Normalized to: Quick, L.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:2003.11182 [pdf] - 2089174
Exploration Strategy for the Outer Planets 2023-2032: Goals and
Priorities
Moore, Jeff;
Spilker, Linda;
Cable, Morgan;
Edgington, Scott;
Hendrix, Amanda;
Hofstadter, Mark;
Hurford, Terry;
Mandt, Kathleen;
McEwen, Alfred;
Paty, Carol;
Quick, Lynnae;
Rymer, Abigail;
Sayanagi, Kunio;
Schmidt, Britney;
Spilker, Thomas
Submitted: 2020-03-24, last modified: 2020-05-05
The outer solar system is home to a diverse range of objects, holding
important clues about the formation and evolution of our solar system, the
emergence and current distribution of life, and the physical processes
controlling both our own and exoplanetary systems.
This White Paper summarizes the Outer Planets Analysis Group's (OPAG's)
priorities as they relate to the Decadal Survey. Taking into account the
science to be achieved, the timing of solar system events, technological
readiness, and programmatic factors, our mission recommendations are as
follows. OPAG strongly endorses the completion and launch of the Europa Clipper
mission, maintaining the science capabilities identified upon its selection,
and a Juno extended mission at Jupiter. For the decade 2023-2032, OPAG endorses
a new start for two directed missions: first, a mission to Neptune or Uranus
(the ice giants) with atmospheric probe(s), and second, a life detection Ocean
World mission, along with additional technological development for life
detection. A Neptune mission is preferred because, while the Neptune and Uranus
systems provide equally compelling opportunities to address the Origins and
Processes Questions, Triton is a higher priority ocean world target than the
Uranian satellites. The mission to Neptune or Uranus should fly first because a
delay threatens key science objectives, and additional technological
development is required for a directed life detection mission.
Along with missions, we emphasize the necessity of maintaining a healthy
Research and Analysis (R&A) program as well as a robust Earth-based observing
program. OPAG's top two technology priorities are rapid development of a
next-generation radioisotope power source for a mission to Neptune or Uranus,
and development of key life detection technologies in support of an Ocean World
mission.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:2001.10981 [pdf] - 2054187
Characterizing deposits emplaced by cryovolcanic plumes on Europa
Submitted: 2020-01-29
In the absence of direct observations of Europa's particle plumes, deposits
left behind during eruptive events would provide the best evidence for recent
geological activity, and would serve as indicators of the best places to search
for ongoing activity on the icy moon. Here, we model the morphological and
spectral signatures of europan plume deposits, utilizing constraints from
recent Hubble Space Telescope observations as model inputs. We consider
deposits emplaced by plumes that are 1 km to 300 km tall, and find that in the
time between the Galileo Mission and the arrival of the Europa Clipper
spacecraft, plumes that are < 7 km tall are most likely to emplace deposits
that could be detected by spacecraft cameras. Deposits emplaced by larger
plumes could be detected by cameras operating at visible wavelengths provided
that their average particle size is sufficiently large, their porosity is high,
and/or they are salt-rich. Conversely, deposits emplaced by large plumes could
be easily detected by near-IR imagers regardless of porosity, or individual
particle size or composition. If low-albedo deposits flanking lineated features
on Europa are indeed cryoclastic mantlings, they were likely emplaced by plumes
that were less than 4 km tall, and deposition could be ongoing today.
Comparisons of the sizes and albedos of these deposits between the Galileo and
Europa Clipper missions could shed light on the size and frequency of
cryovolcanic eruptions on Europa.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1811.06536 [pdf] - 1785961
Seismicity on Tidally Active Solid-Surface Worlds
Hurford, T. A.;
Henning, W. G.;
Maguire, R.;
Lekic, V.;
Schmerr, N.;
Panning, M.;
Bray, V. J.;
Manga, M.;
Kattenhorn, S. A.;
Quick, L. C.;
Rhoden, A. R.
