paoletti, F.;
Parisi, M.;
Pasqualetti, A.;
Passaquieti, R.;
Passuello, D.;
Persichetti, G.;
Piergiovanni, F.;
Pietka, M.;
Pinard, L.;
Poggiani, R.;
Prato, M.;
Prodi, G. A.;
Punturo, M.;
Puppo, P.;
Rabeling, D. S.;
Racz, I.;
Rapagnani, P.;
Re, V.;
Regimbau, T.;
Ricci, F.;
Robinet, F.;
Rocchi, A.;
Rolland, L.;
Romano, R.;
Rosinska, D.;
Ruggi, P.;
Sassolas, B.;
Sentenac, D.;
Sperandio, L.;
Sturani, R.;
Swinkels, B.;
Tacca, M.;
Taffarello, L.;
Toncelli, A.;
Tonelli, M.;
Torre, O.;
Tournefier, E.;
Travasso, F.;
Vajente, G.;
Brand, J. F. J. van den;
Broeck, C. Van Den;
van der Putten, S.;
Vasuth, M.;
Vavoulidis, M.;
Vedovato, G.;
Verkindt, D.;
Vetrano, F.;
Vicere, A.;
Vinet, J. -Y.;
Vitale, S.;
Vocca, H.;
Ward, R. L.;
Was, M.;
Yvert, M.;
Zadrozny, A.;
Zendri, J. -P.
Submitted: 2011-08-07
The Virgo gravitational wave detector is an interferometer (ITF) with 3km
arms located in Pisa, Italy. From July to October 2010, Virgo performed its
third science run (VSR3) in coincidence with the LIGO detectors. Despite
several techniques adopted to isolate the interferometer from the environment,
seismic noise remains an important issue for Virgo. Vibrations produced by the
detector infrastructure (such as air conditioning units, water
chillers/heaters, pumps) are found to affect Virgo's sensitivity, with the main
coupling mechanisms being through beam jitter and scattered light processes.
The Advanced Virgo (AdV) design seeks to reduce ITF couplings to environmental
noise by having most vibration-sensitive components suspended and in-vacuum, as
well as muffle and relocate loud machines. During the months of June and July
2010, a Guralp-3TD seismometer was stationed at various locations around the
Virgo site hosting major infrastructure machines. Seismic data were examined
using spectral and coherence analysis with seismic probes close to the
detector. The primary aim of this study was to identify noisy machines which
seismically affect the ITF environment and thus require mitigation attention.
Analyzed machines are located at various distances from the experimental halls,
ranging from 10m to 100m. An attempt is made to measure the attenuation of
emitted noise at the ITF and correlate it to the distance from the source and
to seismic attenuation models in soil.
[18]
oai:arXiv.org:1009.5190 [pdf] - 328806
Calibration and sensitivity of the Virgo detector during its second
science run
The Virgo Collaboration;
Accadia, T.;
Acernese, F.;
Antonucci, F.;
Astone, P.;
Ballardin, G.;
Barone, F.;
Barsuglia, M.;
Basti, A.;
Bauer, Th. S.;
Beker, M. G.;
Belletoile, A.;
Birindelli, S.;
Bitossi, M.;
Bizouard, M. A.;
Blom, M.;
Bondu, F.;
Bonelli, L.;
Bonnand, R.;
Boschi, V.;
Bosi, L.;
Bouhou, B.;
Braccini, S.;
Bradaschia, C.;
Brillet, A.;
Brisson, V.;
Budzynski, R.;
Bulik, T.;
Bulten, H. J.;
Buskulic, D.;
Buy, C.;
Cagnoli, G.;
Calloni, E.;
