sort results by

Use logical operators AND, OR, NOT and round brackets to construct complex queries. Whitespace-separated words are treated as ANDed.

Show articles per page in mode

Quick, Lee

Normalized to: Quick, L.

6 article(s) in total. 171 co-authors, from 1 to 2 common article(s). Median position in authors list is 10,5.

[1]  oai:arXiv.org:2003.11182  [pdf] - 2089174
Exploration Strategy for the Outer Planets 2023-2032: Goals and Priorities
Comments: Whitepaper to be submitted to Planetary Science Decadal Survey 2020
Submitted: 2020-03-24, last modified: 2020-05-05
The outer solar system is home to a diverse range of objects, holding important clues about the formation and evolution of our solar system, the emergence and current distribution of life, and the physical processes controlling both our own and exoplanetary systems. This White Paper summarizes the Outer Planets Analysis Group's (OPAG's) priorities as they relate to the Decadal Survey. Taking into account the science to be achieved, the timing of solar system events, technological readiness, and programmatic factors, our mission recommendations are as follows. OPAG strongly endorses the completion and launch of the Europa Clipper mission, maintaining the science capabilities identified upon its selection, and a Juno extended mission at Jupiter. For the decade 2023-2032, OPAG endorses a new start for two directed missions: first, a mission to Neptune or Uranus (the ice giants) with atmospheric probe(s), and second, a life detection Ocean World mission, along with additional technological development for life detection. A Neptune mission is preferred because, while the Neptune and Uranus systems provide equally compelling opportunities to address the Origins and Processes Questions, Triton is a higher priority ocean world target than the Uranian satellites. The mission to Neptune or Uranus should fly first because a delay threatens key science objectives, and additional technological development is required for a directed life detection mission. Along with missions, we emphasize the necessity of maintaining a healthy Research and Analysis (R&A) program as well as a robust Earth-based observing program. OPAG's top two technology priorities are rapid development of a next-generation radioisotope power source for a mission to Neptune or Uranus, and development of key life detection technologies in support of an Ocean World mission.
[2]  oai:arXiv.org:2001.10981  [pdf] - 2054187
Characterizing deposits emplaced by cryovolcanic plumes on Europa
Comments: 50 pages, 12 Figures, accepted for publication in Icarus
Submitted: 2020-01-29
In the absence of direct observations of Europa's particle plumes, deposits left behind during eruptive events would provide the best evidence for recent geological activity, and would serve as indicators of the best places to search for ongoing activity on the icy moon. Here, we model the morphological and spectral signatures of europan plume deposits, utilizing constraints from recent Hubble Space Telescope observations as model inputs. We consider deposits emplaced by plumes that are 1 km to 300 km tall, and find that in the time between the Galileo Mission and the arrival of the Europa Clipper spacecraft, plumes that are < 7 km tall are most likely to emplace deposits that could be detected by spacecraft cameras. Deposits emplaced by larger plumes could be detected by cameras operating at visible wavelengths provided that their average particle size is sufficiently large, their porosity is high, and/or they are salt-rich. Conversely, deposits emplaced by large plumes could be easily detected by near-IR imagers regardless of porosity, or individual particle size or composition. If low-albedo deposits flanking lineated features on Europa are indeed cryoclastic mantlings, they were likely emplaced by plumes that were less than 4 km tall, and deposition could be ongoing today. Comparisons of the sizes and albedos of these deposits between the Galileo and Europa Clipper missions could shed light on the size and frequency of cryovolcanic eruptions on Europa.
[3]  oai:arXiv.org:1811.06536  [pdf] - 1785961
Seismicity on Tidally Active Solid-Surface Worlds
Comments: 31 pages, 5 pages, submitted to Icarus
Submitted: 2018-11-15
Tidal interactions between planets or stars and the bodies that orbit them dissipate energy in their interiors. The energy dissipated drives internal heating and a fraction of that energy will be released as seismic energy. Here we formalize a model to describe the tidally-driven seismic activity on planetary bodies based on tidal dissipation.
[4]  oai:arXiv.org:1709.02763  [pdf] - 1723419
Solar system science with the Wide-Field InfraRed Survey Telescope (WFIRST)
Comments: 58 pages, 14 figures, 7 tables
Submitted: 2017-09-08, last modified: 2018-07-27