Submitted: 2018-11-15
Tidal interactions between planets or stars and the bodies that orbit them
dissipate energy in their interiors. The energy dissipated drives internal
heating and a fraction of that energy will be released as seismic energy. Here
we formalize a model to describe the tidally-driven seismic activity on
planetary bodies based on tidal dissipation.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1709.02763 [pdf] - 1723419
Solar system science with the Wide-Field InfraRed Survey Telescope
(WFIRST)
Holler, B. J.;
Milam, S. N.;
Bauer, J. M.;
Alcock, C.;
Bannister, M. T.;
Bjoraker, G. L.;
Bodewits, D.;
Bosh, A. S.;
Buie, M. W.;
Farnham, T. L.;
Haghighipour, N.;
Hardersen, P. S.;
Harris, A. W.;
Hirata, C. M.;
Hsieh, H. H.;
Kelley, M. S. P.;
Knight, M. M.;
Kramer, E. A.;
Longobardo, A.;
Nixon, C. A.;
Palomba, E.;
Protopapa, S.;
Quick, L. C.;
Ragozzine, D.;
Reddy, V.;
Rhodes, J. D.;
Rivkin, A. S.;
Sarid, G.;
Sickafoose, A. A.;
Simon, A. A.;
Thomas, C. A.;
Trilling, D. E.;
West, R. A.
Submitted: 2017-09-08, last modified: 2018-07-27
We present a community-led assessment of the solar system investigations
achievable with NASA's next-generation space telescope, the Wide Field InfraRed
Survey Telescope (WFIRST). WFIRST will provide imaging, spectroscopic, and
coronagraphic capabilities from 0.43-2.0 $\mu$m and will be a potential
contemporary and eventual successor to JWST. Surveys of irregular satellites
and minor bodies are where WFIRST will excel with its 0.28 deg$^2$ field of
view Wide Field Instrument (WFI). Potential ground-breaking discoveries from
WFIRST could include detection of the first minor bodies orbiting in the Inner
Oort Cloud, identification of additional Earth Trojan asteroids, and the
discovery and characterization of asteroid binary systems similar to
Ida/Dactyl. Additional investigations into asteroids, giant planet satellites,
Trojan asteroids, Centaurs, Kuiper Belt Objects, and comets are presented.
Previous use of astrophysics assets for solar system science and synergies
between WFIRST, LSST, JWST, and the proposed NEOCam mission are discussed. We
also present the case for implementation of moving target tracking, a feature
that will benefit from the heritage of JWST and enable a broader range of solar
system observations.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.03573 [pdf] - 1663501
Solar System Ice Giants: Exoplanets in our Backyard
Rymer, Abigail;
Mandt, Kathleen;
Hurley, Dana;
Lisse, Carey;
Izenberg, Noam;
Smith, H. Todd;
Westlake, Joseph;
Bunce, Emma;
Arridge, Christopher;
Masters, Adam;
Hofstadter, Mark;
Simon, Amy;
Brandt, Pontus;
Clark, George;
Cohen, Ian;
Allen, Robert;
Vine, Sarah;
Hansen, Kenneth;
Hospodarsky, George;
Kurth, William;
Romani, Paul;
Lamy, Laurent;
Zarka, Philippe;
Cao, Hao;
Paty, Carol;
Hedman, Matthew;
Roussos, Elias;
Cruikshank, Dale;
Farrell, William;
Fieseler, Paul;
Coates, Andrew;
Yelle, Roger;
Parkinson, Christopher;
Militzer, Burkhard;
Grodent, Denis;
Kollmann, Peter;
McNutt, Ralph;
André, Nicolas;
Strange, Nathan;
Barnes, Jason;
Dones, Luke;
Denk, Tilmann;
Rathbun, Julie;
Lunine, Jonathan;
Desai, Ravi;
Cochrane, Corey;
Sayanagi, Kunio M.;
Postberg, Frank;
Ebert, Robert;
Hill, Thomas;
Mueller-Wodarg, Ingo;
Regoli, Leonardo;
Pontius, Duane;
Stanley, Sabine;
Greathouse, Thomas;
Saur, Joachim;
Marouf, Essam;
Bergman, Jan;
Higgins, Chuck;
Johnson, Robert;
Thomsen, Michelle;
Soderlund, Krista;
Jia, Xianzhe;
Wilson, Robert;
Englander, Jacob;
Burch, Jim;