Campagna, E.;
Canuel, B.;
Carbognani, F.;
Cavalier, F.;
Cavalieri, R.;
Cella, G.;
Cesarini, E.;
Chaibi, O.;
Chassande-Mottin, E.;
Chincarini, A.;
Cleva, F.;
Coccia, E.;
Colacino, C. N.;
Colas, J.;
Colla, A.;
Colombini, M.;
Corsi, A.;
Coulon, J. -P.;
Cuoco, E.;
D'Antonio, S.;
Dattilo, V.;
Davier, M.;
Day, R.;
De Rosa, R.;
Debreczeni, G.;
del Prete, M.;
Di Fiore, L.;
Di Lieto, A.;
Emilio, M. Di Paolo;
Di Virgilio, A.;
Dietz, A.;
Drago, M.;
Fafone, V.;
Ferrante, I.;
Fidecaro, F.;
Fiori, I.;
Flaminio, R.;
Forte, L. A.;
Fournier, J. -D.;
Franc, J.;
Frasca, S.;
Frasconi, F.;
Freise, A.;
Galimberti, M.;
Gammaitoni, L.;
Garufi, F.;
Gaspar, M. E.;
Gemme, G.;
Genin, E.;
Gennai, A.;
Giazotto, A.;
Gouaty, R.;
Granata, M.;
Greverie, C.;
Guidi, G. M.;
Hayau, J. -F.;
Heitmann, H.;
Hello, P.;
Hild, S.;
Huet, D.;
Jaranowski, P.;
Kowalska, I.;
Krolak, A.;
Leroy, N.;
Letendre, N.;
Li, T. G. F.;
Liguori, N.;
Lorenzini, M.;
Loriette, V.;
Losurdo, G.;
Majorana, E.;
Maksimovic, I.;
Man, N.;
Mantovani, M.;
Marchesoni, F.;
Marion, F.;
Marque, J.;
Martelli, F.;
Masserot, A.;
Michel, C.;
Milano, L.;
Minenkov, Y.;
Mohan, M.;
Morgado, N.;
Morgia, A.;
Mosca, S.;
Moscatelli, V.;
Mours, B.;
Neri, I.;
Nocera, F.;
Pagliaroli, G.;
Palladino, L.;
Palomba, C.;
Paoletti, F.;
Pardi, S.;
Parisi, M.;
Pasqualetti, A.;
Passaquieti, R.;
Passuello, D.;
Persichetti, G.;
Pichot, M.;
Piergiovanni, F.;
Pietka, M.;
Pinard, L.;
Poggiani, R.;
Prato, M.;
Prodi, G. A.;
Punturo, M.;
Puppo, P.;
Rabeling, D. S.;
Racz, I.;
Rapagnani, P.;
Re, V.;
Regimbau, T.;
Ricci, F.;
Robinet, F.;
Rocchi, A.;
Rolland, L.;
Romano, R.;
Rosinska, D.;
Ruggi, P.;
Sassolas, B.;
Sentenac, D.;
Sperandio, L.;
Sturani, R.;
Swinkels, B.;
Toncelli, A.;
Tonelli, M.;
Torre, O.;
Tournefier, E.;
Travasso, F.;
Vajente, G.;
Brand, J. F. J. van den;
van der Putten, S.;
Vasuth, M.;
Vavoulidis, M.;
Vedovato, G.;
Verkindt, D.;
Vetrano, F.;
Vicere, A.;
Vinet, J. -Y.;
Vocca, H.;
Ward, R. L.;
Was, M.;
Yvert, M.
Submitted: 2010-09-27, last modified: 2011-01-18
The Virgo detector is a kilometer-length interferometer for gravitational
wave detection located near Pisa (Italy). During its second science run (VSR2)
in 2009, six months of data were accumulated with a sensitivity close to its
design. In this paper, the methods used to determine the parameters for
sensitivity estimation and gravitational wave reconstruction are described. The
main quantities to be calibrated are the frequency response of the mirror
actuation and the sensing of the output power. Focus is also put on their
absolute timing. The monitoring of the calibration data as well as the
parameter estimation with independent techniques are discussed to provide an
estimation of the calibration uncertainties. Finally, the estimation of the
Virgo sensitivity in the frequency-domain is described and typical
sensitivities measured during VSR2 are shown.