We present a community-led assessment of the solar system investigations achievable with NASA's next-generation space telescope, the Wide Field InfraRed Survey Telescope (WFIRST). WFIRST will provide imaging, spectroscopic, and coronagraphic capabilities from 0.43-2.0 $\mu$m and will be a potential contemporary and eventual successor to JWST. Surveys of irregular satellites and minor bodies are where WFIRST will excel with its 0.28 deg$^2$ field of view Wide Field Instrument (WFI). Potential ground-breaking discoveries from WFIRST could include detection of the first minor bodies orbiting in the Inner Oort Cloud, identification of additional Earth Trojan asteroids, and the discovery and characterization of asteroid binary systems similar to Ida/Dactyl. Additional investigations into asteroids, giant planet satellites, Trojan asteroids, Centaurs, Kuiper Belt Objects, and comets are presented. Previous use of astrophysics assets for solar system science and synergies between WFIRST, LSST, JWST, and the proposed NEOCam mission are discussed. We also present the case for implementation of moving target tracking, a feature that will benefit from the heritage of JWST and enable a broader range of solar system observations.
[5]  oai:arXiv.org:1804.03573  [pdf] - 1663501
Solar System Ice Giants: Exoplanets in our Backyard
Rymer, Abigail; Mandt, Kathleen; Hurley, Dana; Lisse, Carey; Izenberg, Noam; Smith, H. Todd; Westlake, Joseph; Bunce, Emma; Arridge, Christopher; Masters, Adam; Hofstadter, Mark; Simon, Amy; Brandt, Pontus; Clark, George; Cohen, Ian; Allen, Robert; Vine, Sarah; Hansen, Kenneth; Hospodarsky, George; Kurth, William; Romani, Paul; Lamy, Laurent; Zarka, Philippe; Cao, Hao; Paty, Carol; Hedman, Matthew; Roussos, Elias; Cruikshank, Dale; Farrell, William; Fieseler, Paul; Coates, Andrew; Yelle, Roger; Parkinson, Christopher; Militzer, Burkhard; Grodent, Denis; Kollmann, Peter; McNutt, Ralph; André, Nicolas; Strange, Nathan; Barnes, Jason; Dones, Luke; Denk, Tilmann; Rathbun, Julie; Lunine, Jonathan; Desai, Ravi; Cochrane, Corey; Sayanagi, Kunio M.; Postberg, Frank; Ebert, Robert; Hill, Thomas; Mueller-Wodarg, Ingo; Regoli, Leonardo; Pontius, Duane; Stanley, Sabine; Greathouse, Thomas; Saur, Joachim; Marouf, Essam; Bergman, Jan; Higgins, Chuck; Johnson, Robert; Thomsen, Michelle; Soderlund, Krista; Jia, Xianzhe; Wilson, Robert; Englander, Jacob; Burch, Jim; Nordheim, Tom; Grava, Cesare; Baines, Kevin; Quick, Lynnae; Russell, Christopher; Cravens, Thomas; Cecconi, Baptiste; Aslam, Shahid; Bray, Veronica; Garcia-Sage, Katherine; Richardson, John; Clark, John; Hsu, Sean; Achterberg, Richard; Sergis, Nick; Paganelli, Flora; Kempf, Sasha; Orton, Glenn; Portyankina, Ganna; Jones, Geraint; Economou, Thanasis; Livengood, Timothy; Krimigi, Stamatios; Szalay, James; Jackman, Catriona; Valek, Phillip; Lecacheux, Alain; Colwell, Joshua; Jasinski, Jamie; Tosi, Federico; Sulaiman, Ali; Galand, Marina; Kotova, Anna; Khurana, Krishan; Kivelson, Margaret; Strobel, Darrell; Radiota, Aikaterina; Estrada, Paul; Livi, Stefano; Azari, Abigail; Yates, Japheth; Allegrini, Frederic; Vogt, Marissa; Felici, Marianna; Luhmann, Janet; Filacchione, Gianrico; Moore, Luke
Comments: Exoplanet Science Strategy White Paper, submitted to the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine, Space Studies Board, 9 March 2018
Submitted: 2018-04-10
Future remote sensing of exoplanets will be enhanced by a thorough investigation of our solar system Ice Giants (Neptune-size planets). What can the configuration of the magnetic field tell us (remotely) about the interior, and what implications does that field have for the structure of the magnetosphere; energy input into the atmosphere, and surface geophysics (for example surface weathering of satellites that might harbour sub-surface oceans). How can monitoring of auroral emission help inform future remote observations of emission from exoplanets? Our Solar System provides the only laboratory in which we can perform in-situ experiments to understand exoplanet formation, dynamos, systems and magnetospheres.
[6]  oai:arXiv.org:1602.04861  [pdf] - 1411325
Version 1 of the Hubble Source Catalog
Comments: 25 pages, 30 figures, 2 tables, 4 appendices; AJ accepted
Submitted: 2016-02-15
The Hubble Source Catalog is designed to help optimize science from the Hubble Space Telescope by combining the tens of thousands of visit-based source lists in the Hubble Legacy Archive into a single master catalog. Version 1 of the Hubble Source Catalog includes WFPC2, ACS/WFC, WFC3/UVIS, and WFC3/IR photometric data generated using SExtractor software to produce the individual source lists. The catalog includes roughly 80 million detections of 30 million objects involving 112 different detector/filter combinations, and about 160 thousand HST exposures. Source lists from Data Release 8 of the Hubble Legacy Archive are matched using an algorithm developed by Budavari & Lubow (2012). The mean photometric accuracy for the catalog as a whole is better than 0.10 mag, with relative accuracy as good as 0.02 mag in certain circumstances (e.g., bright isolated stars). The relative astrometric residuals are typically within 10 mas, with a value for the mode (i.e., most common value) of 2.3 mas. The absolute astrometric accuracy is better than $\sim$0.1 arcsec for most sources, but can be much larger for a fraction of fields that could not be matched to the PanSTARRS, SDSS, or 2MASS reference systems. In this paper we describe the database design with emphasis on those aspects that enable the users to fully exploit the catalog while avoiding common misunderstandings and potential pitfalls. We provide usage examples to illustrate some of the science capabilities and data quality characteristics, and briefly discuss plans for future improvements to the Hubble Source Catalog.