Nordheim, Tom;
Grava, Cesare;
Baines, Kevin;
Quick, Lynnae;
Russell, Christopher;
Cravens, Thomas;
Cecconi, Baptiste;
Aslam, Shahid;
Bray, Veronica;
Garcia-Sage, Katherine;
Richardson, John;
Clark, John;
Hsu, Sean;
Achterberg, Richard;
Sergis, Nick;
Paganelli, Flora;
Kempf, Sasha;
Orton, Glenn;
Portyankina, Ganna;
Jones, Geraint;
Economou, Thanasis;
Livengood, Timothy;
Krimigi, Stamatios;
Szalay, James;
Jackman, Catriona;
Valek, Phillip;
Lecacheux, Alain;
Colwell, Joshua;
Jasinski, Jamie;
Tosi, Federico;
Sulaiman, Ali;
Galand, Marina;
Kotova, Anna;
Khurana, Krishan;
Kivelson, Margaret;
Strobel, Darrell;
Radiota, Aikaterina;
Estrada, Paul;
Livi, Stefano;
Azari, Abigail;
Yates, Japheth;
Allegrini, Frederic;
Vogt, Marissa;
Felici, Marianna;
Luhmann, Janet;
Filacchione, Gianrico;
Moore, Luke
Submitted: 2018-04-10
Future remote sensing of exoplanets will be enhanced by a thorough
investigation of our solar system Ice Giants (Neptune-size planets). What can
the configuration of the magnetic field tell us (remotely) about the interior,
and what implications does that field have for the structure of the
magnetosphere; energy input into the atmosphere, and surface geophysics (for
example surface weathering of satellites that might harbour sub-surface
oceans). How can monitoring of auroral emission help inform future remote
observations of emission from exoplanets? Our Solar System provides the only
laboratory in which we can perform in-situ experiments to understand exoplanet
formation, dynamos, systems and magnetospheres.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1602.04861 [pdf] - 1411325
Version 1 of the Hubble Source Catalog
Whitmore, Bradley C.;
Allam, Sahar S.;
Budavari, Tamas;
Casertano, Stefano;
Downes, Ronald A.;
Donaldson, Thomas;
Fall, S. Michael;
Lubow, Stephen H.;
Quick, Lee;
Strolger, Louis-Gregory;
Wallace, Geoff;
White, Richard L.
Submitted: 2016-02-15
The Hubble Source Catalog is designed to help optimize science from the
Hubble Space Telescope by combining the tens of thousands of visit-based source
lists in the Hubble Legacy Archive into a single master catalog. Version 1 of
the Hubble Source Catalog includes WFPC2, ACS/WFC, WFC3/UVIS, and WFC3/IR
photometric data generated using SExtractor software to produce the individual
source lists. The catalog includes roughly 80 million detections of 30 million
objects involving 112 different detector/filter combinations, and about 160
thousand HST exposures. Source lists from Data Release 8 of the Hubble Legacy
Archive are matched using an algorithm developed by Budavari & Lubow (2012).
The mean photometric accuracy for the catalog as a whole is better than 0.10
mag, with relative accuracy as good as 0.02 mag in certain circumstances (e.g.,
bright isolated stars). The relative astrometric residuals are typically within
10 mas, with a value for the mode (i.e., most common value) of 2.3 mas. The
absolute astrometric accuracy is better than $\sim$0.1 arcsec for most sources,
but can be much larger for a fraction of fields that could not be matched to
the PanSTARRS, SDSS, or 2MASS reference systems. In this paper we describe the
database design with emphasis on those aspects that enable the users to fully
exploit the catalog while avoiding common misunderstandings and potential
pitfalls. We provide usage examples to illustrate some of the science
capabilities and data quality characteristics, and briefly discuss plans for
future improvements to the Hubble Source Catalog.